― Dadaismus (Dada), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:12 (8 years ago) Permalink
Country completism has to be the most insane, since so many big artists were really prolific and the albums are very unavailable (as opposed to jazz per se). I couldn't imagine trying to get everything by Johnny Cash or George Jones.
― Keith C (kcraw916), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:13 (8 years ago) Permalink
Stewart, do you have this?
http://www.rhinohandmade.com/artistink/index.mgi2
― Stormy Davis (diamond), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:15 (8 years ago) Permalink
I'm more interested in stuff with the band(s) really. I'd rather like (at least a copy of) the CD with the poetry readings that comes with that set, but once you start to get into Don's art on any level above just enjoying images on the web or at a push going to an exhibition, you're getting into a whole new - and substantially more expensive - ballgame.
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:20 (8 years ago) Permalink
I think that kind of depends on your definition of "everything"!
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:23 (8 years ago) Permalink
I think I have basically everything by the Captain recording-wise though! as well as Mallard albums and Mu albums and so forth. I guess I never picked up that Unconditionally Guaranteed-era boot that was floating around tho..
― Stormy Davis (diamond), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:26 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Ken L (Ken L), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:31 (8 years ago) Permalink
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:43 (8 years ago) Permalink
― Ken L (Ken L), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 18:40 (8 years ago) Permalink
I think the only bands I even own every album by are Sleater-Kinney and the Dismemberment Plan.
― Lyra Jane (Lyra Jane), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 22:57 (8 years ago) Permalink
when did "official" catalog stop meaning singles (listing both b-sides and singles seems redundant) and ep's?
― Dan Gr (certain), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 08:09 (7 years ago) Permalink
I quite like both of those albums. Though not everything in between. Was that an exclusive or inclusive statement?
― Ian John50n (orion), Wednesday, 5 October 2005 15:29 (7 years ago) Permalink
i think catering for completists has ruined a lot of best of overview compilations. not everyone needs 2 full cds of an artist at once. especially when it includes not so good or not that interesting early material instead of the hits/unquestionably good stuff.
― titchyschneiderMk2, Saturday, 12 January 2008 10:39 (5 years ago) Permalink
Classic albums reissued on CD with some really shite b-sides tacked on at the end - definite dud. (I know that, in theory, you can program them out, but life's too short.)
― Soukesian, Saturday, 12 January 2008 20:40 (5 years ago) Permalink
As for completism, where it's actually possible, I find I want to resist snagging that last item - because then it's over.
― Soukesian, Saturday, 12 January 2008 20:41 (5 years ago) Permalink
Great when I was 17, glad to get rid of this habit as an adult.
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Saturday, 12 January 2008 21:17 (5 years ago) Permalink
I find I want to resist snagging that last item - because then it's over.
Heh, I try to resist because I know it'll inevitably be disappointing if it's the last (and most likely weakest) album in an artists canon.
― Mr. Odd, Saturday, 12 January 2008 21:46 (5 years ago) Permalink
I think completism for the sake of completism (rather than for the sake of love of that artist's work) is a dud.
I tend not to be a completist, but I've lately been finding riches being more of a completist, e.g by seeking out solo albums by bands I like (like the Who and Kiss), which in the past I wouldn't have bothered seeking out. So I think there's something to be said for seeking out lesser-heralded albums by bands you like, as long you don't go in with too high expectations.
― Euler, Saturday, 12 January 2008 21:50 (5 years ago) Permalink