dudes for the last time this has nothing to do w/ forgetting to use 'imo'
― lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Monday, 13 December 2010 15:54 (thirteen years ago) link
ehh I don't think that's true gbx - from what I recall, the pfork review was using a bunch of extra-album stuff (i.e. stuff not related to the album whatsoever like kanye's twitter, his presence in the media etc.) whereas this no-trivia thing is explicitly using elements from the songs themselves to support his argument
― deej me how to whiney (dayo), Monday, 13 December 2010 15:54 (thirteen years ago) link
Well even if you take the strong words out of it deej, I don't get your point. What is wrong with you trying to convince people of listening to someone you think more people should be listening to?
― irish xmas caek, get that marzipan inta ya (a hoy hoy), Monday, 13 December 2010 15:54 (thirteen years ago) link
― irish xmas caek, get that marzipan inta ya (a hoy hoy), Monday, December 13, 2010 9:54 AM (48 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
nothing, its HOW YOU DO IT that matters.
― lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Monday, 13 December 2010 15:56 (thirteen years ago) link
I think there are terms much better suited to what you are using 'dishonest' for, like maybe overblown, or bombastic, or ostentatious, or exaggerated, or over-the-top?
― deej me how to whiney (dayo), Monday, 13 December 2010 15:56 (thirteen years ago) link
tbf i didn't read that no-trivia piece, just the bit you excerpted. it seemed so awful from that snippet alone that i didn't want to read the whole thing. then i went to the website (i've never heard of it) and the dude is dropping a 1000+ words on each track which made me squeamish so i thought fuck it
i still really don't understand what you all are arguing about in this thread. like, ever. i just pop in sometimes to see if the cluster is still fucking
― kanellos (gbx), Monday, 13 December 2010 15:57 (thirteen years ago) link
i keep hoping it's about race
― modrić in paradise (blueski), Monday, 13 December 2010 15:58 (thirteen years ago) link
there's still time!
― kanellos (gbx), Monday, 13 December 2010 15:58 (thirteen years ago) link
I just like poking deej
― deej me how to whiney (dayo), Monday, 13 December 2010 15:59 (thirteen years ago) link
― deej me how to whiney (dayo), Monday, December 13, 2010 9:56 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
what if it contradicts content directly?
― lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Monday, 13 December 2010 15:59 (thirteen years ago) link
I just like poking deej― deej me how to whiney (dayo), Monday, December 13, 2010 9:59 AM (33 seconds ago) Bookmark
― deej me how to whiney (dayo), Monday, December 13, 2010 9:59 AM (33 seconds ago) Bookmark
well we all do. it's just so....reliable
― kanellos (gbx), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:00 (thirteen years ago) link
sorry deej i remember reading the review and don't remember it being anything more than what you would expect "hey guyz there is this cool dude who should maybe have a bigger following". it wasn't liking you were calling him the second coming of jesus.
― irish xmas caek, get that marzipan inta ya (a hoy hoy), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:00 (thirteen years ago) link
i'm genuinely not sure whether deej is deliberately throwing these accusations around to goad me, or whether he's too dim to actually realise how serious they are for a professional critic. either way, shut the fuck up, you moronic little gadfly.
― lex lex lex lex lex on the track BOW (lex pretend), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:00 (thirteen years ago) link
i just like sbing dayo
― lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:03 (thirteen years ago) link
thank you sir, may I have another
― deej me how to whiney (dayo), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:04 (thirteen years ago) link
arguing? check.butthurtedness? check.
good job guys keeping this thread alive
― one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:05 (thirteen years ago) link
that universalizing-subjectivity-as-fact thing is exactly what i was criticizing lex's piece for basically how criticism works.
― The baby boomers have defined everything once and for all (Dorianlynskey), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:05 (thirteen years ago) link
no, its really not
― lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:07 (thirteen years ago) link
I must be missing a crucial part of your argument then.
― The baby boomers have defined everything once and for all (Dorianlynskey), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:09 (thirteen years ago) link
i think we all get carried away from time to time in visceral reactions to records & end up letting this keep from being as precise as we want. i dont mean this as a damning dishonesty, like some grand conspiracy to deceive an audience, but more like an excitability that makes us more ax-grinding and less precise / genuine.
― lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:17 (thirteen years ago) link
worst thread ever
― i genuinely thought when i first joined that he was the admin (ilxor), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:19 (thirteen years ago) link
at least it parallels the kanye album (overwrought, really stupid in parts, occasional glimpses of greatness but then is weighted back down by its flaws, goes on and on and on with no end in sight)
― i genuinely thought when i first joined that he was the admin (ilxor), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:20 (thirteen years ago) link
xpost. OK, I get your point now. I don't see it as subjectivity vs fact but yeah, it's hard not to get swept up in the moment, whether that's a general cultural mood or just the force of your own initial reactions. I'm not sure whether later, more distanced reactions are any more precise or genuine though - heat-of-the-moment can be genuine even if you later row back a little.
― The baby boomers have defined everything once and for all (Dorianlynskey), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:20 (thirteen years ago) link
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (3576 of them)
― deej me how to whiney (dayo), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:20 (thirteen years ago) link
Other threads are available.
― The baby boomers have defined everything once and for all (Dorianlynskey), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:21 (thirteen years ago) link
but this stoop has the best view
― modrić in paradise (blueski), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:22 (thirteen years ago) link
― i genuinely thought when i first joined that he was the admin (ilxor), Monday, December 13, 2010 11:19 AM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark
well now that you're here
― call all destroyer, Monday, 13 December 2010 16:25 (thirteen years ago) link
next kanye album thread needs to be treated like Animal Collective - Merriweather Post Pavilion (2009)
― irish xmas caek, get that marzipan inta ya (a hoy hoy), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:27 (thirteen years ago) link
― The baby boomers have defined everything once and for all (Dorianlynskey), Monday, December 13, 2010 10:20 AM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark
i think i tend to get more from reviews that tell me something that i, too, see in the record, then discuss how those things function, whether for good or bad. if a writer is describing something that i dont hear -- after reading it & giving it another shot to hear that particular characteristic -- especially when it seems like the writer is involved in a partisan project to convince me of its cultural value / lack thereof -- im probably not going to be very into that review. im less interested in the war between thumbs up vs. thumbs down.
this goes for whether i like or dont like or am ambivalent about a record, i think
― lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:28 (thirteen years ago) link
^^^i might be overstating things a bit here, not sure, have 2 reflect
― lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:29 (thirteen years ago) link
i find the idea that opinions are only genuine if they're somewhat tempered to be really odd. is this a US/UK divide? i remember back in the stylus jukebox days, all the US writers would hand out marks between 5 and 7, for EVERYTHING, whereas in the UK version you were assured every week of multiple 0s and 10s.
― lex lex lex lex lex on the track BOW (lex pretend), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:30 (thirteen years ago) link
a partisan project
every piece of criticism is a "partisan project" o_0
― lex lex lex lex lex on the track BOW (lex pretend), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:31 (thirteen years ago) link
every time i write a review, damn str8 i'm trying to convince the reader of an album or artist's cultural import/lack thereof
i think i tend to get more from reviews that tell me something that i, too, see in the record, then discuss how those things function, whether for good or bad.
^^ caveat that sometimes they can open up something i hadnt heard originally, but do on re-listening
― lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:32 (thirteen years ago) link
yeah but imo insight trumps all
if a writer is describing something that i dont hear -- after reading it & giving it another shot to hear that particular characteristic -- especially when it seems like the writer is involved in a partisan project to convince me of its cultural value / lack thereof -- im probably not going to be very into that review gonna call that writer dishonest
fixed that for you
― deej me how to whiney (dayo), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:35 (thirteen years ago) link
well, if he misrepresents something, yes
― lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:37 (thirteen years ago) link
― lex lex lex lex lex on the track BOW (lex pretend), Monday, December 13, 2010 10:31 AM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
even if it means saying a kanye record sounds just like his old ones, when this is blatantly not the case?
― lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:38 (thirteen years ago) link
*marks bingo card*
― deej me how to whiney (dayo), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:38 (thirteen years ago) link
deej for all the time you seem to have spent thinking about my review, i'm not convinced you've actually read it, or indeed clocked that it's a 150-word capsule review and therefore by its very nature not going to go into great detail or justifications
xp wtf have i "misrepresented"? are you seriously going to try to have this argument again? why don't you just come out with it and call me a liar? this, fyi, is the point at which i would dump a drink on your head if you were saying this shit to me IRL
― lex lex lex lex lex on the track BOW (lex pretend), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:39 (thirteen years ago) link
in your opinion
for chrissakes we covered this already, both al and i actually took the time to explain this to you in detail. are you this fucking annoying IRL?
― lex lex lex lex lex on the track BOW (lex pretend), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:40 (thirteen years ago) link
well, im going to stop arguing this now because lex is threatening to dump drinks on me & dayo is trolling w/ typical uselessness
― lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:41 (thirteen years ago) link
al's argument was far more nuanced -- he suggested that the album based itself on ideas from older kanye tracks but what was added was not worthwhile & in fact made the songs worse -- a subtle distinction to you maybe but it makes a diff imo, its not the same as blatantly retreading his older stuff
― lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:42 (thirteen years ago) link
im going to stop arguing this now
let's fucking hope
― lex lex lex lex lex on the track BOW (lex pretend), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:42 (thirteen years ago) link
he suggested that the album based itself on ideas from older kanye tracks but what was added was not worthwhile & in fact made the songs worse -- a subtle distinction to you maybe but it makes a diff imo, its not the same as blatantly retreading his older stuff
i don't know if you're able to count, but untangling it like this takes up a third of my word count. i'll take using the one word "retread" instead.
― lex lex lex lex lex on the track BOW (lex pretend), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:43 (thirteen years ago) link
if you're calling deej a retard, you spelled it wrong
― TamTam Club (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:47 (thirteen years ago) link
Jesus deej, you just keep going around in circles huh? Were you born with a stumpy left leg?
― irish xmas caek, get that marzipan inta ya (a hoy hoy), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:47 (thirteen years ago) link
done arguing now, just here to lol @ me having the rep for being butthurt when yall are the ones calling me retarded & saying you would throw drinks on me irl
― lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:49 (thirteen years ago) link
i just sorta lol @ the idea that throwing a drink on someone is a thing that actually happens outside of sitcoms
― kanellos (gbx), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:52 (thirteen years ago) link
*splash*
*beat*
"well that went well"
*laff track*
― kanellos (gbx), Monday, 13 December 2010 16:53 (thirteen years ago) link