Taking Sides: ACHTUNG BABY by U2 VS. MONSTER by R.E.M

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (184 of them)
Reinventions aside,
REM>U2
but
Achtung Baby>Monster

M. V. (M.V.), Saturday, 28 October 2006 20:14 (seventeen years ago) link

Love'em both, but Achtung's got the edge.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Saturday, 28 October 2006 20:34 (seventeen years ago) link

ha casino - i halfguessed you revived this!

j blount (papa la bas), Saturday, 28 October 2006 21:51 (seventeen years ago) link

probably reposting something i've said already above but achtung for me (criticising it for sameyness in comparison to monster seems a bit much), love them both though ('the fly's alot more disco than 'ebttrt' btw). r.e.m. glam move totally sincere i have no doubt - stipe's a huge roxy music and t. rex fan and obv him and buck both like new york dolls (hence: they formed a band).

j blount (papa la bas), Saturday, 28 October 2006 21:56 (seventeen years ago) link

judging by the number of albums i see in the budget bin at the cd store, people liked (i.e., were less likely to sell back) achtung baby. they always have like 12+ copies of monster.

max (maxreax), Saturday, 28 October 2006 22:10 (seventeen years ago) link

The Fly may or may not be more disco, but it's a lot less good IMO. I can get behind Bono a lot more when he's going for some sort of Flood-fried cool than when he gets into that flanged whispery crap and tries to sound actually profound. "A man may rise, a man may fall..." ugh...might as well be the shitty Johnny Cash song.

Doctor Casino (Doctor Casino), Saturday, 28 October 2006 22:32 (seventeen years ago) link

they always have like 12+ copies of monster.

. . . and a couple hundred more in the back.!

Stephen Bush (Stephen B.), Saturday, 28 October 2006 22:33 (seventeen years ago) link

ts: monster vs. to bring you my love

the orchid and the wasp (Jody Beth Rosen), Saturday, 28 October 2006 22:51 (seventeen years ago) link

The Fly may or may not be more disco, but it's a lot less good IMO. I can get behind Bono a lot more when he's going for some sort of Flood-fried cool than when he gets into that flanged whispery crap and tries to sound actually profound. "A man may rise, a man may fall..." ugh...might as well be the shitty Johnny Cash song

That's my favorite part of the song! It's one of those stupid ideas executed brilliantly, with diminishing returns, as the years went on.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Saturday, 28 October 2006 22:52 (seventeen years ago) link

Also: The Edge's solo in "The Fly" might be my favorite.

An even better thread idea might be to compare the albums' first singles: "The Fly" vs "What's the Frequency, Kenneth?" At the time I was less prepared for the U2 song.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Saturday, 28 October 2006 22:53 (seventeen years ago) link

"Kenneth" slays "The Fly." In fact, if you pull just the ringers from each album, I have a feeling Monster would just about win out song-for-song, with a few draws thrown in. It's the mid-grade material on Achtung that stands tall over the similarly-situated stuff on Monster. (That is: "Tryin' To Throw Your Arms Around The World" beats "King of Comedy" no contest.)

Doctor Casino (Doctor Casino), Saturday, 28 October 2006 23:25 (seventeen years ago) link

Slurred, distorted sex-jive vs slurred, distorted messianism.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Saturday, 28 October 2006 23:32 (seventeen years ago) link

Achtung's ringers: "Who's Gonna Ride...?", "Acrobat."

Monster's ringers: "You," "Circus Envy," "Bang and Blame."

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Saturday, 28 October 2006 23:34 (seventeen years ago) link

The Fly may or may not be more disco, but it's a lot less good IMO. I can get behind Bono a lot more when he's going for some sort of Flood-fried cool than when he gets into that flanged whispery crap and tries to sound actually profound. "A man may rise, a man may fall..." ugh...might as well be the shitty Johnny Cash song.
-- Doctor Casino (agode...), October 28th, 2006 4:32 PM.

Prediction: There will come a day when "The Fly" is your favorite song on Achtung Baby. This is what happens.

hearditonthexico (rogermexico), Sunday, 29 October 2006 01:07 (seventeen years ago) link

they always have like 12+ copies of monster.
. . . and a couple hundred more in the back.!

i like the idea of r.e.m. fans across the country returning en masse a week after monster came out to sell their no-longer-wanted copies

max (maxreax), Sunday, 29 October 2006 01:08 (seventeen years ago) link

in fact, that alone kind of makes me like monster more; it must have been perceived as a much greater break from previous albums than achtung baby was (regardless of how much of a break it actually was, whatever that might mean)...

max (maxreax), Sunday, 29 October 2006 01:09 (seventeen years ago) link

But let's not forget that a break from previous albums was the best thing that could have happened to U2 coming off of Rattle & Hum, at which point they had taken the Enoiscana thing as far as they could and had to change or die.

Whereas REM was coming off their Joshua Tree.

hearditonthexico (rogermexico), Sunday, 29 October 2006 01:15 (seventeen years ago) link

Enoiscana

this broke my brain.

the orchid and the wasp (Jody Beth Rosen), Sunday, 29 October 2006 01:20 (seventeen years ago) link

you have to wonder too if u2 fans (if such a body besides "the general american/european public" exists) are, in the end, more tolerant of change than r.e.m. fans. but i think you're right, it's hard to follow up an album like automatic for the people without alienating people, whereas w/ rattle and hum you'd do a hard job not to bring ppl back to the fold.

max (maxreax), Sunday, 29 October 2006 01:29 (seventeen years ago) link

i think the irony bits are completely overstated for both albums and both bands. whatever poses they struck in photos or rolling stone covers or live shows, the albums in their "ironic" periods are completely sincere affairs.

gear (gear), Sunday, 29 October 2006 01:52 (seventeen years ago) link

But let's not forget that a break from previous albums was the best thing that could have happened to U2 coming off of Rattle & Hum, at which point they had taken the Enoiscana thing as far as they could and had to change or die.

This kind of leads in the direction of ultimately giving REM more long-term credit, insofar as, even though their albums have gotten less and less consistent, they've steadfastly refused to do a "they've returned to their classic sound!" record - even going so far as to release "Bad Day" just to prove that they could still do it if they wanted to. Whereas, after Pop, U2 seemed to realize they had taken the whole ironic, Euro, dancey, electronicafied, whatever thing, as far as they could...and then couldn't think of anything else so they just went for what they knew wouldn't fail to sell records on Beautiful Day or whatever it was called.

As for whether or not it was an "ironic" period, I'll grant that for REM it's a lot more debateable, but, seriously, PopMart?

Doctor Casino (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 29 October 2006 03:20 (seventeen years ago) link

This kind of leads in the direction of ultimately giving REM more long-term credit, insofar as, even though their albums have gotten less and less consistent, they've steadfastly refused to do a "they've returned to their classic sound!" record - even going so far as to release "Bad Day" just to prove that they could still do it if they wanted to. Whereas, after Pop, U2 seemed to realize they had taken the whole ironic, Euro, dancey, electronicafied, whatever thing, as far as they could...and then couldn't think of anything else so they just went for what they knew wouldn't fail to sell records on Beautiful Day or whatever it was called.

Best Album Since Blood On The Tracks

hearditonthexico (rogermexico), Sunday, 29 October 2006 03:31 (seventeen years ago) link

Categories that both "U2" and "R.E.M." belong to:

-Bands that became popular in the 1980s

-Bands consisting only of white men

-Bands whose names lack lowercase letters

-Bands whose newest record is consistently "hailed as their best since the last one mattered"

-Bands whose entire discography is owned by my dad

-Bands who I listened to a lot in junior high

-Bands whose music features guitars and drums and a bass and vocals, either in concert or separately

-Bands who have been on the cover of Time magazine

max (maxreax), Sunday, 29 October 2006 03:41 (seventeen years ago) link

this is an interesting thread for me because i rate rem WAAAAYYYYY higher than u2 looking at their whole catalogs but Achtung and especially the next one (zooropa?) revived my interest in u2 after having completely written them off. credit mostly to eno and edge's guitar. as for rem, i think monster is when i finally checked out after being a huge fan of their early work, losing interest after the 3rd album, and having a revival with Out Of Time & Automatic. there isn't a single song off Monster that i care to hear ever again, What's the Frequency Kenneth is one of the worst singles in rem's up & down career.

totally off-topic, but i remeber seeing a feelies/rem show at the Felt Forum (lol, what a great name for a concert venue, amirite?) circa 1987. feelies didn't make much of an impression, rem were pretty good, but i had started to lose interest at that point (the Superman album) and then stipe did an ultra-diva pose late in the concert when some teens up front were pushing close to the stage - they walked off and never came back!! i guess they thought it was too dangerous/possibility of someone being crushed or something, but it easily could have been handled by security. that really ended the rem phase of my youth

timmy tannin (pompous), Sunday, 29 October 2006 03:51 (seventeen years ago) link

even though their albums have gotten less and less consistent

Always seems important to register dissent re. this position. : D

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 October 2006 03:59 (seventeen years ago) link

This is like putting "Revolver" up against "Dirty Work".

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 30 October 2006 14:03 (seventeen years ago) link

Two bands approaching the same sound from different directions.

I wouldn't say Depeche Mode were approaching this sound by "Violator". "Songs Of Faith And Devotion" was very obviously an attempt to sound like "Achtung Baby" era U2, but "Violator" is more of a classic "dark" electropop album, which has also been the case with all of their post SOFAD-efforts.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 30 October 2006 14:05 (seventeen years ago) link

in answer to the question posed, achtung baby.

monster for me is listenable, but fairly forgettable. it doesn't have a great deal of consistency or even a particular standout track (ok, maybe 'crush with eyeliner') to make me reflect on it when it's not playing. i've tried to revisit it a couple of times, but never seem to get more than a minimal kick out of it.

achtung baby is a strange record for me. it really does seem to be built around a few very good songs ('mysterious ways', 'one', 'acrobat', 'the fly') while the rest are either interesting ('love is blindness') or completely expendable ('so cruel', 'trying to throw your arms around the world'). the whole thing sounds great, and when the better tracks merge with the slick production, the record truly shines. really, a bizarre instance of an album where i treasure the highlights and tend to overlook the impact of the weaker tracks, perhaps because they're largely inoffensive and unmemorable. somehow it remains relatively untarnished and a landmark of early 90s rock.

Charlie Howard (the sphinx), Monday, 30 October 2006 15:10 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm still waiting for R.E.M. to go through a "let's go to Berlin and record" phase.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Monday, 30 October 2006 18:24 (seventeen years ago) link

This kind of leads in the direction of ultimately giving REM more long-term credit, insofar as, even though their albums have gotten less and less consistent, they've steadfastly refused to do a "they've returned to their classic sound!" record - even going so far as to release "Bad Day" just to prove that they could still do it if they wanted to. Whereas, after Pop, U2 seemed to realize they had taken the whole ironic, Euro, dancey, electronicafied, whatever thing, as far as they could...and then couldn't think of anything else so they just went for what they knew wouldn't fail to sell records on Beautiful Day or whatever it was called.

This is OTM in every way. Add "Imitation Of Life" to "Bad Day", though. One of the great "eighties" R.E.M. songs.

David A. (Davant), Monday, 30 October 2006 20:41 (seventeen years ago) link

And if R.E.M. roamed into areas they never expected to, nor were equipped for, at least they didn't sit on their laurels. The common wisdom is that they should have called it a day after Berry left, but I can't help admiring their stubborn refusal to cry uncle. And, although patchy and sporadic, they did write some good stuff after the brilliant NAIHF that I'm glad we got to hear. U2, by contrast, have been pretty consistently dire after Pop.

(Ha, Just noticed the coincidence with the titles: "Beautiful Day" and "Bad Day" both being attempted -- and successful -- returns to form.)

David A. (Davant), Monday, 30 October 2006 20:47 (seventeen years ago) link

after Pop?

hearditonthexico (rogermexico), Monday, 30 October 2006 20:55 (seventeen years ago) link

You know, I debated that one with my inside voice, because there are parts of Pop I like, whereas there is very little on the last two I could say that about ("Beautiful Day", maybe "Vertigo" and I have this weird thing for "In a Little While"), but if you prefer to say "after Zooropa" I wouldn't be upset.

David A. (Davant), Monday, 30 October 2006 21:00 (seventeen years ago) link

The last two U2 albums are both great, because they are leaving behind the somewhat failed experimentation that was "Pop".

And - and this is important - the last two U2 records are not returns to their 80s style. The U2 of the 80s were a mainly riff-based rock band, with The Edge's guitar playing the obvious centrepiece of everything, while the U2 of the oughties is more of a melodic pop band, heavily influenced by the classic songwriting style of the Britpop bands.
I obviously prefer the latter, which is why the last two U2 albums have been my favourite albums by then ever.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 30 October 2006 22:39 (seventeen years ago) link

but if you prefer to say "after Zooropa" I wouldn't be upset

I'm a Zooropa guy. Though I believe gear (obv. not Geir) will occasionally post in defense of Pop.

Geir, I agree that the last two records are not "returns to form," and I even think They've got some of Teh Edge's coolest playing, but what you're overlooking is that they're also boring and irrelevant. They're like the greatest Remy Zero records ever.

hearditonthexico (rogermexico), Tuesday, 31 October 2006 00:48 (seventeen years ago) link

the last two albums are totally old pro rock music, U2 on autopilot. they're good enough, i suppose. the records almost exist to be played in a live setting. 'how to dismantle an atomic bomb' in particular came off a lot better in concert than it did on on record. 'pop' was the reverse. i think it's a really good album. bono's best lyrics, etc etc i've said it before.

gear (gear), Tuesday, 31 October 2006 00:51 (seventeen years ago) link

There is no such thing as "irrelevant" music. Music is timeless, good music works regardless of age or "relevance".

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Tuesday, 31 October 2006 09:50 (seventeen years ago) link

"Pop" was a faillure - a failed attempt to do something that U2 aren't supposed to do. "Staring At The Sun" was a great song though, pointing forwards towards the Britpop-influenced style of their next two albums.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Tuesday, 31 October 2006 10:26 (seventeen years ago) link

Any thoughts on this?

blackmail (blackmail.is.my.life), Thursday, 9 November 2006 14:39 (seventeen years ago) link

i was listening to MONSTER again last night
and YOU and STAR 69 are STILL CLASSIC.

pisces (piscesx), Thursday, 9 November 2006 14:52 (seventeen years ago) link

"Pop" was a faillure - a failed attempt to do something that U2 aren't supposed to do.

http://cache.kotaku.com/gaming/bono_takes_two.jpg

"...and y'know, I also think we need to sort out the environment because people are affected by that too and...what's this?... Alright, then, Geir has told me that I'm not supposed to talk about the environment. Just stick to poverty, yeah."

"By the way, did anyone buy that song we did with Green Day?... You did? Fookin' suckers!"

wordy rappaport (EstieButtez1), Thursday, 9 November 2006 14:59 (seventeen years ago) link

Editor!

"in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, for which their music was often used as an inspirational backdrop."

hearditonthexico (rogermexico), Thursday, 9 November 2006 15:40 (seventeen years ago) link

atta had 'zooropa' on his headphones

gear (gear), Thursday, 9 November 2006 18:58 (seventeen years ago) link

one year passes...

while the U2 of the oughties is more of a melodic pop band, heavily influenced by the classic songwriting style of the Britpop bands "Acrobat" by U2

Doctor Casino, Sunday, 12 October 2008 14:39 (fifteen years ago) link

three years pass...

I'm still waiting for R.E.M. to go through a "let's go to Berlin and record" phase.

― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Monday, October 30, 2006 10:24 AM (5 years ago)

It happened!

timellison, Friday, 10 August 2012 21:11 (eleven years ago) link

This kind of leads in the direction of ultimately giving REM more long-term credit, insofar as, even though their albums have gotten less and less consistent, they've steadfastly refused to do a "they've returned to their classic sound!" record - even going so far as to release "Bad Day" just to prove that they could still do it if they wanted to

(Ha, Just noticed the coincidence with the titles: "Beautiful Day" and "Bad Day" both being attempted -- and successful -- returns to form.)

"Bad Day" wasn't a return to form, it WAS their old form, an outtake from Lifes Rich Pageant.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Saturday, 11 August 2012 03:09 (eleven years ago) link

> they've steadfastly refused to do a "they've returned to their classic sound!" record

Every album after New Adventures was marketed as a "return to form"

john. a resident of chicago., Saturday, 11 August 2012 03:10 (eleven years ago) link

"Star 69" just came on. This would have been a much better single than "Bang and Blame."

Guayaquil (eephus!), Monday, 13 August 2012 18:04 (eleven years ago) link

I can't check to see if it was an official single but it did get a lot of airplay.

a regina spektor is haunting europe (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 13 August 2012 18:05 (eleven years ago) link

it was a promotional single w/ no video but it was maybe the 3rd or 4th biggest radio hit off the album.

PollopolicĂ­a (some dude), Monday, 13 August 2012 18:07 (eleven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.