Swingers (the movie) - Classic or Dud?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (28 of them)
BLUESKI BRINGS YOU 1000 "SO-SO" FILMS

*makes non-commital hand gesture*

Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 11:23 (twenty years ago) link

ESOJ, do you have trouble concentrating?

no, not at all. i am, however, rather impatient and prone to bouts of antsiness

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 11:25 (twenty years ago) link

right, right, right and Im looking like the money like the bomb.

Chris V. (Chris V), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 11:28 (twenty years ago) link

I'm not nuts about the movie, ESPECIALLY the Tarantino references, which always make me cringe. Also, it really looks like crap. But Vince Vaughn is a great movie star in it.

slutsky (slutsky), Thursday, 22 May 2003 00:21 (twenty years ago) link

the best joke is the 818 one.

i miss pink dot, there used to be one right in between the nuart and the 405, i almost walked in just to see what was in there!!!

i think if i hadn't spent a few years in LA i'd probably dismiss this movie but it has a few charming episodes... it's basically LA Story for gen x swing kids.

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 22 May 2003 00:27 (twenty years ago) link

Perhaps the duddest of all possible duds as far as mid-90s cinematic touchstones go.

Wasn't Liman his own cinematographer here? He should have fired himself. He doesn't seem to know how to light anyone; even Heather Graham looks pasty and sickly here.

amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 22 May 2003 00:35 (twenty years ago) link

Yeah, this movie looks SO bad.

Liman's next two movies were much better, though I did have some problems with Go. Liked Bourne though.

slutsky (slutsky), Thursday, 22 May 2003 00:39 (twenty years ago) link

By the way, people really look like shitty in movies these day--a combo of bad lighting and make-up, I think. Monica Belluci's skin looked really weird in that last Matrix movie. I mean it's Monica Belluci, you really have to go out of your way to mess that up.

slutsky (slutsky), Thursday, 22 May 2003 00:41 (twenty years ago) link

Full disclosure: I turned this off after an hour.

I find Monica Bellucci pretty boring. Heather Graham too, but I think everyone finds her boring.

amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 22 May 2003 00:46 (twenty years ago) link

Yeah, but she has nice skin (thus my point).

slutsky (slutsky), Thursday, 22 May 2003 00:48 (twenty years ago) link

even Heather Graham looks pasty and sickly here

I'm trying to think of a movie where Heather Graham DIDN'T look pasty and sickly...

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 22 May 2003 01:18 (twenty years ago) link

license to drive

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 22 May 2003 02:04 (twenty years ago) link

sickly... hot!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 22 May 2003 02:09 (twenty years ago) link

vince vaghan has half a thumb missing. true.

piscesboy, Thursday, 22 May 2003 11:40 (twenty years ago) link

fourteen years pass...

watched this last night for the first time in 15 or so years.

everyone otm above about how bad it looks. when they do the reservoir dogs slow-mo strut and later the homage to the copacabana steadicam from goodfellas you can't help but think: this looks god-awful, especially compared to the reference points.

it is also so of its time. the aforementioned goodfellas and reservoir dogs rips, and obviously most notably the whole swing revival, saddle shoes, wallet chains and big bad voodoo daddy element - but also the real 90s battle-of-the-sexes gender politics of it - the "likable" lovelorn protagonist who is a foil to the womanizing vince vaughn constantly calls women skanks.

a pretty decent enough watch from a nostalgia point of view and some of it holds up reasonably well - still found michael's awkward attempts at banter with women in the vegas section pretty amusing, i like ron livingston in anything he's in despite him being the least notable or exciting actor around. but basically the only remarkable aspect of it is the career making performance of vince vaughn - who was never this good, or handsome, again

-_- (jim in vancouver), Friday, 16 June 2017 16:49 (six years ago) link

the choice of the swing revival as the scene to use is probably the single lamest thing and yeah vince vaughn is really good and was never this good again, but the seeds of his whole lazy dead-eyed douche schtick that he made his subsequent career on are all here, it's just masked with an energy he never captured again. in retrospect he's kind of an embarrassing star. the gender stuff is pretty lame, this is definitely a dudebro POV film in the least interesting sense.

it is kind of funny to see this as a time capsule of that swing scene. The Derby is now a Chase bank, after the swing thing faded it turned into a pay-to-play venue for local musicians and then quietly shut its doors.

nomar, Friday, 16 June 2017 17:14 (six years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.