The official bored-at-work cryptic crossword pass it on thread.

Jungfrau?

― ledge (ledge), Thursday, 15 December 2005 10:21 (7 years ago) Permalink

Oh my god. Is it Jungfrau?

― Casuistry (Chris P), Thursday, 15 December 2005 11:10 (7 years ago) Permalink

Pending that adjudication:
Blair goes around and about in church, that is, for festive treat (5,3)

― ledge (ledge), Thursday, 15 December 2005 11:23 (7 years ago) Permalink

Mince pie!

― Archel (Archel), Thursday, 15 December 2005 11:26 (7 years ago) Permalink

Yup!

― ledge (ledge), Thursday, 15 December 2005 11:30 (7 years ago) Permalink

Can this be a joint effort, because I haven't worked it out either yet:

Erif (8)

(From today's Araucaria)

― Archel (Archel), Thursday, 15 December 2005 12:01 (7 years ago) Permalink

Ok I know it now. Carry on!

― Archel (Archel), Thursday, 15 December 2005 12:09 (7 years ago) Permalink

Surely backfire or fireback or something - at least one of those may be a word. xpost obv.

― ledge (ledge), Thursday, 15 December 2005 12:10 (7 years ago) Permalink

Yeah I thought fireback. Though it could equally be backfire. Shit.

― Archel (Archel), Thursday, 15 December 2005 12:12 (7 years ago) Permalink

Reminds me of a variation on an old chestnut that was posted earlier:
ONMLKJIH (9)

― ledge (ledge), Thursday, 15 December 2005 12:13 (7 years ago) Permalink

backwater

― Onimo (GerryNemo), Thursday, 15 December 2005 12:14 (7 years ago) Permalink

Ok, I don't get that and I didn't get HIJKLMNO either :(

Oh wait yes I do. H to O. H2O. Right.

― Archel (Archel), Thursday, 15 December 2005 12:19 (7 years ago) Permalink

Yeah, it was Jungfrau. That was a homebrew clue.

― k/l (Ken L), Thursday, 15 December 2005 13:01 (7 years ago) Permalink

Why the "turns"?

― Casuistry (Chris P), Thursday, 15 December 2005 14:09 (7 years ago) Permalink

So... who's up? Onimo?

― Archel (Archel), Thursday, 15 December 2005 15:39 (7 years ago) Permalink

Messed up time for the short generation to get together (7)

(man that's bad, sorry again ailsa)

― Onimo (GerryNemo), Thursday, 15 December 2005 15:47 (7 years ago) Permalink

meeting?

― k/l (Ken L), Thursday, 15 December 2005 15:48 (7 years ago) Permalink

I GOT IT. but I don't have the brain power to come up with a clue. So I'll keep quiet.

xpost

― Huk-L (Huk-L), Thursday, 15 December 2005 15:49 (7 years ago) Permalink

meeting, yes.

― Onimo (GerryNemo), Thursday, 15 December 2005 15:50 (7 years ago) Permalink

I can't come up with my own clues either. But if Huk doesn't want to go I'll just keeping ripping off Araucaria. Is there copyright on clues? Oh well:

Appeal to teacher as to existence of deity? (6)

― Archel (Archel), Thursday, 15 December 2005 16:03 (7 years ago) Permalink

I think it is Osiris...

― ledge (ledge), Thursday, 15 December 2005 16:52 (7 years ago) Permalink

Yep :)

― Archel (Archel), Thursday, 15 December 2005 16:55 (7 years ago) Permalink

Not bad, although O for out for appeal is a bit of a stretch. As is this:

(His) specious argument for confused, pointless cause is trouble (9)

― ledge (ledge), Thursday, 15 December 2005 17:00 (7 years ago) Permalink

I was more bothered by the "sir" part, of course.

If that clue is for what I think it is, then it might be a stretch, because I can't quite put it together. An "e" too many, maybe?

― Casuistry (Chris P), Thursday, 15 December 2005 17:52 (7 years ago) Permalink

My addled brain can't work that out at all, but would "pointless" mean that a compass point i.e. "E" isn't there, solving the mystery of Casuistry's extra "e"? Apologies if this is way off the mark.

― ailsa (ailsa), Thursday, 15 December 2005 18:38 (7 years ago) Permalink

Then where does the Y come in?

― Casuistry (Chris P), Thursday, 15 December 2005 19:03 (7 years ago) Permalink

I don't even know what the answer is! I was just randomly dissecting bits of clue.

― ailsa (ailsa), Thursday, 15 December 2005 19:04 (7 years ago) Permalink

I just worked it out! Can't quite do why either though :(

NO HINT PLZ

― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Thursday, 15 December 2005 19:06 (7 years ago) Permalink

That's about as far is I got, too.

― k/l (Ken L), Thursday, 15 December 2005 19:06 (7 years ago) Permalink

could trouble just mean "try"?

― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Thursday, 15 December 2005 19:07 (7 years ago) Permalink

My last was an xpost, I get it now. I think the clue is fine, except for the "(His)" maybe.

― k/l (Ken L), Thursday, 15 December 2005 19:12 (7 years ago) Permalink

God, I am teh dumb. Yes, clue seems OK to me as well (now that brain has caught up with normality after being stuck at work all day)

― ailsa (ailsa), Thursday, 15 December 2005 19:14 (7 years ago) Permalink

Oh ah, "try". Like "trying times". Ah!

― Casuistry (Chris P), Thursday, 15 December 2005 23:00 (7 years ago) Permalink

Does this mean I get the next clue? Sweet.

― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Thursday, 15 December 2005 23:12 (7 years ago) Permalink

Lack a swarthy heart, sticking with Windows (4)

― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Thursday, 15 December 2005 23:20 (7 years ago) Permalink

(also how do I explain cryptic crosswords in a letter to an american school I am recommending a kid to? "british-style cryptic riddles" sounds daft.)

― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Friday, 16 December 2005 00:01 (7 years ago) Permalink

They're called "cryptic crosswords" here. If the person doesn't know what that term means, however, good luck trying to explain it to them!

― Casuistry (Chris P), Friday, 16 December 2005 00:06 (7 years ago) Permalink

"Cryptic crosswords" doesn't mean like Will Shortz right?

― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Friday, 16 December 2005 00:26 (7 years ago) Permalink

No.

― k/l (Ken L), Friday, 16 December 2005 03:48 (7 years ago) Permalink

Except when the Times runs them, of course. Just, you know, to be pedantic.

― Casuistry (Chris P), Friday, 16 December 2005 07:46 (7 years ago) Permalink

Have I killed this thread? :(

--N-

― Gravel Worklesworth, Tuesday, 20 December 2005 13:40 (7 years ago) Permalink

Not a scooby.

― ledge (ledge), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 14:11 (7 years ago) Permalink

I'm baffled.

― Archel (Archel), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 14:53 (7 years ago) Permalink

I'm baffled too. Want to give one more letter, with the proviso that whoever gets it has to explain HOW the clue works?

― ailsa (ailsa), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 14:54 (7 years ago) Permalink

Sure! -AN-

― Gravel Worklesworth, Tuesday, 20 December 2005 14:55 (7 years ago) Permalink

Is it pane?

― Archel (Archel), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 14:59 (7 years ago) Permalink

See I thought pane, just because of the window thing, but I have NO IDEA WHY!!! Please help us in the right direction, GP...

― ailsa (ailsa), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 15:01 (7 years ago) Permalink

You're at the wrong end!

"Windows" is maybe not very good :(

― Gravel Worklesworth, Tuesday, 20 December 2005 15:04 (7 years ago) Permalink

Ooh, I get it!!

WANT (wa = heart of swarthy, NT = Windows!) = lack

― ailsa (ailsa), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 15:18 (7 years ago) Permalink

Shit, I have to think of a new one now. Bear with me a minute...

― ailsa (ailsa), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 15:19 (7 years ago) Permalink