Steven Spielberg - classic or dud

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1054 of them)
it's not just about that (although, you know, it's nice to have more than the two-shot, the close-up, the master -- nice also to have expressive editing JUST OCNE IN A WHILE). i don't care if he's "great art" (blah jargon) or not; it's just he isn't all that interesting. there are more interesting directors. like spielberg!!! they both have a somewhat limited and audience-minded view of 'human nature', praps.

xp

N_RQ, Thursday, 28 July 2005 09:33 (10 years ago) Permalink

I'm with NRQ here.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Thursday, 28 July 2005 09:50 (10 years ago) Permalink

i'm gonna have to restrain myself from writing an entire essay here, but suffice to say i think hawks is one of the five greatest directors ever and i can't even begin to say why his best films transcend "expressive editing" and all that film school bullshit. this is verging on "the ramones aren't as interesting as frank zappa" territory. and i hope no one thinks i'm being a boring old film rockist because hawks is like the most ENTERTAINING great director who ever lived. and i don't think your last sentence shows much (or any) understanding of his attitude toward his audience.

i actually LIKE spielberg and feel he gets a bad rap from "entertainment is not art" types, but howard hawks is a greater director than spielberg for the same reason charles schulz is a greater artist than dave sim.

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Thursday, 28 July 2005 10:15 (10 years ago) Permalink

haha when ppl ask me tomorrow why i look so sleepy i'll have to say "cos i was up at 4 a.m. being the film geek version of that guy who throws a fit because you think picard is better than kirk."

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Thursday, 28 July 2005 10:16 (10 years ago) Permalink

and i hope no one thinks i'm being a boring old film rockist because hawks is like the most ENTERTAINING great director who ever lived.

i. dis. agree. there, that wasn't so hard. in this context, i don't care about great directors. i care about entertaining films. hawks' films are *quite* entertaining. but they don't stand out particularly from hollywood films of the 'classic' (c. 1930 - c. 1960) period.

he has a slightly nasty, right-libertarian view of society based on the rugged-individualist/masculinist ideal (women have to be men). it's this glib view of 'how to deal' that i mean by 'audience-minded'. he's all about winners.

expressive editing (blah phrase, but whatevs) is not film school bullshit. following the aesthetic choices of 1950s cahiers du cinema is film school bullshit!!

N_RQ, Thursday, 28 July 2005 10:25 (10 years ago) Permalink

when did great exciting crowd-pleasing moviemaking become "film school bullshit"?

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 28 July 2005 13:24 (10 years ago) Permalink

if indy running from the rock is now considered some abstract academic film-school braininess then i don't even know what we're talking about anymore

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 28 July 2005 13:25 (10 years ago) Permalink

i think jd thought that what i meant [that was fun] by expressive editing and non-shot-reverse-shot moviemaking was, i dunno, something hyper-intellectual -- resnais, or whatever. i love resnais, but i *also* meant modern movies LIKE 'SAVING PRIVATE RYAN'. i have my qualms but as movie art there's a shitload more to chew on in 'SPR' than there is in anything by hawks.

N_RQ, Thursday, 28 July 2005 13:30 (10 years ago) Permalink

i'm gonna refuse to take sides on this one

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 28 July 2005 13:33 (10 years ago) Permalink

would the oft-overlooked michael curtiz be a better predecessor comparison?

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 28 July 2005 13:34 (10 years ago) Permalink

no-one has seen all of curtiz's movies. he made 100s. there's no pressing reason to separate his stuff from hawks' or from thatera of hollywood in general: more unites 'to have and have not' and 'casablanca' than, oh i dunno, two curtiz films i've forgotten the names of. it doesn't belittle classic genre films to say that the differences between them are not particularly big -- in the context of the history of film as a whole.

point is the kind of stuff spielberg does, like the beach scene, was beyond the dreams of any classic hollywood director. they'd have fucking killed to have done it. maybe sam fuller with spielberg's crew would be the best thing.

N_RQ, Thursday, 28 July 2005 13:41 (10 years ago) Permalink

Hitchcock was also "middlebrow" (which seems to be the label for a great image-maker who also entertains a mass audience). Not that Spielberg has ever achieved the consistency of Hitch from 1954-64, but his films (esp post-Jurassic) generally show more complexity and disturbingly adult themes than directors who are taken more seriously (cf Spike Lee, Soderbergh, Coens).

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 28 July 2005 13:46 (10 years ago) Permalink

Here are some movies I have not seen and don't have any real intention of seeing.

# Indiana Jones 4 (2006) (announced)
# Untitled Steven Spielberg/Abraham Lincoln Project (2007) (pre-production)
# Untitled 1972 Munich Olympics Project (2005) (filming)
# War of the Worlds (2005)
# The Terminal (2004)
# Catch Me If You Can (2002)
# Minority Report (2002)
# Artificial Intelligence: AI (2001)

This list, of films I have seen, arranged more or less in descending order of quality (last = best) is the reason why I'm not interested in any of the films above:

# Saving Private Ryan (1998)
# The Lost World: Jurassic Park (1997)
# Schindler's List (1993)
# Jurassic Park (1993)
# Hook (1991)
# Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade (1989)
# Empire of the Sun (1987)
# The Color Purple (1985)
# Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1984)
# E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (1982)
# Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)
# Jaws (1975)
# Duel (1971)

In conclusion, Thank You Mr. Spielberg for bringing some really fantastic adventures to the big screen, and showing us some highly exciting moments, No Thank You Mr. Spielberg for saddling nearly all of them with increasingly awful casting as time marches on and for trying to choke us to death with your faith in the human spirit or whatever you want to call that unbelievably smug annoying self-congratulatory horseshit.


xpost,
more complexity and disturbingly adult themes
So do the fucking Matrix movies. OMG HE DIES TO SAVE EVERYBODY

TOMBOT, Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:22 (10 years ago) Permalink

Such soul-crushing cynicism deserves, oh, Michael Bay.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:30 (10 years ago) Permalink

"unbelievably smug annoying self-congratulatory horseshit"

this is kinda otm -- it's there in the movies -- but the horseshit bits are outnumbered by the highly exciting moments. or, they're *both* there. same way fall-flat bits of unfunniness and misanthropy coexist with real chills in hitchcock.

otoh, is 'saving private ryan' really that smug? it has those terrible bookends, and the matt damon bits are really annoying, but i've seen far less convinving movies about war.

N_RQ, Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:34 (10 years ago) Permalink

Spielberg has always been very good at provoking a visceral reaction using whatever crap he has available. He knows how to make ostensibly exciting movies. Unfortunately, since you know that all of his ostensibly exciting movies will be ending in some fashion that makes you feel like a baby chickadee just regurgitated golden liquid cuddles of redemption directly into your stomach, the thrill isn't there, because you're just waiting for the hammer to fall and get the brainwashing over with.

The first time I saw Duel I knew it was supposed to be "atypical" Spielberg but I still spent probably half the movie waiting for some insipid deus ex machina to rob me of all my actual emotions and replace them with spoonfed lotus blooms. This is what he's done to his legacy.

TOMBOT, Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:34 (10 years ago) Permalink

into the west was awesome - rachel leigh cook!!

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:36 (10 years ago) Permalink

i helped my friend videotape an audition for into the west! he didn't get the part though :(

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:38 (10 years ago) Permalink

I am the only person in the world who thinks Jaws is a shitty, shitty movie. I don't entirely blame Spielberg because the book it's based on is even worse than the film, so in that respect, he did well.

Looking at that list above I realize I've disliked a LOT of his movies, without even really realizing they were Spielberg flix. I mean the only movies that I like in that list are Raiders, Last Crusade, Duel, Catch Me If You Can (and that's not even an active like because I forgot I saw it until recently) and...uh...well, I don't actually like Jurassic Park at ALL but Jeff Goldblum dresses fantastically in it so I'll give it a little bit of a pass (THAT FINAL SHOT OF THE T-REX AND THE RAPTORS IS THE ABSOLUTE WORST SHOT IN THE ENTIRE HISTORY OF CINEMATOGRAPHY AND DIRECTION AND THAT IS A STONE COLD FACT PEOPLE). I'd like Saving Private Ryan better if the bookends were deleted and it was about a half hour shorter.

Dr. Morbius, how about you discuss the "disturbing adult themes" in, say, Catch Me If You Can?

Allyzay knows a little German (allyzay), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:38 (10 years ago) Permalink

He's okay. I thought Minority Report was pretty decent, up until the ending, anyway.

Leon C. (Ex Leon), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:39 (10 years ago) Permalink

anyway, i gotta agree with everyone praising band of brothers on this thread, i really liked it so much more than i expected (and overall a lot more than saving private ryan).

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:39 (10 years ago) Permalink

Dud. Fuck him. I am Filmist.

Anti-Pope Consortium (noodle vague), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:40 (10 years ago) Permalink

Ok the more I'm thinking about that final shot of the T-Rex and the Raptors in the lobby with the fucking banner floating in front of them in Jurassic Park the more angry I'm getting. Goddamn hack.

Allyzay knows a little German (allyzay), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:42 (10 years ago) Permalink

minority report had a pretty good first third/half, i guess, but boy does it ever go to shit. and it's about as dark and adult as an episode of young indiana jones

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:42 (10 years ago) Permalink

catch me if you can woulda been alot more disturbing/adult/fun if it'd kept true to frank abagnale's motivation in the book (pussy).

jaws fucking rules ally. jpark3's pretty great, the best of the bunch no doubt. poltergeist was pretty great. band of brothers was incredible. into the west was rousing fun.

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:44 (10 years ago) Permalink

catch me would've been better if it had been about 30 mins shorter

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:44 (10 years ago) Permalink

WAIT WAIT I ALSO LIKE EMPIRE OF THE SUN.

Jaws does NOT fucking rule!

Allyzay knows a little German (allyzay), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:45 (10 years ago) Permalink

i think jpark3 is rett bratner or someone...

N_RQ, Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:46 (10 years ago) Permalink

it's jumanji guy... joe johnston

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:47 (10 years ago) Permalink

nrq makes a really good point: that maybe spielberg is - deliberately? that wd be so cool - sacrificing good UNIFIED WORKS for the opportunity to make astonishing scenes or moments

UNIFIED WORKS suck anyway

ie his refusal to end his recent movies unyuckily is the price he is prepared to pay for the chance to shoot [x] idea

i don't buy this really, but i wd admire SS lots if i discovered this is where he's secretly at

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:47 (10 years ago) Permalink

war of the worlds woulda been alot better if richard dreyfuss had come out of the ship at the end.

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:47 (10 years ago) Permalink

or if it had turned out it was the nazis!

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:48 (10 years ago) Permalink

allyzay i have seen lisztomania and yr hyperbole impresses me none

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:48 (10 years ago) Permalink

jaws rules

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:49 (10 years ago) Permalink


from up-coming director's cut

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:51 (10 years ago) Permalink

free frisky

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:52 (10 years ago) Permalink

i don't buy this really, but i wd admire SS lots if i discovered this is where he's secretly at

oh, begone intentionality! i think most movies are compendia of bits with lots of redundancies put in to keep front office happy. it's always been like that(?). spielberg is a total enigma as a man -- i have read a biography of him and know NOTHING about him.

but cutting through or ignoring the 'greatest generation' blah i've been impressed by the action scenes in the saving private ryan/band of brothers projects.

as with albums, ignore the rubbish bits.

N_RQ, Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:53 (10 years ago) Permalink

bbbbbbbut what if Richard Dreyfuss was the Nazis?????!

My hyperbole is totally correct, watch JP again and wait for it...that final shot of the freaking T-Rex. Claymation dinosaur, why you ruin shot all the time? I would've liked Jurassic Park better if there was no dinosaurs, but instead Richard Dreyfuss and Roy Scheider.

Anyway I am still interested in finding out how Spielberg classics like Catch Me If You Can or The Terminal or The Lost World explore more disturbing, dark, and adult themes than Bamboozled and are more complex than The Big Lebowski! I'll give Morbius Soderberg.

XPOST ARGH STOP IT WITH THOSE MORPHED ANIMALS

Allyzay knows a little German (allyzay), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:53 (10 years ago) Permalink

Film school types have a different measuring stick than an ordinary film viewer like me. Speilberg is probably the quinessential film school success story, the Lord of the Film School Graduates, the wet dream of budding director-wannabes. He's filthy rich, can command any script he pleases, casts A-list actors at will, and has all Hollywood groveling before him. He's a One Phone Call kind of guy.

Does this make him classic, or just Darryl Zanuck reborn?

I stick with my B+ assessement. He has good chops, and a consistent record. I like him OK, but nothing he makes excites me much.

Aimless (Aimless), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:54 (10 years ago) Permalink

'lost world' is about the amoral exploitation of scientific research for profit -- it's an adult theme. treatment another matter.

aimless -- steve is hurt, but he will try to improve his record for next semester.

N_RQ, Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:57 (10 years ago) Permalink

i don't give a penny fig for intentionality nrq, it is a phantom of goofy wackness, i wd still admire SS if this is where he was at!! it wd just be kinda cool given everything, if he too thought john williams wz an gharstly hack but WHAT THE HELL, at least with him on board i get to do x y and z

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:57 (10 years ago) Permalink

well the treatment and exploration of these adult themes would seem to be the key here.

Allyzay knows a little German (allyzay), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:58 (10 years ago) Permalink

jpark1 wasn't all that but people were just so damn happy to finally get to see a real live dinosaur.

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:59 (10 years ago) Permalink

wow you musta sawn i difft version to me blount

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 28 July 2005 15:00 (10 years ago) Permalink

Film school types have a different measuring stick than an ordinary film viewer like me. Speilberg is probably the quinessential film school success story, the Lord of the Film School Graduates, the wet dream of budding director-wannabes. He's filthy rich, can command any script he pleases, casts A-list actors at will, and has all Hollywood groveling before him. He's a One Phone Call kind of guy.

what's your point here exactly? that people in film school like him because he's successful? wtf does that have to do with anything

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 28 July 2005 15:01 (10 years ago) Permalink

claymation dinosaurs

Allyzay knows a little German (allyzay), Thursday, 28 July 2005 15:01 (10 years ago) Permalink

when i finally saw jurassic park 2 i was amazed at how bad and UN-masterful it was actually

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 28 July 2005 15:01 (10 years ago) Permalink

(hmmm i am leavin the surface of planet english i think --- brisk walk off to robster's bday for me)

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 28 July 2005 15:02 (10 years ago) Permalink

give him our best mark

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 28 July 2005 15:04 (10 years ago) Permalink

will do! i am sure this will be settled when i am next online

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 28 July 2005 15:04 (10 years ago) Permalink

1941
This just falls completely flat. I have no problem with Spielberg (or anyone else) making this type of film but nothing here works. Ok maybe except the ferris wheel rolling, that looked nice, but overall zzzzzz...

E.T. THE EXTRA TERRESTRIAL
First time in like a quarter century I've watched this, hated it then, hated it now. Really this is where my lack of respect for Spielberg comes from, I just can't manage to care about any of these humans or that little hun. One thing I observed for the first time is that the elder brother is really good, that actor never went on to anything notable, did he? He should have.

RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK
INDIANA JONES AND THE TEMPLE OF DOOM
Love both of these. Raiders is like what I was saying about Jaws, every scene seems like a set piece. The monkey plays the Drew Barrymore role in this, ie the narc. This is a case of Spielberg's default tone actually suiting the material.
Temple Of Doom is almost as good, I know there's racism accusations but I don't really get that, the goofy knockabout stuff seems pretty much across the board regardless of skin tone. Not as good as Raiders because Karen Allen >>>>> Kate Capshaw, but there are so many immense sequences here.

THE COLOR PURPLE
This was a big film for My Mother, so I saw it in the background a number of times but this is maybe the first time I've properly watched it. And I can see how she relates to it, it's not about race really (that one Oprah sequence aside), it's about domestic abuse. But my problem is that with such a dark subject, why does he choose to film it as a 30's screwball comedy? Oh, Danny Glover can't find his socks! and when he does, there's a hole in them! Now he's trying to cook breakfast! This isn't gunna go well! The amount of mugging going on here gives me a pain behind my eyeballs. But in the parts where the actors are given free reign to be dramatic everyone is quite good, Whoopi especially. And the whole sequence with Danny Glover towards the end after she has left him I actually found quite powerful.

EMPIRE OF THE SUN
I really liked this one at the time, but I really couldn't see much craft in the directing this time around. Nice sets, nice acting (Christian Bale is a bit too theatre kid, but otherwise), great source material, but it's just like all the recent oscarbait shit. It is shot competently, nothing more.

INDIANA JONES AND THE LAST CRUSADE
I never watched this much compared with the first two, which I assumed was due to The Connery Factor, but actually this is really bad on every level. Yes, Connery is bad, but everyone else is too, and the script is just appalling, every gag signposted, everything telegraphed and then the payoffs landing THUNK on the table. In a way this is more offensive than the films where he is trying and failing to do something, this is just laziness on everyone's part.

General Observation: WHY ARE ALL THESE FILMS SO LONG?

Anyway, that's where I'm up to, I was gunna watch some more today but there is a tubby cat on my legs so I didn't want to get up to change discs, instead I jut watched the whole of P'tit Quinquin, which was better than any of this. What's next up? oh, ALWAYS, that'll be a barrel of monkeys. Then fucken HOOK, then Schindler's List, then some dinosaur films. I never would have guessed I would look forward to the holocaust so much...

Jonathan Hellion Mumble, Monday, 22 February 2016 03:25 (4 months ago) Permalink

I put on Hook while babysitting my niece a year or so ago mostly as an excuse to give it a re-watch, and my god are those Lost Boys sequences painful. Hoffman and Hoskins have some fun scenery-chewy moments, and Charlie Korsmo (remember him from Dick Tracy and What About Bob? ) is actually quite affecting as Williams's son--he's like the Elliott's brother of this film, I guess ('cept I love E.T. and everyone in it)--but the film really is every awful thing that Spielberg's haters accuse him of being.

And The Lost World is even worse, though for different reasons. Probably the only Spielberg film that can honestly be called lazy.

pitchforkian at best (cryptosicko), Monday, 22 February 2016 03:35 (4 months ago) Permalink

Close Encounters is my favorite film of his after Raiders. Apparently he's slated to direct the film adaptation of Ready Player One??!

octobeard, Monday, 22 February 2016 05:30 (4 months ago) Permalink

The BFG looks to be even more of a disaster than Tintin

Chicamaw (Ward Fowler), Monday, 22 February 2016 12:34 (4 months ago) Permalink

General Observation: WHY ARE ALL THESE FILMS SO LONG?

and bad.

xyzzzz__, Monday, 22 February 2016 12:46 (4 months ago) Permalink

delete thread? just til you ppl learn to watch master filmmakers. Go pick on Zulawski.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 February 2016 12:57 (4 months ago) Permalink

Wrong again, bye.

xyzzzz__, Monday, 22 February 2016 13:15 (4 months ago) Permalink

One for the lovers and the haters: Spielberg in 30 shots

T.L.O.P.son (Phil D.), Friday, 4 March 2016 17:58 (3 months ago) Permalink

Spielberg so great that even the 3 seconds of "BFG" from the goddamn trailer seems worthy among those clips.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 4 March 2016 18:14 (3 months ago) Permalink

it's possible that some of the material shot for the trailer will be reused in the movie tho

leet gentlemen's club (contenderizer), Friday, 4 March 2016 18:26 (3 months ago) Permalink

"omg iconic amazing" dropoff about halfway through that thing is pretty decisive

tall hat, cgi tintin & pensive horse not quite holding up against scheider dolly zoom, etc

leet gentlemen's club (contenderizer), Friday, 4 March 2016 18:31 (3 months ago) Permalink

u mad, tintin chase sequence is as good as anything in the Raiders movies. Agreed that's a bad choice from War Horse, though. Better shot would be the British cavalry riding into the German machine guns and the riderless horses appearing in shot on the other side.

T.L.O.P.son (Phil D.), Friday, 4 March 2016 19:27 (3 months ago) Permalink

always loved that rise/pull-back as indy regards the idol

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 4 March 2016 19:33 (3 months ago) Permalink

a man putting something in context

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 4 March 2016 19:33 (3 months ago) Permalink

empire of the sun shot rly something too, almost too much something

denies the existence of dark matter (difficult listening hour), Friday, 4 March 2016 19:36 (3 months ago) Permalink

btw somehow NYC is getting to see a new 35mm print of Close Encounters from the late '90s 'director's cut,' which is an amalgam of '77/80 but no goddamn starship interior, hooray.

http://www.movingimage.us/visit/calendar/2016/04/22/detail/close-encounters-of-the-third-kind

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 March 2016 19:58 (3 months ago) Permalink

1 month passes...

Ian Freer on Spielberg and the Amblinification of modern movies:

But there is something in the films themselves beyond nostalgia that makes them resonate today. Unlike many modern films aimed at a family audience, Amblin – named after the 1968 short Spielberg made as a calling card – created genre flicks that didn’t pull their punches. Gremlins had a gleefully malicious streak – in one scene a gremlin is ground in a blender and exploded in a microwave – that lead to the creation of a new US rating, the PG-13, and felt edgy compared to the more anodyne feel of contemporary family films. But they also didn’t shy away from messy experience. Refusing to talk down to audiences, Spielberg created a whole sub-genre of sci-fi as autobiography, using fantasy as a means to smuggle in tough emotional truths delivered with finesse and telling detail.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/film/midnight-special/steven-spielberg-jeff-nichols-80s-movies/

painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture (DavidM), Friday, 8 April 2016 21:15 (2 months ago) Permalink

Watched "Empire of the Sun" with my older daughter. Maybe goes overboard with the dramatic crane reveals, but what an immaculately crafted film.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 8 April 2016 21:23 (2 months ago) Permalink

In the top three Spielberg films, for me.

painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture (DavidM), Friday, 8 April 2016 21:30 (2 months ago) Permalink

mine too

P51 MUSTANG CADILLAC OF THE SKY

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 8 April 2016 21:32 (2 months ago) Permalink

There's a JG Ballard series coming up here where they're screening EotS, and the program notes say they're including it as a botched adaptation. GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 8 April 2016 21:33 (2 months ago) Permalink

that's interesting -- from what i remember of both the book and the film there are some sizable tonal differences at times, but "botched" doesn't seem right. did ballard himself not like the movie?

tylerw, Friday, 8 April 2016 21:37 (2 months ago) Permalink

here's what he wrote!

I was deeply moved by the film but, like every novelist, couldn't help feeling that my memories had been hijacked by someone else's. As the battle of Britain fighter ace Douglas Bader said when introduced to the cast of Reach for the Sky: "But they're actors."

Actors of another kind play out our memories, performing on a stage inside our heads whenever we think of childhood, our first day at school, courtship and marriage. The longer we live - and it's now 60 years since I reluctantly walked out of Lunghua camp - the more our repertory company emerges from the shadows and moves to the front of the stage. Spielberg's film seems more truthful as the years pass. Christian Bale and John Malkovich join hands by the footlights with my real parents and my younger self, with the Japanese soldiers and American pilots, as a boy runs forever across a peaceful lawn towards the coming war. But perhaps, in the end, it's all only a movie.

http://www.theguardian.com/books/2006/mar/04/fiction.film

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 8 April 2016 21:40 (2 months ago) Permalink

ha, that is great

tylerw, Friday, 8 April 2016 21:42 (2 months ago) Permalink

FWIW, for a director so closely associated with families, EotS - along with ET and AI - are his only three told more or less exclusively from the perspective of the child, right? Anyway, "Empire" has stuck with me since its release. Some truly incredible shots. (And a fleeting Ben Stiller.)

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 8 April 2016 21:42 (2 months ago) Permalink


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.