Yo P&J, I'm really happy for you, Imma let you finish, but ILX had the greatest 2009 poll of all time! All time! (2009 ILX Trax Poll Results: TOP TEN TODAY)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2744 of them)

this list is still perfect, i voted for 'no intention' but 'stillness is the move' was the first song i loved off of the album and obviously the most ear-friendly to the general population as there's no dave longstreth in it. shame i have class at 2 30, each new placing unfolding brings us nearer and nearer to impending doom of 'my girls' at #1, it's such a nail-biter.

samosa gibreel, Tuesday, 2 February 2010 18:54 (fourteen years ago) link

i'm pretty sure they're singing perfectly well from a technical pov. who are you guys to know, anyways?

samosa gibreel, Tuesday, 2 February 2010 18:55 (fourteen years ago) link

Dan knows.

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 2 February 2010 18:55 (fourteen years ago) link

I don't get what you mean by "tuning not very good" Hi Dere. The song has an unusual and complex melodic contour, and to sing that melody in unisom has got to be tough, (even moreso the close harmonies). I think the vocals overall are amazing on this. what little bit of pitch variance there is enhances this imo.

Dan S, Tuesday, 2 February 2010 18:56 (fourteen years ago) link

I'm kinda o_O that THIS is what all the 09 DP hype was about, but it still seems like a pretty good tune. Shrill yelping at the end doesn't argue its case very well, tho.

they ate only candy canes (Pillbox), Tuesday, 2 February 2010 18:56 (fourteen years ago) link

someone needs to get that bitch an autotuner amirite

samosa gibreel, Tuesday, 2 February 2010 18:57 (fourteen years ago) link

guys i think the thing about dan and singing is that he's picking up on stuff that the rest of us are not even really hearing so best just to let it go

call all destroyer, Tuesday, 2 February 2010 18:57 (fourteen years ago) link

haha i'm so glad dan is backing me up here, all the press about DPs this year has tried to portray their singer as a mariah-esque virtuoso and it's just like UH NO, she is YELPING OUT OF TUNE

unfair. I don't like this song and didn't understand all the hype it received, but I do think the vocals are good. true, she's not mariah-esque, but for that she should be thankful.

m the g, Tuesday, 2 February 2010 18:57 (fourteen years ago) link

uh oh

cozen, Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:00 (fourteen years ago) link

the ululating/melisma thing kinda annoys me even when people do it well or are more widely perceived as having done it well. a bit like scat.

mdskltr (blueski), Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:00 (fourteen years ago) link

#6 plz!

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:02 (fourteen years ago) link

haha okay ppl

First off, this isn't THAT unusual or complex to me. Then again, I'm a professional chorister who has sung a shit-tone of twelve-tone music by Britten, Pinkham and Tavener.

Secondly, if you are basing so many important rest points on notes in the scale that aren't part of the foundational chord, if you sing them flat (which happens a LOT in the first two lines; hell, she starts the song on a minor 3rd which is a note in the chord and is still slightly under), you're going to fuck up the musical impact the song is supposed to have and make life hell for anyone trying to harmonize with you (the vocal lines don't actually lock into each other until they hit the word "highway"; the upper voice is sharp on "get a job" and the lower voice is slightly flat, keeping the chord they're going for out of tune). The don't really pull things together until the bridge and the top voice is still slightly off.

If you're going to do shit like this, your intonation needs to be in sync with the people you're singing with; it isn't as bad if you all go flat or sharp together, but when one person is riding sharp and the other is riding flat, you're fucked. Also note that I don't think anyone is singing wrong notes here; they are not singing the notes they're on the way they need to in order for the chords to be in tune.

PIES! PIES! PIES! PIES! PIES! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:12 (fourteen years ago) link

"shit-tone"

call all destroyer, Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:15 (fourteen years ago) link

haha oops, paging Freud (altho I do actually dig Brittenand Tavener, who's really more minimalist, a lot)

PIES! PIES! PIES! PIES! PIES! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:16 (fourteen years ago) link

btw thanx for that explanation of what's happening on the verses, it always sounds a little wonky to me--like the girls were just below their range or something

call all destroyer, Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:18 (fourteen years ago) link

thanks for the clarification, Dan! I didn't realize you were thinking about this on such an expert level.

Dan S, Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:18 (fourteen years ago) link

DanP, no offense, but like isn't your eval of that song's vox (which on first listen, is balls ftktah) kinda like some yngwie type critiquing a cobain wannabe at guitar center?

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:29 (fourteen years ago) link

that video is way out of tune visually

do you want to be happier? (whatever), Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:31 (fourteen years ago) link

thing abt dan and singing is that all his rules for what is "good" or "right" seem kindof irrelevant to me, like just bc someone is a "technically" better singer doesnt mean i want to hear them, so everytime he complains abt stuff like tuning i'm like "i rilly dont care"

plaxico (I know, right?), Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:33 (fourteen years ago) link

xxp that would be reasonable if Kurt man tried to tell Yngwie man that Cobain-style guitar technique represented the form's pinnacle of versatility, wouldn't it?

Send me an e-mail and tell me of your bulging desires (DJ Mencap), Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:34 (fourteen years ago) link

can we change the board description to "shit-tone" plz

forksclovetofu, Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:34 (fourteen years ago) link

I think those girls are more talented than a Cobain wannabe at Guitar Center, and if you're equating my singing capability to Yngwie Malmsteen's guitar-playing ability I am never going to sing for you so that you continue thinking I'm that ridiculously talented!

PIES! PIES! PIES! PIES! PIES! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:35 (fourteen years ago) link

Dan's contributions to singing/vocalist conversation are like Grant on Mythbusters telling the audience the nuts and bolts of something while Tory and Kari are fucking around setting things on fire.

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:35 (fourteen years ago) link

"yngwie type" :P

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐ (Steve Shasta), Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:37 (fourteen years ago) link

aw

PIES! PIES! PIES! PIES! PIES! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:38 (fourteen years ago) link

it sounds like the singers are not technically good enough to succeed at what it sounds like they're trying to succeed at. but maybe they don't care and they like the glitches, which might make them super clever but i'd rather hear joanna newsom than that.

do you want to be happier? (whatever), Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:38 (fourteen years ago) link

so to be closer to your analogy, if the Cobain type is bashing his way through Ygnwie-esque music, I don't think it's out of line for the Yngwie-type to comment on how it is supposed to go

PIES! PIES! PIES! PIES! PIES! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:39 (fourteen years ago) link

xp: ugh son

The Reverend, Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:40 (fourteen years ago) link

(I mean, I'm not going to give vocal pointers on how to sing "Rise" by PiL in tune, for example.)

PIES! PIES! PIES! PIES! PIES! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:41 (fourteen years ago) link

supposed

plaxico (I know, right?), Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:41 (fourteen years ago) link

i'd rather hear joanna newsom than that

I'd rather hear cats fuckin than joanna newsom.

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:41 (fourteen years ago) link

unless they're hepcats.

EZ Snappin, Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:42 (fourteen years ago) link

still holding out that Cats Fuckin will make the top 5 here

PLIES! PLIES! PLIES! PLIES! PLIES! (some dude), Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:42 (fourteen years ago) link

I don't think I've ever heard Joanna Newsom

PIES! PIES! PIES! PIES! PIES! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:42 (fourteen years ago) link

Maybe it's participatory discrepancy.

Mordy, Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:43 (fourteen years ago) link

those weren't cats in the dirty projectors song?

xxp

do you want to be happier? (whatever), Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:43 (fourteen years ago) link

ugh the song isn't nearly as tedious as dan's x's and o's-style crit would lead you to believe.

ha for a minute i was wondering if all our voter intimidating in the other thread would prevent "my girls" from showing up. still not likely, though "stillness" >>> "my girls"

xp what plax and and SS said

rasta batman gigolo (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:43 (fourteen years ago) link

I was going to OTM Dan before the big post OTMed itself. I love the sly frosty guitar line, the strings+Dave Longstreth hugging an alpaca or just rotating on the mountain thinking about things, but the singing isn't smooth enough to gel w/the rest. Talent is empty&I don't care about it, but their singing here feels like more of an unhappy accident than design.

ogmor, Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:44 (fourteen years ago) link

man i was going to record the bit of a tune i remember for help with track i.d. but now i am too terrified of hi dere

men lie, women lie, hips don't (zvookster), Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:44 (fourteen years ago) link

i wanna here hi dere's reaction to joanna newsom

that sex version of "blue thunder." (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:44 (fourteen years ago) link

I don't think I've ever heard Joanna Newsom

Consider yourself lucky.

I just wish he hadn't adopted the "ilxor" moniker (ilxor), Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:45 (fourteen years ago) link

you guys

YOU GUYS

Joanna Newsom is fucking hilarious

PIES! PIES! PIES! PIES! PIES! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:46 (fourteen years ago) link

<3 <3 <3

that sex version of "blue thunder." (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:46 (fourteen years ago) link

like i think its not really going too far to say that their voices match the concept which is "warped, distended rnb stitched back together out of broken indie rock"

plaxico (I know, right?), Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:46 (fourteen years ago) link

like ur not supposed to be comparing the vocals to solange

plaxico (I know, right?), Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:46 (fourteen years ago) link

which song r u listenin 2

that sex version of "blue thunder." (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:47 (fourteen years ago) link

ha for a minute i was wondering if all our voter intimidating in the other thread would prevent "my girls" from showing up. still not likely, though "stillness" >>> "my girls"

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/ce/Wire01.jpg

I was gonna vote for "My Girls," but then I saw this guy across the room and changed my story

PLIES! PLIES! PLIES! PLIES! PLIES! (some dude), Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:47 (fourteen years ago) link

I just put her name into Youtube and clicked on the first thing that came up, which was a song called "Sprout and the Bean"

holy hell

PIES! PIES! PIES! PIES! PIES! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:47 (fourteen years ago) link

YES THAT IS THE ONE I WANTED YOU TO HEAR

that sex version of "blue thunder." (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:47 (fourteen years ago) link

so happy

that sex version of "blue thunder." (Mr. Que), Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:47 (fourteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.