JFK assassination: was any consensus ever reached as to who actually did it and why?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (174 of them)
read this piece on slate today -- at the end jfk comes up.

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Thursday, 7 October 2004 17:25 (8 years ago) Permalink

The Cuban mob was sick of RFK's meddling. They talked to Fidel, who spoke to Raul, and Raul "took care of it." JFK was killed because of his BROTHER'S meddling. Common knowledge.

andy, Thursday, 7 October 2004 20:02 (8 years ago) Permalink

not the cuban mob; the CHICAGO mob in cuba, who wanted their casinos back. they hated rfk for moving the justice department against them, but rfk had little influence on cuban policy.

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Thursday, 7 October 2004 20:08 (8 years ago) Permalink

According to the book about the NSA I'm reading right now, the intercepts of Castro and the Cuban government's communications at the time showed them to be dumbfounded and a little terrified at JFK's death. They felt they could only get worse. Apparently, they believed it had to be a right-wing U.S. military hit.

Michael White (Hereward), Thursday, 7 October 2004 20:25 (8 years ago) Permalink

the chicago mob wanted their casinos in cuba back, cuban refugees in florida wanted cuba back, Pepsi wanted cuba back for cheap sugar, everyone wanted cuba back. Then JFK bailed on the Bay of Pigs at the last minute. Nixon worked for Pepsi and was in Dallas that day.

http://www.prouty.org/nixon.html

George Bush Sr. was working for the CIA at the time, dealing with cubans, but that's another story.

I love me some conspiracy theories.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 7 October 2004 21:22 (8 years ago) Permalink

http://www.sumeria.net/politics/kennedy.html

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 7 October 2004 21:33 (8 years ago) Permalink

HOLY SHIT

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Friday, 8 October 2004 20:41 (8 years ago) Permalink

I am reading 'Body of Secrets' this week.

Michael White (Hereward), Friday, 8 October 2004 20:43 (8 years ago) Permalink

hmm maybe the premse behind delillo's "libra" wasn't too far off...

latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 9 October 2004 03:29 (8 years ago) Permalink

Gareth the KILLER

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Saturday, 9 October 2004 15:04 (8 years ago) Permalink

1 year passes...
Historical side note, the last person alive who was in the limo just died.


Former Texas first lady Connally dies

By Kelley Shannon, Associated Press Writer
September 2, 2006

AUSTIN, Texas -- Nellie Connally, the former Texas first lady who was riding in President Kennedy's limousine when he was assassinated, has died, a family friend said Saturday. The 87-year-old was the last living person who had been part of that fateful Dallas drive.

Connally, the widow of former Gov. John Connally, died late Friday of natural causes at an Austin assisted living center, said Julian Read, who served as the governor's press secretary in the 1960s.

As the limousine carrying the Connallys and the Kennedys wound its way through the friendly crowd in downtown Dallas, Nellie Connally turned to President Kennedy, who was in a seat behind her, and said, "Mr. President, you can't say Dallas doesn't love you."

Almost immediately, she heard the first of what she later concluded were three gunshots in quick succession. A wounded John Connally slumped after the second shot, and, "I never looked back again. I was just trying to take care of him," she said.

She later said the most enduring image of that day was the bloodstained roses.

"It's the image of yellow roses and red roses and blood all over the car ... all over us," she said in a 2003 interview with The Associated Press. "I'll never forget it. ... It was so quick and so short, so potent."

Read said Connally had been sitting at her desk writing thank-you notes when she died.

"She has been extremely active and vital the past few days and weeks," he said. "It's a shock to all of us."

In 2003, she published a photo-filled book -- "From Love Field: Our Final Hours with President John F. Kennedy" -- based on 22 pages of handwritten notes she compiled about a week after the assassination and rediscovered in 1996.

Texas Gov. Rick Perry called Connally "the epitome of graciousness."

"Long before she was propelled into the national spotlight from the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, she was a Texas icon," Perry said in a statement.

Connally, formerly Nellie Brill, met her husband at the University of Texas in Austin, and they married on Dec. 21, 1940.

John Connally managed several political campaigns for fellow Texan Lyndon B. Johnson, including his 1964 presidential campaign. Connally was elected Texas governor as a Democrat in 1962 and won re-election twice, serving three two-year terms.

He was treasury secretary in the Nixon administration and ran for president as a Republican in 1980, when Ronald Reagan was elected. John Connally died in 1993.

Nellie Connally helped raise money for many charities. In 1989, Richard Nixon, Barbara Walters and Donald Trump turned out for a gala to honor her and raise money for diabetes research.

"I've never known a woman with Nellie's courage, compassion and character," Walters said. "For all her ups and downs, I've never heard a self-pitying word from her."

John and Nellie Connally suffered financial difficulties after he left office. Private business ventures after 1980 were less successful than John Connally's career as a politician and dealmaking Houston lawyer. An oil company in which he invested got into trouble, and $200 million worth of real estate projects went sour, and he ended up filing for bankruptcy.

Nellie Connally served on the Board of Visitors of The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center since 1984, and a fund in her name raised millions for research and patient programs. The Houston hospital's center for breast cancer also is named for Connally, a survivor of the disease for more than 15 years.

About a year ago, Connally moved back to Austin after decades in Houston.

Survivors include her daughter, Sharon Connally Ammann, two sons, John B. Connally III and Mark Connally, eight grandchildren and seven great-grandchildren.

Funeral services are pending. She is to be buried near her late husband in the Texas State Cemetery in Austin.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Wednesday, 13 September 2006 20:33 (6 years ago) Permalink

Gear did it.

cousin larry bundgee (bundgee), Wednesday, 13 September 2006 20:36 (6 years ago) Permalink

it was the second gator

latebloomer (latebloomer), Wednesday, 13 September 2006 21:14 (6 years ago) Permalink

There are other considerations, like the magic bullet, etc. But there's not much doubt, except from loonies, that Oswald delivered the famous kill shot.

There was a documentary, maybe a couple of years ago, that pretty convincingly dealt with every doubt/conspiracy theory including the 'magic bullet' one. IIRC it was to do with the fact that the seats at the back were higher than the seats at the front, and that the front of the car was more narrow at the front. Or something. Anyway, by the end of the documentary I was completely won over to the Oswald-acting-along side.

Teh littlest HoBBo (the pirate king), Wednesday, 13 September 2006 21:18 (6 years ago) Permalink

along = alone

Teh littlest HoBBo (the pirate king), Wednesday, 13 September 2006 21:29 (6 years ago) Permalink

ha freudian slip

latebloomer (latebloomer), Wednesday, 13 September 2006 21:59 (6 years ago) Permalink

It seems like some recognize only two possibilities for this event:

1. Oswald did it and he was a lone gunman, without any assistance whatsoever.

2. Oswald was a patsy and INSERT CONSPIRACY HERE did it.

Why not

3. Oswald was solely responsible for physically shooting Kennedy, but he was aided/abetted/instructed in doing so by party or parties unknown.


Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Wednesday, 13 September 2006 22:34 (6 years ago) Permalink

gear (gear), Wednesday, 13 September 2006 22:35 (6 years ago) Permalink

Kennedy was clearly killed by the missing plane that never struck the Pentagon.

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Wednesday, 13 September 2006 22:43 (6 years ago) Permalink

Oswald was solely responsible for physically shooting Kennedy, but he was aided/abetted/instructed in doing so by party or parties unknown.

I've always thought that this was the most likely explanation.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Wednesday, 13 September 2006 22:54 (6 years ago) Permalink

i figure it was the mob using oswald

disappointing goth fest line-up (orion), Wednesday, 13 September 2006 23:08 (6 years ago) Permalink

i figure it was the mob using oswald

That's kinda what I believe too. With the CIA & FBI knowing all about it, but looking the other way.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Wednesday, 13 September 2006 23:22 (6 years ago) Permalink

3. Oswald was solely responsible for physically shooting Kennedy, but he was aided/abetted/instructed in doing so by party or parties unknown.

wasn't like 30 minutes of Stone's JFK spent on this?

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 13 September 2006 23:45 (6 years ago) Permalink

Yeah, but since he thought the killing was ordered by rabid anti-communists...or giant alien space bats, or something equally likely...

Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Thursday, 14 September 2006 02:29 (6 years ago) Permalink

i figure it was the mob using oswald

This documentary (that I mentioned earlier) looked into that as well, and the gist of it was that there had been so many supergrasses over the past 40 years that it was unthinkable that if the mob had been involved the truth wouldn't have come out by now.

Teh littlest HoBBo (the pirate king), Thursday, 14 September 2006 08:36 (6 years ago) Permalink

Kennedy had spiked the White House programme looking into amusing ways to kill Castro and on 22 November 1963 was in the middle of arranging secret talks with Cuba to assure a peaceful co-existence. He was more worried about the exiles in Florida than the communists in the Caribbean.

Hello Sunshine (Hello Sunshine), Thursday, 14 September 2006 08:40 (6 years ago) Permalink

it was unthinkable that if the mob had been involved the truth wouldn't have come out by now.

I wouldn't necessarily agree with that. The conspiracy crowd likes to talk about the body count of mysterious deaths associated with the assassination, but what about the body count of just being a mid-level Mafia soldier in the 1960s? Most of those guys were probably dead or in jail by the mid-70s.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Thursday, 14 September 2006 16:12 (6 years ago) Permalink

the conspiracy crowd wishes it were in an espionage film. there's nothing to any of the theories.

gear (gear), Thursday, 14 September 2006 16:18 (6 years ago) Permalink

"the conspiracy crowd wishes it were in an espionage film"

so did Oswald

latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 14 September 2006 21:28 (6 years ago) Permalink

there's nothing to any of the theories.

So then, why did Jack Ruby whack Oswald?

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Thursday, 14 September 2006 21:37 (6 years ago) Permalink

it was, most likely, the confluence of a twisted, batshit assassin meeting an increasingly nutty small-time hustler, wannabe mafia guy who saw a chance to be an impressive big shot (ih his also-twisted mind). people like to point to coincidences and irrational behavior as evidence of a greater conspiracy, but let's face it: crazy people do stupid shit all the time. sometimes they do it to each other, in public, on TV.

gear (gear), Thursday, 14 September 2006 21:45 (6 years ago) Permalink

no mafia guy is gonna tell jack ruby, "hey you're unbalanced and nuts, let's give you the oswald gig. promise not to tell whodunit?"

gear (gear), Thursday, 14 September 2006 21:47 (6 years ago) Permalink

Gear OTM. Gerald Posner's 'Case Closed' is a gd debunking of the conspiracy theories.

Ward Fowler (Ward Fowler), Thursday, 14 September 2006 21:50 (6 years ago) Permalink

Gerald Posner's 'Case Closed' is a gd debunking of the conspiracy theories.

There's a fair amount of errors in Case Closed though, which make it about as useful as the pro-conspiracy books. Posner is a dick forever though for his famous post-9/11 "focus and clarity" editorial in the Wall Street Journal where he reversed his opinion on Bush II and came out in support of him.

Still, I would have liked to have seen of his debates with Vincent Bugliosi.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Thursday, 14 September 2006 22:03 (6 years ago) Permalink

Peter Dale Scott's book on Kennedy is really interesting

xave (xave), Thursday, 14 September 2006 22:32 (6 years ago) Permalink

'i am wrong about bush'

and what (ooo), Thursday, 14 September 2006 22:41 (6 years ago) Permalink

Peter Dale Scott's book on Kennedy is really interesting

-- xave (sl...), September 14th, 2006.

Deep Politics and the Death of JFK?

i agree, it's an interesting read.

for me, the most plausible scenario is the one discussed in this book:

Live By the Sword by Gus Russo

it more or less argues for Oswald acting alone, but creates context for his motivations.

here's the forward from the book for good measure.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 14 September 2006 23:42 (6 years ago) Permalink

"The fact that many of the conspiracy theorists have been able to produce convincing evidence of their suspicions does not seem to trouble many people. The plausability of a conspiracy is less important to them than the implauability of someone as inconcequential as Oswald having the werewithal to kill someone as concequential — as poweful and well-guarded — as Kennedy. To accept that a random act of violence by an obscure malcontent could bring down the president of the United States is to acknowledge a chaotic, disorderly world that frightens most Americans. Believing that Oswald killed Kennedy is to concede, as New York Times columnist Anthony Lewis said, "that in this life there is often tragedy without reason"

Kennedy — An Unfinished Life, by Robert Dallek

You could also say much the same about 9/11.

Hello Sunshine (Hello Sunshine), Friday, 15 September 2006 14:36 (6 years ago) Permalink

Arse. That first line should say "have been UNABLE to produce evidence..."

Hello Sunshine (Hello Sunshine), Friday, 15 September 2006 14:37 (6 years ago) Permalink

someone as inconcequential as Oswald

The dude defected to the Soviet Union! Do people forget this? Also, some dude he was in the service with thought he was a fake commie working for the CIA to find real ones.

Really cool, wickedly cool, cooly cool bon apetit! (ex machina), Friday, 15 September 2006 14:47 (6 years ago) Permalink

Also, some dude he was in the service with thought he was a fake commie working for the CIA to find real ones.

Kerry Thornley!

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Friday, 15 September 2006 16:00 (6 years ago) Permalink

Actually, one of the best commentaries on the assassination came from the KGB. There was a "JFK's KGB files" special around the time of the 40th anniversary of the assassination that got into Oswald's time in the Soviet Union. In short, the KGB thought he was a crazy plant from the CIA and fed him some useless stuff until they could kick him back out of the country.

Later, the KGB figured that Oswald acted with potential mob help, and that the CIA and FBI didn't care since Kennedy was out of their hair.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Friday, 15 September 2006 16:07 (6 years ago) Permalink

don delillo's libra is absolutely essential on this topic. not as fact, certainly, but in the psychology of the thing.

Jams Murphy (ystrickler), Friday, 15 September 2006 16:11 (6 years ago) Permalink

Kerry Thornley = DISCORDIAN... scary though

Also the dude who wrote a BOOK about Oswald pre assasination!

Really cool, wickedly cool, cooly cool bon apetit! (ex machina), Friday, 15 September 2006 16:13 (6 years ago) Permalink

Gear OTM here and on the 9/11 thread.

Teh littlest HoBBo (the pirate king), Friday, 15 September 2006 16:15 (6 years ago) Permalink

>"The fact that many of the conspiracy theorists have been able to >produce convincing evidence..."

Well, there's no convincing evidence for string theory, yet, and we're not giving up on that.

Berating conspiracy theorists for lacking evidence has always struck me as rather unscientific. You invent hypotheses and then gather evidence, right?, not the other way around. If you totally disregard hypotheses that lack evidence, no one would ever gather evidence and there'd be a moratorium on new ideas.

It's only been sixty years, and that's nuthin. Sometimes it takes centuries to solve a murder.

Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:06 (6 years ago) Permalink

yes the truth is that kennedy died on that u-boat

gear (gear), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:09 (6 years ago) Permalink

pt-103 whatever

gear (gear), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:10 (6 years ago) Permalink

I like Ellroy's conclusion in "American Tabloid" - ie, *everybody* did it!

however, Squirrel Police OTFM about the scientific method

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:12 (6 years ago) Permalink

Shakey you did NOT just agree with me. Say it ain't so!

Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Friday, 15 September 2006 17:27 (6 years ago) Permalink

funny how Ollie Stone had a character raise that same counterargumenet only to get shouted again.

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 17:42 (1 year ago) Permalink

i've never read a dedicated book so i basically know nothing but i always assumed that the assassination was a zeitgeist thing: a spirit of hate for kennedy floating thickly around, and this weird insecure perennial patsy who wanted to be Part Of History hanging out in a series of rooms drinking while people he wanted to impress grumbled SOMEONE SHOULD SHOOT THE SONUVABITCH. when there's evidence that lbj or dick helms or whoever are Covering Stuff Up i suspect it's not secrets about dealey plaza they're concealing but secrets about the state of the union 1963. (i like the delivery in stone's nixon of "i don't think you understand how much people hate kennedy down here!") but most of that stuff isn't even secret at this point. idk. for me all the lessons that ought to be learned from the assassination have to do with the way the spirit of a time can become so pressurized and toxic that it suddenly spurts out some violence (which then begets violence, which then etc, and suddenly you have The Sixties). the national need to believe in a conspiracy seems like a fear of history: surely someone else must have done this to us. so basically i'm in mick jagger's camp.

their private gesture for bison (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 18:03 (1 year ago) Permalink

fear of history, fear of random universe, think you nailed it there

the late great, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 18:08 (1 year ago) Permalink

^^^this, plus also treasure maps and secret doors for the next generation

a la bouquet marmoset (Austerity Ponies), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 18:15 (1 year ago) Permalink

"Who did this terrible thing to our city? My GOD it was me!"

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 18:24 (1 year ago) Permalink

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 18:24 (1 year ago) Permalink

ok just imagine Alan Alda playing X, sitting on that bench with Kevin Costner.

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 18:24 (1 year ago) Permalink

haha i thought that was mike love for a second b/c i'm listening to the beach boys thread in another tab and i was like, yeah, i could get behind the idea that mike love masterminded the kennedy assassination

Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 18:33 (1 year ago) Permalink

"A devastating national trauma will cause people to drown their sorrows in refreshing songs about surf, sun and fun... We'll make millions, if everyone can just keep quiet."

Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 18:35 (1 year ago) Permalink

"I loved like the warmth of the sun / Within me at night / It won't ever die."

pplains, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 18:41 (1 year ago) Permalink

i heard crosby stills and nash did it

before they could end the vietnam war ... they had to start it

the late great, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 18:46 (1 year ago) Permalink

"everywoodyallenmovie.com" an important resource of which i was previously unaware

their private gesture for bison (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 18:47 (1 year ago) Permalink

i heard crosby stills and nash did it

Grassy knoll and Oswald's schemin'
THREE SHOT IN MO-TOR-CADE

Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:03 (1 year ago) Permalink

this summer I hear the gunning
Jack dead in DEALEY-O

Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:07 (1 year ago) Permalink

I like this new (?) pop-music-centric conspiracy theory. Too bad Paul McCartney hadn't died yet - one of his doubles would fit the pattern perfectly.

Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:10 (1 year ago) Permalink

funny how Ollie Stone had a character raise that same counterargumenet only to get shouted again.

― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn)

stone in the director's cut later discredited this character when he tried to set up garrison in a gay bathroom sting!

omar little, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:18 (1 year ago) Permalink

The other thing about the assassination, beyond it exerting a continuing fascination-magnetism in the American psyche, etc., is that it's never one HUNDRED percent easy to dismiss conspiracy theories, because of everything else that it turned out the government really was doing, e.g. COINTELPRO, which is partially on record but still mostly redacted and/or classified. Like, it's a ripe atmosphere for conspiracy theories when you have actual conspiracies going on, and everybody (since the, what, early 70s?) now knows at least the outlines of it.

Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:19 (1 year ago) Permalink

Totally. CIA, mafia, they were all off the freaking chain as far as over-extending their reach, and it's not like batshit stuff didn't really happen.

But I agree that the parties involved are no known for their secret-keeping abilities, so single gunman is still the most rational theory that holds any water.

Part of me does love the conspiracy though. Oswald was such a fuckin mook

Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:28 (1 year ago) Permalink

some good stuff here i didn't know. pretty scary imo.

― piscesx, Wednesday, April 18, 2012 7:44 AM

hmmmmm - http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/nagell1.htm

am0n, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:33 (1 year ago) Permalink

parallax view is dope tho

am0n, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:33 (1 year ago) Permalink

pakula is dope

the late great, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:34 (1 year ago) Permalink

you're referring, i believe, to chairing the special operations group. as vice president. as you know, that was... unique. not so much an operation as... an organic phenomenon. it grew. changed shape. it developed... appetites. it's not unusual in such cases that things are not committed to paper. that could be very embarrassing!

their private gesture for bison (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:35 (1 year ago) Permalink

it's a shame you didn't take similar precautions, dick!

their private gesture for bison (difficult listening hour), Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:35 (1 year ago) Permalink

xp re pakula: if you like wide angle shots of soul deadening 70s corporate architecture, he's your go to man

the late great, Tuesday, 8 May 2012 19:36 (1 year ago) Permalink

xp re pakula: if you like wide angle shots of soul deadening 70s corporate architecture, he's your go to man

He was your go-to guy for that sort of thing. Rollover is practically a filmed catalog of office interiors and exteriors.

Vini Reilly Invasion (Elvis Telecom), Wednesday, 9 May 2012 06:03 (1 year ago) Permalink

The other thing about the assassination, beyond it exerting a continuing fascination-magnetism in the American psyche, etc., is that it's never one HUNDRED percent easy to dismiss conspiracy theories, because of everything else that it turned out the government really was doing, e.g. COINTELPRO, which is partially on record but still mostly redacted and/or classified. Like, it's a ripe atmosphere for conspiracy theories when you have actual conspiracies going on, and everybody (since the, what, early 70s?) now knows at least the outlines of it.

― Doctor Casino, Tuesday, May 8, 2012 7:19 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Totally. CIA, mafia, they were all off the freaking chain as far as over-extending their reach, and it's not like batshit stuff didn't really happen.

But I agree that the parties involved are no known for their secret-keeping abilities, so single gunman is still the most rational theory that holds any water.

Part of me does love the conspiracy though. Oswald was such a fuckin mook

― Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, May 8, 2012 7:28 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

OTM, not to mention the Castro assassination plots the CIA kept from the Warren Commission. Oswald may have acted alone, but he wasn't living in a vacuum.

bark ruffalo (latebloomer), Wednesday, 9 May 2012 06:45 (1 year ago) Permalink


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.