i really don't think Drag City would have be TOO bummed out by moving 7000K units of a TRIPLE album by some crazy ass Ren Faire chick
― om nom nom nom de plume (M@tt He1ges0n), Wednesday, 3 March 2010 22:54 (fourteen years ago) link
10 years ago
when will Drag City sign a unicorn is my question
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 3 March 2010 22:56 (fourteen years ago) link
"I'm half unicorn on my mother's side"
http://www.amoeba.com/dynamic-images/blog/Sarah/oldham2.jpg
― om nom nom nom de plume (M@tt He1ges0n), Wednesday, 3 March 2010 22:58 (fourteen years ago) link
lolllllllll
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:06 (fourteen years ago) link
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3209/2511001117_6f8a94e081.jpg
― tylerw, Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:09 (fourteen years ago) link
^^^dude has a two song triple album coming out on southern lord i heard
waiting for the vinyl
― om nom nom nom de plume (M@tt He1ges0n), Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:11 (fourteen years ago) link
Yeah dude! Clear vinyl splattered with unicorn blood, limited to 666 copies. Only $350!
― you gone float up with it (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:13 (fourteen years ago) link
Woah, it's a Doomicorn
― We should have called Suzie and Bobby (NickB), Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:15 (fourteen years ago) link
gonna be a concept album about unicorns i believe
― tylerw, Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:16 (fourteen years ago) link
The RIAA does count each disc as a discrete unit, so HOOM would only need to sell 166,667 copies to go gold. But in terms of Soundscan reporting, single-disc albums, triple albums, and box sets are all counted as one unit.
right - I was confusing RIAA & Soundscan - thanks
how do record labels make _any_ money.
they don't. practically all of them who are left including the big ones are now officially doing it 1) for the love and 2) because it's all they know how to do. the money aspect is gone. whether this is a favorable development or no, we will know conclusively in about 20 years by my out-of-thin-air estimate.
― Lee Dorrian Gray (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:16 (fourteen years ago) link
Rainb 0)))
― We should have called Suzie and Bobby (NickB), Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:17 (fourteen years ago) link
starting to believe that new joanna newsom album just part of a big conceptual coup whose centerpiece is this thread
j0hn: so i guess drag city makes enough for their employees to eat and that's about it?
― by another name (amateurist), Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:18 (fourteen years ago) link
That really bums me out. I mean, shit, I keep buying physical CDs and vinyl hoping that I'm doing my tiny, little part to help support labels like this and it sucks to realize it isn't helping at all.
― you gone float up with it (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:19 (fourteen years ago) link
sometimes i think the only people making money in indie rock are Pitchfork and The Fader
― Tonytta! Tonitta! Tonétta! (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:19 (fourteen years ago) link
and carles
― max, Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:19 (fourteen years ago) link
faders only making money b/c it is technically a "marketing company"
― max, Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:20 (fourteen years ago) link
uh, exactly
― Tonytta! Tonitta! Tonétta! (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:21 (fourteen years ago) link
I don't know drag city's individual situation but afaik that's about the extent of things industry-wide. I try not to make a lot of noise about it in public places for various reasons but the people who work at the record labels work 12+ hour days for ok pay and are awesome people generally speaking and it's sad that the market has told them "you don't really count as far as we-all are concerned"
― Lee Dorrian Gray (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:22 (fourteen years ago) link
McDonalds is only making money because they're technically a "fast food restaurant"
― max, Wednesday, March 3, 2010 6:20 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― Tonytta! Tonitta! Tonétta! (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:22 (fourteen years ago) link
i am a marketing company
― max, Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:23 (fourteen years ago) link
that said, I am pretty certain drag city is stoke with a 7000 opening week - that's strong for an indie, and stronger still for a multi-disc indie record
― Lee Dorrian Gray (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:23 (fourteen years ago) link
lol & hipsterpuppies amirite??
<3
yeah, when you have a popular meme, Google sends you a check like ASCAP
― Tonytta! Tonitta! Tonétta! (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:26 (fourteen years ago) link
loooooool
― Lee Dorrian Gray (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:28 (fourteen years ago) link
i wonder how many people illegally DL'd this album and are listening to it regularly (and how this compares w/ 7,000 who purchased it).
― by another name (amateurist), Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:28 (fourteen years ago) link
10,000? 20,000? 6,000,000?
what is money
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:30 (fourteen years ago) link
what the fuck can a unicorn spend a dollar on
Do I have to take a picture of myself kissing my copy and send it to the tumblr to prove my dedication? Just wondering guys.
― you gone float up with it (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:31 (fourteen years ago) link
are you a unicorn?
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:31 (fourteen years ago) link
kissing my copy
eating it would show tru dedication
― by another name (amateurist), Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:32 (fourteen years ago) link
whiney in all seriousness if you have not already translated that stuff into cold hard cash then you need to either 1) hire a manger working on spec or 2) hire me because if I were in your shoes right now the next 3 months of my rent would already be paid
― Lee Dorrian Gray (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:33 (fourteen years ago) link
hipster unicorns
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:34 (fourteen years ago) link
Stuff Hipster Robocops Like
― tylerw, Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:35 (fourteen years ago) link
i wonder how many people illegally DL'd this album and are listening to it regularly (and how this compares w/ 7,000 who purchased it)
bigchampagne has those #s I think though you have to pay to see them. I think it's like 10:1 which leads labels to say "we'd be selling all those records if it weren't for the damned internet!" which obv isn't true; not everybody who takes something they can get for free would necessarily buy it given the absence of the free option. my own (again, thin-air based) guess is that sales would maybe be approx. twice what they are across the board w/o the internet, but maybe not, because the internet has increased the amount of exposure indie acts can get - it's a complicated q & there's pretty much zero point in imagining how things might have shaken out otherwise - without the internet, practically no-one would have heard of jn at all
― Lee Dorrian Gray (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:38 (fourteen years ago) link
all you have to do is believe
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:39 (fourteen years ago) link
the "big" indies -- Sub Pop, Matador, Merge, etc. -- are at least somewhat profitable, right?
― ksh, Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:48 (fourteen years ago) link
i imagine that would be the case with merge, at least
― by another name (amateurist), Wednesday, 3 March 2010 23:52 (fourteen years ago) link
but maybe not, because the internet has increased the amount of exposure indie acts can get - it's a complicated q & there's pretty much zero point in imagining how things might have shaken out otherwise - without the internet, practically no-one would have heard of jn at all
yeah otm. i feel like it's difficult to pinpoint buying a record as like a definitive moment anymore, too: people might download first and buy later; buy some of it on itunes; go see her next time she's in town; buy the next lp or whatever.
― werewolf congress (schlump), Thursday, 4 March 2010 00:41 (fourteen years ago) link
well yeah but in fairness if the album sales could approach the amount of exposure, it'd be good times for artists - it's not like the # of people downloading translates into Newsome selling out the Hollywood Bowl or anything
― Lee Dorrian Gray (J0hn D.), Thursday, 4 March 2010 00:48 (fourteen years ago) link
hey she sold out Harvard!
― Wet Hot American Oil Spill (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 4 March 2010 00:51 (fourteen years ago) link
http://thequietus.com/articles/03830-joanna-newsom-have-one-on-me-album-review
Excellent review by Petra Davis in The Quietus. Sorry for going off topic lulzx
― craigboney (Mister Craig), Thursday, 4 March 2010 00:54 (fourteen years ago) link
I know Insound is doing pretty well. Moving plenty of vinyl there. I also work at a CD/record store where business is based off of used items mostly, and that model is not like it was but its still holding its own.
― Evan, Thursday, 4 March 2010 01:04 (fourteen years ago) link
Thanks to Amazon presence as well.
― Evan, Thursday, 4 March 2010 01:05 (fourteen years ago) link
What someone should do is print up 500 copies of some weird folk record they made, sneak a few into stores around the world, and then spend the next 20 years planting rumors about this "lost" album's purported greatness but particularly its elusiveness. Maybe every few years coax a few friends to form bands "influenced" by said "lost" record/artist. And then, 20 years down the line, when the price of this ultra rare artifact hits the roof, occasionally auction one off anonymously to pay for your retirement.
Virtually foolproof, I say, though it doesn't take into account the giant asteroid hitting or its impact on vinyl sales.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 4 March 2010 01:23 (fourteen years ago) link
yes Josh but who's to say such efforts haven't already been undertaken, without success, countless times?
― Lee Dorrian Gray (J0hn D.), Thursday, 4 March 2010 01:49 (fourteen years ago) link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vashti_Bunyan
― ksh, Thursday, 4 March 2010 01:51 (fourteen years ago) link