Britpop : Time For Reevaluation?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1554 of them)
The "we're much cooler and better than the Yanks but we still desparately want their approval every time we send one of our piss-poor indie bands like Kula Shaker over there" attitude, that is.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 11:36 (twenty-one years ago) link

The one thing of course which Stubbs misses out in his piece was the actual Exocet which finally did for Britpop - the Spice Girls.

Then again, yer basic teen pop never really went away; Take That and Boyzone were massive all the way through Britpop - and don't forget that both "Common People" and "Wonderwall" were kept off number one by the Waterman-produced, Cowell-managed Robson and Jerome.

Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 11:40 (twenty-one years ago) link

Then again, yer basic mainstream million selling indie-schmindie has never gone away either - in album sales at least... look at Radiohead, the Manics, the Verve, Catatonia, the Shitophonics, Travis and now Coldplay all of which were almost as big, if not bigger, than Blur and Pulp but are all generally perceived to have hit after Britpop died.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 11:43 (twenty-one years ago) link

I think Suzy paints the definite picture of the evolving nature of 'Britpop'. Other pop bands simply don't figure nor scan when discussing 'Britpop'. Hi-NRG, pre-fabricated pop music (i.e. Take That, Spice Girls, Gareth Gates) has been with us since the dawn of teenage radio time. I think factoring in pre-fab pop is just confusing things. Because pre-fab pop is well, like a big woolley blanket, always there no matter what significant cultural movement is happening. It's ridiculous, akin to comparing say; anti-folk with the Spice Girl. Sure, it's 'ironic' but it does not have much significance.

s samson, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 11:49 (twenty-one years ago) link

The Spice Girls were the decisive factor which swung the Saturday afternoon Top Shop crowd away from Britpop, though.

Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 11:52 (twenty-one years ago) link

Britpop and the bands involved in Britpop fell apart simply because they could not sustain momentum. Insolent, lazy, coke-addled, too English, too brand new your retro - in America the only people who possibly cared about these acts effected bad English accents and dressed badly. Hardly a youth revolution like Nirvana. Or a youth revolution like Klein's No Logo. Essentially the acts had nothing to say except 'I'm British and I'm Proud'. Almost like a travel agency advertisement. And to become truly iconic an act has to make it in America. Oasis came close but failed with 'Be Here Now'. But it is funny that a British Pop music movement failed to sustain momentum even within their own country. But I will leave my comments about Britannia for another day!

s samson, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 11:58 (twenty-one years ago) link

british music suceeds in america when it isnt specific, when it seems anywhere-like. eg depeche mode

gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 12:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

The Nipper is near the money as ever, though I think a word or two may be missing from his post. Also, I don't really agree about 'There's No Other Way': I think I like it. I did A-level revision to it. I don't know whether I liked it then. Probably I did.

Gareth is correct: 'London scene 1990s' != Britpop. He is correct as well to see Britpop as a rejection of 1988-1993, as much as a continuation.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 12:03 (twenty-one years ago) link

The last time the Brits had a true shot at iconic musical status was with the Cure and Depeche Mode in 1989. With underdogs, The Smiths and New Order bubbling under. I don't factor in pop music because I can't think that a) it's any good b) I am American and I don't like irony.

s samson, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 12:03 (twenty-one years ago) link

And of course Gareth is right - the most successful British acts are non-specific, Morcheeba, Bush, Verve and Oasis. I never really thought of Verve and Oasis are Britpop - more just plain old rock'n'roll.

s samson, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 12:06 (twenty-one years ago) link

Hmm, dirty dronerockers bathe and get shorter, directional haircuts. Or looked down at their shoes to realise they were by Patrick Cox.

suzy (suzy), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 12:11 (twenty-one years ago) link

What?

kate, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 12:14 (twenty-one years ago) link

''"the younger britpop generation knew nothing about the late 80s music as documented by Simon Reynolds in Blissed Out book, their music experiences/ knowledge did not include post-punk /industrial music."

Who cares? How snobby and elitist can you get? I know nothing of the bands you mention - but big fucking deal.''

well I think most ppl who were into britpop were 13-17, say.

Everyone when they get into music starts buying pop, which would include britpop at that time but it is not snobbish to go and buy some TG recs and prefer that to say, oasis or sleeper.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 12:15 (twenty-one years ago) link

Kate back on DDB patrol I see ;-p

suzy (suzy), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 12:16 (twenty-one years ago) link

and I do like ADF's kneejerk reactionary politics and I think more good has come out of a single ADF interview than all britpop put together.

and they've managed to make a couple of decent singles so ADF wins!

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 12:19 (twenty-one years ago) link

Hey, don't mention DDB's totally out of context and not back it up.

KATE, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 12:22 (twenty-one years ago) link

Sorry, thought it was implicit in whole 88-93 shoegazey/MBV/Spacemen vibe.

suzy (suzy), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 12:33 (twenty-one years ago) link

I think I would prefer to look at Britpop as a glinch in the whole musical spectrum. What particularly british music scene has come out of that? Is it too early for the Britpop revival?

s samson, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 12:54 (twenty-one years ago) link

''Is it too early for the Britpop revival?''

FOR THE SAKE OF HUMANITY LETS NOT GO THERE!

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 12:55 (twenty-one years ago) link

How can any good come out of their interviews? They preach to the converted. You're not going to see a KKK member at an ADF concert!

They are the worst kind of reactionary politics IMO.

calum, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 12:57 (twenty-one years ago) link

is there a 'good' kind of reactionary politics?

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 12:58 (twenty-one years ago) link

Well, Calum it would depend on how much you would want to read of Liam and Noel doing coke, pop-academic revivalist publications on the Spice Girls or the top ten records of Cast.

I would take an ADF interview any day!

s samson, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 12:59 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'm with Martian all way the way on his Blissout comments. I was also 24 in 94 and the real golden age now seems like 88-93. He's also spot on with the April 94 starting point (from a general media standpoint anyway). Add in John Smith's death to the mix. I remember listening to Parklife on the earphones in Virgin's Oxford St branch on a real scorcing April 94 day and after leaving the shop I heard that Smith had died, thus paving the way for the start of Blair's Cool Britannia I guess. Read an article on Oasis in the MM later that day. Still, I possess some great memories form the 94-97 period and actually enjoyed aspects of lad culture while listening to Disco Inferno and jungle compilations. I guiltily admit that I find it hard not to get a little teary eyed nostalgic for many of the Britpop singles but reading through this thread you realize there's always a big mass of good music out there to pick n' choose from. Kevin Shield's hoped in 1995 that Britpop would eventually be forgotton about like the early sixties skiffle movement and that jungle etc would be what'll get written about in future history books as the real great legacy of the decade. Maybe that'll happen but as ever the truth (good or bad?) lies somewhere in between.

David Gunnip, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 13:17 (twenty-one years ago) link

Is it too early for the Britpop revival?
I concur. People seemed like they weren't even ready for a new wave synth-pop revival, and that was a revival from 20 years ago! Britpop has been gone...how long exactly? (Not long enough...I can STILL smell Noel Gallaghers pitsweat in the air, and I'm all the way over HERE!)

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 13:20 (twenty-one years ago) link

What early sixties skiffle movement?

(a) Skiffle was over by 1958.
(b) No skiffle = no Britpop (from Cliff/Shadows/Beatles onwards). An absurd and ridiculous statement.

Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 13:32 (twenty-one years ago) link

Phuck THAT! Skiffle will NEVER DIE!

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 13:32 (twenty-one years ago) link

Okay...never mind. That was irrational. I'm going back to bed.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 13:33 (twenty-one years ago) link

custos in being irrational shockah!

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 13:46 (twenty-one years ago) link

Well you've got a point Julio. But they all just seemed like idealistic, and very naive, people (ADF that is). Some of their comments were a bit racist in themselves too - it always seemed to be things dramatically Christian and white that they were rallying against. Shame really, as there is good and bad in every culture...

calum, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 13:51 (twenty-one years ago) link

''Some of their comments were a bit racist in themselves too''

well I can't remember that anything they said could be 'racist' but I'll pull out a couple of the old NMEs and check (I prob won't do this actually).

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 13:55 (twenty-one years ago) link

I think Kevin Shields was being 'ironic'.

s samson, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 14:01 (twenty-one years ago) link

do a "spoonerism" on pulp & blur - the result = bulp and....

plur!!

PLUR!!!!!!!!1!

do you see!!1

Pashmina (Pashmina), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 14:03 (twenty-one years ago) link

Some wicked gonzo postings from Suzy there, you're probably a famous hack but I've got no idea who you are. The 15 year old at the NME, that's Bidisha, isn't it? What's she up to now? I used to see her at tonnes of gigs in the early 90's then she got a huge publishing deal and disappeared from the scene, last time I saw her was about a year ago on a Nicky Campbell hosted late night talk show.

It's important to highlight the connection between the British/London riot grrrl scene and Britpop. When Blow Up (then Londinium) first started the main attendees were members of Comet Gain and Huggy Bear. Paul Tunkin would always play Stereolab's "Ping Pong" and JSBX "Afro" at the club, nowhere else in London would do this. I started going there with a mate of mine who eventually formed Menswear, he also used to attend lots of riot grrrl gigs with me. The original Menswear was a 4 piece, their drummer at the time now drums for The Beatings via Heck and a few other bands whose names escape me. All of them, except for my mate, came from Southend, they went religously to The Pink Toothbrush in Raeliegh and saw tonnes of great bands play there. They weren't clueless fuckwits (well, maybe Chris was).

Suzy seems like she was right up there with the head scenesters, I on the other hand have never been. But I've been at the right places at the right time.

They're overlooked but Smash were a very important bridge between Riot Grrrl and Britpop. You have to realise, for a year or so before 1994/5, there was no indie, just bland pacific northwest inspired metal like Alice in Chains. Seeing Smash play for the first time at The Monarch was one of the most exciting things in my life (at that time).They ignited sparks for everybody that being political, being British, providing your audience, this was so important but nobody did it. TNWOTNW was quite a limp scene, it never took off but I'll stand by it, no Smash = no Britpop. You could say, No riot grrrl = no NWOTNW = no Britpop.

On the dance music side of thing, lots of people were going to Megadog at a pub in Seven Sisters (can't recall it's name) and The North London Polytechnic. I'm not sure how many of these people were also going to Blow Up, Smashing or Fantasy Ashtray but I couldn't have been the only one. London was a million times more exciting a decade ago than it is now, everything going on now, in my opinion, just seems derivative of that moment in time.

I liked The Heavenly Sunday Social, it was like the grand celebration for a clique of people who'd been broad minded and gone out of their way to experience different aspects of London. It was the first place I'd ever been to were you could have a chat at the bar to a guy wearing a Pastels t-shirt whilst a DJ was playing Masters at Work. That seems like nothing out of the ordinary now but back then it was mind-blowing, like there's loads of musically broadminded people out there and they all seem to have decided to come here.

Then the drugs kicked in and people suddenly seemed to care more about how much they earned and what they could spunk their money on rather than the music.

But shit, nothing will beat hearing "Cigarettes and Alcohol" being played at The Albany for the last Sunday Social, it was amazing. As with any scene, the build up was fantastic and I doubt the film will cover that because there was no scene to categorise at that time, just satellites that converged into one horrible monster.

Stephen Burrows (steveeeeeeeee), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 14:26 (twenty-one years ago) link

Well saying that any band comprising young white lads playing guitar was representative of everything wrong with the UK (indicating that this is because they ARE white and play guitars) is a bit steep...

I'm sure they mean well, but having a rant at Britney for not being poitical enough is beyond silly.

calum, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 14:31 (twenty-one years ago) link

the george robey wasnt it?

gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 14:33 (twenty-one years ago) link

''You have to realise, for a year or so before 1994/5, there was no indie, just bland pacific northwest inspired metal like Alice in Chains.''

hahahaha!!!!!!!

this thread is a gift!

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 14:34 (twenty-one years ago) link

Oh god, I loved brit pop. Too many sad examples of obsession to list. I was 12 in 1995 and lived in rural quebec so it all seemed very exotic. Plus, the feeling of being cooler than girls at junior high who liked the backstreet boys. That was also the first year we got the internet and I would only chat with people from England! My first friend was this 30something guy who loved Sleeper. I was going to run away to Stoke.

Genevieve, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 14:34 (twenty-one years ago) link

"the george robey wasnt it?"

Yeah, cheers Gareth, it turned into The Powerhaus for a bit after the one in Angel shut down. Saw The Make Up and The New Bad Things play there but not much else.

Stephen Burrows (steveeeeeeeee), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 14:38 (twenty-one years ago) link

Collective Soul vs Stabbing Westward

dave q, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 14:50 (twenty-one years ago) link

Steven, my NME editor was not a 15-year-old when we worked together, not the writer you mention. IIRC her book deal thing was way overhyped, not that much money really and in any case I think the novel tanked (I used her for a story in my anthology but that writing was even worse). Huge publishing deals are what Zadie Smith gets.

Ohh I never liked SMASH or These Animal Men. No matter what they said were still too much like Camden Lurchers for me.

suzy (suzy), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 15:37 (twenty-one years ago) link

Camden Lurchers

Silverfish to thread! Whatever happened to Milk, anyway?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 16:03 (twenty-one years ago) link

I've re-evaluated it certainly - I used to think it was mostly crap with some good points, now I think it was just crap.

Dadaismus, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 16:10 (twenty-one years ago) link

What early sixties skiffle movement?

Mr Shields was misquoted, there - he was in fact talking about the early sixties trad jazz movement.

Chriddof (Chriddof), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 16:17 (twenty-one years ago) link

Didn't Milk join forces with a guy from Swervedriver and become Skyscraper?

Stephen Burrows (steveeeeeeeee), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 16:29 (twenty-one years ago) link

Actually I think you're right. Nowhere near as good as Swervedriver.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 16:30 (twenty-one years ago) link

What early sixties skiffle movement?
(a) Skiffle was over by 1958.

Yes and no. Skiffle, in its original form, was certainly over by 1958. BUT... Skiffle's main performer, Lonnie Donegan, started the 60s by releasing heavily Music Hall influenced singles like "My Old Man's a Dustman" and "Does Your Chewing Gun Lose It Flavour" - songs that were a lot more typically English-sounding than skiffle ever was. The Music Hall influences that were later to appear in the music of The Kinks, The Beatles, Queen and Madness (and, ultimately, Blur) may not have happened if it wasn't for those hits.

Sure, the British has Music Hall top hits like Mike Sarne's "Come Outside" and Temperance Seven's "You're Driving Me Crazy" in the early 60s too, but those were seen as one-off novelties, while Donegan was actually a major and important innovator name in pre-Beatles English popular music.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 16:35 (twenty-one years ago) link

*yawn*...okay, combat nap is over. I feel better.
What did I miss?

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 18:01 (twenty-one years ago) link

Where does Romo fit into all this then?

Venga, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 21:49 (twenty-one years ago) link

Pricey's Dream Deferred.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 21:50 (twenty-one years ago) link

OK, my top 10 Britpop albums (and I don't really consider all of these Britpop, especially not number 1, but they are done by bands or artists instrumental in the period of 1993 - 1997 so here goes...) Oh - I've limited myself to one album per artist, hence no Coming Up by Suede.

1) Dog Man Star - Suede
2) Different Class - Pulp
3) Vauxhall and I - Morrissey
4) The Masterplan - Oasis
5) Elastica - Elastica
6) Parklife - Blur
7) The Sound of McAlmont and Butler - McAlmont and Butler
8) Tellin' Stories - The Charalatans
9) 1977 - Ash
10) The It Girl - Sleeper


Calum Robert, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 22:01 (twenty-one years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.