Sea Devils And Die: GeroniMoffat's Doctor Who In The 2010s

The thing I found most frustrating about the rusty book is that some of his initial ideas for episodes are so incredibly good. But then he just doesn't have the self control or the work ethic to actually sit down and write them properly and so lots of them ended up coming out samey and shit (although when they didn't, we got things like Midnight). I think he spent too much of his time rewriting other people's scripts when he should really have been getting other people to rewrite his.

He can't do endings, basically.

Exhibit A: Queer as Folk

The one bit I remember liking/laughing at from the Writer's Tale is RTD's awe/disbelief that Moffat had already planned out his whole season ahead of time.

If you all had read his book Damaged Goods, you wouldn't have been as disappointed in his Who episodes.

He can't do endings, basically.

i think this is reflected in the last ep or two of tw: children of earth as well.

no issues with how he resolved s1 (esp. considering a regeneration would not have been part of the original plan) and s2. once rose was out of the picture he seemed to struggle much more, but bringing her back just made a bigger mess.

It's funny how when it comes to all this, we talk all about the writers and never about the directors. Total opposite of what happens with cinema, generally.

In TV the director's not the boss, the producers are. There's a number of reasons for that but the main one is that Dr Who needs to look and feel like Dr Who, just like ER needs to look and feel like ER. There's precious little room for putting any sort of individual stamp on the acting, the camera movement, the lighting, etc. So the only differences from week to week are going to be in the scripts.

If you all had read his book Damaged Goods, you wouldn't have been as disappointed in his Who episodes.

― low-rent black gangster nicknamed Bootsy (DJP), Friday, 3 June 2011 21:11 (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Highly important and otm point made here. It's a good but not great book with weird/stupid bits.

I think the pacing of a Who episode is really important and there are some that have felt so manic that they've been difficult to follow or care about, and that's certainly a directing issue. Some episodes just FEEL totally different from one another and it's not just an issue of which era or planet they're taking place in.

xp I just realised I can't remember a single thing about Damaged Goods (apart from somebody being called something Tyler)

depressed 80s tenement housing (can't remember the British term for this... council estate?) taken over by an alien made of trash; a pivotal subplot involves an HIV-positive gay man lusting after the Doctor's male companion, who before this book had been described as a relentlessly upbeat former cop from the 30th century who was relentlessly, deadly serious about his procedural work, but for some reason in this book decided to fuck the HIV-positive man in the middle of a stakeout, leading up to a horribly facile and offensive coda after The Big Fight where it's discovered that this tryst injected the HIV-positive man with future antibodies that cure HIV

all of the previous was totally unnecessary to the plot and counter to the characterization of the Doctor's companion; not so much the gay tryst, as much as it happening in the middle of him doing his job

(the fawning praise of that book at the time made me realize that fans and authors co-existing on the same newsgroup wasn't necessarily a good thing)

i am almost dreading the next ep wrt pace, altho the second preview clip has quite a laid back 'calm before the storm' feel. that scene probably occurs within the first five mins.

Damaged Goods contains a gay character, David, and homosexuality is a recurring theme explored in much of Davies's writing, as he himself noted in an article for The Guardian newspaper in 2003. "The first gay character I ever wrote was a Devil-worshipping Nazi lesbian in a Children's BBC thriller, Dark Season. She was too busy taking over the world to do anything particularly lesbian, though she did keep a Teutonic Valkyrie by her side at all times... Once I'd started, I never stopped... I even wrote a Doctor Who novel in which the six-foot blond, blue-eyed companion interrupts the hunt for an interdimensional Gallifreyan War Machine to get a blowjob in the back of a taxi. Like you do."[4]

no you fucking don't, not if you actually understand the characters you are writing rather than trying to get your personal wank material published

taken over by an alien made of trash

Sub-absorbaloff at best

actually the trash alien was an out-of-control Gallifreyan war machine; I have managed to block out almost everything about the book that I liked, lol

holy shit, are these books canonical + like approved by the estate? i can't even imagine...

Before the new series, they were semi-canonical; now they are kind of in a weird limbo space because the books bent over backwards to incorporate show canon (including the McGann movie) but the show has this on-again, off-again view of book canonicity (I think some of the monsters introduced in the books have been off-handed mentions in the series, but then again you have at least one instance of an entire book story being repurposed into a TV story).

sometimes really tempted to read The Dying Days and Lungbarrow

and THEN, when the BBC took the Doctor Who license back from Virgin, Virgin spun off into a new series using Benny, the Doctor's most popular Virgin book companion, which had its own set of weird canon synchronicities with the official BBC book line

Like, seriously, never mention Canon to Who fans. Wiggy McGann doesn't count for some people because 'The Movie' was technically that, a film, so doesn't count.

This idea of preserving a canon for a fictional character who has been handled by dozens of writers in multiple formats over many years is quite odd, really.

Holmes canonists are the real mentalists imo.

Oh, and UNIT DATING CONTROVERSY.

Like I've said before, if they can't even agree on the day of the earth's desctruction then consistency is basically out the window from the start.

xxp idk at least you can say "Conan Doyle and only Conan Doyle is canon", and then have fun arguments about e.g. Watson's wandering wound. Maybe he was never in the army at all!

Holmes canonists are the real mentalists imo.

lol this allows a gret tie-in to All-Consuming Fire, the Virgin NA that ties Holmes canon and Doctor Who canon together:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/2d/All-Consuming_Fire.JPG

Xpost ... I picked up The Writer's Tale from a slush pile at work and was genuinely surprised by how much it made me despise RTD. Not just for his seat-of-the-pants approach to the show, but for the attention-seeking neediness that seeped out of every single sentence.

again, none of this would have been surprising if you'd read Damaged Goods back in 1996

I was so happy that "Rose" didn't feature Billie Piper bewilderedly watching an all-male frottage party that none of his other storytelling issues really bothered me. (little did I know he was saving that type of thing for Torchwood, lol)

Anyone here going to watch the new Torchwood series on Starz? The promo for it made it look like it could be good, but.

You know, it will still be Torchwood.

I am VERY tempted to order Starz for it (much like I ordered HBO for "Game of Thrones") because I liked "Children of Earth" so much. I hope it leans more on the apocalyptic creepy side and less on the "everyone in Torchwood has sex with each other" side

(I recognize that, without that latter side, it isn't really Torchwood)

bill pullman is in the new series. i hope he doesn't have sex with anybody.

it's RTD, Bill Pullman is likely to have sex with everybody

Rusty has already said Nu Torchwood will have more sex, gay sex, sex and explosions/ridic car chases than the BBC ever let him have. He also has a helicopter (presumably this will pan out the same way as JNT spunking away the budget of Battlefield).

I am bracing myself for a scene where Gwen stops chasing a monster so she can strap on a dildo and peg Rhys

Didn't you watch Series 2? That was hinted at in the wedding episode iirc.

holy shit, are these books canonical + like approved by the estate?

the... Who family estate?

Didn't you watch Series 2? That was hinted at in the wedding episode iirc.

I vaguely remember that...?

Alium posing as Cuntstubble Gappy's mum as I remember it. Long discussion in a Mexican standoff about them all shagging.

In TV the director's not the boss, the producers are. There's a number of reasons for that but the main one is that Dr Who needs to look and feel like Dr Who, just like ER needs to look and feel like ER. There's precious little room for putting any sort of individual stamp on the acting, the camera movement, the lighting, etc. So the only differences from week to week are going to be in the scripts.

Stanley Kubrick's DOCTOR WHO

Is he?

WOULD WATCH

a pivotal subplot involves an HIV-positive gay man lusting after the Doctor's male companion, who before this book had been described as a relentlessly upbeat former cop from the 30th century who was relentlessly, deadly serious about his procedural work, but for some reason in this book decided to fuck the HIV-positive man in the middle of a stakeout

oh god I think I had managed to cut that out of my memories somehow. Cheers for the summary. My god.

In fact I'm pretty sure that that scene was the moment when I went from being intrigued by Davies's take on DW (I read it in 2003 or something) to just thoroughly wtf

Doctor Who New Series 2005 (spoilers ahoy) <-- evidence of me liking this book and making allowances for RTD, sigh

I know! I was basically all "... o_O uh waht"

Even better was reading rec.arts.drwho at the time; Kate Orman (co-plotter of that book) and her soon-to-be-husband Jon Blum were regular posters and were very keen on slapping the homophobe tag on everyone who objected to Rusty's... interesting, and not backed up by any other author before or after him, take on Chris Cwej. I think I even got into it with them or their acolytes, under the reasonable-to-me argument that Chris having a gay encounter wasn't a problem, but him having a gay encounter in the middle of a stakeout was so painfully out-of-character that there was no way to read the scene other than to think Rusty really, really, really wanted to blow a fictional blonde future Adonis, and the "justifying" coda was in actuality horrifyingly tacky and awful.

Actually perusing back through the archives, I had an overall positive impression of the book at the time even though I objected to the irrational out-of-character sexcapades, which kind of reinforces my post upthread re: forgetting everything I actually liked about the book, lol.