Being sexually attracted to (or repulsed by) certain racial types: the acceptable face of racism?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (230 of them)
i get the feeling that the actual points of my posts early would never actually be read, anyway.
-- ken c

Not so!!! I ain't hatin' on you playa!~ It's just a pet peeve, sorry if I overreacted. People throw the racism card around a little too freely, in my opin. We can't help our feelings, although with time and experience, the lucky ones may be able to change them. We can't make ourselves like or love or respect people we don't love, even if it's based on something like ethnicity. It's a shame, but it's not a crime. I think racism is what happens when you act on those feelings to deny people access to things they have an inherent right to, like housing or employment or access to commercial establishments and the like. No one has a right to my love or respect or lust even. It's a shallow person who defines things so categorically, perhaps, I don't find white women attractive, or something like that, sure. But it's not racist. There has to be a distinction between criminal behavior--which I think racism is--and unfortunate narrow-mindedness. That's all I mean. But in the case of someone who says, as you quote, I don't find Asian women attractive, while not necessarily racist, gives one pause to think he might also be racist in behavior. That could well be.

Skottie, Tuesday, 13 April 2004 23:08 (twenty years ago) link

i guess we just have a different definitions of racism.. see to me i see this kind of narrow mindedness as racism, but then when i say racism i don't think of it as necessarily "omg wtf put him in jail" kind of thing.

Especially when it comes to feelings and attraction... i mean - it's naturally such a subjective thing, anyway (like haw haw the way the girls all have the hots for me just because i'm so pretty etc.) - you'd file a lawsuit if someone doesn't give you a job because you're ugly!!

But I digress, of course, noone has the right to anybody's love or feelings - however, when things become so catagorical like someone saying "i don't find <race> attractive", implying that the race is the deciding factor in attractiveness. Well, of course i wouldn't put this person to jail and i can understand how thoughts like this could come about, it's not even necessarily "right" or "wrong" (love is a feeling), but i would certainly classify it as a racist thought.

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 09:51 (twenty years ago) link

n.b. i think it's just the whole "holy shit oh god fucking hell" that people sometimes associate with racism nowadays that sometimes confuse the issue. most of the time it's omg wtf shit, but sometimes it's only natural.

on a similar vein i'm an utter sexist when it comes to attraction. haha yes, i like the sex bit.

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 09:59 (twenty years ago) link

Good point. Does that make me a homophobe because I don't want to fuck men?

Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 10:09 (twenty years ago) link

Surely the definition of racism is very simple: it is discrimination which is fully or partly based on race. When we look for a sexual partner, we discriminate for and against people on account of their gender, looks, interests, social position etc. Throw race into the mix and you have an element of racial discrimination, i.e. a degree of racism. Which is to claim that, in general, to you, one race is more attractive than another. But racism is a way too emotive word, so let's just call it racial discrimination, which can be positive (i.e. affirmative action)

I'm still interested that it seems acceptable to say: "I'm attracted to black men." but it's not acceptable to say: "I don't find black men attractive."

not telling, Wednesday, 14 April 2004 10:17 (twenty years ago) link

Markelby, your homophobia point is a red herring. You can discriminate against men sexually without hating homosexuals. Just like you can discriminate against a race sexually without hating people of that race.

not telling, Wednesday, 14 April 2004 10:21 (twenty years ago) link

So what's the point in calling it racism? Is this entire thread to make a pissy little semantic point?

Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 10:36 (twenty years ago) link

dingdingding!

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 10:40 (twenty years ago) link

I'm still interested that it seems acceptable to say: "I'm attracted to black men." but it's not acceptable to say: "I don't find black men attractive."

it's ok to say "i'm attracted to black men" sure, but probably not to say "i'm ONLY attracted to black men".

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 10:53 (twenty years ago) link

mark you're not a homophobe for that because if you're like me, you'd totally fuck a lesbian right?

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 10:55 (twenty years ago) link

I'm bored of my own thread, so no doubt it's time to let it gracefully drift down the page and into oblivion. But no, Markelby, I didn't just want to make a pissy semantic point. I was interested in what people thought of the question of race and sexual attraction. I was interested in why some people find certain races more sexually attractive than others, and I was interested in what people's attitude to that was.

Pip pip!

not telling, Wednesday, 14 April 2004 10:56 (twenty years ago) link

haha i just read that last post, well actually a liberal lesbian would be even better.

xpost

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 10:57 (twenty years ago) link

Ken, what exactly is wrong with saying "I'm only attracted to black men?" Why shouldn't you be? Is it wrong to say "I'm only attracted to men?"

not telling, Wednesday, 14 April 2004 10:59 (twenty years ago) link

see again. this is it. i shouldn't have said "ok" or "not ok".. i lazily used "ok" as a shorthand for "isn't racist", or "not ok" as "is racist".

see my post earlier. it is racist to only be attracted to one race, but it's not something that would get you into jail.

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 11:03 (twenty years ago) link

There has to be a certain element of discrimination in who we find sexually attractive, otherwise it would be complete chaos. So I have to find a particular person from each race that i find sexually attractive, or I'm being racist, right?

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 11:05 (twenty years ago) link

Surely saying "I'm only attracted to black men" is racist on your terms, even if you yourself are white! Fair enough that the thread stimulated an interesting debate, but it's a shame your own input to it was based on critcising people because they weren't playing the same language games as you.

Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 11:12 (twenty years ago) link

That was to not telling, obv, not PP. Oh, and fwiw I think it's very lame to say "I'm bored of my thread". See it through dude.

Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 11:13 (twenty years ago) link

you don't "have to" find anybody of each race attractive, that's the thing. you're attracted to people, most or all of them are of a particular race/type/whatever, that's fine, but why make sweeping generalisations?

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 11:15 (twenty years ago) link

His face is black because he is a sweep, not because he is trying to make himself more attractive to people who attracted to underage black boys. If that happens, it's just a bonus.

Momus (Momus), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 12:36 (twenty years ago) link

I still hold to a strict constructionist view of the definition of racism. There has to be action taken or denied based on race and these actions must regarding something to which the person has a right to (like employment) or a right to be free from (like lynching). There's a big difference between this and not finding certain groups attractive. Of course, these things can overlap.

But then consider people like Strom Thurman, an institutional racist who found black people attractive, fucked them, and had kids with them. Then as legislator tried to fuck them again metaphorically. Or J. Edgar Hoover who was a notorious persecutor of gays and then was of course gay himself.

No, I'm sorry, I think there has to be a very tight definition. You have a right to a job but no right to be thought of as attractive.

Skottie, Wednesday, 14 April 2004 12:37 (twenty years ago) link

May I just say that I am repulsed by the blatant discrimination of J0hn Darnie11e's statement at the top of this thread that it's racist when Momus does it but is otherwise OK. I suppose he thinks his off-colour joke is acceptible. Why, if I weren't in this wheelchair I would show him a thing or two.

Momus (Momus), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 12:48 (twenty years ago) link

But y'are, Blanche. Y'are.

Skottie, Wednesday, 14 April 2004 12:50 (twenty years ago) link

being a momusist c/d?

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 13:06 (twenty years ago) link

Would saying "I find woollen hair, flat noses and big lips unattractive" be more or less racist than saying "I don't find black people attractive"?

Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 14:10 (twenty years ago) link

Duh, less, because those aren't physical traits that are exclusive to them thurr people of higher melatonin levels.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 14:12 (twenty years ago) link

Er, melanin, whichever...I forget.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 14:13 (twenty years ago) link

i only fuck senegalese, but i'll suck off anyone from fraconphone west africa really.

phil-two (phil-two), Wednesday, 14 April 2004 14:16 (twenty years ago) link

If this is racism, then bisexuals are the only non-sexists.

the, Monday, 19 April 2004 05:34 (twenty years ago) link

I don't discriminate!

Why would anyone find a certain 'race' unattractive? All of them seem to have plenty of attractive people in my experience. I wish there weren't so many goddamn white people everywhere here though, ya know.

christhamrin (christhamrin), Monday, 19 April 2004 06:12 (twenty years ago) link

If this is racist is not liking, say, indian food also racist?

Sick Nouthall (Nick Southall), Monday, 19 April 2004 07:42 (twenty years ago) link

Nah, that's just silly. :)

ipsofacto (ipsofacto), Monday, 19 April 2004 07:49 (twenty years ago) link

hating indian food is akin to hating life

the surface noise (electricsound), Monday, 19 April 2004 07:50 (twenty years ago) link

Touch my vindaloo/This is life

The Papadom Girls (Dan Perry), Monday, 19 April 2004 13:11 (twenty years ago) link

one year passes...
Well, I guess if you want to debate the semantics of it, it is de facto racism. But I differentiate between a concious decision to discriminate against someone on the basis of their race and the innate set of preferences I have been influenced by culturally(and born with?). One is intentional (more or less), while the other isn't. They are separate in my mind the same. I don't intentionally set out to find a reason not to find someone attractive.

alma, Saturday, 31 December 2005 20:19 (eighteen years ago) link

That distinction is ridiculous. It also moderately offends me in how sorely it underestimates racism. Seriously, seriously: racism is a "conscious decision," as distinct from something "culturally influenced?" Think this over for a second: are you kidding me? By that logic, "racism" would amount to, say, Indian people waking up one day and saying "you know, I've decided that from now on I don't like Puerto Ricans." And by that logic, you would not be racist if you grew up in the segregated American south, in a culture where it was just generally assumed that black people were inferior to everyone else. Do you see how unreal and near-dangerously dumb this is?

No, "political" ideas about race stem from basically the same material as interpersonal ideas about race -- cultural influence, family influence, personal experience, all the usual shit that shapes people's worldviews. If there's a distinction between them, it's this: we can put intellectual checks on our "political" ideas about race. They matter in our opinions about the world and in the way we treat people, so when we recognize racism in our thinking, we can use our big old brains to try and quash it. Our genitals are more complicated. For one thing, they're not out in the open; chances are we'll never really have to investigate why we're attracted to the people we're attracted to, and the mechanics of the thing are so closed-off and mysterious to us that we probably wouldn't get very far even if we tried. More importantly, it's really hard to override our attractions with logic and intellect.

So yeah ... who we're attracted to is just as bound up in our ideas about race as anything else. And yeah, there's gonna be mild or complex racism in that, as there is in anything. There's a reason we don't go around hassling people about that, though, and the reason is that it matters very little. It doesn't deny people jobs or housing; it probably won't affect how you vote; it probably won't affect how you treat people -- it's limited to the sphere of your personal life, and so it's entirely, entirely your own business. Your business, like everyone else's, is going to be affected by complicated ideas about race, yes, but in most cases that's between you and your own brain.

And remember that this is true of loads of things having nothing to do with race. Everything affects our romantic life, good and bad. The way you think about sex can be influenced by the model of your happy parents or by having been sexually abused as a child. It's all in there, and it's pretty much up to individuals to sort out how to deal with it -- what's "right" and what's "wrong," what's "healthy" and what's not, what's worth trying to change and what's not.

And please for god's sake let's not pretend racism is any less complicated than that -- this idea that racism is some kind of "conscious decision" wherein people decide to totally hate some group is just completely unreal. It's as complicated and semi-conscious as anything else in our heads, and it's way less about some sort of decided "hate" than it is about little ideas and preconceptions and tiny chunks of worldview.

nabisco (nabisco), Saturday, 31 December 2005 21:07 (eighteen years ago) link

one month passes...
revive that one if you want to discuss this issue.
-- Sororah T Massacre (stevem7...), February 16th, 2006 3:48 PM. (blueski) (later) (link)

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 16 February 2006 15:49 (eighteen years ago) link

also good is the sequence on this thread

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Thursday, 16 February 2006 16:00 (eighteen years ago) link

isnt this just about sexual preference? or cultural preference even? i know black and asian people who wouldnt really want to date outside their races due to cultural reasons. they have more in common in terms of background and things like that with black and asian people.

okok, Thursday, 16 February 2006 16:00 (eighteen years ago) link

This thread fairly well sums up my sexual triggers. It excludes almost everyone, and I don't know how it happened. There appears to be nothing I can do about it.

Zora (Zora), Thursday, 16 February 2006 22:52 (eighteen years ago) link

hahahaha

i'm OTM in case nobody noticed

-- the surface noise (electricsoun...), April 13th, 2004 7:35 AM.

chrisco (chrisco), Thursday, 16 February 2006 23:25 (eighteen years ago) link

wow i was so cranky on this thread

electric sound of jim (and why not) (electricsound), Thursday, 16 February 2006 23:27 (eighteen years ago) link

If this is racism, then bisexuals are the only non-sexists.

-- the (logica...), April 19th, 2004.

Exactly. Am I sexist because I am only attracted to one sex ?

splates (splates), Thursday, 16 February 2006 23:29 (eighteen years ago) link

do people have an obligation to examine/challenge their preferences in this way? not that it's the same of course but is being heterosexual the acceptable face of homophobia? and not that race and class are the same either, but do welfare mothers really make better lovers?

what of people who are attracted to those who look like themselves (not just generally but specifically)? how many of us does this describe? are they racist if they're vain/narcissistic (primarily auto-erotic?) in the first instance?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 16 February 2006 23:30 (eighteen years ago) link

"sexual orientation" isn't quite the same thing, though, as it isn't nearly the same proxy for class/opportunity (which isn't to say freedom)?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 16 February 2006 23:32 (eighteen years ago) link

asian women do nothing for me. there, i said it.

Paunchy Stratego (kenan), Friday, 17 February 2006 00:01 (eighteen years ago) link

Nabisco's December 31st post is well put, and pure 100% truth.

josh in sf (stfu kthx), Friday, 17 February 2006 00:04 (eighteen years ago) link

Seconded.

Paunchy Stratego (kenan), Friday, 17 February 2006 00:06 (eighteen years ago) link

Yeah Nabisco OTM there.

He starts well by making a culturalist case, and saying that racism is present in all situations. But then he spoils his point a bit by saying "it's pretty much up to individuals to sort out how to deal with it"... as if there were a place where individuals could step outside of all that cultural stuff he's just described, or as if there weren't also group solutions, cultural solutions, political solutions (legislation, changing social mores, being John and Yoko and posing naked together on an album sleeve, etc).

Momus (Momus), Friday, 17 February 2006 00:37 (eighteen years ago) link

dude, just buy nabisco a Valentine already. we get it, you wuv him.

horsehoe (horseshoe), Friday, 17 February 2006 00:41 (eighteen years ago) link

Naked John and Yoko solved nothing, for anyone, ever, let's just be honest about that one.

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Friday, 17 February 2006 00:56 (eighteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.