i gave a googler an invite once
― jhøshea, Thursday, 25 October 2007 16:37 (sixteen years ago) link
Cutty otm
xp
― Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 25 October 2007 16:38 (sixteen years ago) link
seriously this dude is being silly. when he gets threatened w/ real time he will flip on any users who were posting shit before the release date.
― deej, Thursday, 25 October 2007 16:43 (sixteen years ago) link
http://www.airbrush.ch/images/DesignFabu/Fila.jpg
― am0n, Thursday, 25 October 2007 16:50 (sixteen years ago) link
someone do nick sylvester style interview w/ OiNK
― deej, Thursday, 25 October 2007 16:52 (sixteen years ago) link
According to users, Oink had a daily throughput the equivalent of five million songs and registered members were able to download around 1,000 songs.
Best media line yet
― Confounded, Thursday, 25 October 2007 17:00 (sixteen years ago) link
i was about a year away from figuring out if i wanted to learn what oink is. don't you people get enough music as it is?
― tremendoid, Thursday, 25 October 2007 17:07 (sixteen years ago) link
(boxcar)
-- jhøshea, Thursday, October 25, 2007 12:37 PM (41 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
lol, so did Confounded. to a lady who broke his heart.
― sanskrit, Thursday, 25 October 2007 17:25 (sixteen years ago) link
crabcigar APPRECIATION THREAD
― am0n, Thursday, 25 October 2007 17:43 (sixteen years ago) link
Q: Do I as a normal user need to be scared? A: No. The logs stored were not enough to incriminate any of our users. They have better things to do than hunt down 180,000 Britney Spears fans.
― Leee, Thursday, 25 October 2007 17:56 (sixteen years ago) link
if u uploaded an album before the release date tho?
― deej, Thursday, 25 October 2007 17:59 (sixteen years ago) link
not saying i have btw, i havent even been a member for over a year
― deej, Thursday, 25 October 2007 18:00 (sixteen years ago) link
i still miss audiogalaxy
― forksclovetofu, Thursday, 25 October 2007 18:14 (sixteen years ago) link
Hardly an authoritative reply: http://tehpaine.blogspot.com/2007/10/frequently-asked-questions.html#c9161380854469170335
― Leee, Thursday, 25 October 2007 18:18 (sixteen years ago) link
-- sanskrit, Thursday, October 25, 2007 1:25 PM (58 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
do i want to know more abt this?
― jhøshea, Thursday, 25 October 2007 18:25 (sixteen years ago) link
I hope everyone of you thieves is hounded to your graves for stealing money from artists that starved for their fame. You think that musicians are born rich? Think again. You're on the same moral ground as a race riot looter. Feel that you fucktards.
from Leee's link.
Feel that you fucktards.
― Roberto Spiralli, Thursday, 25 October 2007 18:36 (sixteen years ago) link
audiogalaxy was such shit. yeah i want an album of mp3s culled from 10 different people, different bitrates, and some incompletes. uhhhh?
― cutty, Thursday, 25 October 2007 18:36 (sixteen years ago) link
lol specifically a RACE riot looter
― deej, Thursday, 25 October 2007 18:56 (sixteen years ago) link
Audiogalaxy was BROAD; I could find music on there by local bands I went to college with. Also, the community aspect was great. I missed OINK entirely, though one of you folks DID pass me an invite, so I'm not sure how it compares.
― forksclovetofu, Thursday, 25 October 2007 19:16 (sixteen years ago) link
i assure you oink was BROAD-ER. i sent your significant other an invite.
― cutty, Thursday, 25 October 2007 19:20 (sixteen years ago) link
Meanwhile, Usenet just keeps on chugging away...
― Elvis Telecom, Thursday, 25 October 2007 19:28 (sixteen years ago) link
Yeah, Audiogalaxy was awesome for tracking down rare b-side or whatever, but an absolute nightmare for getting albums.
― jon /via/ chi 2.0, Thursday, 25 October 2007 19:30 (sixteen years ago) link
What is usenet? I keep seeing this mentioned now.
― Herman G. Neuname, Thursday, 25 October 2007 20:00 (sixteen years ago) link
It's like this text-based group-based topic-based network thing that existed before the graphical browser html thing took over.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet
― StanM, Thursday, 25 October 2007 20:06 (sixteen years ago) link
some thoughts--
the record labels are already fucked. no hope for them with any of the new models they've tried to implement.
they had the biggest, nerdiest, music consumers (by consume i mean downloading, uploading and listening) right in front of them with oink.
they could have monetized that shit. release albums to oink, etc. instead the completely OBLITERATE their demographic in one fell swoop.
wake up, morans...
― cutty, Thursday, 25 October 2007 21:29 (sixteen years ago) link
the labels couldn't get an invite
― am0n, Thursday, 25 October 2007 22:00 (sixteen years ago) link
Approximately 175,000 of the 180,000 members were industry people.
― StanM, Thursday, 25 October 2007 22:05 (sixteen years ago) link
i'm sure the real stats on industry people on oink would blow some minds.
― cutty, Thursday, 25 October 2007 22:19 (sixteen years ago) link
I can't believe Usenet has never been seriously policed by The Man. It's been the home of free shit for a decade or more, and honestly, it seems as good as ever.
― Dandy Don Weiner, Thursday, 25 October 2007 22:36 (sixteen years ago) link
I can't believe people don't know what Usenet is.
― HI DERE, Thursday, 25 October 2007 22:40 (sixteen years ago) link
The Man and all his fuckwitted lackeys are way too dense to get their heads round binaries.
mind, i've not been anywhere near usenet for years now.
― grimly fiendish, Thursday, 25 October 2007 22:40 (sixteen years ago) link
anyone have an invite to usenet ;)
― cutty, Thursday, 25 October 2007 22:42 (sixteen years ago) link
alt.confused.googlers.IRE
― grimly fiendish, Thursday, 25 October 2007 22:43 (sixteen years ago) link
Anti file-sharing laws considered
I'm confused by a couple of quotes:
While he said that the government had no interest in "hounding 14-year-olds who shared music", it was intent on tracking down those who made multiple copies for profit.
so they'll be tracking down... no one? "Multiple copies for profit"?
"Where people have registered music as an intellectual property I believe we will be able to match data banks of that music to music going out and being exchanged on the net"
And, what? I can't even begin to guess a meaning for that. Is there a single vague notion about what file-sharing involves amongst people of authority?
― Merdeyeux, Thursday, 25 October 2007 22:45 (sixteen years ago) link
I can't believe Usenet has never been seriously policed by The Man.
I believe my ISP doesn't carry binaries groups anymore after being threatened by exactly That Man a couple of years ago - but when they did their retention rates were so crappy it wasn't very useful anyway.
― StanM, Thursday, 25 October 2007 22:51 (sixteen years ago) link
God, all this talk of usenet brings back memories... ("http? It'll never catch on, it's just souped-up ftp with pictures!")
― StanM, Thursday, 25 October 2007 22:55 (sixteen years ago) link
This spirit of this is true - It's always really funny to hear the Brave Filesharers of Today imagining that every last label employee wasn't on OiNK. Because in fact they all were.
― J0hn D., Thursday, 25 October 2007 22:56 (sixteen years ago) link
It makes this news story even more hilarious than ever...
RIAA Sues Usenet, Decries it as 'Brazen Outlaw' By David Kravets 10.16.07 | 4:00 PMThe Recording Industry Association of America's litigation strategy is taking a detour into the internet's Precambrian layer, suing a company that distributes the ancient decentralized message board known as Usenet.Fargo, North Dakota-based Usenet.com is the target of the lawsuit (.pdf) filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, in which 14 recording companies allege the service "enables and encourages its customers to reproduce and distribute millions of infringing copies of Plaintiff's valuable copyrighted sound recordings."The suit, filed Friday, is something of a throwback in the RIAA's recent litigation strategy. It targets an alleged facilitator of copyright theft instead of an individual pirate."They started by going after Napster, Aimster, Grokster, and after that they said, 'We're gonna go after individuals to see if we (can) get into the psyche of people that peer-to-peer file sharing is wrong,'" says Washington, D.C.-based copyright attorney Ross Dannenberg. "Now it has come full circle. Throughout this cycle, (Usenet) newsgroups have been ignored."In the past four years, the RIAA has sued more than 20,000 people on allegations of copyright infringement. Two weeks ago, the association won a $222,000 judgment in the first such case to go to trial.But Usenet's decentralized architecture means RIAA gumshoes can't easily trace uploaders, as they can on peer-to-peer services like Kazaa. That may have prompted the RIAA to focus on feed provider Usenet.com, which boasts about the anonymity it provides users."Shh ... quiet! We believe it’s no one’s business but your own what you do on the internet or in Usenet! We don’t log your activity. We don’t track your downloads," the company says on its website. It also offers an encrypted tunneling service, for an additional fee, to frustrate any efforts by ISPs or corporate network administrators to police downloads.The Usenet network is a global, distributed message-board network that was created in the pre-internet days, when it relied on dialup modems for distribution. Now it's carried over the internet. Usenet.com redistributes the full Usenet feed for a subscription fee.Usenet.com did not immediately return messages for comment.
The Recording Industry Association of America's litigation strategy is taking a detour into the internet's Precambrian layer, suing a company that distributes the ancient decentralized message board known as Usenet.
Fargo, North Dakota-based Usenet.com is the target of the lawsuit (.pdf) filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, in which 14 recording companies allege the service "enables and encourages its customers to reproduce and distribute millions of infringing copies of Plaintiff's valuable copyrighted sound recordings."
The suit, filed Friday, is something of a throwback in the RIAA's recent litigation strategy. It targets an alleged facilitator of copyright theft instead of an individual pirate.
"They started by going after Napster, Aimster, Grokster, and after that they said, 'We're gonna go after individuals to see if we (can) get into the psyche of people that peer-to-peer file sharing is wrong,'" says Washington, D.C.-based copyright attorney Ross Dannenberg. "Now it has come full circle. Throughout this cycle, (Usenet) newsgroups have been ignored."
In the past four years, the RIAA has sued more than 20,000 people on allegations of copyright infringement. Two weeks ago, the association won a $222,000 judgment in the first such case to go to trial.
But Usenet's decentralized architecture means RIAA gumshoes can't easily trace uploaders, as they can on peer-to-peer services like Kazaa. That may have prompted the RIAA to focus on feed provider Usenet.com, which boasts about the anonymity it provides users.
"Shh ... quiet! We believe it’s no one’s business but your own what you do on the internet or in Usenet! We don’t log your activity. We don’t track your downloads," the company says on its website. It also offers an encrypted tunneling service, for an additional fee, to frustrate any efforts by ISPs or corporate network administrators to police downloads.
The Usenet network is a global, distributed message-board network that was created in the pre-internet days, when it relied on dialup modems for distribution. Now it's carried over the internet. Usenet.com redistributes the full Usenet feed for a subscription fee.
Usenet.com did not immediately return messages for comment.
― Elvis Telecom, Thursday, 25 October 2007 23:00 (sixteen years ago) link
RIAA goon #1: I hear there's copyright violation on Usenet! OMGWTF RIAA goon #2: Usenet? Is that a dot com or a dot net? RIAA goon #1: Just sue whatever comes up
― Elvis Telecom, Thursday, 25 October 2007 23:01 (sixteen years ago) link
All the more reason to spend a couple bucks on dedicated usenet service. ISP usenet almost always blows.
― Elvis Telecom, Thursday, 25 October 2007 23:02 (sixteen years ago) link
Has an actual economist ever written an article on this issue?
― downloadsofist, Thursday, 25 October 2007 23:49 (sixteen years ago) link
^
― gr8080, Friday, 26 October 2007 01:33 (sixteen years ago) link
The Effect of File Sharing on Record Sales An Empirical Analysis
― lucas pine, Friday, 26 October 2007 01:39 (sixteen years ago) link
sort of? there have been a handful like that
― lucas pine, Friday, 26 October 2007 01:40 (sixteen years ago) link
I'm not really wondering about the effect on record sales so much as an analysis of consumer behavior. Has there ever been in instance where a business sustained itself because its customers were nice people who liked to give money to support the product, not because giving money actually got them something extra? Or a commodity whose scarcity was maintained only through the threat of lawsuits?
― downloadsofist, Friday, 26 October 2007 02:53 (sixteen years ago) link
Shareware
― downloadsofist, Friday, 26 October 2007 02:56 (sixteen years ago) link
I'd like to see some nutbar group of nutbars try to prosecute usenet for archiving newsgroup posts for 40 years. Next is house raids for blank CDs.
― Autumn Almanac, Friday, 26 October 2007 03:01 (sixteen years ago) link
In the past four years, the RIAA has sued more than 20,000 people
That figure is staggering. What the hell is their plan here, exactly? That from now on major labels have to figure legal carpet bombing of their customers into their business model?
― adamj, Friday, 26 October 2007 07:04 (sixteen years ago) link
Business model? None of that money they get from those lawsuits goes to artists, I'm not sure if it goes to the labels either.
― StanM, Friday, 26 October 2007 07:46 (sixteen years ago) link