'one joke' and finnegans wake

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (32 of them)

I've read 5/3 of it.

Budgen died in 1971. He certainly wasn't some kind of sole recipient of the one true secret about either book. JJ did feed information to various people, but I don't think it's true to say that there's a fact that he kept from us that, if we had it, would clarify everything. We ('we'?) already know a great deal about both books, though FW does remain darker than U.

Josh: I think your question could also be approached in terms of 'style'. Ulysses is obviously not a one-trick pony - partly because it's such a many-styled book, and different things are at stake and different pleasures available in each case. FW, on the other hand, can look from a distance rather uniform in style. If it felt less uniform I'd like it more warmly than I do. But those Wakeans who love it so much would probably maintain that its style was far from uniform -- which suggests to me that this is indeed a key aspect of the question you're trying to raise.

Possibly the most clear-yet-rigorous accounts of 'what the gimmick is [gimmicks are]' are those offered by Derek Attridge, eg. in Peculiar Language (1988) and Joyce Effects (2000).

the pinefox, Thursday, 7 November 2002 16:48 (12 years ago) Permalink

yes, the pf, that is an eminently more helpful way to phrase my question.

Josh (Josh), Thursday, 7 November 2002 21:26 (12 years ago) Permalink

1 year passes...
To josh, whereever he may be: if you're inquiring about "puns and reedles", it's a play on "pins and needles", which is the sensation you get when a limb without sufficient circulation (a dead leg) starts coming back to life.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 14:18 (11 years ago) Permalink

(the actual allegorical nature of its usage wasn't in mind while I wrote that sentence, it was only when I went back to put in (a dead leg) that a loud click was heard upstairs)

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 14:21 (11 years ago) Permalink

6 years pass...

Never read much on the Wake, so this is a start:

The LRB should give this guy some space, from here:

"Finnegans Wake is based on the structure of the zodiac, the zodiac signs being derived from the nature of numbers and a corresponding geometric sequence."

xyzzzz__, Friday, 10 December 2010 18:23 (4 years ago) Permalink

1 month passes...

why on earth do i need to shell out $410 for a hardcover copy of this

talk talk talk (diamonddave85), Monday, 31 January 2011 18:25 (4 years ago) Permalink

you don't.

jed_, Monday, 31 January 2011 18:33 (4 years ago) Permalink

If you find $410 burning a hole in your pocket, there may be worse things to fling it away upon. Otherwise, what jed said.

Aimless, Monday, 31 January 2011 18:55 (4 years ago) Permalink

because art is dead

^probably more bullshit self-aggrandizement and non-essential info^ (Edward III), Monday, 31 January 2011 18:56 (4 years ago) Permalink


Never Make Your Moog Too Soon (James Redd and the Blecchs), Monday, 31 January 2011 19:30 (4 years ago) Permalink

1 year passes...

what a fantastic piece of work this is.

red is hungry green is jawless (Noodle Vague), Friday, 23 March 2012 10:28 (3 years ago) Permalink

i was thinking of reading this over spring break

thomp, Friday, 23 March 2012 13:27 (3 years ago) Permalink

also the cantos

thomp, Friday, 23 March 2012 13:28 (3 years ago) Permalink

nv, thanks for ruining any kind of productivity i had planned for this afternoon! looks great, thx

thomasintrouble, Friday, 23 March 2012 13:40 (3 years ago) Permalink

nice. making me want to finish the fcker.

woof, Friday, 23 March 2012 14:10 (3 years ago) Permalink

i want a counterpart to those two to read, ideally something like 'pilgrimage' w/o my actually having to read 'pilgrimage'

thomp, Friday, 23 March 2012 14:15 (3 years ago) Permalink

the site looks good but a lot of its 'glosses' appear to be straight definitions of well-known words that were already appearing in FW in unaltered, Standard English form.

the pinefox, Saturday, 24 March 2012 11:11 (3 years ago) Permalink

yes some of the glosses feel unnecessary, am not sure whether the annotator feels those words are archaic or peculiar to British usage

red is hungry green is jawless (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 24 March 2012 11:34 (3 years ago) Permalink

Haha, the pinefox otm

Radio Boradman (James Redd and the Blecchs), Saturday, 24 March 2012 16:46 (3 years ago) Permalink

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.