Excelsior the book

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (832 of them)
since I did say "will be leaving after this thread" and have become something of a point of discussion I will post-peace-out say this: have the people who are saying "you could google J0hn's name so what's the big deal" noticed how I spell(ed) my name in this forum? with a "zero" for an "O" and a "1" for an "L"? That's called "googleproofing."

I am so fuckin' angry and depressed about this, I love my ilx0r friends and am going to really miss them/y'all a whole lot but being printed without my permission is horseshit

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:38 (nineteen years ago) link

1) because no one cares about the stuff in the book.
2) only we know it exists
3) I'm sure Mark Grout will pull it when he realizes how upset it made John.

xpost

BRRRRR (ex machina), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:38 (nineteen years ago) link

Nick, that's so fucking stupid I don't even know where to begin.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:40 (nineteen years ago) link

I am sorry to see J0hn go though. I want J0hn to stay, which is why I want him to realize this isn't really such a big deal. But I'm sorry he's upset.

St. Nicholas (Nick A.), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:40 (nineteen years ago) link

http://www.google.com/search?q=%22john+darnielle%22+site%3Ailx.wh3rd.net

It is really well known that "lastplanetojakarta.com" is J0hn's, also

BRRRRR (ex machina), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:40 (nineteen years ago) link

Hmm, Jon agrees with me. Maybe it is stupid.

St. Nicholas (Nick A.), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:41 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm sure something can be done, John. Perhaps postpone your decision until you find out how this can be sorted?

Penelope_111 (Penelope_111), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:41 (nineteen years ago) link

That's called "googleproofing."

Yeah, but there's a ton of M0UNT@!N G0@TS threads and it's naive to think that someone can't work their way back to it. Not that the book is right, but it's not the earth shattering public revelation that you're making it out to be.

deanomgwtf!!!p%3Fmsgid%3D4581997 (deangulberry), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:42 (nineteen years ago) link

People do understand that CafePress is a printing service -- like Kinko's -- and not a publisher, right?

Feel whatever you feel regardless, but some of the posts sound like the posters think otherwise.

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:42 (nineteen years ago) link

dan, i understand where you are coming from... but.
j0hn isnt writing lyrics into these posts, sure it is copyrighted material (for what reason i do not know), but he is just bantering on like the rest of us.

and if he is ashamed of what he wrote, he shouldnt have written it in the first place/left a long time ago.

xpost i am sure

todd swiss (eliti), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:43 (nineteen years ago) link

Sorry to have resorted to referring to ya in 3rd person, J0hn. It *is* horseshit -- I'm a very occasional poster compared to a lot of folks, and I'm all over that Gear's Couch thread.

J0hn, because you (unlike Mark) understand the openendedness of these threads, I can only assume that when you say you're leaving "after this thread," it's a cruelly subtle way of saying you're not leaving at all! Cool!

Clarke B. (Clarke B.), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:44 (nineteen years ago) link

In theory I think the idea of an ILX book is kinda cool in an infeasibly geeky way, but people need to be asked. I am sad to see J0hn go and hope it's only a temporary thing.

Jon, people can't see full email addresses unless they're registered.

At least 3 Xs.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:44 (nineteen years ago) link

http://www.mingthemerciless.com/bloomps.jpg

DiMarceau Fishpower, Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:45 (nineteen years ago) link

It has nothing to do with shame/worth of posts and everything to do with "one thing that you should reasonably be able to expect when you post to ILX is that another ILXor will not copy things you've written into a book which will then be sold to people without asking you first".

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:46 (nineteen years ago) link

Exactly.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:46 (nineteen years ago) link

There's stuff on those threads from before I changed my name and took my work email address off ILX.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:47 (nineteen years ago) link

I really don't think that's a reasonable expectation for anyone who isn't brand new to the internet, frankly.

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:48 (nineteen years ago) link

i didn't realize this would anger people. but it has. mark grout you get one of these to the side of the head, it won't hurt, but your honor should be damaged:

http://www.rainbownetrigging.com/rainbow-images/industrial-glove-big.jpg

artdamages (artdamages), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:49 (nineteen years ago) link

It's not that people don't know I'm here: I'm fine with people know I'm here, deanomgwtf!!! It's that stuff-being-printed-under-my-name is quite a great deal different from talking- about-it-under-a-googleproofed-version-of-my-name-on-a-thread. That anybody here thinks "oh what's the big deal: talking on a forum, printing it in a book - what's the diff?" really exacerbates how shitty the whole thing makes me feel. I'm not "ashamed of what [I] wrote," todd - it was a conversation I was having with friends, not something I wanted preserved in print. It has nothing to do with imagining that people can't find me here - of course that's OK! It has to do with being printed/preserved for posterity in a way I didn't want. The idea that one should be as careful with one's words on an internet forum as one is when writing for print seems so patently ridiculous as to spurn further comment.

I'm gonna leave this thread & the forum now for real, as my attemps to clarify my position are just making me angrier & angrier. Bye everybody.

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:50 (nineteen years ago) link

Tep; Why?

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:50 (nineteen years ago) link

I think that 95% of us agree that mark did something dumb, but maybe we should give him a chance to do something about it before we completely freak out.

St. Nicholas (Nick A.), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:51 (nineteen years ago) link

I agree. If, presumably, none have been sold, it can just be pulled, right?

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:52 (nineteen years ago) link

ps I keep thinking of the sitcom Dear John except in reverse and not at all. anyway great theme song. J0hn will be missed, but we must carry on. I for one have to do a radio show that no one will be listening to.

artdamages (artdamages), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:53 (nineteen years ago) link

It has nothing to do with shame/worth of posts and everything to do with "one thing that you should reasonably be able to expect when you post to ILX is that another ILXor will not copy things you've written into a book which will then be sold to people without asking you first".

Well, since this isn't inherent to the internet, I guess the responsibility for maintaining this belief falls on the moderators of this board, no?

deanomgwtf!!!p%3Fmsgid%3D4581997 (deangulberry), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:54 (nineteen years ago) link

Do I have to spell out that "reasonably expect" means "the likelyhood that it could happen obviously exists but chances are that it won't and that this no bearing on your right to feel annoyed or pissed off when someone does it"?

For the record, I personally don't care that my posts are in this thing. I do not make the mistake of thinking that this means that no one else should care, either.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:54 (nineteen years ago) link

xpost "Excelsior: The Book" (dumbass)

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:55 (nineteen years ago) link

http://socsci.gulfcoast.edu/fsale/presentations/LOGIC2/img045.jpg

whoooooosh, Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:56 (nineteen years ago) link

Well, Dan, you should be smart enough to realize that there are a lot of different people on ILX and they all expect different things out of it that sound "reasonable" to them.

deanomgwtf!!!p%3Fmsgid%3D4581997 (deangulberry), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:57 (nineteen years ago) link

It's awful that John is made to feel like this. I completely understand his anger.

Penelope_111 (Penelope_111), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:58 (nineteen years ago) link

Tep; Why?

Because it won't ever be honored. Because it's unrealistic. It's like expecting that you can walk down the street having a conversation with the person next to you, or on the other end of your cell phone, without people listening. It's unrestricted space, and it's explicitly and visibly unrestricted space: it isn't possible to occupy it without being aware of that.

It's like expecting that those eavesdroppers -- whether they mean to be or not -- will never tell other people what they heard you talking about, nor post it to "In Passing," nor in their book about People Saying The Darndest Things, or whatever.

It might be a reasonable requirement of courtesy, but like it or not, courtesy beyond a certain point isn't a reasonable expectation. It just doesn't happen. It isn't something given by default.

It's not like this is new. The profit involved should be irrelevant, and seems to be irrelevant to most peoples' concerns: would they object to someone printing out a thread at Kinko's to read at work? That's all CafePress does: they print it out. They make no claims to copyright or ownership (they do require that their clients possess copyright to the work they're printing; it's never been clear they need to). So the concern is either empty principle or has to do with privacy: not wanting to be read by people you don't know are reading, or aren't answerable to the ILX community, or whatever.

How is it any different from printing out a thread and showing it to a spouse or coworker? Or letting them read your screen? Or the lurkers who read everything anyway?

I'm not saying it isn't okay to be bothered by it, although it's probably clear it doesn't bother me; I'm saying it's not reasonable to expect people to act accordingly, because they haven't been, and they aren't going to start.

(The odds that anyone who's been active in popular online places for a few years hasn't been reprinted somewhere without their consent or knowledge are not great.)

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:58 (nineteen years ago) link

I'd geniunely like to see what Momus has to say about all this.

Clarke B. (Clarke B.), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:01 (nineteen years ago) link

That may be so, but I would expect a regular poster to these forums to at least ask. I'll take emptty principle every time, I think.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:01 (nineteen years ago) link

Would you expect a regular poster to ask before showing their non-ILXing spouse, coworker, or friend a thread?

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:02 (nineteen years ago) link

I don't think Mark meant anything malicious with the book. I do feel, like everyone else, that it was a major blunder and a not-so-slick thing to pull. Does "he really didn't mean to" truly have no currency online?

Clarke B. (Clarke B.), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:03 (nineteen years ago) link

All the way up here I did ask this q:

'Are you taking out email addresses or the names or what exactly?'

Mark hasn't ans this.

I didn't see any harm mostly bcz the threads selected (ILE) were harmless stuff, ilm would be a far more serious issue bcz there are ppl who make a living out of writing whereas the stuff selected here is not like that.

see you soon j0hn.

massive x-post

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:03 (nineteen years ago) link

Storm. Teacup. When return, bring pie and Momus refutations, please.

Momus (Momus), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:03 (nineteen years ago) link

That's a different matter, Tep. You can debate the ontology of printing out a thread or showing your screen to a coworker all you like, but a book is decidedly different, especially one that can be bought in a public place.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:05 (nineteen years ago) link

See what Mark has to say and then decide whether or not to get so upset, take action ... etc.

deanomgwtf!!!p%3Fmsgid%3D4581997 (deangulberry), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:05 (nineteen years ago) link

That's a different matter, Tep. You can debate the ontology of printing out a thread or showing your screen to a coworker all you like, but a book is decidedly different, especially one that can be bought in a public place.

Why? This is a print on demand service, one no more public than here -- and harder to find. The word "book" doesn't have magic powers that make it different from "printout."

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:07 (nineteen years ago) link

Please note, Cafe Press is not a publisher.

http://www.cafepress.com/cp/info/

'Welcome to our marketplace of over 3 million member-created products ranging from custom-designed T shirts to posters and books...'

This is like going to Kinko's and printing out a webpage, then circulating it amongst a few friends. Relax!

Momus (Momus), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:07 (nineteen years ago) link

I just said that twice, Momus.

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:08 (nineteen years ago) link

(Apparently peoples' concerns go beyond that, in other words.)

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:09 (nineteen years ago) link

Right. I am largely unaware of this Cafe Press place and also Kinko's, for what it's worth.

I still think Mark should have asked. I could have got the Bee Vibrator thread in if he had.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:09 (nineteen years ago) link

http://socsci.gulfcoast.edu/fsale/presentations/LOGIC2/img045.jpg

swoop, Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:09 (nineteen years ago) link

You forgot the "and charging your friends to read it" part.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:09 (nineteen years ago) link

I don't think any good can be served by belittling someone's feelings about this.

Penelope_111 (Penelope_111), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:10 (nineteen years ago) link

You can't legally record a phone conversation without telling the other person involved - I see this as analogous to that.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:10 (nineteen years ago) link

What if I compiled this website, made a cover, and sold it on cafepress?

WITH A FOURTEEN CENT PROFIT!

Pleasant Plains (Pleasant Plains), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:11 (nineteen years ago) link

Dan, Kinko's charges, too. You pay for the copies. CafePress costs a lot of money; I work with them all the time. Print on Demand is an expensive service (albeit much cheaper than it used to be). Mark wouldn't make any money from this without selling over 100 copies.

Nick: Sorry, Kinko's was the only chain name I could think of; a photocopy shop, in other words.

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:12 (nineteen years ago) link

i am with tep 100 percent.

todd swiss (eliti), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:12 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.