can't believe jay batman returned and i was asleep ;_;
― markers, Wednesday, 15 June 2011 19:29 (1 year ago) Permalink
wait, he got sb'd? ;_; rip lolz
― markers, Wednesday, 15 June 2011 19:30 (1 year ago) Permalink
mod banned iirc
― burberry kush (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 15 June 2011 19:34 (1 year ago) Permalink
ah, thx -- goodnight sweet knight
― markers, Wednesday, 15 June 2011 19:40 (1 year ago) Permalink
wanted to respond to this from the now locked og batman thread:
― ...wow! (Le Bateau Ivre), Monday, June 13, 2011 6:48 PM (2 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink(Markers you magnificent bastard <3 If ever a gif was appropriate it's this one, made before this Batmeltdown on here)― ...wow! (Le Bateau Ivre), Monday, June 13, 2011 6:49 PM
― ...wow! (Le Bateau Ivre), Monday, June 13, 2011 6:48 PM (2 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
(Markers you magnificent bastard <3 If ever a gif was appropriate it's this one, made before this Batmeltdown on here)
― ...wow! (Le Bateau Ivre), Monday, June 13, 2011 6:49 PM
lmao <3 awesome move & full cred 2 u now and forever for bringing that image into a jb context
― markers, Wednesday, 15 June 2011 20:23 (1 year ago) Permalink
Thin-skinned WND douchebag to sue Esquire, doesn't understand parody/satire law is fairly settled.
― Shart Shaped Box (Phil D.), Friday, 17 June 2011 18:47 (1 year ago) Permalink
It's not the founding fathers these dudes love, it's the romantic idea of the founding fathers, which absolves them of responsibility for the present. What did the founding fathers think about the income tax, health care, abortion, oil, war in the middle east, etc? Pretty much nothing.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 17 June 2011 20:01 (1 year ago) Permalink
well hasn't that always been the thing with these dorks? strict constitutionalists that also like to bloviate about what the founders would have thought about modern developments. it's like one or the other, guys
― all the pretty HOOSes (gbx), Friday, 17 June 2011 20:03 (1 year ago) Permalink
hitchens evisceration of mamets book is pretty good but even funnier than hitch's review are the actual quotes from the book, such as
"The BP gulf oil leak . . . was bad. The leak of thousands of classified military documents by Julian Assange on WikiLeaks was good. Why?"
― ☂ (max), Saturday, 18 June 2011 16:16 (1 year ago) Permalink
shockingly, wingnutdaily "op-ed" begins: "I know this sounds crazy."
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=312393
Yet, all it would take is for one state to recognize that – real or fraudulent – the document he released affirms he does not meet the requirements of a "natural born citizen." In fact, he is a walking, talking, breathing example of what a "natural born citizen" is not – complete with the dual loyalties the founders feared.
June 18, 2011
― reggie (qualmsley), Saturday, 18 June 2011 19:53 (1 year ago) Permalink
how are they going to fill a week, is my other questioneverything they've listed so far could be knocked out in an afternoon― anarcho-misogynist puppies (DJP), Wednesday, June 15, 2011 3:47 PM (3 days ago)
everything they've listed so far could be knocked out in an afternoon
― anarcho-misogynist puppies (DJP), Wednesday, June 15, 2011 3:47 PM (3 days ago)
lets be fair given the parenting that leads to sending your kids to something like this odds are the kids will be a little slow
― lemon kerrang! (jjjusten), Saturday, 18 June 2011 20:12 (1 year ago) Permalink
If I were as prone to sloganizing as Mamet, I’d keep clear of bumper-sticker comparisons altogether.
I wonder what a smart but mislead writer like Mamet thinks about being taken down by an equally smart writer who a) can't be easily dismissed as an idiot and b) can't be dismissed a mere ideological analog? I bet a Mamet response would be predictably bellicose, but surely he'd recognize, at least privately, that he just got his ass kicked in public.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 18 June 2011 20:24 (1 year ago) Permalink
otm and the moment I finished the Hitchens review I googled around to see if Mamet had responded. Hitchens was the perfect person to get to review that book.
― Mordy, Saturday, 18 June 2011 20:32 (1 year ago) Permalink
Mamet is crazy and will continue to be crazy.
― little mushroom person (abanana), Saturday, 18 June 2011 22:58 (1 year ago) Permalink
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/167205-obama-addresses-gop-leadership-conference-
― goole, Saturday, 18 June 2011 22:59 (1 year ago) Permalink
i know we have a lawless warmonger in office and all but that shit is hilarious
― markers, Wednesday, June 15, 2011 10:23 PM (4 days ago) Bookmark
<3 <3 <3
― ...wow! (Le Bateau Ivre), Saturday, 18 June 2011 23:13 (1 year ago) Permalink
complete with the dual loyalties the founders feared
Know what else the founders feared? Getting sick and going to the doctor and HAVING LEECHES SUCK OUT THEIR BLOOD. Also smallpox, scurvy, and baths.
― Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 18 June 2011 23:30 (1 year ago) Permalink
Get a life, lib dopes. There's nothing wrong with laughing at some well-written n|i|gger jokes.Semper Fi!BY PROUD CONSERVATIVE on 06/18/2011 at 17:56
Semper Fi!BY PROUD CONSERVATIVE on 06/18/2011 at 17:56
ffs
― chupacabra - a delicious burrito (DJP), Sunday, 19 June 2011 20:16 (1 year ago) Permalink
i'm more offended by the idea that the jokes were well-written
― J0rdan S., Sunday, 19 June 2011 20:28 (1 year ago) Permalink
need to work on the drawn out end credits
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 23 June 2011 20:38 (1 year ago) Permalink
not interesting in and of itself, but evidence that the PUA-dudebro and basic 'conservative' webworlds are well connected
http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/122966/
― ~edgy~ (goole), Friday, 24 June 2011 21:01 (1 year ago) Permalink
Why the hell would you link to that from a political blog and reference PUA unless you have some weird thing about women?
― mh, Friday, 24 June 2011 22:02 (1 year ago) Permalink
The right has some weird thing about women.
― phantoms from a world gone by speak again the immortal tale: (Jenny), Friday, 24 June 2011 23:34 (1 year ago) Permalink
FYI
What the hell?? John McCain blames the illegals for the wildfires in AZ...
― Jesse, Saturday, 25 June 2011 14:44 (1 year ago) Permalink
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/06/sovereign_citizen_thrown_out_of_pizza_chain_bankru.php
The case centers around Giordano's owner John Apostolou, who was forced to give up his control of the pizza chain, which he's owned since 1988, after his businesses fell into $45.5 million worth of debt. The chain has been under bankruptcy protection since February, but Apostolou only lost control after he submitted some court filings in the style of the sovereign citizen movement. One filing declared that Apostolous and his wife are "American Freemen, free inhabitants of the Illinois state, and we find it impossible to obtain State declared Legal Tender at Law." They also said they don't believe in U.S. currency or the legal system, typical beliefs of sovereign citizens, who generally consider almost all branches of the U.S. government to be illegitimate.
― ☂ (max), Thursday, 30 June 2011 01:14 (1 year ago) Permalink
I LOVE THESE GUYS
when can we a pynchon book about these effing wackos
I knew their pizza was wrong somehow!
― mh, Thursday, 30 June 2011 05:44 (1 year ago) Permalink
What did people pay for their pizza with? Was it some kind of barter system?
― textbook blows on the head (dowd), Thursday, 30 June 2011 06:47 (1 year ago) Permalink
omg Girodano's!
― phantoms from a world gone by speak again the immortal tale: (Jenny), Thursday, 30 June 2011 11:19 (1 year ago) Permalink
so, reading into this a little, the pizza man, in dire straits, did some up some 'halp with taxes' searches on the internet, and ran into the sovereign dudes, and then hired one?
― ~edgy~ (goole), Thursday, 30 June 2011 13:13 (1 year ago) Permalink
yeah, seems like it
― ☂ (max), Thursday, 30 June 2011 13:22 (1 year ago) Permalink
iirc something similar happened to wesley snipes, though i dont think it was specifically a sovcit type
You don't need to google the truth.
― textbook blows on the head (dowd), Thursday, 30 June 2011 16:50 (1 year ago) Permalink
LOL:
The rules set up by Mall of America officials for Sarah and Bristol Palin's book signing yesterday seemed to have been written in anticipation of an army of fans."'Camping out' is not allowed," the rules read. "Beginning at 5 a.m., guests will be allowed to line up."But there was no teeming crowd of rabid Palinites at 5 a.m. And less than a half hour into the appearance of Bristol, Sarah, and Todd Palin, the crowd had dwindled to a trickle of latecomers.
"'Camping out' is not allowed," the rules read. "Beginning at 5 a.m., guests will be allowed to line up."
But there was no teeming crowd of rabid Palinites at 5 a.m. And less than a half hour into the appearance of Bristol, Sarah, and Todd Palin, the crowd had dwindled to a trickle of latecomers.
― Michael Bay, CEO of Transformers (Phil D.), Thursday, 30 June 2011 18:14 (1 year ago) Permalink
did some up some 'halp with taxes' searches on the internet, and ran into the sovereign dudes, and then hired one
what did he pay with? a hog? goods and services?
― j., Thursday, 30 June 2011 18:14 (1 year ago) Permalink
Pizza.
― phantoms from a world gone by speak again the immortal tale: (Jenny), Thursday, 30 June 2011 19:04 (1 year ago) Permalink
does he trade pizzas to his customers?
― j., Thursday, 30 June 2011 19:58 (1 year ago) Permalink
sign me up for this pizza based economic model
― brownie, Thursday, 30 June 2011 19:59 (1 year ago) Permalink
That will be a 50-pizza registration fee, please.
― you're in the club and the light hits your ass like pow (Laurel), Thursday, 30 June 2011 20:00 (1 year ago) Permalink
do you take calzones
― brownie, Thursday, 30 June 2011 20:02 (1 year ago) Permalink
What are you, some kind of foreigner?
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 30 June 2011 20:04 (1 year ago) Permalink
speaking of batshit summer camps:
http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2011/06/29/137478762/the-tuesday-podcast-libertarian-summer-camp
― gr8080+ (gr8080), Friday, 1 July 2011 18:43 (1 year ago) Permalink
From one of the first comments:
I've considered myself a Libertarian for many years, but have to say that I found their views a bit extreme. I didn't know that there were some branches of Libertarianism that were against government regulating food or medicine safety.
iow, I've been calling myself a libertarian because it sounds nice, but I have never taken the slightest effort to discover what "libertarian" might mean.
― Aimless, Friday, 1 July 2011 18:51 (1 year ago) Permalink
when I was in high school, there was maybe a 15-minute window where I thought the concept of libertarianism was worth investigating; those 15 minutes ended when I realized the person I was discussing this with was a disenfranchised just-slightly-short-of-being-racist douche who considered the Civil Rights Act to be an overreach of government
― DJP, Friday, 1 July 2011 18:55 (1 year ago) Permalink
I think that anyone who is an actual Libertarian has to think that! The rest are just enthralled with the romanticism of some ideas, imo
― mh, Friday, 1 July 2011 19:02 (1 year ago) Permalink
whenever i take that "political compass" test (something i've been doing for what seems like decades now), i wind up deep in left/libertarian territory, between the little "dalai lama" and "nelson mandela" dots.
Economic Left/Right: -4.88Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.69
this inclined me, once upon a time, to think that i might actually be a libertarian. at least until i found out what actual, real-world "libertarians" were all about. now i have no home. :(
― And the piano, it sounds like a carnivore (contenderizer), Friday, 1 July 2011 19:08 (1 year ago) Permalink
come on yall, there is such a thing as left libertarianism
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 1 July 2011 19:10 (1 year ago) Permalink
Kinda feel that we should merege our dns
― start having sex eugenically w/ (Michael White), Friday, 26 April 2013 19:56 (4 weeks ago) Permalink
How about I just blame the patriarchy for your dn.
― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Friday, 26 April 2013 19:59 (4 weeks ago) Permalink
Works for me
― start having sex eugenically w/ (Michael White), Friday, 26 April 2013 20:06 (4 weeks ago) Permalink
can't stop won't stop
http://nydwracu.wordpress.com/2013/05/12/dubstep-and-neoreactionary-aesthetics/
― goole, Monday, 13 May 2013 02:09 (1 week ago) Permalink
Christ that blog is exhausting.
― beach situations (Austerity Ponies), Tuesday, 14 May 2013 14:28 (1 week ago) Permalink
http://www.examiner.com/article/analysis-irs-political-suppression-cost-romney-the-2012-election
― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 23 May 2013 03:40 (Yesterday) Permalink
In my final prediction of November 5 of last year, just one day before the election, I took into the account the best information on hand to project that Mitt Romney would win the election narrowly with 275 electoral votes and a slim majority of the popular vote.
― Doctor Casino, Thursday, 23 May 2013 03:47 (Yesterday) Permalink
and romney's camp actually believed that creep.
― oxygenating our wombspace (abanana), Thursday, 23 May 2013 07:00 (Yesterday) Permalink
this guy's argument makes no sense. if the Tea Party groups were campaigning for Romney, doesn't that mean they shouldn't have had tax exempt status...?
― four Marxes plus four Obamas plus four Bin Ladens (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 23 May 2013 17:09 (Yesterday) Permalink
Yup. If harrasing the groups influenced the election, then harrasing the groups was the right thing to do...
― Frederik B, Thursday, 23 May 2013 17:25 (Yesterday) Permalink
not USA but still intersting
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/05/23/the-fascist-history-behind-dominique-venner-s-suicide-at-notre-dame.html
― goole, Thursday, 23 May 2013 18:28 (Yesterday) Permalink
Venner started several political groups based on European nationalism and rooted in the idea of ethnicity-based exceptionalism. His Europe-Action espoused a similar racialized ideology and united the remnants of the FEN, a white supremacist student group; the OAS; and handful unapologetic Nazi collaborators. These movements united a number of discordant strains—white supremacism, anti-communism, patriarchal morality, neo-pagan tribal religion—into a grand story about what must be done to save European culture from extermination.
getting better
http://www.examiner.com/article/what-did-nate-silver-know-and-when-did-he-know-it
― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 23 May 2013 19:05 (Yesterday) Permalink
you guys must be putting save-a-Bam Democrat shit in this thread by now, right?
― ballin' from Maine to Mexico (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 23 May 2013 19:06 (Yesterday) Permalink
no that's for the general politics thread
― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 23 May 2013 19:11 (Yesterday) Permalink