and that doesn't even start to consider the question of should we americans consume resources at a pace that far outpaces the rest of the developed world (except for tiny oil rich places in the middle east which use oil to flush their toilets with)
― Whiney G. Blutfarten (dayo), Sunday, 18 September 2011 19:48 (twelve years ago) link
my whole life could be like the faerie queene
― k3vin k., Sunday, 18 September 2011 19:51 (twelve years ago) link
http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.USE.ELEC.KH.PChttp://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.USE.PCAP.KG.OE
like the only countries that consistently use as much power as or more than the US are middle eastern oil kingdoms and scandinavian countries (I guess cause it's cold all the damn time and they don't want to freeze to death)
damn scandos
― Whiney G. Blutfarten (dayo), Sunday, 18 September 2011 19:52 (twelve years ago) link
and canada
― iatee, Sunday, 18 September 2011 19:53 (twelve years ago) link
aussies too but they are forgiven because it is really fun to ride jeeps in the outback, in fact it's compulsory
― Whiney G. Blutfarten (dayo), Sunday, 18 September 2011 19:53 (twelve years ago) link
this is why we need to make more transit-oriented megacities in coastal california
― iatee, Sunday, 18 September 2011 19:56 (twelve years ago) link
also you can ignore those other countries because combined I'm not sure their populations would approach even 1/6 of america's
― Whiney G. Blutfarten (dayo), Sunday, 18 September 2011 19:56 (twelve years ago) link
oh damn 35 million people live in canada... who knew... okay maybe 1/4
― Whiney G. Blutfarten (dayo), Sunday, 18 September 2011 19:57 (twelve years ago) link
and like iatee said it's not a question about what we want to do it's a question about what we can afford to do. like I want to live in an airship, it would be really rad - but I can't afford it. but if all of a sudden the gov passed a national law that said "dayo and only dayo can construct and build an airship and we will subsidize 99% of the cost" then fuck yeah, I'm gonna take out a loan and build an airship.
btw do any of ya'll want to come and hang out on my airship, I've got xbox 360
― Whiney G. Blutfarten (dayo), Sunday, 18 September 2011 20:01 (twelve years ago) link
don't make this about our military-industrial complex
― iatee, Sunday, 18 September 2011 20:02 (twelve years ago) link
speaking of industrial policy, another take on things:
http://pedestrianobservations.wordpress.com/2011/08/30/special-interests-and-the-general-interest/
― iatee, Sunday, 18 September 2011 20:03 (twelve years ago) link
like I want to live in an airship, it would be really rad - but I can't afford it.
cute lil analogy bro but right now there are not millions of people and businesses based in airships. there are, however, in suburbs.
people right now are driving 15mpg SUVs. i don't think in just 20 yrs it's gonna go from that to motor vehicles as a whole being unaffordable. anyway i don't know why y'all are still obsessed with gasolina. 4th time:
so have all car-based suburbs either convert to public trans-based ones or die; get rid of those zoning laws too, and?
― A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Sunday, 18 September 2011 20:11 (twelve years ago) link
...
― Whiney G. Blutfarten (dayo), Sunday, 18 September 2011 20:14 (twelve years ago) link
it's not a matter of 'shooting for' but rather determining what the cost actually is, how it is paid, and who pays for it
right. i just got the impression that iatee thinks 13/g gas would be a good thing.
― A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Sunday, 18 September 2011 20:19 (twelve years ago) link
a. an environmentally sustainable world would be 'a good thing'b. 13/g gas would be 'a very bad thing' for the american economy
― iatee, Sunday, 18 September 2011 20:23 (twelve years ago) link
i dont get what were supposed to do with that sentence you keep quoting
― max, Sunday, 18 September 2011 20:24 (twelve years ago) link
it would be a good thing insofar as the true cost of oil would be laid bare and we would be forced to plan around it, would be a kickstart to plans of upgrading america's public transportation system. the question is now, do you amputate the foot, or do you wait until gangrene sets in and lose the leg. (to give you another cute lil analogy, bro, since you seem to love them)
― Whiney G. Blutfarten (dayo), Sunday, 18 September 2011 20:24 (twelve years ago) link
oh max just keep making snappy terse rejoiners, it's brilliant
― A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Sunday, 18 September 2011 20:44 (twelve years ago) link
rejoinders too
― A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Sunday, 18 September 2011 20:45 (twelve years ago) link
he's not joking we have no idea what kind of response you're expecting
― iatee, Sunday, 18 September 2011 20:46 (twelve years ago) link
you keep banging on about car-dependent suburbs when i've already said i think they're very problematic
― A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Sunday, 18 September 2011 20:49 (twelve years ago) link
hard to tell when the brilliant wit that is max is 'joking'
please don't rejoin us tho max
― A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Sunday, 18 September 2011 20:50 (twelve years ago) link
no, but really, what do you want as a response to that sentence [only kind of a joke]
― max, Sunday, 18 September 2011 20:51 (twelve years ago) link
like that sentence, the bit before the semicolon is basically "what is going to happen over the next century regardless of what posters on the internet say, barring the invention and mass production of the solar-powered riding mower" and the bit after is "a good way to ease the transition" [there is a joke in this post but the thrust of it is fairly serious]
― max, Sunday, 18 September 2011 20:53 (twelve years ago) link
ok i'm saying i am in favor of those 2 things, and wondering what other major acts would need to occur in order to have sustainable suburbs.
― A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Sunday, 18 September 2011 20:54 (twelve years ago) link
cause there being nothing but rural, small town, and urban (the density cutoff being San Fran) isn't realistic imo. yes yes what we can afford will dictate blah blah but i think we can plan/arrange things so town-center, public-trans based suburbs can work in the long-term. i get that y'all are not invested in thinking about that because you prefer an urban lifestyle and basically fuck all who don't.
― A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Sunday, 18 September 2011 21:00 (twelve years ago) link
um basically SAY 'fuck all who don't'
― A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Sunday, 18 September 2011 21:01 (twelve years ago) link
i know that joeks have been made and there are a bunch of urbanites on one side and you on the other, but you seem to be taking it awfully personally.
ppl are questioning the ongoing economic feasibility of current suburban development. i don't think anyone is suggesting that suburban dwellers are assholes or that they should go fuck themselves
― mookieproof, Sunday, 18 September 2011 21:07 (twelve years ago) link
once youve moved off of cars onto public transportation youve solved 80% of what is "bad" about "suburbs." you wouldnt really even be living in "a suburb" as were defining it, and as has been discussed 40m times above
― max, Sunday, 18 September 2011 21:12 (twelve years ago) link
suburban development in america is probably connected w/ america's post-wwII king of the mountain I can do anything fuck it I want it all giant mountain of coke on my desk my dick is 15 inches long feeling
― A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Sunday, 18 September 2011 21:12 (twelve years ago) link
i grew up in an old-school suburb with a lawn and a ballfield over the fence from my back yard. i enjoyed being able to play catch or wiffle hockey in the yard and even had a flower garden for a couple years (my mom had a much larger vegetable garden).
this was a relatively close-in and dense suburb that was built along a river and near several coal mines. it was not a development with identical enormous houses named 'parson's croft' or 'briar ridge', though if i'd grown up in one it probably would have been fine too.
there are levels and levels, some of which are more feasible than others.
― mookieproof, Sunday, 18 September 2011 21:15 (twelve years ago) link
yeah GD i dont really know what to tell u except that you are like insanely sensitive and im sorry that you are being forced to read this thread?
― max, Sunday, 18 September 2011 21:16 (twelve years ago) link
b. inordinate desire for privacy / anti-social behavior = correlated w/ political conservatism, and how many republicans we got around here? was trying to think of an ilxor example of someone from a city who hated cities, and...roger adultry came to mind - prob not coincidentally one of the only loud conservatives we've had. I think he was from staten island tho, so...lol...
― A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Sunday, 18 September 2011 21:17 (twelve years ago) link
yeah max i dont really know what to tell u except that you are like an enormous smug dick and im sorry that you are being forced to read this thread?
― A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Sunday, 18 September 2011 21:18 (twelve years ago) link
im not tho!! i am choosing to read this thread
― max, Sunday, 18 September 2011 21:18 (twelve years ago) link
― A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Sunday, 18 September 2011 21:19 (twelve years ago) link
i don't care abuot this stupid argument but quit abusing max you look like a jerk
― horseshoe, Sunday, 18 September 2011 21:19 (twelve years ago) link
heh this is my fault too, i should just let it go but
― max, Sunday, 18 September 2011 21:19 (twelve years ago) link
oh poor max
― A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Sunday, 18 September 2011 21:20 (twelve years ago) link
http://www.meh.ro/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/meh.ro5380-455x551.jpg
― zvookster, Sunday, 18 September 2011 21:20 (twelve years ago) link
case it's not clear i give fuck all what i look like to smug knowitall holier than thou fucks
― A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Sunday, 18 September 2011 21:21 (twelve years ago) link
yeah dogg i dont really know what to tell u? i really am sorry if i offended u? but maybe u should "take a chill pill"
― max, Sunday, 18 September 2011 21:21 (twelve years ago) link
i don't get offended. i do get tired of the whole "let's make snide remarks and interpret what this guy says in the worst possible way, insult his intelligence, and then when he reacts be all 'whoa dude what's YOUR problem'" schtick. grow up.
― A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Sunday, 18 September 2011 21:25 (twelve years ago) link
all right well i feel like we made a lot of progress today
― max, Sunday, 18 September 2011 21:27 (twelve years ago) link
let the record show that max didn't deny being a smug dick?
― J0rdan S., Sunday, 18 September 2011 21:28 (twelve years ago) link
"being a smug dick" was kind of my m.o. on this thread, i feel... a little bit bad about it, but i came onto ilx in the golden age of the noise board, needling sensitive posters is what i was raised on, and i dont think ive ever seen ppl more sensitive than suburbanites on this thread
― max, Sunday, 18 September 2011 21:29 (twelve years ago) link
except for me bc I am otm
― ima.tumblr.com (@imsothin) (m bison), Sunday, 18 September 2011 22:16 (twelve years ago) link
I feel like the 'when you react' part seems a lot like 'you getting offending'
if you're cool w/ a coordinated policy transition away from a car-dependent lifestyle then the only thing we apparently disagree on is 'would you like to live in the suburbs'...but that still doesn't seem to be the case? I mean is that really the only thing you're reacting to?
as for 'can there be a suburb without cars' - http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/12/science/earth/12suburb.html - yes, something like that is probably what you're imagining - but again, as max said "you wouldnt really even be living in "a suburb" as were defining it." that place is a 'suburb' of Freiburg, but actually has a higher population density than the city itself. can we build new places like that? sure and we have some experiments here and there, very marginal in the big picture. as the article mentions, it's not even *legal* in most places to build a neighborhood like that. and can we retrofit 1970s american suburbs into something like that? well...not so easily.
― iatee, Monday, 19 September 2011 00:39 (twelve years ago) link
I haven't read that Pitt article but
and most zoning laws in the United States still require two parking spaces per residential unit.
that is just fucking insane
― Whiney G. Blutfarten (dayo), Monday, 19 September 2011 01:12 (twelve years ago) link