the scene between sherlock and mycroft in the morgue after identifying her body (the first time) was one of the all-time great holiday TV moments. for me.
― the girl from spirea x (f. hazel), Monday, 2 January 2012 20:51 (twelve years ago) link
Loved this, although thoroughly dismayed at some of my favourite stories (Greek Interpreter, Naval Treaty, Speckled Band) being discarded as in-jokes therefore won't be made.
― 50,000 raspberries with the face of Peter Ndlovu (aldo), Monday, 2 January 2012 20:52 (twelve years ago) link
Not much compensation but they're fleshed out a bit here:
http://www.johnwatsonblog.co.uk/
― Quoth the raven "Nevermind" (ledge), Monday, 2 January 2012 21:57 (twelve years ago) link
that is a bit better than the fake sherlock one, at least
this was really pretty good, i thought. ever-increasing bait-and-switch-and-switch-and-switch-and-switch. it seems strange to me that there are british television shows where things happen every minute or two, rather than one or two things happening in an episode, at depth.
― thomp, Monday, 2 January 2012 22:06 (twelve years ago) link
so so so so so much fun. sacrificing an evening's essential study was totally worth it.
― Upt0eleven, Monday, 2 January 2012 22:18 (twelve years ago) link
does anybody know where i can watch this online?
― gnome rocognise gnome (remy bean), Monday, 2 January 2012 22:24 (twelve years ago) link
I just webmailed you
― kinder, Monday, 2 January 2012 22:48 (twelve years ago) link
Best thing on telly over the whole Christmas period. Absolutely loved it.
― that mustardless plate (Bill A), Tuesday, 3 January 2012 10:25 (twelve years ago) link
otm. wish they hadn't kept referring to her "camera phone" though.
― 1N1ck, Tuesday, 3 January 2012 10:37 (twelve years ago) link
Really enjoyed this, better than last year's and hilarious throughout. The beheading reveal was lame though.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 3 January 2012 12:07 (twelve years ago) link
Was the beheading reveal bit an actual memory or a Sherlock fantasy moment?
― Daisy Click Clack, Tuesday, 3 January 2012 12:10 (twelve years ago) link
i even liked that. that kind of setup - we're in That Middle East, there are sinister looking arabic types with swords, possibly muezzin wailing - is a horrible televisual cliché and tends to be telegraphing the idea that dark, serious things are happening; for two seconds i thought they actually were going to go there (which would have been aaaaaaaawful) and then it turns out to be for the sake of a gag, so well done them
xpost i had that thought but if it's a fantasy he's not established as having any other reason to know she was/n't beheaded, so
― thomp, Tuesday, 3 January 2012 12:13 (twelve years ago) link
also it sets up that sherlock definitely knows mycroft is enlisting john to lie to him. (that stuff in this episode that sort of shifts into the idea that sherlock's family/friends are in the position of dealing with a mentally ill person is really smart, i think. -- in terms of convincingly modernizing the given material of the original without rewriting it.)
― thomp, Tuesday, 3 January 2012 12:17 (twelve years ago) link
also part of why i like this -- the scene where they're waiting in buckingham palace really brought this home -- is that cumberbatch and freeman are sort of playing peter cook and dudley moore, too
― thomp, Tuesday, 3 January 2012 12:18 (twelve years ago) link
I enjoyed it, but found all the "look at me, I'm writing a blog!/ hey guys just Tweet me @sherlockholmes" stuff to be a bit overdone. I think Cumberbatch is a bit of a ham too. Freeman and Gatiss are both good, though.
― good luck in your pyramid (Neil S), Tuesday, 3 January 2012 12:50 (twelve years ago) link
I enjoyed it - but it's definitely made for the attention deficit disorder generation.
― Daisy Click Clack, Tuesday, 3 January 2012 13:01 (twelve years ago) link
I loved this unreservedly.
― bouquet beatdown (Nicole), Tuesday, 3 January 2012 13:22 (twelve years ago) link
i've seen the first 2 minutes of this, which was enough to remind me how little i care for the dude playing moriarty.
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 3 January 2012 13:24 (twelve years ago) link
Oh yeah, I forgot about him! Which probably speaks to how slight and badly miscast he is.
― Nicole, Tuesday, 3 January 2012 13:29 (twelve years ago) link
oh noes it's scary Ant from Ant 'n Dec!
― good luck in your pyramid (Neil S), Tuesday, 3 January 2012 13:29 (twelve years ago) link
he might be a good actor in another situation but he was just so obviously at sea, and overcompensating by doing the whackadoo sub-joker loud-quiet madman schtick we've all seen 10 million times
i totally plant to watch, though
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 3 January 2012 13:39 (twelve years ago) link
uh, plan
If it makes you feel any better he is hardly in the episode after those first two minutes.
― Nicole, Tuesday, 3 January 2012 13:44 (twelve years ago) link
yay!
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 3 January 2012 13:54 (twelve years ago) link
― Daisy Click Clack, Tuesday, 3 January 2012 13:01 (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
lol old man, u old
― thomp, Tuesday, 3 January 2012 14:22 (twelve years ago) link
I almost literally cannot wait until Sunday when the do Hound of the Baskervilles. I am wishing the days away.
― Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 3 January 2012 14:34 (twelve years ago) link
I like Moriarty! I really like his protean capriciousness. Malice born of boredom, a similar boredom to Holmes. Thought this was unreservedly excellent. Oh, and quite clearly Speedy isn't a cab firm as i stupidly said upthread. I meant to wander up the street where they film it to have a look at whether it is definitely an irl cafe. But didn't. I think it is. How tremendously exciting.
― Fizzles the Chimp (GamalielRatsey), Tuesday, 3 January 2012 18:16 (twelve years ago) link
The cafe in Google streetview looks real enough.
― fun loving and xtremely tolrant (Billy Dods), Tuesday, 3 January 2012 18:24 (twelve years ago) link
Try again: http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?q=gower+street&hl=en&ll=51.526221,-0.136664&spn=0.009105,0.019119&num=100&hnear=Gower+St&gl=uk&t=h&z=16&vpsrc=0&layer=c&cbll=51.526288,-0.136743&panoid=PxvoCwy-erhpK_1yyUQCpA&cbp=12,254.82,,0,3.79
― fun loving and xtremely tolrant (Billy Dods), Tuesday, 3 January 2012 18:28 (twelve years ago) link
It does indeed. Although that link seemed to take me to the other side of Gower Street. (xpost) ah yes, there it is.
I didn't really mind the beheading bit, or the sort of equivalent scene in the second episode of season one, where SH is fighting with a rather out-of-time desert clad swordsman, although both jarred. But I find the slight touch of the penny dreadful or comic book quite appealing ultimately i think.
― Fizzles the Chimp (GamalielRatsey), Tuesday, 3 January 2012 18:32 (twelve years ago) link
I missed this because I was away for the New Year. Does anyone know if the Beeb going to do a repeat on BBC 3 (or something) sometime this week or do I have to watch it on iPlayer?
― Stone Monkey, Tuesday, 3 January 2012 18:32 (twelve years ago) link
BBC3, Saturday, 7pm.
― oppet, Tuesday, 3 January 2012 18:41 (twelve years ago) link
I thought this was great. Surprised how much I like Martin Freeman in particular.
― oppet, Tuesday, 3 January 2012 18:42 (twelve years ago) link
I think Cumberbatch is a bit of a ham too.
oh noes!
lol at the implication that Gatiss isn't, tho
― Θ ̨Θƪ (sic), Tuesday, 3 January 2012 20:30 (twelve years ago) link
A lot of next week's Hound of the Baskervilles was filmed in and around my friend's pub.
― nate woolls, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 10:31 (twelve years ago) link
xp yeah, fair enough, difficult to play Holmes without being at least a little bit hammy I suppose. For example:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjKXFBkNE10
― good luck in your pyramid (Neil S), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 11:04 (twelve years ago) link
:D aw, that's great
― Θ ̨Θƪ (sic), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 12:09 (twelve years ago) link
Brett's the man for doing the dissipated Holmes, but he is also surprisingly convincing (and funny) as the tough guy.
― good luck in your pyramid (Neil S), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 12:47 (twelve years ago) link
I wish Mrs Hudson was my landlady. It would be brilliant.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 12:50 (twelve years ago) link
Lot of criticism of Moffat for turning Adler into a sexist cliche, which I have to say I agree with; she should be every bit as unemotional as Holmes and thus unlikely to fall for him and be found out that way. Also, she shouldn't need Moriarty as a 'boss' or Holmes as a saviour; she's meant to be ruthlessly self-sufficient. The dominatrix thing I thought was a little cheap but ultimately didn't mind as such.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jan/03/sherlock-sexist-steven-moffathttp://stavvers.wordpress.com/2012/01/01/irene-adler-how-to-butcher-a-brilliant-woman-character/
― Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 13:20 (twelve years ago) link
The Guardian piece was cringe inducingly awful, because anyone who thinks that Who is more sexist now than under RTD is more than a little deluded.
― Nicole, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 14:26 (twelve years ago) link
I mean, there are parts of the Irene Adler crit I can agree with but when an article is started on such a boldly false assertion I can't take it seriously.
― Nicole, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 14:29 (twelve years ago) link
I hated the last minute or two and wished they hadn't been included because they were dumb and pointless but reading into it that Moffatt likes his formerly strong women on their knees begging to be rescued by the big man hero is equally dumb.
Think Moffatt's Sherlock is clearly meant to be hot for Adler without ever admitting it - there's no other reason to go to Pakistan to rescue your adversary (especially when it is a really dumb thing to do). It's not just about male reason beating feminine emotion yet again.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 14:36 (twelve years ago) link
the original character is a cipher and making pronouncements about how she 'should' be or that conan doyle's gender politics are superior to moffat's is all a bit facepalm, tbh. - & to read the episode as demonstrating sherlock's superiority is to ignore that, you know, he's presented as being basically constitutionally and neurologically incapable of enjoying life, & she isn't
― thomp, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 15:29 (twelve years ago) link
I think Moffatt has a tendency to write himself into corners that he then can't quite convincingly write himself out of and teaming Adler and Moriarty up was his handy way of getting them out of the swimming pool alive *and* introducing Irene.
I need to watch that plane scene again maybe but was it really saying that Adler was acting completely under Moriarty's orders and without any agency or ingenuity of her own? I don't buy that.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 4 January 2012 15:39 (twelve years ago) link
*SPOILER* The lot of us who watched it tried to parse out Why the information was so valuable to Moriarty, and Why it was only valuable once it had been deciphered, but we couldn't figure it out.
― gord downer (Ówen P.), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 15:41 (twelve years ago) link
WHY it's valuable. Moriarty keeps on being defined in terms of being capriciously disruptive and destructive. his fight against boredom showing itself that way rather than Holmes'. Anti-establishment - see his raspberry at St Stephen's tower. Holmes - Buck House - is ultimately establishment.
Also complete absence of sentiment, in contrast to both Holmes and IA. Mycroft already pointed out despite SH's asseverations to the opposite his very choice of career is sentimental romantic.
WHY it needed to be deciphered. Muddier definitely. Depends on a series of questions - did Moriarty request she get the information? (phone call in pool suggests yes - this means he wasn't just working out how to exploit info already on her phone like she suggests at the end). Was Moriarty aware of a long-term spying operation but not sure of the details? Probably. Hence can only be destroy long-term spying op by knowing what knowledge they have. Like Tinker Tailor in reverse. He only needed to know it was a plane. Hence his text.
― Fizzles the Chimp (GamalielRatsey), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 16:29 (twelve years ago) link
Also, can I just sat how much I love the direction/scene transitions in this show, especially in this most recent ep
― Not only dermatologists hate her (James Morrison), Wednesday, 4 January 2012 22:30 (twelve years ago) link
Same director does next week, too; then the last one's by the guy that did Pandorica Opens / Big Bang / Christmas Carol / Astronaut / Moon on Who.
― Θ ̨Θƪ (sic), Thursday, 5 January 2012 00:32 (twelve years ago) link
this was sooo good
still don't think i actually understand the scheme adler had goin
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 5 January 2012 01:17 (twelve years ago) link