Sea Devils And Die: GeroniMoffat's Doctor Who In The 2010s

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (6943 of them)

(In those he just talks over the guest and steps on their stories to get in effusive praise that they are the most PHENOMENAL talent in their field, possibly ever!)

naked hdsl (sic), Wednesday, 27 July 2011 03:56 (twelve years ago) link

That too

Crazed Mister Handy (kingfish), Wednesday, 27 July 2011 04:40 (twelve years ago) link

Ha, that line at the end of the BBC America trailer is totally Moffat laughing at everybody.

James Mitchell, Wednesday, 27 July 2011 04:42 (twelve years ago) link

river song with an eyepatch, like kovarians, is playing with my head

Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Saturday, 30 July 2011 20:06 (twelve years ago) link

I hope it turns out she's Melanie Bush.

50,000 raspberries with the face of Peter Ndlovu (aldo), Saturday, 30 July 2011 20:49 (twelve years ago) link

river song with an eyepatch, like kovarians, is playing with my head

― Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Saturday, July 30, 2011 4:06 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

This. Would it be completely insane, given that River can maybe regenerate (perhaps, if she is the time baby from early on), that she IS Madame Kovarian somehow? And thus engineers her younger self to kill the Doctor in the spacesuit while her (slightly) younger self tries to stop this from happening?

That feels too timey-wimey but Moffat loves that shit.

Somewhere between Fergie and Jesus (Alex in Montreal), Saturday, 30 July 2011 22:55 (twelve years ago) link

Kind of wish Moffat would calm down on this shit slightly myself. I still think his best Who scripts are all from the Rusty era.

Inevitable stupid samba mix (chap), Sunday, 31 July 2011 01:25 (twelve years ago) link

I do like the fact that the show is finally getting to grips with time travel and its complexities, though, rather than just using it to arrive somewhere for adventure of the week (not that there's necessarily anything wrong with that)

not bulimic, just a cat (James Morrison), Sunday, 31 July 2011 01:43 (twelve years ago) link

Oh yeah, I´m totally up for all that in theory, I just think Moffat´s plotting has been far less elegant as show runner than when it was on a smaller scale... A tad overambitious perhaps.

Inevitable stupid samba mix (chap), Sunday, 31 July 2011 01:49 (twelve years ago) link

Can people please, please stop talking on the thread about things in trailers that some of us might like to be surprised by in a narrative context?

naked hdsl (sic), Sunday, 31 July 2011 05:42 (twelve years ago) link

i doubt it tbh. no point posting the trailers if their contents then can't be referred to at all.

blueski, Sunday, 31 July 2011 11:15 (twelve years ago) link

well...

naked hdsl (sic), Sunday, 31 July 2011 12:15 (twelve years ago) link

^ uses flashblock

naked hdsl (sic), Sunday, 31 July 2011 12:15 (twelve years ago) link

i'm inclined to say just don't look at the thread it if you're gonna be so precious about what amounts to no spoilers? but this thread has always played by its own weird rules about spoilers, so i'm not gonna say it very loudly.

remy bean, Sunday, 31 July 2011 12:21 (twelve years ago) link

Could we post the trailer up and then talk about it? I haven't seen it so really have no idea what's going on up thread, so feel your frustration sic, but if a trailer is available surely we could have it on the thread and chat about it?

all microwaves must be destroyed (captain rosie), Monday, 1 August 2011 07:29 (twelve years ago) link

Trailer's up the thread a bit, hence why people were talking about it.

ailsa, Monday, 1 August 2011 08:44 (twelve years ago) link

Duh, I'm a twunt.

all microwaves must be destroyed (captain rosie), Monday, 1 August 2011 10:17 (twelve years ago) link

Yeah, I reckon discussing trailers is fair game.

Inevitable stupid samba mix (chap), Monday, 1 August 2011 11:45 (twelve years ago) link

i'm inclined to say just don't look at the thread it if you're gonna be so precious about what amounts to no spoilers?

but I really like the theorising and discussion and nerding out about what's actually aired!

but this thread has always played by its own weird rules about spoilers, so i'm not gonna say it very loudly.

yeah that's the thing - it's not like I'm whinging on the Community thread about all the casting spoilers for imminent episodes.

I do take some strength from the dude in charge of the show these days having p much the same attitude as me though - that the episodes themselves are written to pace reveals and twists and shocks in a dramatic way, and that spoilers fuck up the storytelling for (most of) the audience and the author's intent

naked hdsl (sic), Monday, 1 August 2011 12:16 (twelve years ago) link

A trailer is not a spoiler. If it's been broadcast, it's fair game.

Matt DC, Monday, 1 August 2011 12:18 (twelve years ago) link

it's a spoiler if the creator didn't want it in the trailer! [not that I'm saying that's happened this time, just that Moffatt's been frustrated by it before. but 99.7% of pre-movie movie trailers are total, awful spoilers]

that argument last time turned into Suzy saying if it was in the Radio Times, or talked about in breakfast television on BBC Scotland, then it was "out there" and there was no way anyone could possibly not immediately report it on this thread. slippery slope innit.

anyway sorry for getting tedious, I was just quietly asking nicely ^^

naked hdsl (sic), Monday, 1 August 2011 13:05 (twelve years ago) link

AAAAAAAAAAAAARGH.

murdoch most foul (suzy), Monday, 1 August 2011 13:35 (twelve years ago) link

xpost Moffat has no problem with official trailers because I do believe those are approved of by the showrunner but he does have a problem with people who attend preview screenings and -then- post spoilers, particularly important plot spoilers. Which I totally understand, while most of whom who do attend the screenings are quick to just write something along the lines eg "a more darker season in tone, a surprise in episode 4, will blow your mind" etc, there are one or two who do let out key plot details and which I have seen floating around in many places. The trailers just show you glimpses but as far as i can see don't really tell you about what's actually going to happen.

Roz, Monday, 1 August 2011 14:53 (twelve years ago) link

this thread is the most spoiler neurotic tv thread i've read on ilx, which either says something about doctor who, or about the kinds of ppl who watch it

Mordy, Monday, 1 August 2011 15:01 (twelve years ago) link

Ha ha, could it be because of river songs catchphrase feeding into reality?

all microwaves must be destroyed (captain rosie), Monday, 1 August 2011 15:10 (twelve years ago) link

lol probably the latter xpost

Roz, Monday, 1 August 2011 15:18 (twelve years ago) link

Just noticed: Doctor Who credits RT Davies when his ideas are used (ie Ood) in Moffat-era Who

Torchwood does not, and never has, credited Moffatt, despite him creating Torchwood's main character, Captain Jack

not bulimic, just a cat (James Morrison), Tuesday, 2 August 2011 03:40 (twelve years ago) link

think moffat'd want to distance himself tbh

a dry, airless meringue (reddening), Tuesday, 2 August 2011 03:58 (twelve years ago) link

remember when there was something hiding in the darkness after death and it was a blue cgi minotaur

a dry, airless meringue (reddening), Tuesday, 2 August 2011 03:59 (twelve years ago) link

Did Moffatt create Captain Jack or just write the episode in which Rusty wanted him introduced?

Matt DC, Tuesday, 2 August 2011 09:28 (twelve years ago) link

Jack is surely just RTD's big wet dream and if Moffat thought he worked as a big broody lead character at all I'd be bitterly disappointed.

blueski, Tuesday, 2 August 2011 12:03 (twelve years ago) link

Did Moffatt create Captain Jack or just write the episode in which Rusty wanted him introduced?

Iirc RTD created the character, Moffatt just happened to write the first episodes in which he was to appear in.

online pinata store (Nicole), Tuesday, 2 August 2011 13:42 (twelve years ago) link

Enjoying the AV Club's current series of classic Who reviews:

http://www.avclub.com/tvclub/tvshow/doctor-who-classic,186/

Inevitable stupid samba mix (chap), Tuesday, 9 August 2011 05:11 (twelve years ago) link

Chap raises an interesting point re: "inelegant plotting," although do admire the general anarchy of it.

his best Who scripts are all from the Rusty era

This however I totally disagree with -- thought "Big Bang" and the Christmas ep were as good as anything he's done.

Chuck_Tatum, Tuesday, 9 August 2011 10:56 (twelve years ago) link

Eleventh Hour was splendid

generous loller at dollies (sic), Tuesday, 9 August 2011 11:00 (twelve years ago) link

Indeed it was, but not Empty Child or Blink splendid IMO.

Inevitable stupid samba mix (chap), Tuesday, 9 August 2011 20:05 (twelve years ago) link

best "new Doctor" episode ever - it had a different job to do than a Blink or Empty Child

generous loller at dollies (sic), Wednesday, 10 August 2011 01:38 (twelve years ago) link

I think the Moffat scripts from RTD's era are more well thought of because their quality stood out in relief to some of the crap episodes that surrounded them, and that's not the case now because episodes are more consistently decent. If that makes sense.

online pinata store (Nicole), Wednesday, 10 August 2011 02:26 (twelve years ago) link

Also he could concentrate on one story a year.

Gukbe, Wednesday, 10 August 2011 02:33 (twelve years ago) link

Moffatt's also changed the format to have more through-season continuity (Bad Wolf nonsense aside), which makes single episodes less able to stand completely out

generous loller at dollies (sic), Wednesday, 10 August 2011 02:33 (twelve years ago) link

There have been reports of budget cuts being behind the BBC’s decision not to air a full season of Doctor Who during 2012—

Absolute nonsense. First of all, we are airing in 2012. The only thing that’s happening is that we’re moving a bit later...There’s lots of reasons for that that will become clear quite soon...It is certainly not a reduced episode count. Do you think the BBC would really let that happen? With an average audience of 10 million?…Doctor Who’s international profile is huge. It’s never been more successful. You’re not going to reduce a show like this. The opposite is going to happen, in fact.

Daily Beast interview with Moffatt

Gukbe, Tuesday, 23 August 2011 19:54 (twelve years ago) link

Wow, the interviewer must be a dullard that takes tigerbeatdown seriously.

¯\(°_o)/¯ (Nicole), Tuesday, 23 August 2011 20:22 (twelve years ago) link

Well, that sucked.

Melissa W, Saturday, 27 August 2011 20:02 (twelve years ago) link

explains why it took a whole hour for this thread to reappear

Once Were Moderators (DG), Saturday, 27 August 2011 20:07 (twelve years ago) link

shut up, hitler.

i enjoyed it (as per) - loved the fan continuity baiting - not so sure what it means in the arc of things.

the numskulls robot reminded me of when i watched the sontaran experiment as a teeny. there's a sequence where the sontaran was watching the humans on a monitor via a camera that's in a pendant round one fella's neck. the way the pendant lay on his chest i thought the sontaran was inside the man.

Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Saturday, 27 August 2011 20:11 (twelve years ago) link

heartbroken about the missed opportunity for some sort of who/'allo 'allo crossover episode :(

Once Were Moderators (DG), Saturday, 27 August 2011 20:53 (twelve years ago) link

Aside from being reminiscent of Meet Dave, this was really quite good!

Gukbe, Saturday, 27 August 2011 21:00 (twelve years ago) link

I enjoyed it, but I did watch it with someone who hasn't seen much of the Matt Smith series and he was very confused indeed.

What happened to Hitler in the end?

emil.y, Saturday, 27 August 2011 21:06 (twelve years ago) link

He's still in the closet. OH NOES GAY AGENDAR

50,000 raspberries with the face of Peter Ndlovu (aldo), Saturday, 27 August 2011 21:10 (twelve years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.