Excelsior the book

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (832 of them)
Dan OTM, of course. I mean really, what is the point?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:28 (nineteen years ago) link

Todd, I think your points are fair. I actually did print off an ILM thread a long time ago to show to one of my music professors, and I now feel like I have some sort of responsibility to be retroactively guilty about it. Granted, making an actual book and selling it is quite a different matter, but can we really expect the things we write on here never to reach anyone outside "the circle"?

Clarke B. (Clarke B.), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:28 (nineteen years ago) link

Clarke, it's an open web forum. Anything is possible.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:29 (nineteen years ago) link

I can't wait to show all of my old funny posts that nobody got to my future children. if they do not laugh, I will be very angry.

AdamL :') (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:30 (nineteen years ago) link

Mark, why didn't you ask in advance? Seriously?

Penelope_111 (Penelope_111), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:30 (nineteen years ago) link

http://www.philipkdick.com/covers/valis-jp.jpg

BRRRRR (ex machina), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:30 (nineteen years ago) link

But the base price is $17.86. Where's our fourteen cents?

Pleasant Plains (Pleasant Plains), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:31 (nineteen years ago) link

John D is gone, Jon W is here, and I'm annoyed with that balance.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:31 (nineteen years ago) link

Exactly, Ned, which is why I am kind of baffled by J0Hn's utter shock that someone would even think to do this. Isn't making a book or anthology out of online writing sort of obvious?

Clarke B. (Clarke B.), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:32 (nineteen years ago) link

TS: Someone stumbling onto a post via Google and referencing it vs Someone copying a thread into a book and selling it

Are you people massively dense or something?

While I'm sorry to see J0hn go, my issue is much less about his departure and much more about the GIGANTIC LEVEL OF STUPIDITY involved in doing something like putting people's copyrighted words into a product and selling it without asking for their consent first.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:33 (nineteen years ago) link

I understand why people are annoyed with this, but (and I may get struck by lightning for saying thus) I think J0hn might be overreacting a tad. Ned's response upthread seemed a little more reasonable.

St. Nicholas (Nick A.), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:34 (nineteen years ago) link

x-post

Not only obvious, but kind of pointless, too, as you say (especially when the only way you can BUY the book is online, but if you have online access in the first place, why do you NEED it? etc etc) -- but is it really a surprise? And why did J0hn seem to take it so personally? I'm extremely upset to see him go, too, FWIW.

Clarke B. (Clarke B.), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:34 (nineteen years ago) link

Clarke, the shock is not that someone might come up with this idea -- I presume the longer-standing members recall the Da Capo/Strokes conundrum, for instance. The shock is that even the Da Capo folks *asked* first.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:35 (nineteen years ago) link

Why are people shocked or surprised that J0hn left, particularly since (as nabisco pointed out) he is a public persona who makes a living based on his words who has just had a big chunk of free time excerpted into someone else's commodity?

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:36 (nineteen years ago) link

(WITHOUT HIS PERMISSION should be at the end of my last post)

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:37 (nineteen years ago) link

Because it's only happened once, and he hasn't given Mark the chance to do anything about it. And NO ONE IS GOING TO BUY THE DAMN BOOK.

St. Nicholas (Nick A.), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:38 (nineteen years ago) link

What was this Da Capo/Strkes conundrum?

AdamL :') (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:38 (nineteen years ago) link

since I did say "will be leaving after this thread" and have become something of a point of discussion I will post-peace-out say this: have the people who are saying "you could google J0hn's name so what's the big deal" noticed how I spell(ed) my name in this forum? with a "zero" for an "O" and a "1" for an "L"? That's called "googleproofing."

I am so fuckin' angry and depressed about this, I love my ilx0r friends and am going to really miss them/y'all a whole lot but being printed without my permission is horseshit

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:38 (nineteen years ago) link

1) because no one cares about the stuff in the book.
2) only we know it exists
3) I'm sure Mark Grout will pull it when he realizes how upset it made John.

xpost

BRRRRR (ex machina), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:38 (nineteen years ago) link

Nick, that's so fucking stupid I don't even know where to begin.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:40 (nineteen years ago) link

I am sorry to see J0hn go though. I want J0hn to stay, which is why I want him to realize this isn't really such a big deal. But I'm sorry he's upset.

St. Nicholas (Nick A.), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:40 (nineteen years ago) link

http://www.google.com/search?q=%22john+darnielle%22+site%3Ailx.wh3rd.net

It is really well known that "lastplanetojakarta.com" is J0hn's, also

BRRRRR (ex machina), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:40 (nineteen years ago) link

Hmm, Jon agrees with me. Maybe it is stupid.

St. Nicholas (Nick A.), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:41 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm sure something can be done, John. Perhaps postpone your decision until you find out how this can be sorted?

Penelope_111 (Penelope_111), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:41 (nineteen years ago) link

That's called "googleproofing."

Yeah, but there's a ton of M0UNT@!N G0@TS threads and it's naive to think that someone can't work their way back to it. Not that the book is right, but it's not the earth shattering public revelation that you're making it out to be.

deanomgwtf!!!p%3Fmsgid%3D4581997 (deangulberry), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:42 (nineteen years ago) link

People do understand that CafePress is a printing service -- like Kinko's -- and not a publisher, right?

Feel whatever you feel regardless, but some of the posts sound like the posters think otherwise.

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:42 (nineteen years ago) link

dan, i understand where you are coming from... but.
j0hn isnt writing lyrics into these posts, sure it is copyrighted material (for what reason i do not know), but he is just bantering on like the rest of us.

and if he is ashamed of what he wrote, he shouldnt have written it in the first place/left a long time ago.

xpost i am sure

todd swiss (eliti), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:43 (nineteen years ago) link

Sorry to have resorted to referring to ya in 3rd person, J0hn. It *is* horseshit -- I'm a very occasional poster compared to a lot of folks, and I'm all over that Gear's Couch thread.

J0hn, because you (unlike Mark) understand the openendedness of these threads, I can only assume that when you say you're leaving "after this thread," it's a cruelly subtle way of saying you're not leaving at all! Cool!

Clarke B. (Clarke B.), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:44 (nineteen years ago) link

In theory I think the idea of an ILX book is kinda cool in an infeasibly geeky way, but people need to be asked. I am sad to see J0hn go and hope it's only a temporary thing.

Jon, people can't see full email addresses unless they're registered.

At least 3 Xs.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:44 (nineteen years ago) link

http://www.mingthemerciless.com/bloomps.jpg

DiMarceau Fishpower, Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:45 (nineteen years ago) link

It has nothing to do with shame/worth of posts and everything to do with "one thing that you should reasonably be able to expect when you post to ILX is that another ILXor will not copy things you've written into a book which will then be sold to people without asking you first".

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:46 (nineteen years ago) link

Exactly.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:46 (nineteen years ago) link

There's stuff on those threads from before I changed my name and took my work email address off ILX.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:47 (nineteen years ago) link

I really don't think that's a reasonable expectation for anyone who isn't brand new to the internet, frankly.

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:48 (nineteen years ago) link

i didn't realize this would anger people. but it has. mark grout you get one of these to the side of the head, it won't hurt, but your honor should be damaged:

http://www.rainbownetrigging.com/rainbow-images/industrial-glove-big.jpg

artdamages (artdamages), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:49 (nineteen years ago) link

It's not that people don't know I'm here: I'm fine with people know I'm here, deanomgwtf!!! It's that stuff-being-printed-under-my-name is quite a great deal different from talking- about-it-under-a-googleproofed-version-of-my-name-on-a-thread. That anybody here thinks "oh what's the big deal: talking on a forum, printing it in a book - what's the diff?" really exacerbates how shitty the whole thing makes me feel. I'm not "ashamed of what [I] wrote," todd - it was a conversation I was having with friends, not something I wanted preserved in print. It has nothing to do with imagining that people can't find me here - of course that's OK! It has to do with being printed/preserved for posterity in a way I didn't want. The idea that one should be as careful with one's words on an internet forum as one is when writing for print seems so patently ridiculous as to spurn further comment.

I'm gonna leave this thread & the forum now for real, as my attemps to clarify my position are just making me angrier & angrier. Bye everybody.

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:50 (nineteen years ago) link

Tep; Why?

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:50 (nineteen years ago) link

I think that 95% of us agree that mark did something dumb, but maybe we should give him a chance to do something about it before we completely freak out.

St. Nicholas (Nick A.), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:51 (nineteen years ago) link

I agree. If, presumably, none have been sold, it can just be pulled, right?

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:52 (nineteen years ago) link

ps I keep thinking of the sitcom Dear John except in reverse and not at all. anyway great theme song. J0hn will be missed, but we must carry on. I for one have to do a radio show that no one will be listening to.

artdamages (artdamages), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:53 (nineteen years ago) link

It has nothing to do with shame/worth of posts and everything to do with "one thing that you should reasonably be able to expect when you post to ILX is that another ILXor will not copy things you've written into a book which will then be sold to people without asking you first".

Well, since this isn't inherent to the internet, I guess the responsibility for maintaining this belief falls on the moderators of this board, no?

deanomgwtf!!!p%3Fmsgid%3D4581997 (deangulberry), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:54 (nineteen years ago) link

Do I have to spell out that "reasonably expect" means "the likelyhood that it could happen obviously exists but chances are that it won't and that this no bearing on your right to feel annoyed or pissed off when someone does it"?

For the record, I personally don't care that my posts are in this thing. I do not make the mistake of thinking that this means that no one else should care, either.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:54 (nineteen years ago) link

xpost "Excelsior: The Book" (dumbass)

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:55 (nineteen years ago) link

http://socsci.gulfcoast.edu/fsale/presentations/LOGIC2/img045.jpg

whoooooosh, Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:56 (nineteen years ago) link

Well, Dan, you should be smart enough to realize that there are a lot of different people on ILX and they all expect different things out of it that sound "reasonable" to them.

deanomgwtf!!!p%3Fmsgid%3D4581997 (deangulberry), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:57 (nineteen years ago) link

It's awful that John is made to feel like this. I completely understand his anger.

Penelope_111 (Penelope_111), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:58 (nineteen years ago) link

Tep; Why?

Because it won't ever be honored. Because it's unrealistic. It's like expecting that you can walk down the street having a conversation with the person next to you, or on the other end of your cell phone, without people listening. It's unrestricted space, and it's explicitly and visibly unrestricted space: it isn't possible to occupy it without being aware of that.

It's like expecting that those eavesdroppers -- whether they mean to be or not -- will never tell other people what they heard you talking about, nor post it to "In Passing," nor in their book about People Saying The Darndest Things, or whatever.

It might be a reasonable requirement of courtesy, but like it or not, courtesy beyond a certain point isn't a reasonable expectation. It just doesn't happen. It isn't something given by default.

It's not like this is new. The profit involved should be irrelevant, and seems to be irrelevant to most peoples' concerns: would they object to someone printing out a thread at Kinko's to read at work? That's all CafePress does: they print it out. They make no claims to copyright or ownership (they do require that their clients possess copyright to the work they're printing; it's never been clear they need to). So the concern is either empty principle or has to do with privacy: not wanting to be read by people you don't know are reading, or aren't answerable to the ILX community, or whatever.

How is it any different from printing out a thread and showing it to a spouse or coworker? Or letting them read your screen? Or the lurkers who read everything anyway?

I'm not saying it isn't okay to be bothered by it, although it's probably clear it doesn't bother me; I'm saying it's not reasonable to expect people to act accordingly, because they haven't been, and they aren't going to start.

(The odds that anyone who's been active in popular online places for a few years hasn't been reprinted somewhere without their consent or knowledge are not great.)

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 19:58 (nineteen years ago) link

I'd geniunely like to see what Momus has to say about all this.

Clarke B. (Clarke B.), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:01 (nineteen years ago) link

That may be so, but I would expect a regular poster to these forums to at least ask. I'll take emptty principle every time, I think.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:01 (nineteen years ago) link

Would you expect a regular poster to ask before showing their non-ILXing spouse, coworker, or friend a thread?

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 20:02 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.