New bohemianism: beards, pickling beets, Fleet Foxes, rye...

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (192 of them)

that is terrible

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:33 (fifteen years ago) link

i only count one example of alliteration ("from falling", and maybe strawberries and summertime???) unless I'm missing something huge

Mr. Que, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:35 (fifteen years ago) link

ilx prac crit club

Just got offed, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:36 (fifteen years ago) link

and where's the assonance, nabisco, where is it??? is it internal?

Mr. Que, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:36 (fifteen years ago) link

i only took one poetry class ever

Mr. Que, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:36 (fifteen years ago) link

"their throats" = I guess that counts as alliteration

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:37 (fifteen years ago) link

why would anyone ever say 'wear a beard'??
unless this is a british thing to say, in which case, carry on being british or whatever

rrrobyn, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:38 (fifteen years ago) link

follow/swallow

Tied round Their Throats

their/there

etc.

it's not bad -- i'd have to hear it though. i guess i should go to that free concert tomorrow?

amateurist, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:38 (fifteen years ago) link

not many internal rhymes, but lots of assonance

amateurist, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:38 (fifteen years ago) link

lots of "rr" sounds

amateurist, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:39 (fifteen years ago) link

i understand yr point re construction and internal rhyme but blargh

rrrobyn, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:39 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah i think the strongest part about those lyrics is the imagery and the imagery is not. . .that great

Mr. Que, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:40 (fifteen years ago) link

edie brickell to thread.

chicago kevin, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:41 (fifteen years ago) link

And I turned round and there you go!

this line doesn't fit well into the verse... it seems to me...

amateurist, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:41 (fifteen years ago) link

crunk foxes

uh oh I'm having a fantasy, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:43 (fifteen years ago) link

I think the free concert is tonight, Am.

jaymc, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:43 (fifteen years ago) link

RYE

Mackro Mackro, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:47 (fifteen years ago) link

http://www.bellewood-gardens.com/Rye%20Bread_1.jpg

I CAN TOTALLY SEE ROBIN PECKNOLD IN THE CRUST

Mackro Mackro, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:50 (fifteen years ago) link

butter churning is so hot right now

velko, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:50 (fifteen years ago) link

jordan's concert is tonight, the fleet foxes are tomorrow (the 18th)

amateurist, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:50 (fifteen years ago) link

Oh, I thought you meant in Chicago. It looks like Fleet Foxes are playing a free show in Chicago tonight, a free show in Madison tomorrow, and then coming back to Chicago on Saturday for Pitchfork...?

jaymc, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:53 (fifteen years ago) link

No matter how many caveats are given y'all pretend not to have sorted out the "lyrics on paper" thing, but I will continue to post bits I like in the full knowledge that everyone will have more fun going "god that's terrible," as if similar bands are doing anything better -- whatevs

The well-turned thing about the imagery is the red-on-white scarves/snow that it kinda suggests at the end may have turned to red-on-white blood/snow. The "there you go" bit breaks meter because it's set on a chord change. The follow/swallow is a nice internal rhyme that I appreciate because the unnecessary rhyme ("swallowed") is a better and more interesting word there than most alternatives. "White snow red as strawberries in the summertime" rolls around well in the mouth and adds a seasonal opposition to the white/red -- whatever, y'all, most everything in there locks together really neatly, if you ask me, but maybe I'm just being over-reminded of a scene in Les Enfants Terrible involving a snowball with a rock inside it.

Amateurist, they do a lot of harmony singing, which I think you might like. Some of the harmonies are interestingly constructed, some more conventional but still nice. (And it's mildly interesting to hear a band like this pay lots of attention to doing multi-part harmonies well instead of just scrounging other, lamer "roots" affectations -- they genuinely sound good singing their harmonies slow and a capella)

nabisco, Thursday, 17 July 2008 20:56 (fifteen years ago) link

nah

rrrobyn, Thursday, 17 July 2008 21:01 (fifteen years ago) link

;)

rrrobyn, Thursday, 17 July 2008 21:01 (fifteen years ago) link

:/

rrrobyn, Thursday, 17 July 2008 21:01 (fifteen years ago) link

The well-turned thing about the imagery is the red-on-white scarves/snow that it kinda suggests at the end may have turned to red-on-white blood/snow.

Yeah, I got that.

Mr. Que, Thursday, 17 July 2008 21:02 (fifteen years ago) link

fully true tho that it works better in the ear than on the page, if that is the comparison, as i have just heard this on their myspace dot com

rrrobyn, Thursday, 17 July 2008 21:02 (fifteen years ago) link

i saw these guys a bit before this micro-blowup and they were impressive -- the singing especially, yes. the songs were catchy and memorable hearing them once, live, so they must be doing something right and it's not surprising they are getting buzz. they were obviously going for that minor-key t-bone burnett style space-country and they nailed it. i always appreciate a band who orchestrates things well, and there was plenty of reverb and purposeful echo-y empty space instead of a lot of generic strumming with a pedal steel on top or whatever.

goole, Thursday, 17 July 2008 21:03 (fifteen years ago) link

i should add here FWIW, i like these guys okay! their voices are great, songs are cool even if i don't care for their lyrics. but i don't care about lyrics that much.

Mr. Que, Thursday, 17 July 2008 21:04 (fifteen years ago) link

basically these guys make me feel old
which i am cool with feeling/being! but not via them
haha
ha

rrrobyn, Thursday, 17 July 2008 21:06 (fifteen years ago) link

if i was me as i was in 2000 today then i wld be all into this
and butter churning

rrrobyn, Thursday, 17 July 2008 21:07 (fifteen years ago) link

it works better in the ear than on the page

now what'd I JUST say?

nabisco, Thursday, 17 July 2008 21:07 (fifteen years ago) link

oh wait sorry i misread you, je suis desolee

nabisco, Thursday, 17 July 2008 21:08 (fifteen years ago) link

d'accord

rrrobyn, Thursday, 17 July 2008 21:10 (fifteen years ago) link

Quand on est ensemble...

nabisco, Thursday, 17 July 2008 21:14 (fifteen years ago) link

oui, mais moi...

rrrobyn, Thursday, 17 July 2008 21:19 (fifteen years ago) link

why would anyone ever say 'wear a beard'??
unless this is a british thing to say, in which case, carry on being british or whatever
I've never heard anyone say "wear a beard", I'd say "I've got a beard" or something. Except I wouldn't, because I haven't got one. I've just been eating spicey Hungarian gherkins my wife got from the 99p shop, they're pickled, can I be a new bohemian? Fleet Foxes sound awful though.

Colonel Poo, Thursday, 17 July 2008 21:32 (fifteen years ago) link

He wears his whiskers long
She wears her hair in a bun
etc.

nabisco, Thursday, 17 July 2008 21:48 (fifteen years ago) link

wears GROWS
wears PUTS

Will M., Thursday, 17 July 2008 21:58 (fifteen years ago) link

Yes, just like that classic song, "if you're going to San Francisco / be sure to PUT some flowers in your hair"

nabisco, Thursday, 17 July 2008 22:02 (fifteen years ago) link

Um that's not the same thing at all!

Colonel Poo, Thursday, 17 July 2008 22:04 (fifteen years ago) link

Am I seriously going to have to get out a dictionary and/or copies of 19th-century literature to convince you guys this usage exists?

nabisco, Thursday, 17 July 2008 22:12 (fifteen years ago) link

No, I'm just being a dick

Colonel Poo, Thursday, 17 July 2008 22:13 (fifteen years ago) link

Haha so am I, kinda. (Jay-Z says "wears her hair in a twist!") It's totally archaic, but I really do like the use of "wear" for styling decisions, including hair growths -- wear your jeans tight, wear your hair long, wear side-whiskers, wear a beard

nabisco, Thursday, 17 July 2008 22:21 (fifteen years ago) link

wear your heart on your sleeve, wear your fingers to the bone, wear a point into the ground, wear out a welcome

rrrobyn, Friday, 18 July 2008 00:34 (fifteen years ago) link

i have just been french-english exchanging and in this talk often turns to discussions of the idiomatic and grammatically weird or archaic when trying to find correct translations - it is funny but also confusing because yeah maybe the wear a beard thing etc is right even if only nabisco and people in the 19thC use it

language so crazy

rrrobyn, Friday, 18 July 2008 00:38 (fifteen years ago) link

ok but if she has already put her hair in a bun she is wearing her hair in a bun.

Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 18 July 2008 05:36 (fifteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.