You're getting such a doing next time I'm in work ;)
― Special topics: Disco, The Common Market (grimly fiendish), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 13:06 (4 years ago) Permalink
have really good puffs alongside the right that can keep me hanging around the site for ages
Also: what the fuck for? Free extra-energy-burning lightbulbs? The miserable woman's guide to a thinner, bitchier 2009? 10 things you never knew about house prices?
― Special topics: Disco, The Common Market (grimly fiendish), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 13:08 (4 years ago) Permalink
Have a look at the celebrity section. So much to read!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/index.html
― Alba, Wednesday, 7 January 2009 13:14 (4 years ago) Permalink
Changing my display name to "beloved lightbulb".
― Neil S, Wednesday, 7 January 2009 13:15 (4 years ago) Permalink
xpread
― Not me I'm the Emotional Type (Ned Trifle II), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 13:15 (4 years ago) Permalink
Actually, look at this sad Richard O'Sullivan story for an example. All those juicy Femail stories boxed down the right!
― Alba, Wednesday, 7 January 2009 13:17 (4 years ago) Permalink
― Beloved lightbulb (Neil S), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 13:17 (4 years ago) Permalink
The Mail website is pretty awesome though. I spend more time on it than any other after The Guardian's. it's usually the site with the best pictures available online, scattered large through the story. The sections work well, and have really good puffs alongside the right that can keep me hanging around the site for ages.
― Alba, Wednesday, January 7, 2009 2:06 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
lol i thought it was a myth that people in the all 'respect' the mail for its vaunted professionalism.
― DANCE MUSIC STUCK AT RECOMBINANT PLATEAU (special guest stars mark bronson), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 13:17 (4 years ago) Permalink
Oops - I linked to the wrong story.
Here's the Richard O'Sullivan one
― Alba, Wednesday, 7 January 2009 13:18 (4 years ago) Permalink
Actor gets old. Let's take a close look at his wrinkly old face. Wot a loser!
― Not me I'm the Emotional Type (Ned Trifle II), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 13:22 (4 years ago) Permalink
But yeah, that was the first one I clicked on as well...
http://blogs.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ianwylie/2007/04/emmerdale_paula_wilcox.html
balance.
― Mark G, Wednesday, 7 January 2009 13:24 (4 years ago) Permalink
All those juicy Femail stories boxed down the right!
Royal! Man has shave.Nostalgia! Man grows older; looks different.Diet! Ex-EastEnder has new publicist.Tits! Also with Big Brother link (This is good, keep it up - Ed)Stating the fucking obvious! Man with cancer "not exactly doing a song and dance about it"Baby! Man and woman have child.Beckhams! Man and woman still exist.Rooneys! Man and woman who had more money than you still have more money than you.
You know, I don't think I've felt this depressed in my life. I'm off to devote my life to charity.
― Special topics: Disco, The Common Market (grimly fiendish), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 13:26 (4 years ago) Permalink
I'm off to devote my life to charity
Still working for the Herald then?
― Billy Dods, Wednesday, 7 January 2009 13:32 (4 years ago) Permalink
And watching Celebrity Big Brother ...
― Alba, Wednesday, 7 January 2009 14:02 (4 years ago) Permalink
Richard O'Sullivan is only 64! It's hardly that old.
― Alba, Wednesday, 7 January 2009 14:03 (4 years ago) Permalink
lol i thought it was a myth that people in the all 'respect' the mail for its vaunted professionalism
Uh...
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 7 January 2009 14:04 (4 years ago) Permalink
in the print meeja
― DANCE MUSIC STUCK AT RECOMBINANT PLATEAU (special guest stars mark bronson), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 14:10 (4 years ago) Permalink
or just newspaper biz
the mail print a story about richard o'sullivan's decay every year, i am sure about it
― the first Woman Tuomas (stevie), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 14:12 (4 years ago) Permalink
I LIVE HERE IN THE UNITED STATES. I WAS CURIOUS ABOUT THE CLOSING CREDITS OF THREE'S COMPANY WHERE IT SAYS "BASED ON MAN ABOUT THE HOUSE". SO I DECIDED TO LOOK IT UP ON THE COMPUTOR NOT ONLY THAT I PURCHASED ALL THE EPISODES TO MAN ABOUT THE HOUSE. THE SHOW IS REALLY FUNNY AND EVEN WATCHING IT OVER AND OVER I NEVER STOP LAUGHING. FOR A FUNNY SHOW LIKE MAN ABOUT THE HOUSE, I THINK THE SHOW SHOULD HAVE RAN A COUPLE OF MORE YEARS BACK THEN. THE SHOW MAN ABOUT THE HOUSE ENDED TOO SOON FOR ME.
Posted by: CARLOS RIOS | July 13, 2008 06:45 PM
― the first Woman Tuomas (stevie), Wednesday, 7 January 2009 14:14 (4 years ago) Permalink
Quite right. I wonder if Mr Rios had Richard O'Sullivan Google Alerts set up.
― Alba, Wednesday, 7 January 2009 14:17 (4 years ago) Permalink
"alert: Richard O'Sullivan looks five minutes older than he did five minutes ago"
― snoball, Wednesday, 7 January 2009 14:21 (4 years ago) Permalink
I thought he was top class in "Dick Turpin" BTW...
― snoball, Wednesday, 7 January 2009 14:22 (4 years ago) Permalink
<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1109722/Men-dont-curvy-women-attractive-father-children-autism.html";>Men who don't find curvy women attractive 'could father children with autism'</a>
o_0
― lex pretend, Thursday, 8 January 2009 16:34 (4 years ago) Permalink
or whatever the ht stupid ml is
― lex pretend, Thursday, 8 January 2009 16:35 (4 years ago) Permalink
Umm. As far as the reporting of such things goes, that ain't bad. No, it doesn't explain how the experiment was controlled, whether the findings were statistically significant, etc -- but when was the last time you saw a newspaper article that did? I fear your problems might well be with the nature of the research than with the Mail's reporting of it, Lex. Me: I'm going to reserve judgement until such time as I've read the article in the JADD (which I might actually do -- it's an area of vague interest to me, that. I could even try to work it into an essay I've written but not yet handed in, but ... no.)
― Special topics: Disco, The Common Market (grimly fiendish), Thursday, 8 January 2009 16:42 (4 years ago) Permalink
i haven't read the story, it was the headline which caught my eye and made it go o_0
― lex pretend, Thursday, 8 January 2009 16:43 (4 years ago) Permalink
it seems like...not even the worst kind of health-related fearmongering, because it's too out-there for that
― lex pretend, Thursday, 8 January 2009 16:44 (4 years ago) Permalink
In the sidebar: "End of the hourglass: Career women usher in a straighter female form. The classic hourglass figure made famous by Sophia Loren and Marilyn Monroe appears to have had its day."
― ledge, Thursday, 8 January 2009 16:45 (4 years ago) Permalink
(I mean: as a hack by trade and psychology student by choice, I've just spent a whole day ploughing through research articles and the one thing I can say is that even a 20-page report can miss out salient facts. So although there are myriad holes in that Mail piece, in terms of crunching down a piece of research into a couple of hundred non-academic words, it's pretty fucking good. If it turns out to be misrepresenting the study completely, of course, I shall stand corrected.)
xpost
Dude, read the fucking article then. It is based on a piece of potentially valid research.
― Special topics: Disco, The Common Market (grimly fiendish), Thursday, 8 January 2009 16:46 (4 years ago) Permalink
Researchers showed 100 men with autistic children pictures of curvy women, women with athletic frames and more rounded women and found that they do not have a preference on which figure they find more attractive.
The new research from the University of Bath suggests that fathers of autistic children do not share the preference of men across the world for the curvier woman.
this really does seem quite o_O tho
― Timezilla vs Mechadistance (blueski), Thursday, 8 January 2009 17:12 (4 years ago) Permalink
So headline should read:
Men who prefer non-curvy women might be fathers to autistic children.
― Mark G, Thursday, 8 January 2009 17:15 (4 years ago) Permalink
"My son has autism, I'm afraid I cannot look at curves with pleasure anymore"
Yes, welcome to experimental psychology.
Men who prefer non-curvy women might be fathers to autistic children
Hah, no: they showed no preference for any figure. "Men who don't conform to arguable global norm for what heterosexual males find attractive" is a bit unwieldy for a headline, though.
What's there isn't an elegant headline, either, I agree. I can see why they chose it, though.
― Special topics: Disco, The Common Market (grimly fiendish), Thursday, 8 January 2009 17:21 (4 years ago) Permalink
AutiDads love Posh More.
there. Fixed.
― Mark G, Thursday, 8 January 2009 17:23 (4 years ago) Permalink
Taking it further...
Dads of autistic children do not want more kids, so are attracted to females that look less childbearing types...?
― Mark G, Thursday, 8 January 2009 17:38 (4 years ago) Permalink
Couldn't the headline have just as easily read "Men who don't find athletic women attractive could father children with autism?"
p.s. I have neither read the article nor the supporting materials.
― He's like a big coloured steamroller (Ned Trifle II), Thursday, 8 January 2009 17:43 (4 years ago) Permalink
I mean, why pick on curvy women when the men didn;t state a preference? That's typical DM o_O surely?
― He's like a big coloured steamroller (Ned Trifle II), Thursday, 8 January 2009 17:44 (4 years ago) Permalink
It could, but the point is that there's cross-cultural support for the curvy stereotype, based on the "ideal" waist-hip ratio of 0.7 (Singh, 1993, I think), so there is a reason for mentioning curves. As you'd know if you'd read the piece (gah, I can't believe I'm sticking up for the Mail).
Not really, no. For the love of all that is decent, read the piece before you start posting, dudes.
― Special topics: Disco, The Common Market (grimly fiendish), Thursday, 8 January 2009 17:47 (4 years ago) Permalink
100 men seems like a very small sample size. I'm a bit more worried about the oestrogen/health stuff and this idea the writer seems to have about autism being similar to brain damage and something that crops up randomly when parents have bad health or put bad things into their kids bodies, it's the same logic they use when they reckon autism is caused by MMR and mercury, and that stuff was all bollocks.
― ‽, Thursday, 8 January 2009 17:49 (4 years ago) Permalink
Ok, read it now.
Dr Mark Brosnan and Dr Ian Walker from the university's Department of Psychology found that as a group the fathers of autistic children didn't all go for the same figure as their most attractive choice.
Hmmm. I really think we may to read the whole thing. It doesn't seem to be quite as clear cut as the DM is making it.
OH REALLY, you say.
― He's like a big coloured steamroller (Ned Trifle II), Thursday, 8 January 2009 17:56 (4 years ago) Permalink
― StanM, Thursday, 8 January 2009 17:58 (4 years ago) Permalink
100 men seems like a very small sample size
It's probably (sadly?) about average for such a study.
this idea the writer seems to have about autism being similar to brain damage
Plenty of studies link autism to brain "damage" of some kind; hellfire, one of the most convincing new theories on unipolar depression suggests that's actually linked in some way to a structurally abnormal brain. Plenty of studies link it to all sorts of things. That's the point: there isn't a pathology of autism yet. This is why research exists.
something that crops up randomly when parents have bad health or put bad things into their kids bodies
What evidence are you using for this, anyway? Can you quote the actual text that states this, or are you basing this reading on your own assumptions about how the Daily Mail often presents such stories? (Which, I'll admit, are usually fucking shocking.)
― Special topics: Disco, The Common Market (grimly fiendish), Thursday, 8 January 2009 17:58 (4 years ago) Permalink
It doesn't seem to be quite as clear cut as the DM is making it
Well, of course it isn't -- this is a very short newspaper article, while (I'd hope!) that what Brosnan and Walker are doing is a tightly controlled experiment. My point, though, is that going "TUT DAILY MAIL HEADLINES WHATEVER NEXT" without actually reading the piece isn't constructive.
Although why I'm wasting time defending the Daily Mail, I really don't know.
― Special topics: Disco, The Common Market (grimly fiendish), Thursday, 8 January 2009 18:00 (4 years ago) Permalink
one of the most convincing new theories on unipolar depression suggests that's actually linked in some way to a structurally abnormal brain
Actually, I wish I'd not written that because it'll be misconstrued, and I'm falling into my own trap of trying to explain something staggeringly complex using very few words. My fundamental point still stands, though: autism could well be linked (NB: correlation, not causality!) to structural "defects" in the brain.
― Special topics: Disco, The Common Market (grimly fiendish), Thursday, 8 January 2009 18:03 (4 years ago) Permalink
My. I went off and made some soup there (very nice, since you ask: fennel and potato with lemon, and a gremolata topping) and expected to come back to a minor clusterfuck. Anyway, I should be toiling over an essay, but because I am the KING OF PROCRASTINATION ...
Autism could well be linked (NB: correlation, not causality!) to structural "defects" in the brain
... a little light reading on that subject for anyone who's interested, in no particular order.
Carper, R A Carper and Courchesne, E (2000). Inverse correlation between frontal lobe and cerebellum sizes in children with autism. Brain, 123 (4), 836-844. (Various other Courchesne papers consider a similar hypothesis.)
Dawson G, Webb SJ, Wijsman E, Schellenberg G, Estes A, Munson J, Faja S (2005). Neurocognitive and electrophysiological evidence of altered face processing in parents of children with autism: implications for a model of abnormal development of social brain circuitry in autism. Dev Psychopathol, 17, 679–697.
Wicker, B (2008). New Insights from Neuroimaging into the Emotional Brain in Autism. In E McGregor, M Núñez, K Cebula and J Carlos Gómez (Eds). Autism: An Integrated View from Neurocognitive, Clinical and Intervention Research. Malden, Mass; Oxford: Blackwell. (Actually: if you want to criticise the Brosnan and Walker study for being "quite o_O", I'd suggest you read that entire book first.)
Sparks, B F, and a fucking shitload of others (2002). Brain structural abnormalities in young children with autism spectrum disorder. Neurology, 59, 184-192.
Haas, R, and, again, more others than I can be arsed rearranging into author/initial format (1996). Neurologic abnormalities in infantile autism. Journal of Child Neurology, 11 (2), 84-92.
Now, shall we look at some studies considering autism and genetic predisposition/hormonal influences? Is that a resounding "no, shut the fuck up, Grimly?" Suits me fine.
― Special topics: Disco, The Common Market (grimly fiendish), Thursday, 8 January 2009 19:43 (4 years ago) Permalink
Has he gone?
OK, back to the Mail and it's crazy URLs.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1109882/Man-created-Barbie-Ken-dolls-kinky-swinger-manic-need-sexual-gratification.html
― He's like a big coloured steamroller (Ned Trifle II), Thursday, 8 January 2009 20:40 (4 years ago) Permalink
‘When Jack talked about creating Barbie it was like listening to somebody talk about a sexual episode, almost like listening to a sexual pervert,’ Ryan’s friend, Stephen Gnass told the author.
Almost.
― He's like a big coloured steamroller (Ned Trifle II), Thursday, 8 January 2009 20:42 (4 years ago) Permalink
Quite, em, compulsive level of detail there, grimly. I prefer my scaremongering lower on facts, higher on sheer panic, please. Here's Warning over 'third-hand smoke'. Not from the Mail, but it might as well be
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 8 January 2009 20:46 (4 years ago) Permalink
Bieber (thinks) "I thought I ordered unidentifiable nibbly things with all the yellow ones taken out, ffs. Oh, and NO right wing tabloid journalist. I swear, if that cardboard box doesn't contain a dwarf in bondage gear covered in mayonnaise, I'll trash this place."
― 'scuse me, while I Rim the Sky... (snoball), Wednesday, 9 May 2012 13:48 (1 year ago) Permalink
I can't work out from this monitor if that bag of chips is sitting on a leopard skin or a huge pile of Cheerios. Or something else?
― Keith pissed on my chips (onimo), Wednesday, 9 May 2012 13:55 (1 year ago) Permalink
"That toaster's gonna go through this fucking mirror for a start."
― 'scuse me, while I Rim the Sky... (snoball), Wednesday, 9 May 2012 13:55 (1 year ago) Permalink
xp looks like a padded red chair to me
― listicular fortitude (DJ Mencap), Wednesday, 9 May 2012 19:33 (1 year ago) Permalink
rofl
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2142088/And-thought-YOUR-mom-embarrassing-Hilarious-collection-photos-women-kids-forget.html
― it looks like something rupert the bear would wear (Algerian Goalkeeper), Thursday, 10 May 2012 17:15 (1 year ago) Permalink
Yet more Pullitzer-worthy investigative journalism, there.
― emil.y, Thursday, 10 May 2012 17:48 (1 year ago) Permalink
"mom"??
― It was you. Miming to Tenacious D. (stevie), Thursday, 10 May 2012 18:35 (1 year ago) Permalink
the daily mail gone done left blighty behind
― tebow kortwa (nakhchivan), Thursday, 10 May 2012 19:01 (1 year ago) Permalink
good riddance imho
― It was you. Miming to Tenacious D. (stevie), Thursday, 10 May 2012 19:02 (1 year ago) Permalink
I had a flash of panic when it said "if you're planning on showering mom with flowers or giving her a card this Sunday" until i realised that i haven't bought my mother a card since 1992 it's actually Sunday the 18th in the UK.
Strange that they'd presumably pick up a US story and not bother changing anything that made it completely obvious they were just printing pre-packaged press releases.
― Just like you, except hot (ShariVari), Thursday, 10 May 2012 19:49 (1 year ago) Permalink
Horror in 'Nappy Valley': Father comes home to find baby son and daughter 'smothered to death by wife' - just 10 days after they moved into £1.2m dream home
Neighbours saw the dark-haired mother being put into a police car by an officer who had an arm around her at around 10.30pm last night.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2142296/Wandsworth-deaths-Father-discovers-murdered-babies-killed-wife-slit-wrists.html#ixzz1uV5V9TDH
― tebow kortwa (nakhchivan), Thursday, 10 May 2012 20:27 (1 year ago) Permalink
This is the thread for unusual details in wikipedia articles Daily Mail stories
― It was you. Miming to Tenacious D. (stevie), Thursday, 10 May 2012 21:37 (1 year ago) Permalink
their bizarre house pricing obsession is just o_O
― Keith pissed on my chips (onimo), Thursday, 10 May 2012 22:12 (1 year ago) Permalink
I had a flash of panic when it said "if you're planning on showering mom with flowers or giving her a card this Sunday"
I read this as 'if you're planning on showering with mom'
― kinder, Thursday, 10 May 2012 22:25 (1 year ago) Permalink
so in other words the mail stole it off some american site? haha
― it looks like something rupert the bear would wear (Algerian Goalkeeper), Thursday, 10 May 2012 22:32 (1 year ago) Permalink
i didn't read it tbh i just looked at the funny pics.
― it looks like something rupert the bear would wear (Algerian Goalkeeper), Thursday, 10 May 2012 22:33 (1 year ago) Permalink
Vanessa-Hudgens-wears-pair-teeny-tiny-shorts-leaves-pilates-class-Austin-Butler.html
― Serov devochka s persikami (nakhchivan), Sunday, 20 May 2012 02:03 (1 year ago) Permalink
something inappropriate about the font which labels the arrow of this suicide flight-path:
― bulge renaissance (+ +), Wednesday, 25 July 2012 11:54 (9 months ago) Permalink
Doesn't it go totally against some sort of code of conduct to show pictures of suicide spots in such articles?
― mod night at the oasis (NickB), Wednesday, 25 July 2012 11:58 (9 months ago) Permalink
PCC code:
*ii) When reporting suicide, care should be taken to avoid excessive detail about the method used.
― joe, Wednesday, 25 July 2012 11:58 (9 months ago) Permalink
further guidance:
Graphic images illustrating suicide methods were often upsetting to relatives and friends. Under the Code, such images would normally have to pass the ‘excessive detail’ test.
― joe, Wednesday, 25 July 2012 11:59 (9 months ago) Permalink
There you go! Obnoxious wankers
― mod night at the oasis (NickB), Wednesday, 25 July 2012 12:00 (9 months ago) Permalink
looks like a compressed version of the guardian g2 font
― caek, Wednesday, 25 July 2012 12:04 (9 months ago) Permalink
coincidence? i think not.
Her husband Jeff discovered the tiny bodies at the couple’s £1.2 million semi-detached home in an affluent part of Wandsworth, south west London.
Neighbours heard investment banker Mr Boots, 34, cry, ‘Oh my God, oh my God’ as he desperately tried to save his two babies.
― Nilmar Honorato da Silva, Tuesday, 30 October 2012 18:40 (6 months ago) Permalink
For some reason that reminds me vividly of the book Boo by Peter de Polnay, possibly even an incident within it, and I can't for the life of me remember why. It's certainly a while since I've thought of it. Is there a Mr Boots in there? Very possibly. There's certainly a tragic occurrence in a... West London I think flat. The tone as well, the tone.
Still fat chance of checking up, since this is about the only information I can get on the book, and PdP is not a writer who has yet ruffled WIkipedia's apodictic curve to infinite reference.
― Fizzles, Tuesday, 30 October 2012 20:39 (6 months ago) Permalink
Here he is in a badly-scanned article from the Catholic Herald talking about that quickly forgotten post-war suggestion of a union between France and England:
http://archive.catholicherald.co.uk/article/30th-october-1942/1/peter-de-polnays-faith-in-anglo-france
Best-selling author no less. Speaking for the common malt and Hun-ridden Paris.
― Fizzles, Tuesday, 30 October 2012 20:48 (6 months ago) Permalink
nice
i thought that bit in that meades interview was quite correct
I feel like the TV, the radio and the papers are always telling me how much ‘we' hate the French, yet I never really see it myself.
JM: I don't see it either.
no confederacy but quite a history of quixotic military-industrial comity in the postwar (suez, concorde, the channel tunnel etc)
and the recent mutterings about unifying the two ruinously expensive nuclear deterrents
― Nilmar Honorato da Silva, Tuesday, 30 October 2012 20:54 (6 months ago) Permalink
Yes, I thought of that bit in the interview as well. And yes, I'd agree it's broadly correct. There's that great southern England folk song - The Grand Conversation on Napoleon - which is all about how the common man (or whatever) wanted Napoleon to invade England and liberate them from their servitude. Can't find a youtube! for shame! Lyrics here - http://mud✧✧✧.o✧✧✧@displays✧✧✧.c✧✧?SongID=6385 Plus, as we all know, much of our energy owned and directed into the future by state-owned French company:
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v34/n17/james-meek/how-we-happened-to-sell-off-our-electricity
(worth reading imo, tho long)
― Fizzles, Tuesday, 30 October 2012 21:02 (6 months ago) Permalink
oh ffs. that link doesn't work. good excuse to troll the daily mail thread maybe:
THE GRAND CONVERSATION OF NAPOLEON
Ye war-beaten tribes,Who were friends of brave BonaparteWho come to view the rocks and cliffsOn St. Helen's shore;The wind it blew a hurricaneAnd the lightning on our decks did flashThe gulls they were screamingAnd the billows loud did roar."Those proud waves," the stranger saidAs he viewed that lone and dreary spotWhere once Napoleon BonaparteHis painful eyes did close;"While in the grave his bones may rotHis name will never be forgotThe grand conversation of Napoleon arose.
A dreadful army he did rise,To conquer Moscow by surprise;He led his men across the Alps,Oppressed by frost and snowBut being near the Russian line,He then began to open his eyes,For Moscow was a-burning,And his men went to and fro.With dauntless eyes he viewed the flames,Then in wildest accents he exclaimed:"Retreat:.yet gallant heroes,While time so gently!: flows!"There were thousands died in that retreat,And many did their horses eat.The grand conversation of Napoleon arose.
Next at Waterloo those F;renchmen foughtCommanded by brave Bonaparte,Assisted by7 F'ield Marshal NeyWho never was bribed by goldThen Blucher led those Prussians in,It broke Napoleon's heart within:"Where is my thirtv thousand men!Alas! for I am old!He made one gallant charge across,Saying, "Alas, brave boys. I fear t'is lost'"The field is in confusion With blood and dying woes; TheBunch of roses did advance, Those English entered into France.The Grand conversation of Napoleon arose.
And now Bonarparte is doomed to beA prisoner across the sea, On St. Helena`s isle.That lone and dreary spot;It's there that he is doomed to he,Which soon will end his misery.His true son followed after himThat was another plot.It's long enough they have been dead,The blast of war around is spread;And may our sapling sprout again,To face our daring foes,For if fortune smiles without delay,The whole world soon will him obey.The grand conversation of Napoleon arose.
― Fizzles, Tuesday, 30 October 2012 21:03 (6 months ago) Permalink
Bert Lloyd version is the one to seek btw.
― Fizzles, Tuesday, 30 October 2012 21:05 (6 months ago) Permalink
This should not be allowed,the birthplace of the fuhrer should be preserved for posterety so future generations can see the place of his birth, not a collection of chic flats.
- martin. , peterborough.uk., 08/11/2012 14:12
― Nilmar Honorato da Silva, Friday, 9 November 2012 00:49 (6 months ago) Permalink
Secrets behind Hugh Jackman's body and Anne Hathaway's rotting prostitute's teeth revealed in a new Les Miserables featurette
― before and after broscience (goole), Monday, 10 December 2012 15:25 (5 months ago) Permalink
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2286391/Orley-Farm-School-headmaster-hid-coded-W---insult-colleagues-retirement-letter-steps-down.html
― Vote in the ILM 70s poll please! (Algerian Goalkeeper), Saturday, 2 March 2013 01:26 (2 months ago) Permalink
― congo nattefrost (DJ Mencap), Friday, 10 May 2013 13:18 (2 weeks ago) Permalink
sorry for hueg but truthbombs only come in one size folks