Kanye West - Dark Twisted Fantasy

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (4640 of them)

still smh @ dishonest - it's too hysterical even to be annoyed by, and it's too obvious that deej is reaching for the word that's the worst insult for critics

lex lex lex lex lex on the track BOW (lex pretend), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 01:33 (thirteen years ago) link

also just in advance there is absolutely no way i'm going to argue about the minutiae what i've just posted re: the production, and especially not with deej, just to prevent this thread from getting even more frustrating

lex lex lex lex lex on the track BOW (lex pretend), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 01:35 (thirteen years ago) link

also the kanye retread thing was already done upthread, I'm just gonna c/p without commenting on it cause I'm not familair with 'jesus walks':

"Power" is a mess??????

― ali-baba-boob-job-bomb.jpg (DJP), Wednesday, November 24, 2010 2:53 AM (6 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

xp: like, it's basically "Jesus Walks Pt 2", I don't get it unless you dislike both of those songs

― ali-baba-boob-job-bomb.jpg (DJP), Wednesday, November 24, 2010 2:54 AM (6 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

well one of the probs with being a bad copy of jesus walks (it actually reminds me more of crack music actually) is that jesus walks already exists

― questeon the answers (call all destroyer), Wednesday, November 24, 2010 2:57 AM (6 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

'Power' is not 'Jesus Walks 2.0' they're both different beasts and they're both great.

― Moka, Wednesday, November 24, 2010 3:06 AM (6 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

You understand that saying something is "(x) Pt 2" is not the same thing as saying those two things are exactly alike? Rather that the latter follows on from the former?

― ali-baba-boob-job-bomb.jpg (DJP), Wednesday, November 24, 2010 3:14 AM (6 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Music-wise? Well yes, they both have spiralling chants and a funk drum loop. Lyrics-wise? If that's the case we could pinpoint almost every song of his following the same themes.

― Moka, Wednesday, November 24, 2010 3:21 AM (6 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

stop being obtuse, dude

Both of them a specific vintage-sounding, martial beat overlaid with staccato interjections from different samples and both follow the same overall structure, with analogous breakdowns in similar spots. I am not saying they are carbon copies but that there is similarity in the way they were constructed; one could even argue that "Power" expands upon the template with both its busier syncopation and the long note in the repeated vocal interjection.

Not saying a word about subject matter, just how the songs are built.

― ali-baba-boob-job-bomb.jpg (DJP), Wednesday, November 24, 2010 3:35 AM (6 days ago) Bookmark

fwiw DJP comes a lot closer to espousing an 'objective approach to interpreting music' than whatever hand-waving you're doing itt deej

.\ /. (dayo), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 01:35 (thirteen years ago) link

hey dayo, you're kind of being a dick itt!

lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 01:37 (thirteen years ago) link

................................

lex lex lex lex lex on the track BOW (lex pretend), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 01:38 (thirteen years ago) link

like, i think im explaining my position thoughtfully & fairly & without whatever argumentative styles ppl are usually giving me shit for, but you're still being an asshole!

lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 01:38 (thirteen years ago) link

okay, this is where I get off the train

sorry if this lands me on your list of 'people who I think are out to get me' deej, maybe you can stare at the candles some more

.\ /. (dayo), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 01:39 (thirteen years ago) link

am i accusing you of 'hand waving'? no, im explaining my position as it relates to yours. am i talking about how frustrating it is to argue with someone who keeps talking shit about me while he argues?

lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 01:39 (thirteen years ago) link

so now you're calling me paranoid. yeah you're a great dude to argue with too man.

lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 01:40 (thirteen years ago) link

ok having not actually listened to this album in over a week (and i'm not attached to the hard drive my mp3s are on atm) so sans detail - it sounded like a graduation rehash most of all. specifically a lot of it sounded like a way inferior spin on "flashing lights" with the rich melody, strings, polished synths etc. pretty conservative throughout - if this is a musical statement it's far more about kanye going back to trad hip-hop post-808s (which he said all along eh was going to do), not going further and further out into experimentation. and a few attention-grabbing samples used unimaginatively.

― lex lex lex lex lex on the track BOW (lex pretend), Monday, November 29, 2010 7:32 PM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i dont know how a minimal track like i.e. 'monster' sounds like flashing lights. or how a song like 'power' sounds like it either. i agree that the record is somewhat conservative, certainly, but i dont think that translates as a rehash of things kanye has done previously. i agree that this is more focused on 'trad hip-hop,' or at the very least, incorporating trad hip hop, but it doesnt really sound like traditional kanye songs to me at all. hes a lot less funny, the music is a lot darker, its much more autobiographical. the songs are much longer.

i dont disagree that if ppl are pushing a line about 'experimentation' they might be overstating it. but it does seem like he's definitively moved in a different direction for this record than any of his others, for better and for worse.

in conclusion, i think that we are listening to different albums

lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 01:44 (thirteen years ago) link

and also, fuck dayo for being a hypocritical dipshit

lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 01:47 (thirteen years ago) link

B-)

lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 01:49 (thirteen years ago) link

i think im explaining my position thoughtfully & fairly & without whatever argumentative styles ppl are usually giving me shit for, but you're still being an asshole!

the argument styles that people usually give you shit for are "inflexibly, all the time and about everything"

phish in your sleazebag (contenderizer), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 01:58 (thirteen years ago) link

hey deej I agree with you

it seems like theres a crit consensus that you're wrong here

but that's just because no one has said they agree with you

so I'm just saying it

peace brother

thistle supporter (mcoll), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 01:58 (thirteen years ago) link

no, its ad hominems. i really dont see what the issue was with my posting in this thread until i called dayo out for being a dick

lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 01:59 (thirteen years ago) link

xp

lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 01:59 (thirteen years ago) link

do agree that it's perfectly reasonable to say that someone is wrong about an album's musical qualities (say, for instance, the idea that kanye is rehashing his past achievements), even if those qualities are hard to define objectively. the onus at that point, however, is on you to make the case.

saying that someone is being "dishonest" about it opens a whole different can of worms, and is much harder to justify with appeals to your own rhetorical fair-mindedness.

phish in your sleazebag (contenderizer), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 02:02 (thirteen years ago) link

why has ghostface killah never made a christmas album?

wheezy f baby (a hoy hoy), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 10:12 (thirteen years ago) link

too Muslim iirc

modrić in paradise (blueski), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 12:36 (thirteen years ago) link

lame.

wheezy f baby (a hoy hoy), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 12:38 (thirteen years ago) link

omg there needs to be a mariah ft. ghostface xmas single

lex lex lex lex lex on the track BOW (lex pretend), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 12:43 (thirteen years ago) link

(all xmas music these days has to revolve around mariah, that's the rule)

lex lex lex lex lex on the track BOW (lex pretend), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 12:43 (thirteen years ago) link

reread this argument, im still right & you guys are being jerks

lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 15:04 (thirteen years ago) link

so were you ever going to answer the direct question I asked you re: my restatement of your argument or are you going to continue playing martyr

Yeezy reupholstered my pussy (DJP), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 15:08 (thirteen years ago) link

so uh isn't the problem here that lex's assertion that this is an album of "rehashes" extremely difficult to prove?

i mean lol @ some of the examples used (breakbeats on mozart, etc.) but what lex is saying isn't remotely like that, and it's not really on him to explain it if he doesn't feel like it.

call all destroyer, Tuesday, 30 November 2010 15:10 (thirteen years ago) link

he did explain it, and it fell apart even further

lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 15:13 (thirteen years ago) link

I haven't read Lex's review so I'm not going to specifically talk about it, but the problem I had with the Pitchfork view wasn't that it was positive, it was that it was playing at empiricism that wasn't there. Nitsuh's works better because there is a concrete subjective argument about why he found the album appealing that works well as value-neutral description of the album.

This is the restatement in question, which I had already reposted once and asked you directly about, which you then ignored in favor of a stupid argument about the word "prog".

Yeezy reupholstered my pussy (DJP), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 15:13 (thirteen years ago) link

i agree with that quote, yes. ryan did that in his Drake review as well

lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 15:15 (thirteen years ago) link

sorry, missed it first time thru

lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 15:16 (thirteen years ago) link

wikipedia page currently lists the guardian as having given this 4 stars

modrić in paradise (blueski), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 15:19 (thirteen years ago) link

oh wait its the kitty empire one i didn't notice before ha

modrić in paradise (blueski), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 15:20 (thirteen years ago) link

i mean lol @ some of the examples used (breakbeats on mozart, etc.) but what lex is saying isn't remotely like that, and it's not really on him to explain it if he doesn't feel like it.

― call all destroyer, Tuesday, November 30, 2010 9:10 AM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark

i guess i kind of disagree that he shouldnt be able to back up his statements like that. if something is vague & leaves ppl wondering what you meant, you should have an argument to back it up. he did & it really seems like an inaccurate description. If people want to defend that paragraph upthread then we can debate that, but i do think that as written 'rehash' of things kanye has done previously is a very inaccurate description of what's going on in this album to the detriment of his overall argument.

lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 15:20 (thirteen years ago) link

the sonic luxuries of this world-beating return to form have no shot at the grace of The College Dropout or Late Registration

This xgau sentence loses me but I love the idea of Kanye as a hip hop Mark Zuckerberg.

deej, FFS let it go. You're beginning to sound insane.

The baby boomers have defined everything once and for all (Dorianlynskey), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 15:23 (thirteen years ago) link

rmde

lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 15:24 (thirteen years ago) link

no just frustrated

lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 15:24 (thirteen years ago) link

while i don't necessarily disagree with (or find "dishonesty") in lex's review i'm not gonna defend it, because i don't think he made a very compelling argument with it, or that he would've necessarily been able to in 200 words anyway (i'll forgive him for glossing over details in a way that i won't for the 800-word raves). i think we could probably pretty easily go through the album track by track and explain why all or most of them are in some way musical or thematic retreads of his earlier work, or at the very nothing it's particularly surprising to hear on a Kanye album in 2010.

Dark Fantasy - kind of a 'low key lyrical opener' in the "Heard Em Say"/"Good Morning" tradition plus the gospel-y College Dropout intro or the kind of obtrusive recurring singing on "I Wonder"
Gorgeous - feels like a more extreme example of the kind of faux-Dilla/RZA hissy lo-fi sound Kanye has always occasionally attempted, never with any particular success, least of all here
Power - as discussed upthread, "Crack Music" x "Jesus Walks" x "Two Words," Kanye even talked in an interview about how he kind of deliberately made the first single something kind of familiar and similar to some of his earlier songs
All Of The Lights - more Kanye-esque in feel (the grandiosity of the horns) and theme (following "Flashing Lights" and "Street Lights") than musically, although that busy drum pattern sounds kind of like a more distorted version of the tom-toms he used to use a lot circa "Overnight Celebrity"
Monster - beat reminds me a lot of the kind of clunky funky Dropout and pre-Dropout mixtape tracks, really probably the most 'old fashioned Kanye' production on the album.
So Appalled - maybe just the RZA guest appearance making me say this but I guess another deliberately sloppy '90s rap homage? I don't really know what he's going for on this crappy song.
Devil In A New Dress - obviously the most straight up Roc-a-fella soul sample type track, some people think the live instrumentation at the end makes it special but even that I think could've been done on Late Registration
Runaway - I could compare this to other hard drums/piano Kanye productions like "Get By" but that would be kind of a copout, I don't really think it sounds like those and this is admittedly one of the more 'different' sounding songs, even if the sound is so basic and minimal that I can't say it's actually very fresh or creative. feel like he was going for a zeitgeist-grabbing "Gold Digger" type pop hit but just fumbled it hardcore.
Hell Of A Life - I wish I could pinpoint one or two specific song titles to cite, but this reminds me a lot of some of more aggressive keyboard beats and pre-808s vocal distortion he was doing on pre-Dropout mixtape stuff
Blame Game - I like this one, nothing mindblowing but it definitely sets a slightly different tone than you're used to on a Kanye record. the obnoxious overlong bit of a comedian riffing is typical of Kanye's first 2 albums, it's just different for it to be actually part of a song now instead of being its own skit.
Lost In The World/ Who Will Survive In America - c'mon, tell me this wouldn't have fit like a glove on 808s. Bon Iver guy is just a new, slightly more indie/obscure model of Maroon 5 guy/Coldplay guy features on previous albums

obviously I'm latching onto some small things or playing up the familiar angle, but I think it'd be harder to do a similar rundown and actually point out things that are distinctly new or fresh or creative within the context of Kanye's discography.

Prince SBanBan (some dude), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 15:26 (thirteen years ago) link

at the very nothing it's particularly surprising to hear on a Kanye album in 2010.

should read "at the very LEAST" but "very nothing" seems like a nice turn of phrase to use here

Prince SBanBan (some dude), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 15:27 (thirteen years ago) link

deej, what I mean (put less bluntly) is that this argument is insoluble. Whatever reasons someone puts forward why MBDTF retreads old themes you won't agree. To my ears, both opinions are valid - there's plenty here that reminds me of previous albums but obviously they're not exactly the same. You're just looking at more and more frustration arguing over a point that, unless you're Kanye West or someone who has staked his critical reputation on this being a masterpiece, DOESN'T MATTER.

The baby boomers have defined everything once and for all (Dorianlynskey), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 15:30 (thirteen years ago) link

wld be curious for deej to go track by track on why this is a fresh and original kanye album

call all destroyer, Tuesday, 30 November 2010 15:32 (thirteen years ago) link

I think where deej is coming from; it all really hinges on whether you think the songs on this album are a conscious attempt to go back to certain songs on the pre-808s albums and redo them, or if you think this newer stuff is heavily informed by the sonic palette but is doing its own thing (which is kind of where I am; to me, if this album is a rehash of anything, it's a thematic rehash of 808s only this time done through a pre-808s soundscape, which is probably why so many people are glomming onto it).

Yeezy reupholstered my pussy (DJP), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 15:36 (thirteen years ago) link

now that both al and i have actually gone into why we think MBDTF pretty much retreads a lot of stuff kanye's already done and doesn't sound particularly fresh or original, it's really incumbent on deej to explain what, specifically, is so new and mindblowing (and i don't mean "the songs are longer"), rather than saying he's not convinced by us - dude newsflash i'm not THAT bothered whether you're convinced, and there are enough people in this thread broadly agreeing with me that your hysterics about people being dishonest just sound mental

lex lex lex lex lex on the track BOW (lex pretend), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 15:36 (thirteen years ago) link

lol, I think I get

Yeezy reupholstered my pussy (DJP), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 15:36 (thirteen years ago) link

damn (re: some dude)

phish in your sleazebag (contenderizer), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 15:37 (thirteen years ago) link

it's really incumbent on deej to explain what, specifically, is so new and mindblowing

He doesn't think there is! He just wants us to acknowledge that other critics hear the new and mindblowing.

look at it, pwn3d, made u look at my peen/vadge (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 15:38 (thirteen years ago) link

to me, if this album is a rehash of anything, it's a thematic rehash of 808s only this time done through a pre-808s soundscape

i would agree with this, broadly - well thematically it continues in the direction of 808s, but "more self-absorbed than 808s" is not what i consider an Important Statement. and as you say, the sonic palette is not radically different to any he's used before

lex lex lex lex lex on the track BOW (lex pretend), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 15:39 (thirteen years ago) link

as a point of legit disagreement: i certainly dont think this record's tracks are unprecedented stylstic approaches, but i do think 'jesus walks x 2 words x crack music' are all three fairly different songs to synthesize in new ways. obviously a lot of the tracks on here have precedents in his previous work, but i find an argument that this constitutes 'more of the same' to be inaccurate. now that al has fleshed out that argument further, i can see the pt about precedents being a set-up for a case that the ego/celebrity/autobiography factor, the musical framing/instrumental connections, the ambition etc. arent enough, that recontextualizing doesnt do enough to kanye's original musical ideas to make them worthwhile. that i even agree with. imo, those factors are enough to definitively say that 'rehash' would be an inaccurate descriptor, though.

lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 15:39 (thirteen years ago) link

oh yeah and obv al's post, together with a hoy hoy going in on this a few days ago, is banging

lex lex lex lex lex on the track BOW (lex pretend), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 15:39 (thirteen years ago) link

um lex new and mindblowing is not the only alternative to 'rehashes of tracks hes done better previously' also djp otm

lotta diamonds ... but prolly more display names (deej), Tuesday, 30 November 2010 15:40 (thirteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.