Britpop : Time For Reevaluation?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1554 of them)
*yawn*...okay, combat nap is over. I feel better.
What did I miss?

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 18:01 (twenty-one years ago) link

Where does Romo fit into all this then?

Venga, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 21:49 (twenty-one years ago) link

Pricey's Dream Deferred.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 21:50 (twenty-one years ago) link

OK, my top 10 Britpop albums (and I don't really consider all of these Britpop, especially not number 1, but they are done by bands or artists instrumental in the period of 1993 - 1997 so here goes...) Oh - I've limited myself to one album per artist, hence no Coming Up by Suede.

1) Dog Man Star - Suede
2) Different Class - Pulp
3) Vauxhall and I - Morrissey
4) The Masterplan - Oasis
5) Elastica - Elastica
6) Parklife - Blur
7) The Sound of McAlmont and Butler - McAlmont and Butler
8) Tellin' Stories - The Charalatans
9) 1977 - Ash
10) The It Girl - Sleeper


Calum Robert, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 22:01 (twenty-one years ago) link

"i was there" will be the title of suzy's autobiography, surely

, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 22:51 (twenty-one years ago) link

These would be my Top 10 Britpop albums. I am limiting myself to the 93-97 period only, despite several great later albums (Coldplay, Travis, Doves, Electric Soft Parade, Supergrass' best two albums and also Oasis' underrated 2000 album "Standing On The Shoulder Of Giants") could well be classified as Britpop.

1. Free Peace Sweet - Dodgy
2. Radiator - Super Furry Animals
3. Homegrown - Dodgy
4. The Great Escape - Blur
5. Parklife - Blur
6. It Doesn't Matter Anymore - Supernaturals
7. (What's The Story) Morning Glory - Oasis
8. Moseley Shoals - Ocean Colour Scene
9. Fuzzy Logic - Super Furry Animals
10.Coming Up - Suede

Note that I don't count Radiohead as Britpop. If I did, then "OK Computer" would be at the very top of the list - beating even Dodgy at their best.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 23:01 (twenty-one years ago) link

Aww Morrissey included in Britpop -- I feel so warm & fuzzy.

in America the only people who possibly cared about these acts effected bad English accents and dressed badly

Have we met?

Mary (Mary), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 23:22 (twenty-one years ago) link

In America the only people who possibly cared about these acts effected bad English accents and dressed badly.

You mean, just like several of the earliest Nuggets bands 30 years earlier?

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 23:38 (twenty-one years ago) link

You mean, just like several of the earliest Nuggets bands 30 years earlier?

But those guys were emulating the Rolling Stones, not bloody Blur.

Venga, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 23:43 (twenty-one years ago) link

But those guys were emulating the Rolling Stones,

Not at the start. The earliest Nuggets bands were emulating The Beatles. Listen to The Knickerbockers, The Gants or The Choir. Not a lot of Rolling Stones there, for certain.

not bloody Blur.

Sadly not, as 93-95 era Blur was clearly much better than 63-65-era Stones. :-)

Anyway, the Britpop bands didn't emulate Blur either. In fact, apart from obscurities such as Menswear and Octopus, no other Britpop bands sounded quite like Blur.

There were a lot of Oasis copycats around though.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 23:53 (twenty-one years ago) link

Even Geir couldn't defend The Levellers or Cast.

Langley, Thursday, 6 March 2003 03:41 (twenty-one years ago) link

Theres a story about how Phil Collins heard what he thought was Oasis and went into Our Price and sang it to the staff so they could identify it. It wasnt Oasis it was Dodgy 'Good Enough' (the biggest pile of turd britpop was responsible for)
Phil Collins thought Dodgy were better than Oasis or Blur. Says it all really.

Philip Buesa, Thursday, 6 March 2003 03:42 (twenty-one years ago) link

shoegazing is getting much better press

keith (keithmcl), Thursday, 6 March 2003 04:12 (twenty-one years ago) link

The real golden age of British pop after the 60s was 1983 - 1986 Echo, Smiths, Cocteau Twins, New Order, Jesus & Mary Chain, etc.

The silver age was 1988-1991 My Bloody Valentine, Ride, Slowdive, etc.

After the death of shoegazing, lo there was a famine in the land of British pop. And into the valley of death stepped the Melody Maker, with their feeble attempt to manufacture "Suedemania". But the kids saw that Suede were shit, and a feeble attempt to copy the Smiths to boot, and then Bernard Butler quit the band, and the future of British pop looked bleak indeed. And into the valley of death stepped Blur, whose debut album was a weak blend of shoegazing and baggy/Madchester. But then Damon bought a Kinks album and declared that modern life was rubbish. And then Oasis appeared. And Blur and Oasis begat Pulp, and Sleeper, and too many other boring bands to count. And then an era of mediocrity reigned across the isle of Albion from 1994 - 1997.

Hopefully future generations will look back and realize that Massive Attack, Bjork, the Chemical Brothers and the entire dance scene was what was really happening during the Britpop era, and not the idiotic "feud" between Blur and Oasis.

John Hunter, Thursday, 6 March 2003 04:19 (twenty-one years ago) link

I feel like going home and smashing every britpop CD i own

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 6 March 2003 04:28 (twenty-one years ago) link

The best Hendrix album is 'Band OF Gypsies' because that has groove. Also i agree that SLy & The Family Stone and Parliament/Funkadelic are better than The Beatles(who i also like)
Geir , do you consider a good rythmn section important?

Philip Buesa, Thursday, 6 March 2003 04:42 (twenty-one years ago) link

Oops wrong thread. My apologies my friends.

Philip Buesa, Thursday, 6 March 2003 04:45 (twenty-one years ago) link

exclude Moz and the Roses, and britpop is one of the more reasonless "movements" - i kinda liked the Stay Together EP by Suede back in the day, tho i suspect that i'd hate it today.

roger adultery (roger adultery), Thursday, 6 March 2003 04:49 (twenty-one years ago) link

Amen to Massive Attack, Chemical Brothers, The Orb, Portishead, Tricky , Underworld being remembered in the future for mid 90s music and not Britpop. But i fear it will be written about in the same way the summer of love in the 60s has been for the last 40 years.

Philip Buesa, Thursday, 6 March 2003 04:53 (twenty-one years ago) link

"i was there" will be the title of suzy's autobiography, surely

*hums "Losing My Edge"*

shoegazing is getting much better press

Goddammit! I should have written that article! But that would have meant pitching to Hilburn and there are things I will not do.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 6 March 2003 05:39 (twenty-one years ago) link

No, you'd actually love the Stay Together EP because it has 'The Living Dead' on it which is fucking gorgeous and tragic beyond belief.

I'd actually forgotten about The Bends. I'd have that in my top 10. so scrap Sleeper from my list.

Calum Robert, Thursday, 6 March 2003 08:01 (twenty-one years ago) link

so scrap Sleeper from my list.

who are you and what have you done with Calum?

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 6 March 2003 08:02 (twenty-one years ago) link

Holding him hostage for payment of old Sleeper singles. Anyone want to cough up or do I cut off the first finger?

Calum, Thursday, 6 March 2003 08:52 (twenty-one years ago) link

"i was there" will be the title of suzy's autobiography, surely

No, I've settled on "you weren't"

suzy (suzy), Thursday, 6 March 2003 11:31 (twenty-one years ago) link

Geir , do you consider a good rythmn section important?

No, I am completely indifferent when it comes to the rhythm section (unless it gets so dominant that it starts dominating - then I hate it). A drummer's only job is to keep the pulse.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 6 March 2003 11:39 (twenty-one years ago) link

It wasnt Oasis it was Dodgy 'Good Enough' (the biggest pile of turd britpop was responsible for)

Dodgy was the best band of that era, not the worst.

However, saying that Dodgy was a product of Britpop is wrong. They started out before Britpop started, and it would be more natural to compare them to acts like Lightning Seeds, Crowded House and Jellyfish - bands that already in the dark ages of music (1987-91 was the first period for music since before The Beatles) decided that they disliked the current unmelodic trend and settled for something classically melodic and influenced by the great 60s music.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 6 March 2003 11:42 (twenty-one years ago) link

Even Geir couldn't defend The Levellers or Cast.

I am not trying to defend Cast, because Cast just didn't have good enough melodies. Their choruses didn't stick in one's head like they should, and they were too harmonically boring too, sounding more like The Searchers than The Beatles.

The Levellers started out already in 1991 or so, and were never Britpop.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 6 March 2003 11:44 (twenty-one years ago) link

'A drummer's only job is to keep the pulse'

Granted, most drummers would do well to stick to just doing that, but isn't the multiplicity of these posts starting to bore the fucking shit out of everybody else too, to the point of giving up in disgust at virtually all threads? For somebody who hates drums so much, these posts are like a 909 stuck on demo mode with the 'off' switch broken

dave q, Thursday, 6 March 2003 12:03 (twenty-one years ago) link

If Dodgy weren't Britpop because they started making records before the period then that kinda kills Pulp and Blur as well doesn't it?

Duh!

Calum Robert, Thursday, 6 March 2003 12:06 (twenty-one years ago) link

Holding him hostage for payment of old Sleeper singles. Anyone want to cough up or do I cut off the first finger?
Ooooh Ooooh, Can I cut him instead? Can I? CAN I?!

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Thursday, 6 March 2003 14:01 (twenty-one years ago) link

hey hey q!!

the pinefox, Thursday, 6 March 2003 15:57 (twenty-one years ago) link

Geir why was 87-91 so barren? it was maybe the most exciting times in music?
Sonic Youth - Day Dream Nation
Acid House
Nirvana - Bleach/Nevermind
Slint - Spiderland
Pixies - Doolittle
Detroit Techno
808 State
Public Enemy
Big Black
Happy Mondays
Spacemen 3
Massive Attack
Primal Scream
My Bloody Valentine
lots of great albums by those bands and more.
Do you dismiss each and every one?

Kevin McMonagle, Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:07 (twenty-one years ago) link

bands that already in the dark ages of music (1987-91 was the first period for music since before The Beatles)
87-91! A Dark Age!
Fuuuccck!

Thats it! No more diplomacy. Gloves are coming off!!
Who wants to hold Gier down while I give him a beating?

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Thursday, 6 March 2003 18:43 (twenty-one years ago) link

stevem to thread!

Don King, Thursday, 6 March 2003 18:59 (twenty-one years ago) link

Sonic Youth - Day Dream Nation
Acid House
Nirvana - Bleach/Nevermind
Slint - Spiderland
Pixies - Doolittle
Detroit Techno
808 State
Public Enemy
Big Black
Happy Mondays
Spacemen 3
Massive Attack
Primal Scream
My Bloody Valentine
lots of great albums by those bands and more.
Do you dismiss each and every one?

I am not saying I dismiss all music from that era (for instance, Crowded House and Jellyfish made their best records then)

But out of the ones you mention Primal Scream, and to some extent Massive Attack, are the only ones I like. Generally the 87-91 era was too much about rhythm and noise and not enough about melody and harmony.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 6 March 2003 22:38 (twenty-one years ago) link

If Dodgy weren't Britpop because they started making records before the period then that kinda kills Pulp and Blur as well doesn't it?

Dodgy never changed their musical style. Blur did. Blur more or less "invented" Britpop on "Modern Life Is Rubbish" (although Suede should get some credit for that too)

As for Pulp, well, maybe they weren't really Britpop. In fact, they were just playing the kind of Bowie/Roxy Music-influenced style that was so popular when they started out in the mid 80s, and for some reason they never broke through until that kind of music became fashionable again because of Britpop.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 6 March 2003 22:41 (twenty-one years ago) link

No, I am completely indifferent when it comes to the rhythm section (unless it gets so dominant that it starts dominating - then I hate it). A drummer's only job is to keep the pulse.

Someone may already have asked this but do you tap your foot or nod your head at all when you listen to music? If so, why?


David (David), Thursday, 6 March 2003 23:19 (twenty-one years ago) link

Aw, man, there are like at least four that are you on here.

(I am playing find the unconvincing, hastily concocted pseudonym)

Ferg (Ferg), Thursday, 6 March 2003 23:47 (twenty-one years ago) link

Massive Attack, Bjork, the Chemical Brothers and the entire dance scene was what was really happening

Your definition of what was "really happening" in the mid-90s couldn't be any more Britpop if it tried...

Venga, Friday, 7 March 2003 00:59 (twenty-one years ago) link

tiger were fucking great

schnell schnell, Friday, 7 March 2003 19:20 (twenty-one years ago) link

808 State were flying the flag for melody in electronic dance music between '87 and '91 (evidence: clarinet of 'Pacific State', the flute in 'Olympic'), then beyond, along with a chunk of the Chicago and Detroit merchants (May, Frankie Knuckles, Marshall Jefferson etc.) - although their prime motivation was surely rhythm they all had a very strong sense of the use of melody and deployed it very well.

'87-'91 was for me the most exciting time for music in my lifetime in terms of innovation and experimentation, perhaps not so much melody and harmony and quality MOR/AOR (tcha, big loss eh?). Geir's conviction that melody and harmony are automatically superior to rhythm and noise by definition do not match my own views obviously.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 10 March 2003 20:38 (twenty-one years ago) link

Massive Attack, Bjork, the Chemical Brothers and the entire dance scene was what was really happening
Your definition of what was "really happening" in the mid-90s couldn't be any more Britpop if it tried...

the way the big dance-based acts are attached to the Britpop concept is irritating, partly for me because i felt it was very much a 'them and us' conflict that prevailed throughout most of the 90s i.e. there were indie kids and there were ravers and never the twain shall meet, until the Chemical Brothers broke thru i guess. it was good that the likes of Tom n' Ed broke down that pathetic barrier but it always felt like it was more a case of the rockist indiekids finally starting to 'get' dance music rather than ravers discovering guitars (dare i say the dance fans were that bit more open-minded, given they were into what was genuinely a new thing? i would but its a horrendous generalisation on both counts)

stevem (blueski), Monday, 10 March 2003 20:44 (twenty-one years ago) link

The Bloomsbury set, Suzy? You and like, Avril? Really? And yes, there was a Riot/Britpop connection, mainly through Blur and Huggy Bears weird anti-symbiotic relationship, but I don't think S*M*A*S*H were the link. I was also, need I say, there (if there's a there there which there bleeding wasn't).

Jim Eaton-Terry (Jim E-T), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 13:24 (twenty-one years ago) link

>"the way the big dance-based acts are attached to the Britpop concept is irritating, partly for me because i felt it was very much a 'them and us' conflict that prevailed throughout most of the 90s i.e. there were indie kids and there were ravers and never the twain shall meet, until the Chemical Brothers broke thru i guess. it was good that the likes of Tom n' Ed broke down that pathetic barrier but it always felt like it was more a case of the rockist indiekids finally starting to 'get' dance music rather than ravers discovering guitars (dare i say the dance fans were that bit more open-minded, given they were into what was genuinely a new thing? i would but its a horrendous generalisation on both counts)"

Balls. That whole rock/dance thing was dead and buried by 92 - I remember bumping into loads of the britpop lot on the Brighton scene in '91 - and going to Trance Europe Express a bit later. The line was totally blurred - especially as britpop came out of Sarah, to some extent, and most of the Sarah fandom were loved up by the turn of the '90s (at least round my way).

Jim Eaton-Terry (Jim E-T), Wednesday, 12 March 2003 13:31 (twenty-one years ago) link

I posted some thoughts about Britpop on CoM today. I haven't attempted to define or analyse; just some semi-random reminiscing about what it/the '90s meant to Laura and myself, in a vaguely therapeutic attempt to say goodbye. Also an excuse to take a couple of weeks' break from CoM - less time to devote to it at present due to increased social life and imminent monthly workload from Uncut, plus I want to do some admin work on the site (i.e. a proper index!).

Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 12 March 2003 13:36 (twenty-one years ago) link

one year passes...
....bwahahahahahaha!

Vagina Wolf, Friday, 23 July 2004 00:54 (nineteen years ago) link

this thread is giving me a rash

purple patch (electricsound), Friday, 23 July 2004 01:23 (nineteen years ago) link

one year passes...
"The whole of Rolling Stone discourse is predicated on the baby-boomer myth that something great-but-unsustainable happened in the 60s. Everything is fitted to that. It justifies the lifestyles of the editors and businesspersonss who made their pile exploiting that culture. Rock music is reduced to an adolescent outburst that "must" succumb to capitalist business-as-usual" (Ben Watson).

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Friday, 12 August 2005 07:55 (eighteen years ago) link

isn't ben watson that menk guy who likes zappa?

N_RQ, Friday, 12 August 2005 08:18 (eighteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.