I don't think this is 'championing an era'. it's playing w/ many of the sounds and themes of the era but that doesn't necessarily mean it's romanticizing them.
romanticizing? yes, definitely. championing? no.
I think the "80s sounds" of Destroyer are greatly exaggerated xp
??? it's hard to imagine a more explicit and direct musical evocation of a musical style & era, outside straight-up copycat/tribute shit.
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Monday, 6 February 2012 00:31 (twelve years ago) link
imo kaputt sounds like "the Saturday Night Live Show Band"
― flopson, Monday, 6 February 2012 00:32 (twelve years ago) link
there's a layer of irony that prevents this from romanticizing anything imo
― iatee, Monday, 6 February 2012 00:34 (twelve years ago) link
I mean he's poking fun at 70s/80s signifiers while at the same time making remarkably pretty music w/ 70s/80s signifiers. the tension between those two things is what makes the album. imo.
― iatee, Monday, 6 February 2012 00:38 (twelve years ago) link
But yeah when people think one era is "better" I think they're morons tbph. Like I think metal right after Venom hits, that's a really interesting era to me, but narratives in which there's a peak/good part after which there are diminishing returns/etc seem like moronic self-serving youth-romanticizing tragedies
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Sunday, February 5, 2012 7:22 PM (20 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
if I hadn't been around for both years, I'd probably pick '93. I was, though, and when I look at the '88 list, I get all BMW-driver-about-the-60s. It Takes Two came out in '88; as much I love a lotta '93 stuff (and as much as I think the strides made in '93 are kinda bigger toward broadening the genre, and therefore more "important"), hearing "It Takes Two" on KDAY was one of those "oh, shit, music is different after this for me" moments. You don't like it, so what, I don't care
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Sunday, January 8, 2012 3:20 PM (4 weeks ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
mainstream rap just gravitated towards what seemed like cover versions. I enjoy a lot of those songs now and can hear all the production work & polish but at the time it seemed like a sad turn
...I loved The Chronic and Doggy Style (and Uncle Sam's Curse what year was that?) but the element of rap that was like mindblowing sheer sonics gave way to what were essentially rock records structurally - same rules as rock in terms of how you get to the vibe/effect. whereas that late 80s stuff was so Structures In Sound - but then again, Wu Tang is fully up on that when they come around, and they weren't "throwback" to me at that point, they were taking that vision to where it would have gone next if it had remained the dominant discourse, which it didn't.
not that all rap had been dense layers of Bomb Squad & not that there isn't plenty of trad song structure at play in Nation of Millions and shit but that's how I break it down to an extent, rap becoming more a new approach to songcraft than a new approach to sound.
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Sunday, January 8, 2012 10:18 PM (4 weeks ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― flopson, Monday, 6 February 2012 00:44 (twelve years ago) link
lots of/most people currently enjoying 80s sounds were too young to remember the 80s anyway. Or not even born. So it's not about romanticising some lost golden period of youth like it is with the boomers and the 60s
― sonderborg, Monday, 6 February 2012 00:47 (twelve years ago) link
aerosmith on the money. dre ruined everything.
― scott seward, Monday, 6 February 2012 00:48 (twelve years ago) link
i grew up in the 80s, it was shit.
― pfunkboy (Algerian Goalkeeper), Monday, 6 February 2012 00:49 (twelve years ago) link
i was there too man! and it sucked for me kinda but i did love a lot of music and still listen to a lot of it but i don't want to go back and don't want stuff to really sound like that all the time. cuz that would be boring. and most people suck at it. except sub-genre people. like rap people and metal people and dance people. and goth people.
― scott seward, Monday, 6 February 2012 00:51 (twelve years ago) link
at the same time, I do think there are things about any given era that are distinctive/worth talking about/defining.
flopson did you overlook this part intentionally or are you just too stupid to understand it? I can explain if need be. either way, it's disturbing to know that you keep a file of my posts, stalking's a terrible look imo
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 6 February 2012 00:52 (twelve years ago) link
"oh no you answered a q pitting one era against another, you HYPOCRITE!" dude you are like the dumbest person on this board, real talk
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 6 February 2012 00:53 (twelve years ago) link
that's an overstatement but that shit pissed me off, participating in a discussion where two eras are compared isn't the same as being some "x era RULES" dumbshit
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 6 February 2012 00:54 (twelve years ago) link
yeah even with music and undoubtedly there was some amazing stuff in the 80s, I was completely unaware of it! I still like the pop stuff i liked then but i dont get nostalgic for it nor do i want anyone else now to make sounds like back then (lol he likes doom metal)
― pfunkboy (Algerian Goalkeeper), Monday, 6 February 2012 00:56 (twelve years ago) link
oh shut up you're such an unfun crank, so i recalled a post you made a month ago, that's a cheap shot
anyways i don't think that qualification exempts you from basically being a hypocrite, explain it to me please
― flopson, Monday, 6 February 2012 00:56 (twelve years ago) link
and my pop stuff i liked ended about 1986 (i liked U2,Queen,PSB after that year)
― pfunkboy (Algerian Goalkeeper), Monday, 6 February 2012 00:57 (twelve years ago) link
if you can't handle being taken to task on your own inconsistencies don't make such broad claims
― flopson, Monday, 6 February 2012 00:57 (twelve years ago) link
lol I apologize dude I'm still mad at you from a shot you took at me earlier this week & also I'm tipsy, yr right I'm an unfun crank it's a personality defect I work on, sorry I popped off atcha man I just got mad
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 6 February 2012 00:58 (twelve years ago) link
it's disturbing to know that you keep a file of my posts, stalking's a terrible look imo
uncool to make light of actual stalking, fuck stuff like this infuriates me
― regal xenophobe (electricsound), Monday, 6 February 2012 00:59 (twelve years ago) link
you of all people
also my bad for deejing and pulling the "stalker!" card, that shit is bullshit, my bad
xp esoj otm
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 6 February 2012 01:00 (twelve years ago) link
cool
― regal xenophobe (electricsound), Monday, 6 February 2012 01:00 (twelve years ago) link
guys madonna is performing "vogue" at a superbowl halftime show in the year 2012 right now
― ⚓ (gr8080), Monday, 6 February 2012 01:04 (twelve years ago) link
can do this though - it's one thing to champion an era as some creative peak, it's another to answer "pick a side: prime thrash vs. early dm" or w/e. there's like a plague of ppl goin nuts about "the 80s" but I as I said in my initial post, I think historical discussion's potentially interesting whereas rose-tinted back-whenism is terrible, which is where I think a lot of retro shit is coming from. iirc the thread you're citing was a "choose between these two" thread in which I participated; you're not likely to catch me swinging into a present-day rap thread goin "X-Clan was better!", I may feel that way but that's on me, it's not like I think genres have to arrest themselves to keep me happy with some idealized frozen historical-present
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 6 February 2012 01:05 (twelve years ago) link
tv's muted but it looks like people are breakdancing too...good to see Maddy remembers 1997 accurately
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 6 February 2012 01:06 (twelve years ago) link
why is everyone hating the 80's? Lots of great music came out in the 80's. I don't understand this thread anymore.
― JacobSanders, Monday, 6 February 2012 01:08 (twelve years ago) link
i love the 80s!
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/401279_10150594457687137_686202136_9090491_1813989338_n.jpg
― scott seward, Monday, 6 February 2012 01:11 (twelve years ago) link
rufus just took that of me. sorry for the GOOGLEBOMB.
― scott seward, Monday, 6 February 2012 01:12 (twelve years ago) link
i was high the entire decade too so my judgement isn't entirely sound.
I think it can be romanticizing, but I don't see a problem with it in general. Romanticism is not something that has to be shunned because of a fear that it's divorced from reality.
― timellison, Monday, 6 February 2012 01:13 (twelve years ago) link
im not gonna lie i did enjoy like a prayer just there
― pfunkboy (Algerian Goalkeeper), Monday, 6 February 2012 01:17 (twelve years ago) link
teh destroyer record sounds like al stewart not 'the 80s'
also its dope
― D-40, Monday, 6 February 2012 01:18 (twelve years ago) link
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Sunday, February 5, 2012 7:58 PM (14 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink its cool--tbh i was pretty stoked for an epic flameout but i can't not accept an apology & you managed to slip one in while i was out of the room. also happy to know those posts got under your skin ;-)
― flopson, Monday, 6 February 2012 01:19 (twelve years ago) link
lol fu flopson beef 4ever :)
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 6 February 2012 01:21 (twelve years ago) link
how can I, drinking beer, resist this
which particular al stewart album is this synth-heavy deej
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 6 February 2012 01:22 (twelve years ago) link
Year of Kaputt
― EZ Snappin, Monday, 6 February 2012 01:25 (twelve years ago) link
rule: don't ever believe any music made today is as good as al stewart
― crüt, Monday, 6 February 2012 01:25 (twelve years ago) link
I definitely thought his voice sounds a little like Al Stewart also.
― timellison, Monday, 6 February 2012 01:26 (twelve years ago) link
both of them sound like Peter Lorre
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 6 February 2012 01:28 (twelve years ago) link
al stewart mating with neil tennant or something.
― scott seward, Monday, 6 February 2012 01:28 (twelve years ago) link
it's one thing to champion an era as some creative peak, it's another to answer "pick a side: prime thrash vs. early dm" or w/e. there's like a plague of ppl goin nuts about "the 80s" but I as I said in my initial post, I think historical discussion's potentially interesting whereas rose-tinted back-whenism is terrible, which is where I think a lot of retro shit is coming from. iirc the thread you're citing was a "choose between these two" thread in which I participated; you're not likely to catch me swinging into a present-day rap thread goin "X-Clan was better!", I may feel that way but that's on me, it's not like I think genres have to arrest themselves to keep me happy with some idealized frozen historical-present
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Sunday, February 5, 2012 8:05 PM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
mmm think i essentially agree with you on this. i think a statement like "I loved The Chronic and Doggy Style ... but the element of rap that was like mindblowing sheer sonics gave way to what were essentially rock records structurally" is reductive in the same way many arguments about rock post-70's/rave post-90's/jazz post-60's are reductive: rap continued/continues to be innovative in terms of mindblowing sheer sonics, despite including chord progressions and elements of rock structure
also, while we 99% of the time rightly assume that the person who shows up to say "x-clan did it better" is someone with not-super-interesting ideas about music, i believe it's the responsibility of vocal fans of contemporary music in genres with encroaching histories to counter such claims with examples of great contemporary music and vivid, well-argued enthusiasm, not to automatically call someone a moron for holding such an opinion based on an abstract and rigidly held belief that genres never regress. sometimes they do, and sometimes very smart people argue it convincingly
― flopson, Monday, 6 February 2012 01:49 (twelve years ago) link
i get where you're coming from but i dunno i dont listen kaputt or west coast and go "oh cool 80's sounds here" i just hear awesome fresh music
― ⚓ (gr8080)
― omar little, Monday, 6 February 2012 02:12 (twelve years ago) link
? the past-ness, other-era-ness of the sounds in Kaputt seems like a big part of what the album's "about" to me
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 6 February 2012 02:36 (twelve years ago) link
it sounds futuristic imo
― ⚓ (gr8080), Monday, 6 February 2012 02:36 (twelve years ago) link
Year of the cat is one of my favorite jawns
― dave coolier (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 6 February 2012 02:37 (twelve years ago) link
I think that sort of futurism is a specifically what-the-future-was-imagined-as-in-the-past kinda deal
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 6 February 2012 02:37 (twelve years ago) link
if you take a time machine back to 1970 maybe
xps
― pfunkboy (Algerian Goalkeeper), Monday, 6 February 2012 02:38 (twelve years ago) link
how could you read the lyrics of the title track to be futuristic?
― iatee, Monday, 6 February 2012 02:38 (twelve years ago) link
exactly. this is 'the nightfly'.
On our local sports talk station, dan ”the common man” cole is originally from detroit, so he likes to troll vikings fans by saying ” the roar has been restored” and then he plays ” year of the cat” but they edit in a lions roar every time the chorus comes in
― dave coolier (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 6 February 2012 02:41 (twelve years ago) link
\(o_0)/ you guys are so weird
― ⚓ (gr8080), Monday, 6 February 2012 02:41 (twelve years ago) link