Hip Hop taken to new levels.

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (755 of them)

I'd like to congratulate you all on the ridiculous level of immaturity that has been present throughout this thread.
Its been cool guys.

― ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 16:38 (twenty years ago) link

Hello, pot? This is kettle. You have a call on line one: something regarding blackness."

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 17 November 2003 16:42 (twenty years ago) link

The original poster didn't say that he wanted more "progressive" hip hop - he said he wanted more "experimental" hip hop. There's a difference. So rather than jumping on him for supposedly claiming that hip hop as it currently exists is "not progressive", which as far as I can see he never said, why not listen to what he's actually saying. Surely there are many innovative and even experimental things going on even in the most popular hip hop, but if someone wants to seek out hip hop with a more self-consciously "out" (in the jazz sense) approach, why should we want to stop them?

― o. nate (onate), Monday, 17 November 2003 16:46 (twenty years ago) link

also, being called "immature" on these boards is something Dan Perry is extremely used to

― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 17 November 2003 16:47 (twenty years ago) link

A badge of honor he wears with pride!

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 17 November 2003 16:47 (twenty years ago) link

Hello, pot? This is kettle. You have a call on line one: something regarding blackness."

How exactly was I being immature?
Looking up people's personal information on the internet? Oh wait, that was someone else.
Personal insults? Nope, someone else again.
Comparisons to other board members held in less esteem?
Nope, that would be other people too.

An attempt to have a frank discussion about music? How "immature" of me.
Did you even READ this thread, "nickalicious"? Maybe you'll pay attention if I use yr email address to track down yr personal information.

to o. nate - who said I was trying to stop him? as I said before - "he can listen to whatever he damn well pleases."

― ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 16:48 (twenty years ago) link

Do you mean point #3, Oops? I think that's what makes P73 unique, at least on Vocal Studies, is the treatment of vocals.

― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 17 November 2003 16:49 (twenty years ago) link

once again: you called Dan Perry immature, and I said he's used to being called that. are we clear now?

― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 17 November 2003 16:49 (twenty years ago) link

(hi, Dan!)

― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 17 November 2003 16:50 (twenty years ago) link

(Blithely ignoring the rest of this thread, which makes me embarrassed, frankly.)

― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 17 November 2003 16:50 (twenty years ago) link

Frankly, I think the original poster would enjoy the Vaudeville Villain album, perhaps. The production on it is far from the standard p-funk/rock/jazz samples.

― ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 16:56 (twenty years ago) link

Yeah,you're right jaymc. I dunno why I applied #4 to Prefuse.
Though he way he treats vocals is just one of the things that mark his stuff as 'experimental'. (can we think of a new word for this concept?)

― oops (Oops), Monday, 17 November 2003 16:58 (twenty years ago) link

I don't much like the word "experimental" either, maybe "out" is better. Basically I think the idea is music that sacrifices the goal of accessibility and puts a premium on trying to fuck with as many of the variables as possible - to create something that will make people scratch their heads and say WTF?

― o. nate (onate), Monday, 17 November 2003 17:01 (twenty years ago) link

ddrake, my comment towards you was much more addressed at your lame putdowns than anything else. Totally fucking cringeworthy. The error was in not singling out anyone else because a good 85% of this thread reads like a transcript of the time trials for the 2004 Cringelympics.

Sadly, because life is deeply unfair, I have no interest or desire in going back and singling out everyone on the thread who was acting the ass, so you'll have to settle for the following:

ATTENTION ILM PLEASE EAT A GIGANTIC DISEASED DICK OK THX

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 17 November 2003 17:02 (twenty years ago) link

I HAD any "putdowns"?

― ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 17:04 (twenty years ago) link

ha ha ha I laugh and I laugh

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 17 November 2003 17:04 (twenty years ago) link

I would like to hear what serialist hip-hop might sound like.

― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 17 November 2003 17:04 (twenty years ago) link

vol 1, vol 2, vol 3?

― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 17 November 2003 17:15 (twenty years ago) link

― o. nate (onate), Monday, 17 November 2003 17:17 (twenty years ago) link

STEE-V RIKE "Hip Hop For 18 Rappers"

― donut bitch (donut), Monday, 17 November 2003 18:29 (twenty years ago) link

Modern Directions in Flow by The Ma$e Electronic Orchestra

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 17 November 2003 18:30 (twenty years ago) link

DJ Spooky?

― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 17 November 2003 18:39 (twenty years ago) link

oh shit, forgot all about him. good call.
you hear that, James? James???

― oops (Oops), Monday, 17 November 2003 18:42 (twenty years ago) link

okay totally deraling but...

J0hn I'm surprised you aren't giving Baraka the benefit of the doubt, y'know, poetic license and all. And the "one state westward" stuff was about how your position is exactly that of the Democratic governor of New Jersey, James McGreevey, who eliminated the New Jersey Poet Laureate position because Baraka wouldn't resign - somebody said "at least he's not Rick Santorum," who is of course one state westward in Pennsylvania.

Read more about it from Baraka's p.o.v. if you like. Not saying I agree with his reasoning all of the time, but the attempts to silence him because he dare write a poem are outrageous and uncalled for.

― hstencil, Monday, 17 November 2003 18:43 (twenty years ago) link

h - I oppose all attempts to silence Baraka! still think that poem (and misogyny in The Dutchman and several other positions he's taken over the years) are sufficient to justify interrogating his other works. Didn't call for his resignation/revocation, have been reading his work since 1984, have enough respect for his brilliant rhetorical & poetic capabilities that I go a little off the rails when I think he's full of shit.

― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 17 November 2003 18:52 (twenty years ago) link

okay, fair enough. The whole brouhaha over that poem really bugs me (mostly because it's not a very good poem, thus not worth the hassle) because 1) he easily could've been writing in character, 2) the myth about Israeli workers staying home that day was widespread and thus worth writing about, I think, and 3) it's not like most of the cricitisms actually talked to why, if he believed the myth, which I find frustrating.

but that's all for a different thread I s'pose.

― hstencil, Monday, 17 November 2003 18:57 (twenty years ago) link

I agree with ddrake, in general. And cinniblount, I dunno why you kept going after him and saying he "played dodgeball" and "didn't get into Oberlin", he was arguing for basically the same position you were. As for the kid who actually started the thread, I think you're looking for some anticon-type stuff(maybe even anti-pop consortium). If so, god help you, 'cause I generally find it unlistenable, and their claim that they are "progressive hip hop" or "beyond hip hop" laughable at best.

― Big Boi, Monday, 17 November 2003 19:35 (twenty years ago) link

cinniblount, I dunno why you kept going after him and saying he "played dodgeball" and "didn't get into Oberlin", he was arguing for basically the same position you were.

Maybe it is because ddrake cannot state his opinion on anything in a way that doesn't reek of asshattery.

― El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Monday, 17 November 2003 19:40 (twenty years ago) link

and their claim that they are "progressive hip hop" or "beyond hip hop" laughable at best

"I don't like it, therefore claims that it's good are specious"

― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 17 November 2003 19:42 (twenty years ago) link

You really don't think anticon sucks? You buy their hype that they're "beyond hip hop"? They're just pandering to your own desire to feel that the music you're listening to is "advanced".

― Big Boi, Monday, 17 November 2003 19:45 (twenty years ago) link

good != progressive or advanced

― oops (Oops), Monday, 17 November 2003 19:46 (twenty years ago) link

Big Boi you're not talking to me, I don't have any opinion re: Anticon. I'm pointing out that your stance seems less critical than "omg that music sux0rz!"

― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 17 November 2003 19:47 (twenty years ago) link

And that doesn't mean that I think their music is bad and anyone who likes it is an idiot. There's no allowing for taste. It just means that their posturing is just as contrived as The Strokes'.

― Big Boi, Monday, 17 November 2003 19:48 (twenty years ago) link

And I think a lot of their fans buy into that, consciously or subconsciously. Progressive or advanced doesn't necessarily mean good, and it definitely doesn't mean you have to disrespect those who came before you. There's really an air of superiority to the way Anticon goes about their business.

― Big Boi, Monday, 17 November 2003 19:50 (twenty years ago) link

http://www.internetclass.com/shaking%20hands.jpg

― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 17 November 2003 19:51 (twenty years ago) link

Egotism? In hip-hop? Get out! *winky*

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 17 November 2003 19:52 (twenty years ago) link

when we don't like it it's egotism, when we like it it's bravado

― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 17 November 2003 19:54 (twenty years ago) link

It's beyond just that though. It takes a certain level of condescension to call your album "Music For the Advancement of Hip Hop" and keep saying "fuck hip hop", "hip hop is dead", etc, in your interviews. I mean yeah, Hip Hop is stale in places, but it's also big enough to encompass a lot of different scenes within it. I'm not the biggest Def Jux fan in the world, but at least the people actually making the music there don't turn their nose up when the words "hip hop" are mentioned. The respect is still there. My own dislike of anticon's music exacerbates the problem, but even without that I don't wanna listen to someone who's gonna disrespect those who came before them. Especially because, with hip hop, if you're an almost entirely white crew, and you say "fuck hip hop", you're making a racial statement too, whether you realize it or not.

― Big Boi, Monday, 17 November 2003 20:01 (twenty years ago) link

it sure gets them a lot of attention though, doesn't it? Hmm...

― oops (Oops), Monday, 17 November 2003 20:04 (twenty years ago) link

Big Boi I actually agree with you on most of this, I just get really tired of all the hatoration that gets put on undie hip-hop around here. Your point about white crews making blanket statements about the health of hip-hop is well-taken.

― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 17 November 2003 20:05 (twenty years ago) link

Fair enough John. I don't mean to make a blanket statement about indie hip hop, as my favorite stuff often tends to come from the small labels (Subterraneous, for example, should definitely be checked out. Subverse does it up right too.) I just have my own problems with anticon, and some of the attitudes that they promote.

― Big Boi, Monday, 17 November 2003 20:10 (twenty years ago) link

Actually I entirely agree with Big Boi, and I like some Anticon stuff. They themselves (or Doseone at the very least) have admitted that Music for the Advancement of Hip-Hop was a horrible title.

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 17 November 2003 20:14 (twenty years ago) link

since no one has mentioned it yet, I have a good amount of love for that new Omid record, and for Mush Records generally--they do the semi-instrumental and experimental stuff w/o coming across like they're having an identity crisis on wax. it's smart and tweaks conventions a bit w/o forgoing what hip-hop fans by and large like about hip-hop, and it's a good bridge to weirder stuff.

― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 17 November 2003 20:23 (twenty years ago) link

(just as important, it's a good bridge from weirder stuff to mainstream stuff)

― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 17 November 2003 20:24 (twenty years ago) link

Well, if it takes someone else saying it for people to agree with me, so be it, listen to big boi.
Not like that's not what I've been saying this entire time or anything....

― ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 20:36 (twenty years ago) link

Is it? Really?

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 17 November 2003 20:37 (twenty years ago) link

It is now!

― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 17 November 2003 20:38 (twenty years ago) link

Um, no, its always what I've been saying.

Notice how big boi kicked it off with "I agree with ddrake."

― ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 20:43 (twenty years ago) link

and would you like the rest of us to follow suit, then? because even when we agree with you, and a lot of us do, the idea that we're supposed to begin our posts with "I agree with ddrake" seems to be a running theme in your posts.

― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 17 November 2003 20:44 (twenty years ago) link

Nonsense.
When did I ever say that?
Where were all these people backing me up back when Ned and his ethugs were smacking me down for the first half of this thread?
Why do even the people who agree with me feel the need to constantly give me shit?

― ddrake, Monday, 17 November 2003 20:46 (twenty years ago) link

Skipping 655 messages at this point... Click here if you want to load them all.

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.