Sea Devils And Die: GeroniMoffat's Doctor Who In The 2010s

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (6943 of them)

Loved the "trap" speech at the end, despite it having been completely spoiled in its entirety by the trailer for the episode.

Also glad that they addressed the one massive inconsistency that almost stopped me enjoying Blink: the angles being the "quickest beings in the whole of the universe" or whatever, but only creep up on people at the speed of someone playing What's the time, Mr Wolf. It wasn't a great explanation but i'm appeased.

Slumpman, Sunday, 25 April 2010 09:57 (fourteen years ago) link

Weirdly, the viewer appears to count as watching them i.e. they never move on 'our' camera.

I like to think of this as a bit of 4th wall breaking viewer participation. They have used "video recordings" and full closeups in this episode and in blink and i imagine they'll do it a bit more next week.

Slumpman, Sunday, 25 April 2010 09:59 (fourteen years ago) link

I agree with all of aldo's complaints and still enjoyed the episode. I just roll with the gripes and enjoy my kids being terrified :)

TARDIS brake thing was terrible though. You'd get away with retconning some og vs nu Who but we've had The Master steal the TARDIS and "forget to put the breaks on" only a series ago.

broad layering (onimo), Sunday, 25 April 2010 10:02 (fourteen years ago) link

I still did enjoy it, though.

THE QUEST IS THE QUEST (aldo), Sunday, 25 April 2010 10:39 (fourteen years ago) link

I need to watch it again, watched in a room full of people under the influence of some alcohol. We did all go "fucking hell, that's Mike Skinner!" at the same time though, which was nice and funny and reminds me that my mates are ace. I think all of Aldo's things annoyed me as well, but I basically still really liked it, was right levels of geeky and scary.

ailsa, Sunday, 25 April 2010 11:02 (fourteen years ago) link

You can't have an army of Weeping Angels and some of the shots shown (particularly in the next week trailer when they're coming down the corridor) explicitly prove this as some Angels are in the field of view of the others. This would be forgiveable or could be overlooked if it hadn't been the resolution of the last one - that them being able to see each other is enough to freeze them.

I think this is why they all appeared to be decayed to the point of not having eyes or proper faces.

Melissa W, Sunday, 25 April 2010 11:05 (fourteen years ago) link

did nobody else just completely hate this:

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4056/4550745002_4ccd96a569.jpg

an animated gnorton popping up in the middle of the doctor's "there's one thing you should never put into a trap" speech.

koogs, Sunday, 25 April 2010 11:11 (fourteen years ago) link

Ugh. I watched it on iPlayer fortunately. F' me, if I were Moffat I'd be livid.

Remember me, but o! forget my feet (GamalielRatsey), Sunday, 25 April 2010 11:12 (fourteen years ago) link

it doesn't help that their cartoon Norton actually looks more like Tennant.

think the complaints upthread are some olympic pedantry as usual.

River Song says she has pictures of "all of your faces" in her book. In which case, why the "Oh, you're so young" in SitL? if she knew what DT looked like and he didn't look any older when he regenerated?

she also said she needed the "spotter's guide" to know which order they go in. when she met DT she didn't seem to know if he was before or after MS (SITL dialogue actually includes "have we done crash of the Byzantium yet?" :o ). i'm going to handwave all this as 'she's got a bit of the ol' space madness'. hopefully she doesn't know what the 12th Doctor looks like.

mdskltr (blueski), Sunday, 25 April 2010 11:29 (fourteen years ago) link

There are likely to be hundreds of well-earned complaints about the Graham Norton plug but I did wonder if it wasn't put there to flummox 'pirates'?

yes we kenya (suzy), Sunday, 25 April 2010 11:32 (fourteen years ago) link

who's pirating this tho when its on iplayer? bit unfair on non-brits!

mdskltr (blueski), Sunday, 25 April 2010 11:34 (fourteen years ago) link

Was thinking of people trying to watch or make a DVD further afield. Also I guess only the English got served with the Norton preview.

yes we kenya (suzy), Sunday, 25 April 2010 11:39 (fourteen years ago) link

River Song's comments about meeting the Doctor in the wrong order surely have something to do with the crack in time and space? Therefore nitpicking about continuity errors when these inconsistencies may well be part of the mysterious timey-wimey story arc running through the season seems premature.

Count Palmiro Vicarion (Stew), Sunday, 25 April 2010 12:44 (fourteen years ago) link

with the 'how come they can look at each other' thing, seems like the Lonely Assassins were a subdued/sensitive sort generally as they weren't snapping people's necks either.

mdskltr (blueski), Sunday, 25 April 2010 12:48 (fourteen years ago) link

Like a hott version of Harry Knowles.

I am never going to be able not to think of her this way now.

ô_o (Nicole), Sunday, 25 April 2010 14:05 (fourteen years ago) link

I thought this episode was absolutely fucking splendid.

i would rather burn than spend eternity with god and rapists (chap), Sunday, 25 April 2010 14:07 (fourteen years ago) link

lots of pics of new daleks in sheffield the other day:

http://www.flickr.com/search/?w=all&q=daleks+sheffield&m=text

dunno what that black one with the double guns is about though. hold does it hold its tea?

koogs, Sunday, 25 April 2010 16:23 (fourteen years ago) link

Weirdly, the viewer appears to count as watching them i.e. they never move on 'our' camera. I can let this go in the interests of drama, but it's still not right.

Are you real?

New Hors d'œuvre (DavidM), Sunday, 25 April 2010 17:50 (fourteen years ago) link

No.

THE QUEST IS THE QUEST (aldo), Sunday, 25 April 2010 17:51 (fourteen years ago) link

That is kind of a weird criticism, that they didn't break the fourth wall when they could have.

Walter Melon (Abbott), Sunday, 25 April 2010 17:52 (fourteen years ago) link

My point is that there's implicit fourth wall, when I don't think there should be.

In terms of my realness, is your doubt in that I'm prepared to handwave away errors, or that you don't think I should criticise errors in writing? (btw, I am not nearly the only one on the internet who has spotted this fault)

THE QUEST IS THE QUEST (aldo), Sunday, 25 April 2010 18:04 (fourteen years ago) link

It never made sense for them to not be able to look at each other. How could they ever exist as a race if that were the case? Why have faces at all etc. I'm still putting this down to the Lonely Assassins just being emo freaks with low self-esteem.

Now what would be really cool is if we see a drawing of an Angel become animated and materialise.

mdskltr (blueski), Sunday, 25 April 2010 18:21 (fourteen years ago) link

I've watched it again and none of the other angels besides the one from the ship have eyes. Some just have cavernous holes where their eyes should be, others just blank, eroded stone.

Melissa W, Sunday, 25 April 2010 18:32 (fourteen years ago) link

question is whether the radiation/energy from the Byzantium will restore their sight, limbs etc. and if so whether they'll then be able to congregate without visual shields

mdskltr (blueski), Sunday, 25 April 2010 18:50 (fourteen years ago) link

Dudes, River Song is so not a future wife. She's a con-artist, there's something very weird about her, and the Doctor is going to really regret not looking in that diary. Thought the 'who or what is River Song' thing was pretty explicitly trailered in this.

She's either a con artist or a renegade Timelord with an axe to grind.

Matt DC, Sunday, 25 April 2010 18:59 (fourteen years ago) link

Perhaps she is The Rani.

Melissa W, Sunday, 25 April 2010 19:04 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah i started thinking that again but seems too obvious. interesting that Father Octavian would be willing to keep this secret from the Doctor too tho.

mdskltr (blueski), Sunday, 25 April 2010 19:50 (fourteen years ago) link

also is it driving anyone else mad how much that guy sounds like a newsreader?

mdskltr (blueski), Sunday, 25 April 2010 19:51 (fourteen years ago) link

somehow not very scared or very interested in this. can't put my finger on it. oddly unengaged with the entire series so far. only some of it can be down to wailing baby/toddler shenanigans :-(

Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Sunday, 25 April 2010 19:51 (fourteen years ago) link

Hmm, con artist eh? That's a good possibility, what with her antics on the space ship (very Bond, that bit). The aside about not going back to jail was very intriguing too. Why did the church guys put her in jail? And why did they let her out? What do they know about her connection to the Doctor? Perhaps the church are religious maniacs who see the Time of the Angels as the Rapture, so they've got River Song to bring the Angel down from the spaceship.
There's definitely something funny about her, but I think there still must be some timey-wimey weirdness involved...

Count Palmiro Vicarion (Stew), Sunday, 25 April 2010 19:59 (fourteen years ago) link

"But they're all dead"
"So's Virginia Woolf, and I'm on her bowling team"

New Hors d'œuvre (DavidM), Sunday, 25 April 2010 20:35 (fourteen years ago) link

"Whenever an image of an Angel is created, it can become an Angel" - what, like the one on the back of your eye? That's recorded by your optic nerve until your brain processes it, and remains there until you forget it? Yes, it happens very quickly, but what is time on that level to a being that exists in the quantum?

Which is maybe why there's dust and shite coming out of Amy's eye,what wit her having stared at one too long?

Loved the episode.

> what with her having stared at one too long?

he said later that it was because she'd looked into its eyes. think it was also in her imagination, like the stone hand.

so many rules...

i liked that the angels never moved when our eyes were on them. and think about the alternatives - some bloke in an angel costume or expensive cgi.

koogs, Monday, 26 April 2010 06:58 (fourteen years ago) link

There are likely to be hundreds of well-earned complaints about the Graham Norton plug...

Beeb apologies for crappy Norton trail

Why is the bbc behaving like a US channel even before Cameron and Murdoch Jnr. get their hands on it?

Ned Trifle II, Monday, 26 April 2010 07:30 (fourteen years ago) link

in "blink" the weeping angels were all people in costume, directed to hold really still. i don't know if they're still doing it that way, but good lord is it effective.

also, if you don't like river song, it's p. funny to remember that someday she's going to be tending to digital children in a computerized tampon commercial for the rest of eternity.

the international mooncake trade (reddening), Monday, 26 April 2010 07:33 (fourteen years ago) link

They're still people in suits in this one too, which is impressive given the final effect.

Fantastic episode, by the way. Adored the pre-titles teaser too.

unpredictable johnny rodz, Monday, 26 April 2010 07:51 (fourteen years ago) link

Glad they set this in a gigantic space labrynth rather than yet another identikit industrial spaceship.

The con artist thing sprung from realising that's how Moffatt originally wrote Captain Jack but there's something way way shifty about her. Also "ssh, spoilers" is an annoying catchphrase.

Angels that break your neck and inhabit your body is a good innovation though, because angels that zap you back in time are not very scary when you have a working time machine.

Thought there might have been something really obvious about the eye dust thing, like maybe Amy was wearing contact lenses that reflected the angel or something.

Amy-Doctor relationship really good in this one, I like how she's constantly taking the piss out of him.

Matt DC, Monday, 26 April 2010 08:57 (fourteen years ago) link

Loving almost everything about this series so far. Lots of MYSTERY.

Matt DC, Monday, 26 April 2010 08:58 (fourteen years ago) link

Angel projecting image on her soul. At least that's my reading after that 'Doors to the soul' bit and reading about Ficino's theories of love and pneumatic phantasms early this morning.

Remember me, but o! forget my feet (GamalielRatsey), Monday, 26 April 2010 09:08 (fourteen years ago) link

To wit:

It is enough that someone looks at him: the pneumatic ray emitted by the other person will penetrate through his pupils into his spiritual organism and, on arrival at the heart, which is its centre, it will cause an agitating disturbance and even a lesion, which can degenerate into a bloody infection. In the opposite case, for instance when the subject is fascinated by the eyes of a beautiful woman and cannot stop looking at them, he emits through his pupils so much spirit mixed with blood that his pneumatic organism is weakened and his blood thickens. The subject will waste away through a lack of spirit and through ocular haemorhage

Weirdos.

Actually, ocular ghost stories are quite interesting - didn't Ringu also have an element of their being something fracture or wrong with the affected person's eye? Kipling's The End of the Passage also great for this.

Remember me, but o! forget my feet (GamalielRatsey), Monday, 26 April 2010 10:12 (fourteen years ago) link

Also like the way the Doctor calls her "Pond!"

Has a Holmes/Watson vibe (except that she's way smarter and sexier than Watson, obviously)

Good ep - best moment easily Amy's getting trapped in The Ring. Nice cliffhanger speech, too - good way to end it.

Nhex, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 03:22 (fourteen years ago) link

Just looking at that spoilery article, and noting the date on it... though it's been accurate so far.

Attention please, a child has been lost in the tunnel of goats. (James Morrison), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 04:09 (fourteen years ago) link

My point is that there's implicit fourth wall, when I don't think there should be.

I'm not sure what you're talking about -- the way I'm reading this is that the viewers ought to see the Angels moving when none of the other characters are watching? That would be a terrible idea, because it sets us outside of the fictional world specifically as viewers, whereas if they don't move when we're watching, we implicitly become wrapped up in the narrative and thus IT IS SCARIER BECAUSE WE'D BETTER KEEP ON EYE ON THEM TOO. Like, I was actually doing Amy's blink-one-eye-at-a-time thing as she was getting trapped in the APC-thingy (and I doubt I'm the only one who got that wrapped up into it)!

Daleks in NYC (Leee), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 16:29 (fourteen years ago) link

I have enough faith in Moffatt to be able to write himself out of the 'how come these angels can look at each other?' corner.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 16:47 (fourteen years ago) link

who's pirating this tho when its on iplayer?

people whose computers are utterly incapable of playing Flash video

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 16:55 (fourteen years ago) link

oh i always forget about the downloadable version

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 16:56 (fourteen years ago) link

people whose computers are utterly incapable of playing Flash video

disgusting savages

mdskltr (blueski), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 17:03 (fourteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.