craftsmanship thread?
― sarahel, Monday, 7 November 2011 05:28 (1 year ago) Permalink
began with hipster knives, has ranged afield to environmental externalities of industrial manufacturing, isn't really a clusterfuck though?
― whoop, up the butt it goes (silby), Monday, 7 November 2011 08:17 (1 year ago) Permalink
ya, just discussing 'the issues' iirc
― blind pele (darraghmac), Monday, 7 November 2011 10:32 (1 year ago) Permalink
Joe Paterno [Started by Ned Raggett (Ned) in August 2006, last updated 18 seconds ago by frogbs on I Love Everything] 871 new answers
this has to have moved on to something besides the coverup scandal ya?
― citation needed (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 10 November 2011 23:00 (1 year ago) Permalink
yup
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 10 November 2011 23:01 (1 year ago) Permalink
-"greatness" and legacies in the face of something negative coming to light- college vs. pro sports- people who have not heard of college coaches, or college sports, or entire sports, or sports as a concept
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 10 November 2011 23:03 (1 year ago) Permalink
Something wonderful.
― i couldn't adjust the food knobs (Phil D.), Thursday, 10 November 2011 23:03 (1 year ago) Permalink
priming the pump
― ASPIE Rocky (dayo), Saturday, 12 November 2011 20:04 (1 year ago) Permalink
creepy thing to write under a post abt drake
― When snap was real ... Thumbs up if you agree (D-40), Saturday, 12 November 2011 20:06 (1 year ago) Permalink
picture of drake rather
ewwwwwwwwwwww
― no jesus, no piece (Neanderthal), Saturday, 12 November 2011 20:07 (1 year ago) Permalink
~~~~~~~~
― ASPIE Rocky (dayo), Saturday, 12 November 2011 20:07 (1 year ago) Permalink
Spin thread has been consistently huge for about 2 weeks now. Anyone?
― Aesop Rizzle (a hoy hoy), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 11:29 (1 year ago) Permalink
spinning the drain IIRC
― good luck in your pyramid (Neil S), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 11:37 (1 year ago) Permalink
twits'n'tweets
― incredible shrinking man on euphonium (Drugs A. Money), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 13:44 (1 year ago) Permalink
Trials and travails of Mr. WW
― mh, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 14:53 (1 year ago) Permalink
pitchfork and bullying?
― Aesop Rizzle (a hoy hoy), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:20 (1 year ago) Permalink
they're two separate things
― sarahell, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:21 (1 year ago) Permalink
and yet are both look like potential clusterfucks
― Aesop Rizzle (a hoy hoy), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:21 (1 year ago) Permalink
bullying = low quality troll brought some challops last night, got a battering, thread then returned to the subject in hand in a non-clusterfucky fashionpitchfork = fucked if i'm opening a pitchfork thread
― summer sun, something's begun, but uh-oh those tumblr whites (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:23 (1 year ago) Permalink
is it still about how the people that write reviews for pitchfork have no discernable posting style writing style
― sarahell, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:34 (1 year ago) Permalink
its just mordy and deej arguing past each other
― # (Lamp), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:39 (1 year ago) Permalink
how come everyone always jumps to 'arguing past each other?' i think we're arguing right at each other
― Mordy, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 23:44 (1 year ago) Permalink
bullying?
― Aesop Rizzle (a hoy hoy),
just a lil bit of fun so let's be cool
― teaky frigger (darraghmac), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 00:55 (1 year ago) Permalink
its ok mordy lamp is also mad at the state of music crit cf his dreams of ppl feeling reflective abt chillwave for many thousands of words
― I Love Pedantry (D-40), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 01:06 (1 year ago) Permalink
i dont think i know enough about the state of music crit to be mad at it
― # (Lamp), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 01:12 (1 year ago) Permalink
― Neanderthal, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 01:13 (1 year ago) Permalink
gentlemen you can't fight in here etc
― teaky frigger (darraghmac), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 01:15 (1 year ago) Permalink
i actually opened tht thread. its not much of a fight. its all good. no blood or anything.
― scott seward, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 01:20 (1 year ago) Permalink
womens issues thread?
also i am guessing this has spawned 2 or 3 spin-off threads i dont get either?
― ⚓ (gr8080), Thursday, 16 February 2012 05:58 (1 year ago) Permalink
contenderizer keeps stating testosterone/being male has something to do with aggression. WCC, an ilx regular, admittedly (by her own explanation) RAGEs at this and says gender aspects are choices. They circle endlessly, never really defining terms
― valleys of your mind (mh), Thursday, 16 February 2012 06:24 (1 year ago) Permalink
i bet there's lots of people telling people how to feel. i bet that makes people calmer, not more angry.
― how did we get here how? (ytth), Thursday, 16 February 2012 06:25 (1 year ago) Permalink
i'd take one of those bets
― are you ready for a little spittle? (electricsound), Thursday, 16 February 2012 06:34 (1 year ago) Permalink
i bet there are lots of convoluted metaphors
― ⚓ (gr8080), Thursday, 16 February 2012 06:53 (1 year ago) Permalink
judith butlerdead chickens
― sarahell, Thursday, 16 February 2012 06:57 (1 year ago) Permalink
quiddities and agonies thread?
― sarahell, Thursday, 16 February 2012 06:58 (1 year ago) Permalink
no clusterfuck really, just the usual + some "riffing"
― ⚓ (gr8080), Thursday, 16 February 2012 07:00 (1 year ago) Permalink
Not "choice" but "culturally constructed" - not the same thing at all. (wilfull misrepresentation like this fuels rage bigtime)
Also, Judith Butler and whether academic writing is obfuscating for 300 or so posts.
― White Chocolate Cheesecake, Thursday, 16 February 2012 08:56 (1 year ago) Permalink
Also WCC admitting that biology may have some factor but until we know for certain etc., how about we talk abt other factors that can change for teh better etc. only for contenderizer to ignore that she wants to move on and continue being annoying, trolling until WCC rages, which happens pretty easily.
The 12th time this happened is where I removed my bookmark.
― a hoy hoy, Thursday, 16 February 2012 10:00 (1 year ago) Permalink
i bet the argument from the original thread gets going here in the summary thread, so us summary-hounds can witness it first hand.
― how did we get here how? (ytth), Thursday, 16 February 2012 15:34 (1 year ago) Permalink
I stand corrected, let my original summary be amended
― valleys of your mind (mh), Thursday, 16 February 2012 15:47 (1 year ago) Permalink
willfully amended?
― how did we get here how? (ytth), Thursday, 16 February 2012 15:50 (1 year ago) Permalink
"WCC vs contenderizer going in circles" is exactly what i would say if you asked me to dream up the worst thread ever, regardless of topic
― ⚓ (gr8080), Thursday, 16 February 2012 22:06 (1 year ago) Permalink
Action Films Poll:
You can be 15 forever
― Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 16 February 2012 22:15 (1 year ago) Permalink
better than being 85 forever
― congratulations (n/a), Thursday, 16 February 2012 22:17 (1 year ago) Permalink
more accurately: there's a poll, and people are talking about the results
― (thinks and smiles) (DJP), Thursday, 16 February 2012 22:17 (1 year ago) Permalink
THERE'S A BOMB ON THE THREAD AND...yeah anyway it's awesome & Morbs is just grumpy
― Janet Snakehole (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 16 February 2012 22:21 (1 year ago) Permalink
did anyone even ask for a summary of the action films poll?
― scott seward, Thursday, 16 February 2012 22:24 (1 year ago) Permalink
of course not, dude is just looking for new thread to be pissy on
― (thinks and smiles) (DJP), Thursday, 16 February 2012 22:25 (1 year ago) Permalink
only for contenderizer to ignore that she wants to move on and continue being annoying, trolling until WCC rages
cuz this is an entirely fair and not-one-sided description of the dynamics at work
― Little GTFO (contenderizer), Thursday, 16 February 2012 22:26 (1 year ago) Permalink