seamless gifs

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (547 of them)

/人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕人\ (zappi), Wednesday, 20 April 2011 11:58 (2 years ago) Permalink

was gonna save this for a politics thread but its not like i ever read them

cum dude (Princess TamTam), Wednesday, 20 April 2011 15:34 (2 years ago) Permalink

Hippocratic Oaf (DavidM), Wednesday, 20 April 2011 17:23 (2 years ago) Permalink

who's the chick with the leg?

popular gay automobile (a hoy hoy), Wednesday, 20 April 2011 17:53 (2 years ago) Permalink

Part of a series of slightly moving posed arty fashion type pictures, not a famous model afaik

StanM, Wednesday, 20 April 2011 18:48 (2 years ago) Permalink

ok - the "leg chick" is a model called Coco -> http://oh-so-coco.tumblr.com/ and the photographer, who does these moving pics she calls Cinemagraphs, is Jamie: http://fromme-toyou.tumblr.com/

StanM, Friday, 22 April 2011 06:55 (2 years ago) Permalink

nate's looks like a bloomin' onion

calling planet smurf (sunny successor), Friday, 22 April 2011 09:49 (2 years ago) Permalink

Some other race (nakhchivan), Friday, 22 April 2011 23:43 (2 years ago) Permalink

:3

corey, Saturday, 23 April 2011 00:27 (2 years ago) Permalink

that cat's body is a pop-tart

markers, Saturday, 23 April 2011 03:25 (2 years ago) Permalink

Hey, that's http://nyan.cat/ !

StanM, Saturday, 23 April 2011 07:39 (2 years ago) Permalink

buy the shirt & stuff: http://www.prguitarman.com/index.php?id=348

StanM, Saturday, 23 April 2011 07:40 (2 years ago) Permalink

400 seconds.

gr8080, Saturday, 23 April 2011 07:51 (2 years ago) Permalink

u mad

StanM, Saturday, 23 April 2011 08:06 (2 years ago) Permalink

J0rdan S., Saturday, 23 April 2011 10:23 (2 years ago) Permalink

J0rdan S., Saturday, 23 April 2011 10:26 (2 years ago) Permalink

Some other race (nakhchivan), Sunday, 24 April 2011 22:41 (2 years ago) Permalink

mmmmmm

Doctor Casino, Monday, 25 April 2011 01:06 (2 years ago) Permalink

gr8080, Monday, 25 April 2011 01:21 (2 years ago) Permalink

so seamless

secretariat on demand (Z S), Monday, 25 April 2011 01:29 (2 years ago) Permalink

Antoine Bugleboy (Merdeyeux), Monday, 25 April 2011 19:50 (2 years ago) Permalink

damn it i see the seam now.

Antoine Bugleboy (Merdeyeux), Monday, 25 April 2011 19:50 (2 years ago) Permalink

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 26 April 2011 20:25 (2 years ago) Permalink

yeah loving those NYC ones

if you wanna gamble, take that shit to vegas (Ste), Tuesday, 26 April 2011 20:58 (2 years ago) Permalink

Love the taxi one.

not_goodwin, Tuesday, 26 April 2011 21:03 (2 years ago) Permalink

I kinda want to know who "invented" these - the person behind iwdrm.tumblr or this pair. I want to credit iwdrm cos i haven't seen him/her throwing around wanky terms like cinemagraph.

Number None, Tuesday, 26 April 2011 21:07 (2 years ago) Permalink

they're two different techniques - cinemagraphs are animating one part of a still photograph where iwdrm captures those loopable moments from films. both are grebt, this thread is the best, and that spinning arm mandala up there O_O

herbal bert (herb albert), Tuesday, 26 April 2011 21:35 (2 years ago) Permalink

I dunno, the iwdrm gifs often have one tiny part of the frame moving with everything else being static in a way it wouldn't have appeared in the film.

Number None, Tuesday, 26 April 2011 21:41 (2 years ago) Permalink

yeah i dont think there's anything different from what iwdrm and these other people are doing besides one is using dvds of feature movies and the other is going out in the world with their dslr

also how do you "animate one part of a still photograph" and have it come out like this?

gr8080, Tuesday, 26 April 2011 21:49 (2 years ago) Permalink

there's no way that this guy used "clever photoshop techniques" to "animate a still photograph" of this:

gr8080, Tuesday, 26 April 2011 21:51 (2 years ago) Permalink

Been out for years - they are called GIF's

- Steve, Nottingham UK, 26/4/2011 22:04

lol

Some other race (nakhchivan), Tuesday, 26 April 2011 21:53 (2 years ago) Permalink

They're really simple, I think. They're really just two layers. The background layer is a looped bit of film. The foreground is a still from the same angle, with a hole cut out over the part of the image that moves.

secretariat on demand (Z S), Tuesday, 26 April 2011 23:57 (2 years ago) Permalink

^bingo

gr8080, Wednesday, 27 April 2011 00:09 (2 years ago) Permalink

scruffy.gif = classic

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 27 April 2011 00:43 (2 years ago) Permalink

the iwdrm ones are often mindblowing because i can't tell how they're working - when they have multiple rhythms going on (e.g. the latest full metal jacket one), which don't really appear to be syncing up with each other, what's going on? i assume i'm just not polyrhyhthmically aware enough to figure out where they meet (if it's something besides that i'd be very interested to hear it), but that he's somehow caught that he can extract that seamless loop from multiple things going on at once is amazing to me.

Antoine Bugleboy (Merdeyeux), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 00:57 (2 years ago) Permalink

If there are multiple pieces looping, that just means that there are multiples "holes" in the foreground cover layer I mentioned a few posts ago.

secretariat on demand (Z S), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 01:02 (2 years ago) Permalink

The cinemagraphs work by using GIFs, a type of picture format similar to a JPEG

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 01:03 (2 years ago) Permalink

When I get back from Denver I'm going to make one of multiple me's walking around my living room. Or maybe cats.

secretariat on demand (Z S), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 01:04 (2 years ago) Permalink

iwdrm and 'cinemagraphs' are really corny, sorry

br8080 (dayo), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 01:19 (2 years ago) Permalink

ugh, he made one of project runway gretchen. :(

reggaeton for the painfully alone (polyphonic), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 01:22 (2 years ago) Permalink

nate woolls, Wednesday, 27 April 2011 08:21 (2 years ago) Permalink

^ real talk

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 09:22 (2 years ago) Permalink

Not impressed at all totally pointless.
- Dave Pittam, Droitwich worcs, 27/4/2011 10:13

For once the comments section of the DM reads less intelligent that the article itself

if you wanna gamble, take that shit to vegas (Ste), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 10:35 (2 years ago) Permalink

well, maybe not for once

if you wanna gamble, take that shit to vegas (Ste), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 10:36 (2 years ago) Permalink

wow last gif is dope cause the blue matches the color of ilx's text

gr8080, Wednesday, 27 April 2011 11:19 (2 years ago) Permalink

ilx text fly @ u face

br8080 (dayo), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 11:29 (2 years ago) Permalink

iwdrm and 'cinemagraphs' are really corny, sorry

I don't mind iwdrm but yea those cinemagraphs are horrid faux-tasteful gee-whiz bullshit

don't judge a book by its jpg (Edward III), Wednesday, 27 April 2011 13:26 (2 years ago) Permalink

yes

caek, Wednesday, 27 April 2011 13:30 (2 years ago) Permalink


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.