no. see previous post.
― Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved, Monday, 10 September 2007 03:29 (7 years ago) Permalink
Indiana Jones and the Secrets of Dr. Freud
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 10 September 2007 03:31 (7 years ago) Permalink
aaaaaand the new title is released
― kingfish, Monday, 10 September 2007 06:33 (7 years ago) Permalink
duh, i are late. oh well
― kingfish, Monday, 10 September 2007 06:34 (7 years ago) Permalink
Indiana Jones and the Tomb Studio Robbers
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 3 October 2007 03:48 (7 years ago) Permalink
John Hurt, the new ungrateful Alec Guinness:
"I enjoyed working with Steven hugely, and we had a great cast. I just wish we'd had something of fabulous interest between each other to act!"
"George is a bit socially crippled, really. Not good with people. So I just left him alone."
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 20 December 2007 21:16 (6 years ago) Permalink
We looked into it and there were various things about it — like the time I had to be on set — where I thought, "No, this isn't going to work out." But then I was advised by everybody that it'd be a good thing to do.
― gabbneb, Thursday, 20 December 2007 21:20 (6 years ago) Permalink
I said, "Well, I need to have a little bit of previous knowledge even if God is doing it." So they sent a courier over with the script from Los Angeles, gave it to me at three o'clock in the afternoon in London, collected it again at eight o'clock in the evening, and he returned the next day to Los Angeles. So that was an expensive read.
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 20 December 2007 21:24 (6 years ago) Permalink
Great short interview in any event. Hurt should write an autobiography if he hasn't already!
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 20 December 2007 21:27 (6 years ago) Permalink
― kingfish, Friday, 18 January 2008 06:19 (6 years ago) Permalink
"If I burn this giant sage smudge-stick, it should dispel all the evil spirits."
― Oilyrags, Friday, 18 January 2008 12:29 (6 years ago) Permalink
is that the ghost of Ray Winston appearing in the second pic?
― Ste, Friday, 18 January 2008 14:04 (6 years ago) Permalink
Indy doesn't look very rough and ready in this shot, his trousers are far too clean for a start.
― Ste, Friday, 18 January 2008 14:05 (6 years ago) Permalink
― i'm grand like auto theft 3 (Jordan), Thursday, 19 March 2009 16:09 (5 years ago) Permalink
George Lucas — I was thinking that this old guy could have been his mentor. He could have known this little girl when she was just a kid. Had an affair with her when she was eleven.
Lawrence Kasdan — And he was forty-two.
G — He hasn't seen her in twelve years. Now she's twenty-two. It's a real strange relationship.
Steven Spielberg — She had better be older than twenty-two.
G — He's thirty-five, and he knew her ten years ago when he was twenty-five and she was only twelve. It would be amusing to make her slightly young at the time.
S — And promiscuous. She came onto him.
G — Fifteen is right on the edge. I know it's an outrageous idea, but it is interesting. Once she's sixteen or seventeen it's not interesting anymore. But if she was fifteen and he was twenty-five and they actually had an affair the last time they met. And she was madly in love with him and he...
S — She has pictures of him.
― i'm grand like auto theft 3 (Jordan), Thursday, 19 March 2009 16:53 (5 years ago) Permalink
okay George Lucas is a big NO
― Wes HI DEREson (HI DERE), Thursday, 19 March 2009 17:05 (5 years ago) Permalink
You know, I just watched "Temple of Doom" again for the first time in ages, and I was wondering: if the Thugees can hypnotize people with their magic blood and have voodoo dolls that work, and if the sacred stones glow during their sacrifice ceremonies ... then doesn't that legitimize their evil supernatural magic power, and sort of imply it's the villagers who are misusing this magic, intrinsically evil power?
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 23 March 2012 16:43 (2 years ago) Permalink
The metaphysics of the Indiana Jones movies is very perplexing
― Large Sack (Empty) (latebloomer), Saturday, 24 March 2012 16:21 (2 years ago) Permalink
If there is a better piece of writing on these films, I haven't read it.
― this is the dream of avril and chad (jer.fairall), Tuesday, 16 October 2012 03:38 (2 years ago) Permalink
Didn't know until yesterday that Temple of Doom was a prequel.
The part of my personality that's still eleven years old thinks that's big news and wants to talk to people about this.
― Cunga, Wednesday, 9 January 2013 23:42 (1 year ago) Permalink
also the part of me that thinks the coolest part about Blade Runner is the "is he an android?" discussion and the part of me that desperately wants to know if Bond is one man or five different guys who go by the same code name James Bond.
― Cunga, Wednesday, 9 January 2013 23:43 (1 year ago) Permalink
Dun dah dun dun
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 9 January 2013 23:44 (1 year ago) Permalink
Yeah wow that last article is intense. I never realized what a horrible person Indiana Jones is.
Of course, he's a cartoon though!
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 10 January 2013 04:17 (1 year ago) Permalink
Does anyone else feel any poignancy in the Belloq/Marion relationship, culminating in his upset at her being tossed into the snake pit with Indy, or have I just watched Raiders so many times at this point that now I'm only looking for new things?
― The Butthurt Locker (cryptosicko), Saturday, 3 August 2013 18:13 (1 year ago) Permalink
saw Temple Of Doom around midnight on an *actual cinema* at a festival last week at very loud volume with a whooping, cheering crowd. it's scarier than i recall! the bit where they force him to drink from a skull in the Temple and all that stuff.. real intense. i'm surprised there wasn't much more of a fuss made back in the day about the horror aspect of a kids film, being as it was a PG over here. maybe there was a fuss made and i forget?
― piscesx, Saturday, 3 August 2013 19:57 (1 year ago) Permalink
Well, it (and Gremlins) started the PG-13 rating.
― The Butthurt Locker (cryptosicko), Saturday, 3 August 2013 20:18 (1 year ago) Permalink
Yeah, there was total fuss.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 3 August 2013 20:44 (1 year ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 6 December 2013 23:34 (1 year ago) Permalink
How long til this gets handed over to J.J. Abrams?
― a fifth of misty beethoven (cryptosicko), Saturday, 7 December 2013 00:15 (1 year ago) Permalink
This is much worst news than Star Wars IMO.
― I wish to incorporate disco into my small business (chap), Saturday, 7 December 2013 00:24 (1 year ago) Permalink
agreed, either they keep making them w/ harrison ford which plz no or they start making them w/o harrison ford which god fucking no.
― balls, Saturday, 7 December 2013 02:24 (1 year ago) Permalink
Oh, come on, isn't the answer obvious?
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 7 December 2013 02:34 (1 year ago) Permalink
― balls, Saturday, December 7, 2013 2:24 AM (1 hour ago)
Well if they were to come up with a really really good screenplay for one more film then obviously I wouldn't be complaining, but how likely is that to happen. Indiana Jones without Ford and Spielberg would not be Indiana Jones.
If they do spin-off films with his kid that wouldn't really bother me.
― I wish to incorporate disco into my small business (chap), Saturday, 7 December 2013 03:45 (1 year ago) Permalink
Me neither, cause then I'd have absolutely zero reason to see them.
― a fifth of misty beethoven (cryptosicko), Saturday, 7 December 2013 04:18 (1 year ago) Permalink
christ this reminds me i saw Temple.. at a festival in summer with a VERY loud sound system and fuck me some bits of it are as good as terrifying.
― piscesx, Saturday, 7 December 2013 05:36 (1 year ago) Permalink