Pitchfork Observed

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (283 of them)

View Previous Page...

LAZY MUSIC COLLECTOR BLINDLY ACCEPTS MUSIC SUGGESTIONS BASED ON NUMERICAL SCALE

― cutty (mcutt), Tuesday, 1 November 2005 03:05 (eighteen years ago) link

Thank you, cutty, for showing us who the real geek is.

― nancyboy (nancyboy), Tuesday, 1 November 2005 03:16 (eighteen years ago) link

fuck off scott, why did you start posting here again?

― cutty (mcutt), Tuesday, 1 November 2005 03:23 (eighteen years ago) link

New thread suggestion:

Pitchfork Bashers: Classic or Dud?

― nancyboy (nancyboy), Tuesday, 1 November 2005 03:23 (eighteen years ago) link

i hate pitchfork bashers too.

― cutty (mcutt), Tuesday, 1 November 2005 03:25 (eighteen years ago) link

MUSIC APPRECIATION IS HARD WORK

RESEARCH IS THE KEY

YOU WILL REACH OTHER, MORE ACCEPTABLE CONCLUSIONS

TRUST ME: I'VE DONE MY HOMEWORK

― SO-CALLED MUSIC JOURNALISM, Tuesday, 1 November 2005 05:13 (eighteen years ago) link

pfm is good but blind faith is dud

― gear (gear), Tuesday, 1 November 2005 05:15 (eighteen years ago) link

http://www.nrk.no/img/466283.jpeg

― login name (fandango), Tuesday, 1 November 2005 05:49 (eighteen years ago) link

Pitchfork's relaunch early next year

Was this the much-trumpeted redesign that barely changed anything except to make it UNUSABLE on dial-up?

My only beef with Pitchfork really is how the Pitchforkiness seems to run so deep through the site, that with some reviews it turns a lot of (potentially) good writing bad-to-unreadable.

Most of the individual staffers and correspondents are okay-to-great, some even recognise the Pitchforkiness and manage to negotiate it well, whilst implicitly acknowledging it's stupidity.

I can pretty much deal with it's taste bias, annoying as it can sometimes be. Most sites have one.

― login name (fandango), Tuesday, 1 November 2005 08:11 (eighteen years ago) link

I try to work the word "creamy" at least once into all my stories.

― Mofrackie, Tuesday, 1 November 2005 12:45 (eighteen years ago) link

thank you cutty BECAUSE YOU WILL DIE ONE DAY AND I WILL BE HAPPY ABOUT IT

― ESTEBAN BUTTEZ~!!, Tuesday, 1 November 2005 12:51 (eighteen years ago) link

oh yeah and here is the internet law

pitchfork: annie and RADIOHEAD
stylus: girls aloud and ELO

― ESTEBAN BUTTEZ~!!, Tuesday, 1 November 2005 12:52 (eighteen years ago) link

Whoa - Brent D's investigation-of-Devendra-Banhart-and-stuff (with much talk of pedophilia) totally vanished from the site today. Huh.

― sean gramophone (Sean M), Tuesday, 1 November 2005 15:15 (eighteen years ago) link

"investigation"

― Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Tuesday, 1 November 2005 15:17 (eighteen years ago) link

Or, um, it just got moved down one slot, Sean?

― David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 1 November 2005 15:22 (eighteen years ago) link

well, maybe. try clicking on it.

― sean gramophone (Sean M), Tuesday, 1 November 2005 15:23 (eighteen years ago) link

I get it just fine. Maybe you need to refine yr clicking technique.

― David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 1 November 2005 15:27 (eighteen years ago) link

it was gone for a second, but that seems like an archival error. xpost

― blackmail.is.my.life (blackmail.is.my.life), Tuesday, 1 November 2005 15:30 (eighteen years ago) link

haha! okay! the paranoiac in me was doubletaking.

― sean gramophone (Sean M), Tuesday, 1 November 2005 15:30 (eighteen years ago) link

my bad: wrong link was there, fixed now.

― scott pl. (scott pl.), Tuesday, 1 November 2005 15:34 (eighteen years ago) link

one month passes...

Scenesters think modern lovers is slang for that Yeah Yeah Yeahs' "Modern Romance" song

― scenester, Tuesday, 13 December 2005 16:39 (eighteen years ago) link

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.