― Raymond Cummings (Raymond Cummings), Thursday, 2 March 2006 17:00 (7 years ago) Permalink
Thanks!
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 2 March 2006 17:00 (7 years ago) Permalink
Even though I'm biased, I really do think Decibel is the best music mag being made in the U.S. But genre mags don't have to play by the same rules as normal mags. they can assume that people know a little bit about the subject and don't have to spoon feed. I still think someone could do this with a music mag aimed at a general audience. write intelligently and with a sense of humor and not play dumb. i really think people would be appreciative. spin started out that way.
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 2 March 2006 17:05 (7 years ago) Permalink
http://www.popmatters.com/music/interviews/mudrian-albert-060228.shtml
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 2 March 2006 17:08 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Thursday, 2 March 2006 17:12 (7 years ago) Permalink
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 2 March 2006 17:16 (7 years ago) Permalink
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 2 March 2006 17:17 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Thursday, 2 March 2006 17:18 (7 years ago) Permalink
"There's a new music magazine, Tracks, which is marketed to an older listening audience. Does this magazine affect you?It is a totally different audience; however, we do cover album reissues. Before us, no other magazines did that. We like to maintain a wider presence, but I think that it would also be a good idea to do a Mojo-like magazine in America."
Is he really saying that Blender was the first magazine to review reissues? Why would he say that?
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 2 March 2006 17:26 (7 years ago) Permalink
(second half 05 newsstand sales: rs - 129k, blender 82k, spin 52k)
― dan (dan), Thursday, 2 March 2006 17:56 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Thursday, 2 March 2006 18:51 (7 years ago) Permalink
― My Psychic Friends Are Strangely Silent (Ex Leon), Thursday, 2 March 2006 19:20 (7 years ago) Permalink
― latebloomer: where dignity goes to die (latebloomer), Thursday, 2 March 2006 20:29 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 2 March 2006 20:30 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Janne Karlsson, Thursday, 2 March 2006 20:40 (7 years ago) Permalink
― latebloomer: where dignity goes to die (latebloomer), Thursday, 2 March 2006 20:43 (7 years ago) Permalink
― latebloomer: where dignity goes to die (latebloomer), Thursday, 2 March 2006 20:44 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 2 March 2006 20:44 (7 years ago) Permalink
― latebloomer: where dignity goes to die (latebloomer), Thursday, 2 March 2006 20:47 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Mr. Vas Djifrens (byzantum), Thursday, 2 March 2006 20:49 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Mr. Vas Djifrens (byzantum), Thursday, 2 March 2006 20:51 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Janne Karlsson, Thursday, 2 March 2006 20:52 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Mr. Vas Djifrens (byzantum), Thursday, 2 March 2006 21:09 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Janne Karlsson, Thursday, 2 March 2006 21:13 (7 years ago) Permalink
― latebloomer: where dignity goes to die (latebloomer), Thursday, 2 March 2006 21:20 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Mr. Vas Djifrens (byzantum), Thursday, 2 March 2006 21:21 (7 years ago) Permalink
― blunt (blunt), Thursday, 2 March 2006 21:24 (7 years ago) Permalink
http://www.gawker.com/news/spin/what-goes-up-must-come-down-spinnin-wheel-got-to-go-round-158054.php
― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 2 March 2006 21:24 (7 years ago) Permalink
― dar1a g (daria g), Thursday, 2 March 2006 21:29 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 2 March 2006 21:29 (7 years ago) Permalink
― juana, Thursday, 2 March 2006 22:02 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Thursday, 2 March 2006 22:20 (7 years ago) Permalink
― blunt (blunt), Thursday, 2 March 2006 22:44 (7 years ago) Permalink
― joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Thursday, 2 March 2006 22:48 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Thursday, 2 March 2006 22:49 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 2 March 2006 22:57 (7 years ago) Permalink
TO
― Je4nne Æ’urÂ¥ (Je4nne Fury), Thursday, 2 March 2006 22:58 (7 years ago) Permalink
― ng-unit, Wednesday, 8 March 2006 15:40 (7 years ago) Permalink
― veronica moser (veronica moser), Thursday, 9 March 2006 00:40 (7 years ago) Permalink
― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 9 March 2006 00:43 (7 years ago) Permalink
that's pretty big news, I'd say! they had a bunch of them.
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Thursday, 9 March 2006 02:43 (7 years ago) Permalink
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 9 March 2006 02:50 (7 years ago) Permalink
not ME personally. just my ilk, i guess.
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 9 March 2006 02:51 (7 years ago) Permalink
I want an ilk.
― Brian O'Neill (NYCNative), Thursday, 9 March 2006 07:35 (7 years ago) Permalink
― anthony easton (anthony), Thursday, 9 March 2006 08:03 (7 years ago) Permalink
roffle
― m coleman (lovebug starski), Thursday, 9 March 2006 11:20 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Russell Dixon (Skinny), Thursday, 9 March 2006 11:22 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Thursday, 9 March 2006 12:33 (7 years ago) Permalink
― pdf (Phil Freeman), Thursday, 9 March 2006 13:16 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 9 March 2006 14:50 (7 years ago) Permalink