Hommophobia inna dancehall style...

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (405 of them)
"[A]re you saying that indigenous tribes shouldn't be exposed to cultural products (i.e. Bible) because they might get bad ideas from them?"

No one should be exposed to the Bible because it is FILLED with bad ideas.

Alex in SF, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Has the culture in question has already been corrupted by Western values (via the Bible)? Should Western culture take the opportunity to clean up it's mess? or is that cultural imperialism again? if push comes to shove, i wouldn't be playing the homophobic stuff to myself or to anyone. There may be clever, subtle, and perfectly valid points to be made, but I just can't stomach it.

Are there dancehall lyrics pertaining to lesbians? or to jews for that matter?

Andrew, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

what about wife-beating, etc?: "gal get whupping"
on some level I think there's definitely comedic exaggeration goin' on
but still, I'm sure some singers mean it literally and certain fans/audiences pick up on it that way.
the homophobia does seem more OTT, rabid ('bun dem' imagery) than the misogyny, though
I still love dancehall anyway, but I can understand why people would be offended
and I wouldn't want to DJ a track that hurt someone's feelings, let alone incite hate
though, for example, slackness is fine for most crowds (maybe not mom)

Paul, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Comedic exaggeration? Yeah, wife beating and fag bashing are hilarious.

Andrew, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Only when they comes from white guys like eminem.

Sterling Clover, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

however eminem is ok? i'm not really seeing the difference between what he says and what the dancehall ppl do

these feelings also predate the introduction of the bible to these countries - look at cultures all over the world that don't use the bible - do they actually embrace homosexuality? did they ever? there's a huge stigma attached to homosexuality in india, for instance - the bible's teachings only really ever infiltrated the southern tip of the subcontinent in any critical mass, the majority of the population pretty much stayed with the ancient teachings of hinduism, which are on the whole really conservative ones for a culture that invented the 'kama sutra'

geeta, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

The difference is that Eminem is, y'know, like really ironic and self- referential and postmodern, so that, like, makes it OK... ;)

Ben Williams, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

blaming the Bible for homophobia is stupid - it's only mentioned a few times, and half of those are dependent upon interpretation. also i think all but one are in the Old Testament, a lot of which has little relevance on Christianity (basic message = be nice to *everybody*)

michael, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Anyway, applying cultural imperialism to Jamaica is a strawman, as the entire culture is the result of hybridization born of mass population transfer (and destruction). And the religion isn't historic, but rather deeply tied to modern Ethiopian history.

Sterling Clover, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

rastafarianism is younger than me!! (haile selassie's state visit to jamaica was in 1963!!)

mark s, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Adam and Eve spoke with God face to face. Hailie Salasie is God (Jah). Therefore, Rastafarianism is the most ancient religion.

DeRayMi, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

oh yeah, well i am not the most ancient poster

methuselah s, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Is it maybe important to separate the rhetoric of "kill homosexuals" from "kill [people I don't like] whom I am going to call homosexual because I don't like them?" Both contain sort of depressingly virulent attacks on homosexuality, but the latter is more (insultingly) homophobic whereas the former is actively and explicitly threatening homosexuals -- cf the difference between saying "kill the developmentally disabled" and "kill all these retards."

I don't really know enough about dancehall to parse which of those forms seems to be the dominant one. And I'm certainly not trying to excuse the latter, just pointing out that it's a hugely different proposition.

nabisco%%, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

look at cultures all over the world that don't use the bible - do they actually embrace homosexuality? did they ever?
Erm, I think you'll find a great deal of them did. (eg Native Americans)

Old Fart!!!, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

it's older than you, Mark: Rastafarianism started in the 30s with the crowning of Ras Tafari as Emperor Haile Selassie. the original Marcus Garvey quote was 'Look to Africa for the crowning of a Black king; he shall be the Redeemer.'

michael, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

nabisco: Because the condemnation of homosexuals is claimed to be in accordance with Rasta belief, the cry to "bun dem" does mean exactly what it says, i.e. burn the fags.

The thing is, Rastafarianism is a Judeo-Christian religion that places great emphasis on apocalypticism. Since the apocalypse (greek for "relevelation") will "reveal" who are the chosen people-- the "elect"--as opposed to the "damned," apocalyptic belief helps to console adherents (who are often oppressed societies) by telling them that there will be a better life for them in the next world/after the day of judgement. Babylon will fall and believers in Jah (the tribe of Judah) will take their rightful place as the "elect." Like Zionists, Rastas believe that there will be a homeland for their people. They think that the bible is talking about the Rastaman's plight--their homeland, the place for "the Israelites" of which Desmond Dekker sings--is in Ethiopia.

Rastafarianism, as an apocalyptic religion, is a very powerful force in the creation of community. The community must have a strong sense of itself, but it also must have a very strong sense of what constitutes the "other" i.e. who IS NOT part of the community.

While the community can provide some extremely positive things, such as empowerment to oppressed people and a sense of validity for one's culture, the desire to abject the "other" requires a clear definition of what doesn't fit. Where does one find this definition? In the Bible, of course!

Babylonians are equated with non-Rastas (significant supporters of the Babylon system being folks like George Bush, the Pope, the Queen- and her facist regime, etc.). Non-Rastas are also those who do not support Rasta belief and, say, commit un-Rasta acts such as having an intimate relationship with someone of the same sex.

The problem for me is that I agree that Babylon is wrong and populated with evil people like George Bush, persay, but I don't like how oppressive forces of Babylon are equated and collapsed with the so-called moral corruption of homosexuality.

cybele, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Allow me to correct what I just said--I don't want to seem like I'm speaking for people. I should have said "they think," I should make it clear that I mean "it is my understanding that Rasta adheres to the following..."

just wanted to be clear...

cybele, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Perhaps the spectacle of wealthy Westerners claiming victim status due to sexual preference is an almost intolerable provocation to people in the Third World who actually ARE oppressed? I imagine the denizens of Trenchtown are less than sympathetic than Americans who go to the Supreme Court demanding their rights as transsexuals or whatever tabloid outrages show up down there. Just a thought.

Which is more likely the subject of these homophobic songs: a) Elton John or kd lang b) Joe Q. Homosexual and his longtime companion, taking the LIRR to Fire Island every weekend c) Homosexual folks who share much the same cultural milieu that the dancehall singers come (or came) from or d) Some beast that's about as grounded in lived experience as the baby-eating horn'd Jews in several centuries' worth of anti-Semitic fantasy?

I dunno, I think the issue of holding other people to moral standards mainly devised by human-rights lawyers bears some examination.

The original poster was expressing her disgust at people who wanted to kill: labelling murder as evil is not some cirlicue of recent European liberal legal trends but is rooted in "Thou Shall Not Kill" (or a corruption or a misunderstanding or a oversimplification of the same).

Doesn't anyone think that the 'right' to actively pursuing sexual minority status is a bit of a luxury in the grand schme of things?

When taken in the grand scheme of the way the rest of the world lives now, or the way the mankind has lived throughout most of its existence, or the way sentient creatures typically live within nature, ALL rights (both with and without scare quotes) start to seem like luxuries.

I live a lie too. I am trapped by my extreme need to sleep with supermodels instead of ratty indie chicks. I am unable to act on this and blame societal factors, such as the fact that I'm in a low- paying job and thus am not attractive to same. My thwarted desire is causing me to lead a shadowy mockery of an existence and my desires are ridiculed by friends and family. What's more, an army of feminists is on hand to tell me I am sick, dangerous and the source of all malignity. Why can't I proudly act on my desire to sleep with supermodels?) Yes I know this is disingenuous.

It's not disingenuous. It's chickenshit.

Michael Daddino, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

labelling murder as evil is not some cirlicue of recent European liberal legal trends but is rooted in "Thou Shall Not Kill" (or a corruption or a misunderstanding or a oversimplification of the same). Which is a tad hypocritical, coming from a bible chock full of stories of the God of the Jews destroying loads of 'enemies of the chosen people'. The universal rule among civilisations of yesterday and today reads "Thou shalt not kill your own kind - if it's an enemy, an animal, a criminal, a plant, a slave, a subhuman, a threat, it's essentially OK".

Murder is only condemned when it upsets or damages the community. If it does not, society quickly comes up with euphemisms (= reducing cognitive dissonance).

Siegbran Hetteson, Wednesday, 19 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Hold on - are you saying that indigenous tribes shouldn't be exposed to cultural products (i.e. Bible) because they might get bad ideas from them?

The phrase "exposed to cultural products" here is probably a little too weak. If I thwacked you in the face with my Louisville Slugger, would you say that you were "exposed to Clarke's bat"?

Clarke B., Wednesday, 19 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

No, but I dunno if I would write songs in praise of the bat manufacturer either

dave q, Wednesday, 19 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

one year passes...
OK, this is a weird and ugly thread to wake back up - it didn't get ugly at the time, but ilX0r is a different place now, so I'm hesitating. But I was just now listening to a wonderful internet radio station called Big Up Radio Dancehall and an Elephant Man song comes on, and I'm like, cool, several times in the past year I've looked at an Elephant Man record and thought "I should buy that, some of this dancehall stuff is beginning to get to me in a big way." And so I listen, and it's not just some anti-homosexual stuff: that's the whole damned song. "Me don't want no chi-chi mon friend, no/not gonna find me with no fassy-man friend, no" etc etc etc et fuckin' CETERA, calls for violence, non-stop stuff which if rendered in standard English would be: "I don't want any gay friends! Don't like the gay men!" etc. i.e. it'd be Skrewdriver, more or less.

And I was, like, kickass interesting rhythm or not, that's fuckin' bullshit.

That's about it.

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 14:52 (twenty years ago) link

...and the worst thing about this shit is that the imbeciles who sing it are the loudest opposers of 'prejudice and oppression'.

Laughable.

russ t, Wednesday, 2 July 2003 15:07 (twenty years ago) link

It just really drives me nuts! 'Cause this is some of the best, most interesting music around, to my ears, and I'm not asking 'em to sing about peace and social justice or anything: I just can't get my muthafukkin' groove on to some guy saying "kill all the fags" over and over!

Damn it!

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 15:27 (twenty years ago) link

can you recommend any non-gay bashing dancehall? I too am interested in it but have no idea where to start.

lawrence kansas (lawrence kansas), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 16:03 (twenty years ago) link

if you got a fast enough connection you can just listen to http://www.bigupradio.com/ - I've been listening to it all morning

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 16:30 (twenty years ago) link

there was a big to-do at wesu when i was program director. one of the reggae djs (he was none-too-bright) kept playing all these virultently anti-gay songs on his show, which was on saturday afternoons when--it was pointed out by another reggae dj--lots of kids were listening. there was a big argument about whether we should tell the dj not to play such songs.

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 16:33 (twenty years ago) link

But this is sort of the way of the world musically. Dancehall homophobia is certainly an extreme example, but when I slake my guilty thirst for puerile current-issue pop-punka stuff, the unbelievably condescending/creepy fear-of-women stuff always makes me feel terrible after a while.

Perhaps part of the irritation with dancehall is that (unlike, say, pop-punka stuff) is that, aside from some astonishingly awful views on social issues, it could be so good -- both musically and sociopolitically.

Ess, Wednesday, 2 July 2003 16:50 (twenty years ago) link

Why can't pop-punka stuff be equally that good? And who's to say it hasn't?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 16:55 (twenty years ago) link

Why can't pop-punka stuff be equally that good? And who's to say it hasn't?

I'm assuming you mean "Who's to say pop-punka stuff hasn't been that good?" No one's to say that in any objective way. It has been really good. But on a personal level, it doesn't give me chills the way good dancehall does. And its more retrograde (jesus, there's an irritating word) tendencies don't bother me as much for that reason -- I don't care about it the same way I do about dancehall.

Ess (Ess), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 17:06 (twenty years ago) link

thanks for the revival didn't catch this the first time around.

when i used to listen to john peel he always used to play the odd dancehall track and he had the same problem so he always would listen out for gay basing stuff and he would only play the 'clean' stuff.

I think its all within the context of the song, you know (but maybe its just that i do have this thing where i don't know abt a lot of the terminology here and i'm poor at picking up on lyrics). I have enjoyed lots of what i've heard on the radio, the rhythms are quite something.

so what makes this diff from, say, gangsta rap. do ppl listen to one and not the other?

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 17:11 (twenty years ago) link

amateurist - what was the outcome with the wanker DJ? Hope you got rid of him....

russ t, Thursday, 3 July 2003 08:32 (twenty years ago) link

As a pretty big dancehall fan and a white liberal, too, I feel I can comment on this reasonably well. Dave Q is making quite a few valid points here (and I usually disagree w/ him on most everything, plus my argument on Burzum's racism w/ Siegbran always falls down as soon as i begin to consider my longstanding LOVE for one of the most prejudiced, violent and all-round objectionable forms of music on the planet).
However, as usual, that damnable Mr Sinker has raised the most pertinent point before I got to the thread! Cultural imperialism is a vital issue here. In the first instance, if you look at the vast majority of imagery used in these batty-boy-bashing anthems, it's all about fires blazing, flames that "bun up di ch-chi man", it doesn't take spectacular interpretive skills to note that these are the classic signifiers of Judeo-Christian hell.
The idea of homosexuality as "sin" was brought to Jamaican society and continues to be reinforced by the Christian faith (Rastafari also Christianity), thus being the first instance of said cultural imperialism.
Secondly, anywhere is the world, poverty is the perfect environment for reactionary, fundamnentalist and hate-filled ideologies to flourish (cf northern English towns and the BNP, the massive rise of fascist groups in the former eastern bloc). Sadly it is human nature for the poor and disenfranchised to want a group to look down upon/castigate/transfer their anger to - in this instance, largely due to the doctrines of the various churches that hold huge influence over Jamaica's collective morality, homosexuals.
I think we would all agree that this is far from desirable, but bearing in mind the fact that the island is still a Third World country in close proximity to the comparatively ludicrous waelth of the US, you have to ask yourself if trying to impose another, equally rigid and equally prescribed value system upon a developing society only adhering to previously set Western moral criteria is not in fact just a case of suddenly moving the goalposts.
As I both DJ (select) and write about dancehall, I do avoid playing virulently homophobic records and when writing about it/interviewing generally call artists on it. In no sense is this being an apologist, it's simply not being so shortsighted/condescending that I expect everyone to have the same viewpoints as me *at exacly the same time*. Hopefully tolerance will be learned over time, but to expect a nation such as Jamaica to fall in line, lockstep with what is deemed "politically correct" in privileged nations such as Europe/the US is completely wrong.
If you refuse to understand this/reconcile yourself to hearing things you don't like in dancehall, the simple answer is not to listen to it. Also Norman C Stoltzoff writes pretty eloquently on this element of dancehall (the factors behind its most pervasive tropes and its function as a realm of dicourse, socio-political, religious and otherwise) in his book Wake The Town And Tell The People, it's well worth a read.

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 3 July 2003 10:10 (twenty years ago) link

Just to muddy everything...


http://www.uk-dance.org/knowledge/social_aspects_of_music/000030.html

dave q, Thursday, 3 July 2003 10:19 (twenty years ago) link

That is total bollocks!!! Just looks at the lrics to TOK's Chi-Chi Man and tell me it's about the Prime Minister!

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 3 July 2003 10:25 (twenty years ago) link

Intro:
Bassie:
My Crew (My Crew) my dogs (my dogs)
Set rules (Set rules) set laws (set laws)
We represent for di lords of yards
A gal alone a feel up my balls

Chorus:
From dem a par inna chi chi man car
Blaze di fire mek we bun dem!!!! (Bun dem!!!!)
From dem a drink inna chi chi man bar
Blaze di fire mek we dun dem!!!! (Dun dem!!!!)

Verse 1:
Craigy:
So mi go so, do yuh see weh I see???
Niggas when your doin that
Nuff a dem a freak dem a carry all dem dutty act
Thug nigga wanna bees nuff a dem a lick it back
It dem bring it to we, hold on nuff a cop a shot
Cop a shot rise up every calico go rat tat tat
Rat tat tat every chi chi man dem haffi get flat
Get flat, mi and my niggas ago mek a pack
Chi chi man fi dead and dat's a fact

Chorus:
From dem a par inna chi chi man car
Blaze di fire mek we bun dem!!!! (Bun dem!!!!)
From dem a drink inna chi chi man bar
Blaze di fire mek we dun dem!!!! (Dun dem!!!!)

Verse 2:
Flexx:
So mi go so la la la la la la la la la la la
Nah go mek nuh chi chi man walk right a so
>From a bwoy a deep we ago dun dem right now
Leff him whole family dem a blow wow

Alexx:
I see it from far mi and dem nah go par
A nuff a dem bwoy mi a smoke man cigar
Mi and dem coulda never inna wrong bar
Dem bwoy deh flex too bizarre

Chorus:
>From dem a par inna chi chi man car
Blaze di fire mek we bun dem!!!! (Bun dem!!!!)
>From dem a drink inna chi chi man bar
Blaze di fire mek we dun dem!!!! (Dun dem!!!!)

Repeat intro twice
Repeat Verse 1 till song end

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 3 July 2003 10:31 (twenty years ago) link

sadly, it's a stunningly produced record...

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 3 July 2003 10:33 (twenty years ago) link

What do you think is worse, writing the song or lying about it?

dave q, Thursday, 3 July 2003 10:34 (twenty years ago) link

That article above looks like the usual "Oh, when we say 'faggot', we really mean 'bad man'!" excuses used by some US rappers!!! (Is this another example of this 'Western Cultural Imperialism' I keep reading about?!?!?)

Old Fart!!! (oldfart_sd), Thursday, 3 July 2003 10:37 (twenty years ago) link

ITS A SCNADAL I TELL YA!

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 3 July 2003 10:38 (twenty years ago) link

SCNADAL

Best word evah!

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 3 July 2003 10:42 (twenty years ago) link

lying about it = worse coz that proves they *know* there's something to be ashamed of

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 3 July 2003 10:45 (twenty years ago) link

dave (stelfox)-what has been the response of artists when you call them on the homophobia in the music?

this is an interesting topic,i'd love to see more discussion on this,although i'm not sure what i think myself

i don't see a huge difference between this and some of the more misogynist elements of rap- (wildflower by ghostface killah)


robin (robin), Thursday, 3 July 2003 10:48 (twenty years ago) link

generally pretty evasive but in some cases totally honest. but evading the question makes me think that repeated calling on it, criticism etc may well speed up some realisation. it has to be taken up and discussed in orgder for anyuthing to happen. i don't like it any more than anyone else but i can put up w/ it better than most and don't find it valid to slag off a genre just coz it don't fit *exactly* with my political leanings. the black metal burzum issue is different to me coz they exist in the same world as me and have absolutely no reason for their prejudices...

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 3 July 2003 10:59 (twenty years ago) link

So Dave, the question has to be asked - would you listen to music or musicians that virulently attacked blacks?
It's hardly a question of a slight misunderstanding or disagreement on political ideas, really, is it, as you seem to suggest in the last part of your post above?

russ t, Thursday, 3 July 2003 11:11 (twenty years ago) link

i think i qualified that with what i said abt burzum... answer's no

Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 3 July 2003 11:14 (twenty years ago) link

ok, everybody who own's a Rolling Stones record raise your hands

James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 3 July 2003 11:19 (twenty years ago) link

why, who do the Stones want to kill?

dave q, Thursday, 3 July 2003 11:20 (twenty years ago) link

it sounds like people are prepared to tolerate homophobia far more than racism (tho misogyny is still by far the most tolerable) whilst not becoming apologists. in the interests of objective criticism or art this is probably fair enough, especially when taking into account Jamaica's situation as described by Dave Stelfox. The attitude of tolerating dubious messages for the sake of great art whilst simultaneously working to eradicate the negative socio-cultural aspects tied to or disguised as religious beliefs in the music is probably the way to go. I'm inclined to believe things have actually improved regarding acceptance of gays and respect of women in certain genres, due to the pressure (in the BBC's documentary on reggae music last year I think it was pointed out that a lot of reggae/dancehall artists were having a rethink or at least toning down the hostile sentiments as it was damaging their sales outside of the Caribbean) - tho it may be wishful thinking to believe it could be eradicated completely within this century.

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 3 July 2003 11:25 (twenty years ago) link

'as it was damaging their sales outside of the Caribbean'!!! who said capitalism and tolerance don't go together!

dave q, Thursday, 3 July 2003 11:28 (twenty years ago) link

Okay, maybe I'm reading way too much into this, but...look at Buju Banton's hands in the photograph. He's making a sign over his crotch that some people use to indicate a vagina. And I invite you to try to sit that way yourself...it does not feel like a very natural position to me. I'm guessing Banton is making the sign to mock the folks in the photograph with him.

^^^^ i almost posted the exact same thing, it seems really weird!

a perfect urkel (gbx), Saturday, 17 October 2009 21:06 (fourteen years ago) link

remember omar, homophobia or even being a white power creep like some of those norway black metal dudes is no sin compared to being an semi-popular indie rock band that uncool ppl like

headroom (max) (M@tt He1ges0n), Saturday, 17 October 2009 21:14 (fourteen years ago) link

^^^^ i almost posted the exact same thing, it seems really weird!

― a perfect urkel (gbx), Saturday, October 17, 2009 5:06 PM

even after seeing the pic i posted?

am0n, Saturday, 17 October 2009 23:25 (fourteen years ago) link

nine months pass...

It's "Gary."

http://www.alfingers.com/news/busy-signal-gary/

Pete Scholtes, Tuesday, 27 July 2010 07:20 (thirteen years ago) link

one year passes...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W90Moq_InEc

am0n, Friday, 18 May 2012 22:19 (eleven years ago) link

i don't even know what this is supposed to mean

http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/assets/8071090/ed-cart-thursday-17-may.jpg

am0n, Friday, 18 May 2012 22:25 (eleven years ago) link

i'm not completely convinced. just a reminder that last time beenie "apologized" he came out with this right after:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5NDcksC0wQ

chilli, Saturday, 19 May 2012 00:42 (eleven years ago) link

hell of a bellybutton on that gay community

why is beenie man wearing a stethoscope?

The Reverend, Saturday, 19 May 2012 06:03 (eleven years ago) link

because he is The Doctor

bentelec, Saturday, 19 May 2012 06:11 (eleven years ago) link

Beenie looks away from the camera too much to make me think he feels it in his heart, but he feels it in his head.

bendy, Saturday, 19 May 2012 06:22 (eleven years ago) link

The 100% cynical response of the people in the Observer video is probably otm, unfortunately.

The US recently cancelled the visas of a couple of dancehall acts and governments within the Caribbean, including Barbados and St Lucia, have started to refuse big-name stars work permits to play there.

Irrespective of whether it's heartfelt or not, it's still the right message.

Just like you, except hot (ShariVari), Saturday, 19 May 2012 06:54 (eleven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dwS82qLToI

evolution is obfuscation, per crit darling (and upcoming no doubt collaborator - can't wait) busy

r|t|c, Saturday, 19 May 2012 14:29 (eleven years ago) link

"link with the rainbow" seems pretty clear to me, but yeah most artists avoid directly targeting homosexuals these days because of all the visa issues

chilli, Saturday, 19 May 2012 19:42 (eleven years ago) link

Buju Banton is undeniably gay

Morrissey & Clunes: The Severed Alliance (PaulTMA), Sunday, 20 May 2012 01:06 (eleven years ago) link

smgdh

The Reverend, Wednesday, 23 May 2012 21:27 (eleven years ago) link

one month passes...

it got kind of buried under the anderson cooper and frank ocean stories, but diana king ("shy guy") came out of the closet this week, too

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/05/diana-king-comes-out-jama_n_1652189.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular

radical ferry (donna rouge), Friday, 6 July 2012 16:42 (eleven years ago) link

cool.

chain the color of am0n (The Reverend), Friday, 6 July 2012 16:53 (eleven years ago) link

I like her description of homophobia as a "heavy burden".

chain the color of am0n (The Reverend), Friday, 6 July 2012 17:05 (eleven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.