Classic or Dud: Chuck Klosterman

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (511 of them)
he has a new big book out! i had no idea. there is even fiction in it, i think. i saw it at the bookstore. i never go to the bookstore.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 7 September 2006 02:11 (seventeen years ago) link

it's called chuck klosterman iv, which i admit is pretty funny.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 7 September 2006 02:18 (seventeen years ago) link

I am trying to think of a female writer who reminds me of CK.

don weiner (don weiner), Thursday, 7 September 2006 12:49 (seventeen years ago) link

The article above particularly annoys me. It seems like Klosterman's typical exaggerated sense of his own significance - I can almost picture him saying "Hey, you guys should do a story on how I just don't get all these people calling me 'the voice of a generation'!"

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Thursday, 7 September 2006 12:53 (seventeen years ago) link

then he does a column on the story on how he doesn't get all these people calling him "the voice of a generation" it can be the centerpiece of a new collection of criticism of CK by CK...

you get my drift. he's the post-Cheerios version of those laughable hack newspaper columnists like Bob Greene (who wrote a book about Alice Cooper in the 70s). self-consciousness sells like sex.

m coleman (lovebug starski), Thursday, 7 September 2006 13:03 (seventeen years ago) link

middlebrow postmodernism.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 7 September 2006 13:08 (seventeen years ago) link

Napoleon Klosterman

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 7 September 2006 13:11 (seventeen years ago) link

"CHUCK! COME WRITE SOME SPAM!"

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 7 September 2006 13:12 (seventeen years ago) link

I don't get the impression that he takes himself nearly as seriously as a lot of people here do. I think he's just as surprised of his successful middlebrowsing as his detractors. He's certainly not a phony, hypocritical asshole on the level of, say, Michael Moore. Nor does he seem particularly cynical or exploitative of his middlebrowing, which is something that most hi-falutin' writers embrace once they start getting checks from the likes of Esquire.

don weiner (don weiner), Thursday, 7 September 2006 13:19 (seventeen years ago) link

Oh come on, he's one of the worst cases of self-aggrandizing modesty I've ever seen.

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Thursday, 7 September 2006 13:40 (seventeen years ago) link

I don't get the impression that he takes himself nearly as seriously as a lot of people here do

I think the problem is that he doesn't take himself seriously enough, and indirectly, that he doesn't take his audience seriously either. If he did, then he would probably try to think through his ideas a little better. Instead I get the feeling that he looks for the "Klosterman angle" on a story - ie., the unconventional perspective that will hold up a sociological phenomenon at an unexpected angle - which will give him the element of surprise. And as long as audience disbelief can be suspended for the three or four pages that a Klosterman essay typically runs, he is satisfied with that. He's not really that serious about the issues he discusses, though he tries to come off as a cross between Malcolm Gladwell and Dave Barry.

o. nate (onate), Thursday, 7 September 2006 13:56 (seventeen years ago) link

that beard is really working for him.

M@tt He1geson: Real Name, No Gimmicks (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 7 September 2006 16:15 (seventeen years ago) link

indeed, the last two books were ghost-written by it

latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 7 September 2006 16:17 (seventeen years ago) link

Ha, I would like to read the Saved by the Bell thing.

I'll put the book in the mail tomorrow. :D

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 7 September 2006 16:19 (seventeen years ago) link

I am trying to think of a female writer who reminds me of CK.

Oddly enough, all the examples I can think of are men's-magazine sex columnists.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 7 September 2006 16:21 (seventeen years ago) link

OK, fine, Tiffani-Amber Thiessen didn't really blossom until she bought tits post-SBTB, but I can't believe no one was willing to stick up for Lark Voorhees' hotness. What is wrong with you people?

pdf (Phil Freeman), Thursday, 7 September 2006 16:33 (seventeen years ago) link

lark voorhees was the secret weapon that kept the male crowd coming back.

gear (gear), Thursday, 7 September 2006 16:37 (seventeen years ago) link

screech was the audience surrogate, then?

latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 7 September 2006 16:40 (seventeen years ago) link

Nate, maybe Klosterman doesn't take himself seriously enough, but that isn't the fault of his audience. Nor is it his fault that his audience doesn't. His audience shows up despite his lack of seriousness (and by seriousness, I think it's more about his barstool wisdom. Barstool wisdom being just that--sounds good in the bar, but never vets well the next morning.) I think he's a lot like Dave Barry in that regard, only not quite as dork-funny.

The more I think about it, there are a lot of music writers who possess a strong writing voice that yet don't really have that much to say. Jessica Hopper comes to mind.

don weiner (don weiner), Thursday, 7 September 2006 16:43 (seventeen years ago) link

what do people think of joe queenan these days? he fits somewhere in the barry/klosterman space-time continuum. except he hates low-brow stuff. he wrote a whole book about hating red lobster and riverdance. are they all the bastard sons of pj o'rourke? or george carlin? who will write the next sniglets? why IS rich hall so popular in the u.k.?

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 7 September 2006 17:02 (seventeen years ago) link

i think the dean martin celebrity roast DVD infomercial that rich hall hosts is the greatest television program of all time!

M@tt He1geson: Real Name, No Gimmicks (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 7 September 2006 18:20 (seventeen years ago) link

wait I meant rich little!

M@tt He1geson: Real Name, No Gimmicks (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 7 September 2006 18:26 (seventeen years ago) link

i used to watch rich hall every morning on the david letterman show do the pitkinville farm report. when david letterman was on in the morning.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 7 September 2006 18:26 (seventeen years ago) link

I loved Letterman's show in the morning. I still remember when he played the Peter Marshall Sings album.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 7 September 2006 18:27 (seventeen years ago) link

I love Joe Queenan's two books of movie columns but haven't read his pop culture stuff. Should I bother?

Zwan (miccio), Thursday, 7 September 2006 18:30 (seventeen years ago) link

I remember seeing some article he did about the Stones in the NYT that was awful.

Zwan (miccio), Thursday, 7 September 2006 18:31 (seventeen years ago) link

yeah, the movieline magazine movie articles were the best. i don't know if he ever did stuff as good as that again.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 7 September 2006 19:13 (seventeen years ago) link

(He has more time for Loverboy and Sleater-Kinney than he does for Pearl Jam or Smashing Pumpkins or Fall Out Boy.)

I bet Chuck likes Fall Out Boy more than Sleater-Kinney. I know I do.

Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Thursday, 7 September 2006 19:54 (seventeen years ago) link

Actually I don't know what he thinks of FOB. MCR or Creed or someone then.

Sundar (sundar), Thursday, 7 September 2006 21:01 (seventeen years ago) link

they remind him of black oak arkansas, donna summer, and die kruezen

M@tt He1geson: Real Name, No Gimmicks (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 7 September 2006 21:10 (seventeen years ago) link

two weeks pass...
I ran across a new Chuck Klosterman book the other day. (Isn't this one of those writers they talk about on ILM?) At a skim (and I have no interest in pursuing any further), horrible.

Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 10:53 (seventeen years ago) link

To say one thing in his defense, I was flipping through Esquire and came across this little ditty he wrote called "Five Things No Bar Should Have," - I chuckled at it. I think his writing style is good for this sort of thing.


Five Things No Bar Should Have

By Chuck Klosterman

1. Natural light. Bars are supposed to be womblike sanctuaries, separate from the blinding bleakness of mainstream society. They should always be poorly lit, and they should not have windows. If I'm drinking at 3:00 P.M., the sun should not remind me what time it is.

2. Patrons who are reading. Darkness also discourages all the bozos who think people will be impressed if they're seen reading in a bar, which is as cool as being drunk at Barnes & Noble.

3. Loud music. There is a belief among many bar owners that loud music creates intimacy (which theoretically increases the possibility of romantic interplay, thereby prompting people to return) by forcing patrons to sit closer together and scream directly into one another's ears. Everybody hates this. I have never been in a bar where people complained about the music being too soft.

4. Dogs. Never bring your dog into a bar. Ever. They're not clean, and they make the place feel like a veterinarian's office. How is it that you can't have a lit cigarette in any bar in New York or L.A., but you can have a pit bull? I understand that cigarettes cause cancer; they do not, however, rip the faces off small children.

5. Twenty-two-year-old female bartenders who "just wanna party." I already have enough problems. That's why I came to the bar.

A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 12:44 (seventeen years ago) link

1. He's ugly

2. He's can't be out pretensed

3. He's old

4. He's got no dawgs yo

5. all of the above

PappaWheelie demands you to ''only pick any'' (PappaWheelie 2), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 15:03 (seventeen years ago) link

Maybe Klosterman should hit some leatherbars.

Zwan (miccio), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 15:07 (seventeen years ago) link

Dear bar owner,

I've arrived early today, well before sunset, to make some demands that you help me get laid tonight. As you can see, I'm not naturally attractive, and I'm getting quite old. Can you tailor this entire evening to my needs in this quest? They are great indeed. I've written articles, books, and even been interviewed on TV. I understand the power of networking. This is why I've come to you.

Love,
I don't need to tell you my name, I was on TV once

PappaWheelie demands you to ''only pick any'' (PappaWheelie 2), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 15:12 (seventeen years ago) link

ive definitely been in bars where the music was too soft

klosterman otm on all other counts

and what (ooo), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 21:57 (seventeen years ago) link

As you can see, I'm not naturally attractive, and I'm getting quite old. (...) I've written articles, books, and even been interviewed on TV.

^^ lol @ pappawheelie in "character"

and what (ooo), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 21:58 (seventeen years ago) link

I would heavily dispute the book one. People in bars are not trying to look cool. Some of us were just reading and wanted to get out of the house and drink. Alternately, we are waiting for someone.

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 22:11 (seventeen years ago) link

yeah, waiting ; (

gear (gear), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 22:15 (seventeen years ago) link

I strongly dispute the dogs one. My favorite bar has dogs in it all the time. They beg for peanuts, that's about it.

Rick Massimo (Rick Massimo), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 22:23 (seventeen years ago) link

by dogs, do we mean bitches?

PappaWheelie has no answers to any question that requires actual thought (PappaW, Tuesday, 26 September 2006 22:24 (seventeen years ago) link

what about babies riding dogs?

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 22:29 (seventeen years ago) link

surely there is room for them.

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 22:29 (seventeen years ago) link

kids drink free from 8-10!

M@tt He1geson: Real Name, No Gimmicks (Matt Helgeson), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 22:31 (seventeen years ago) link

Klusterf#@k is a typical hipster wannabe...30 something year old men who still cling desperately to their high school standards are annoying...

Paul Edward Wagemann (PaulEdwardWagemann), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 23:44 (seventeen years ago) link

hmmm.
i wouldn't have thought there be such 'harsh' critque on the guy here, but i guess if there's anywhere there would be, it'd be here.
i actually think he's pretty damned entertaining, i relate to a lot of his stuff. not all (as i'm totally against his worship of all things radiheady), but most. i'd say, that above and beyond everything else, it's entertainment. nothing really earth-shattering, nothing revealing on human condition, but some semi-valid point, well put together, with a ton of pop culture pointers thrown in to illustrate. 'voice of a generation' is really not a deserved (or sought after, i'd think) mantle to throw on the guy. he seems more with it than some, but far too tuned into media to be removed from it.
all that tripe aside, i'll still read his next book, and more than liekly, enjoy it.

edde (edde), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 23:56 (seventeen years ago) link

um...radioheady...

edde (edde), Tuesday, 26 September 2006 23:56 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah, but Klosterman has never been banned from here, so he's got one on you there...

PappaWheelie has no answers to any question that requires actual thought (PappaW, Wednesday, 27 September 2006 00:55 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.