― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Sunday, 15 June 2003 04:10 (9 years ago) Permalink
― David Allen, Sunday, 15 June 2003 04:10 (9 years ago) Permalink
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Sunday, 15 June 2003 04:11 (9 years ago) Permalink
― Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Sunday, 15 June 2003 04:26 (9 years ago) Permalink
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Sunday, 15 June 2003 04:31 (9 years ago) Permalink
― scott seward, Sunday, 15 June 2003 04:39 (9 years ago) Permalink
― Brian the Snorf, Sunday, 15 June 2003 04:59 (9 years ago) Permalink
― nabisco (nabisco), Sunday, 15 June 2003 05:09 (9 years ago) Permalink
― adam west (adamwest), Sunday, 15 June 2003 05:24 (9 years ago) Permalink
― Al (sitcom), Sunday, 15 June 2003 06:12 (9 years ago) Permalink
me: is this a coke ad?
nancy: yeah, i think so.
me: this sure has been on a long time
nancy: yeah.
me: holy fuck, this is that r kelly song everyone on ilm is talking about!!
nancy: wow.
me: i hope they play it again.
me: is THIS a coke commerical?
nancy: i'm really confused now.
― jess (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 15 June 2003 06:19 (9 years ago) Permalink
22. Am I the only one who thinks he sounds like he's been through some shit on this song? Maybe that's my projecting real life onto the song. There's just way too much soul for a song about downing mix drinks, and you can almost here him trying. I mean, it sounds like he really needs to have fun this freakin' weekend or he's gonna stress out.
Actually, that's only in part of the song, and that juxtaposed with his obvious lust for partying has a great effect.
― Adam A. (Keiko), Sunday, 15 June 2003 06:22 (9 years ago) Permalink
― trife (simon_tr), Sunday, 15 June 2003 06:34 (9 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 15 June 2003 07:32 (9 years ago) Permalink
― nick.K (nick.K), Sunday, 15 June 2003 08:00 (9 years ago) Permalink
'thru ma 'fro' - wordplay. sweet.
― s.r.w. (s.r.w.), Sunday, 15 June 2003 09:47 (9 years ago) Permalink
26. There's something about the production that sounds stripped down just enough so it seems to (cough) "bear the devices"--I'm thinking of the drum fills just before the chorus, and the aforementioned synth line, even the way he double-tracks his vocals ("Sippin' on coke and rum [rum]/I'm like so what I'm drunk [drunk]")....It's like each device calls a bit of attention to itself because the overall production is so sparse (by contemporary standards). Even the relatively langorous way he sings "bounce bounce bounce bounce bounce" (I take it she's bouncing very slowly) calls more attention to that word than a typical R&B/hiphop track where "bounce" would be one of a zillion instructions spit out in 20 seconds or less.
― amateurist (amateurist), Sunday, 15 June 2003 10:20 (9 years ago) Permalink
28. The good grammar: "Food everywhere / as if the party was catered"
― amateurist (amateurist), Sunday, 15 June 2003 10:22 (9 years ago) Permalink
― amateurist (amateurist), Sunday, 15 June 2003 10:23 (9 years ago) Permalink
― amateurist (amateurist), Sunday, 15 June 2003 10:25 (9 years ago) Permalink
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Sunday, 15 June 2003 10:37 (9 years ago) Permalink
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Sunday, 15 June 2003 10:39 (9 years ago) Permalink
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Sunday, 15 June 2003 10:42 (9 years ago) Permalink
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Sunday, 15 June 2003 10:46 (9 years ago) Permalink
I'd like to hear R. get busy a capella like on the second track of Night Beat.
― amateurist (amateurist), Sunday, 15 June 2003 10:49 (9 years ago) Permalink
― nick.K (nick.K), Sunday, 15 June 2003 16:07 (9 years ago) Permalink
― stevem (blueski), Sunday, 15 June 2003 16:15 (9 years ago) Permalink
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Sunday, 15 June 2003 16:16 (9 years ago) Permalink
*I have also expressed the same feelings about this song, but I was wrong.
― Neudonym, Sunday, 15 June 2003 16:20 (9 years ago) Permalink
― Neudonym, Sunday, 15 June 2003 16:22 (9 years ago) Permalink
― stevem (blueski), Sunday, 15 June 2003 16:36 (9 years ago) Permalink
42. Because the entire first verse has been reconstructed to sound like it's a prelude to a song that then (once the chorus kicks in) suddenly exists.
― Neudonym, Sunday, 15 June 2003 16:42 (9 years ago) Permalink
― nabisco (nabisco), Sunday, 15 June 2003 16:43 (9 years ago) Permalink
44. r kelly has never once sported a 'fro to my knowledge
45. does this mean he referring to hair, um, elsewhere than his head?
― jess (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 15 June 2003 16:44 (9 years ago) Permalink
he struck me as a complete tosspot long before those stories emerged, for what its worth (apparently nada)
― stevem (blueski), Sunday, 15 June 2003 16:52 (9 years ago) Permalink
― Colin Beckett (Colin Beckett), Sunday, 15 June 2003 17:11 (9 years ago) Permalink
― Neudonym, Sunday, 15 June 2003 17:20 (9 years ago) Permalink
― Vinnie (vprabhu), Sunday, 15 June 2003 17:26 (9 years ago) Permalink
as another aside, i feel this IS the correct way to think about it...but still i doubt i will ever like the song.
― stevem (blueski), Sunday, 15 June 2003 17:38 (9 years ago) Permalink
― Arthur (Arthur), Sunday, 15 June 2003 17:51 (9 years ago) Permalink
― Al (sitcom), Sunday, 15 June 2003 17:53 (9 years ago) Permalink
I'm totally with #7. I love that he identifies the song as a remix--it's a song about itself!
― s1utsky (slutsky), Sunday, 15 June 2003 17:54 (9 years ago) Permalink
― William Bloody Swygart (mrswygart), Sunday, 15 June 2003 17:55 (9 years ago) Permalink
― Al (sitcom), Sunday, 15 June 2003 17:59 (9 years ago) Permalink
Plus:
50) His green-and-white wristband.
― William Bloody Swygart (mrswygart), Sunday, 15 June 2003 18:07 (9 years ago) Permalink
― Cozen (Cozen), Sunday, 15 June 2003 18:30 (9 years ago) Permalink
it's unbelievable to me that a human being actually wrote this song -- it's such an accepted and perfect american monument that it's easy to forget that it had to be formulated in r. kelly's head and worked on and perfect and honed and all that. at this point it just exists as something that... represents us that it's almost like it was here before we all were. it's like the statue of liberty or something.
― hitler runoff (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 11 March 2010 19:26 (3 years ago) Permalink
anyway
368. how guttural yet clear and pristine he sings "mama roooollin that body" -- he hits such a perfect balance that it's the only line i refuse to sing along to because he just sings it too perfectly that i don't want to deny myself the opportunity of hearing it again
― hitler runoff (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 11 March 2010 19:27 (3 years ago) Permalink
― hitler runoff (J0rdan S.), Thursday, March 11, 2010 2:26 PM (39 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
this is crazy talk, the whole song is so much more a natural extension of the artist's catalog/persona than it is a universal standard singular hit song
― some dude, Thursday, 11 March 2010 20:09 (3 years ago) Permalink
i mean "I Believe I Can Fly" fits your description way more
― some dude, Thursday, 11 March 2010 20:10 (3 years ago) Permalink
well... i think it's both a universal standard hit song & and an extension of kelly's catalog -- i wasn't trying to imply that it was an outlier or anything -- it's just so perfectly constructed to me that it's almost inhuman
― hitler runoff (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 11 March 2010 20:15 (3 years ago) Permalink
uh oh – auteur theory at work!
― The Magnificent Colin Firth (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 11 March 2010 20:36 (3 years ago) Permalink
ha
― guapism rules (The Reverend), Thursday, 11 March 2010 20:50 (3 years ago) Permalink
369. I've always felt like it sounded like a 70s soul song, but for seven years it escaped me exactly just which one. Then it hit me, it sounds like "Let's Do It Again" by the Staple Singers!
― you might be a goon but what's a goon to a viking? (The Reverend), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:43 (3 years ago) Permalink
370. Who are from Chicago. Just like R. Kelly. And it was written and produced by Curtis Mayfield, also a Chicagoan. I was in Chicago for a week or two last summer, and both those songs feel exactly like Chicago during the summer.
― you might be a goon but what's a goon to a viking? (The Reverend), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:44 (3 years ago) Permalink
371. Back to the dancehall inflection on "Mama ROLLIN that body". He really drives the point home with the even more affected "LISTEN NOW!" that follows in the background, as if to remove any ambiguity that he knows exactly what he's doing.
― you might be a goon but what's a goon to a viking? (The Reverend), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:46 (3 years ago) Permalink
372
― Ward Fowler, Friday, 11 March 2011 21:26 (2 years ago) Permalink
http://www.avclub.com/articles/young-the-giant-covers-ignition-remix,71123/
― some dude, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 20:34 (1 year ago) Permalink
^not one of them
― 40oz of tears (Jordan), Tuesday, 20 March 2012 20:45 (1 year ago) Permalink
this is, i think, at least a little offensive to ppl that use ASL ("look at how they ~talk~") but g-d i lol'd ok
― catbus otm (gbx), Tuesday, 11 September 2012 22:13 (8 months ago) Permalink
Released 10 years ago today.
― jaymc, Tuesday, 22 January 2013 18:35 (3 months ago) Permalink
I can't even believe that. Am I just getting old, or has the entirety of post 2000 time blurred together into one big indigestible mass?
― Dominique, Tuesday, 22 January 2013 18:39 (3 months ago) Permalink
Yes.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 22 January 2013 18:46 (3 months ago) Permalink
kids still love this song.
― billstevejim, Tuesday, 22 January 2013 21:26 (3 months ago) Permalink
also 2003 was fucking amazing, so expect a lot more of these "omg no wai 10 years ago" deals
― billstevejim, Tuesday, 22 January 2013 21:28 (3 months ago) Permalink
we get links
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 23 January 2013 16:46 (3 months ago) Permalink
There was no "Ignition" (orig mix), was there?
― Mark G, Wednesday, 23 January 2013 17:06 (3 months ago) Permalink
Crying 4 u
― The Reverend, Wednesday, 23 January 2013 17:10 (3 months ago) Permalink
it was a radio hit before the remix dropped. it's on The Chocolate Factory directly before the remix. it's a fucking awesome song, and I hate that the remix has so totally eclipsed it for most people.
xp
― Doctor No Cassie (some dude), Wednesday, 23 January 2013 17:10 (3 months ago) Permalink
I saw Will Oldham and Matt Sweeney cover the original "Ignition" in 2004.
― jaymc, Wednesday, 23 January 2013 17:14 (3 months ago) Permalink
It's not a bad song, but I've been disappointed when I've come across "Ignition" but not "Ignition (Remix)" in karaoke books.
Almost disappointed that there was an "original", it'd be a bit KLF if it didn't though.
Will have to hear it.
― Mark G, Wednesday, 23 January 2013 17:17 (3 months ago) Permalink
yeah I was DJ'ing for some kids one time early 2004 and I accidentally played the original version. they were like literally teenagers though so i think i cared more than they did.
― billstevejim, Wednesday, 23 January 2013 17:20 (3 months ago) Permalink
There was no "Sex In The Kitchen" (orig mix) though, was there?
― ( ͡° ͜ʖ͡°) (sic), Wednesday, 23 January 2013 21:07 (3 months ago) Permalink
these songs are on platinum-selling albums guys, jeez
― Doctor No Cassie (some dude), Wednesday, 23 January 2013 21:26 (3 months ago) Permalink
this is like when kids think the Jerry Lewis voice was originated by The Animaniacs
I feel sorry for anyone not familiar with the joys of "GIRL. I'M. READY. TO. TOSS. YOUR. SALAD." tbh
― The Reverend, Wednesday, 23 January 2013 22:10 (3 months ago) Permalink
just remembered this topped Stylus' best-of-decade list three years ago.
― the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 23 January 2013 22:10 (3 months ago) Permalink
haha i knew al was gonna flip at that post
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 23 January 2013 22:40 (3 months ago) Permalink
Okay, but there was no "Snake" (orig mix) though, was there?
― ( ͡° ͜ʖ͡°) (sic), Wednesday, 23 January 2013 22:48 (3 months ago) Permalink
― 乒乓, Sunday, 27 January 2013 05:28 (3 months ago) Permalink