Someone explain *ahem* Bangbus to me.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (164 of them)
I did see Manuela from Bignaturals.com is Nikki from boobsquad and the bangbus episode with Christina. I have seen Sierra all over the place she is on boobsquad, big naturals and various amateur sites, I have seen Pantera on cdgirls.com (and also back when on real butts as mentioned before). I think this might be the same reagan but im not sure http://www.teenperfection.com/raunchy_reagan/teen_body.html someone feel free to let me know.

bangbus addict Sal

augustus, Saturday, 15 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

at least its not as fake as milfhunter.

dale, Saturday, 15 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Bang Bus is not real. It's all portrayed by actors. I have seen some of the actors in other porn sites and even videos. It's very funny the way they try to act it out because it's soooo fake. Most the the women in the bus can not act, but others do a decent job of acting. Its fun to watch. Some of the actors in the video gave away the question of "is bangbus real". They kinda blew the cover.

Josh Drew, Sunday, 16 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Fake for sure. The shoots make me sad and fascinated at the same time. Noel especially. Search for BBus victims/survivors/discussion board and there's nothing. If it was real there would be something out there on the net ie, the women trying to cope with getting raped and wanting to protest via the net where they were they were exposed and debauched. Logical no? Noel is so hot–she needs some nice treatment yet what a joke that I feel that way because if it was true I'd be able to reach her somehow but it's all fake, not real and staged to some degrees.....

a, Sunday, 16 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Graham, Sunday, 16 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I have found this thread to be quite interesting. I started out as an addict, downloading full versions off of Kazaa, intrigued by the possibility that much of what I was seeing was real. Most of you have provide real contributions to a very good, I think, guess as to what Bangbus is actually all about. Thanks

rocky, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Rocky pretty much said it all.

I would add that some of the girls seem like they may be doing porn (or quasi-porn) for the first time...monica seems pretty genuine in her initial hesitance, and her pleas to make sure no one outside the van ever sees the tapes. My guess is that some of the girls have for one reason or another (perhaps curiosity + economic need?) decided to give it a go, but weren't told the full story, particulary the mass distribution of the video being shot. No doubt the papers they were required to sign contained some boiler-plate clauses making future legal action a non-option. And, of course, appropriate medical tests were performed on all participants, as indicated in the FAQs...hence the frequent absence of condoms (birth control likely via pill or some other female contraceptive). But the rest of them, like Rene and Alex, are seasoned strippers and/or escorts.

As to the shoots being scripted, other that general instruction to make it look like a spontaneous pick-up, I doubt anything else is predetermined, at least from the woman's side. Anyone who's done any dramatic work (I've written for stage and worked with actors) can tell you that memorizing even a few lines can take time...there's no way these chicks are "acting." A lot of the psychological interplay (and a lot of the sexual stimulation) seems real.

Sanchez is indeed the most annoying man on the internet. Rocky was bang on...Sanchez is a total "Jar Jar." The guy goes way, way overboard in his director/dominator role, and absolutely ruins the hottest moments with his constant yammering and that nails-on-a- chalkboard cackle. I wish someone would stuff a cock into his mouth once the sex starts...the videos would improve 100%. This guy has some serious issues with women. Maybe a few of those bangbus dollars can go towards some much-needed therapy.

Reality Check

R Check, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

graham: nice touch :-)

Alan T, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I have a great idea: The Gay Bangbus.

These guys drive around in a bus, lure ostensibly straight men onto the bus, and then bang them, bringing out their repressed gay desires.

This bus is coming soon to a neighbourhood near you.

DV, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Thats exactly the Baitbus i think someone linked to it in the begining of the thread

Chupa-Cabras, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

look, in america you can find lots of these dumb girls who will do just about anything for money... they don't find any danger with it... now in canada where people are not so rash things are *ahem* unfortunately different

hoser, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

matt middleton to thread!

queenoftheharpies, Monday, 17 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Go to networksolutions.com, to the "whois" section. Look up bangbus.com, cumfiesta.com, boobsquad.com, backroomfacials.com, and the list probably goes on. The underlying company is "Dotster.com". This is corporate run moneymaking shit, not a couple of douchebags running and around in any kind of independent manner. While I don't believe all these women are totally happy about what they are doing, I do believe that the understanding of what they are doing is there well before any of them step into the bus.

James K, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Actually, maybe Dotster is just the registrar. I don't know, but it's interesting to chase down the involved parties. Found this link interesting. http://www.oxcash.com/home.htm?Handler=main&Webmaster=

James K, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

If you think that Sanchez is bad (and I don't mean 'good'), check out one of their other websites - http://www.backroomfacials.com, where they also have the trailers. Basically, this guy (makes Sanchez look like an angel) puts ads in the newspaper for wannabe 'models' or porn stars, and asks them to come for a 'screen test'. Most of them seem to be under the illusion that they are just there to have a chat, fill out forms, whatever (which seems pretty dumb). Sensing their desperation and need to make a few bucks, he then tells them that they have to get 'neked' for the purposes of the screen test, which 'may' lead to job offers, and that they won't get much further unless they go through him - but of course, it's their choice. If they are hesitant, he tells them that they can leave at any time, because there are a lot of girls who are waiting for such a great opportunity. He then kind of bullies them into taking their clothes off, performing 'oral acts' on him, spreading their 'lips' (as he puts it, to check that they are clean) then gets then down on this table and proceeds to have sex with them, while all the while calling them whores and sluts, telling them that they should be lucky that he is giving them this opportunity - and this guy is not acting, he means it. He is one bitter, nasty bastard.

I think that some of them are a bit stunned and puzzled as to why he is so mean. When he's done with them, he tells them that he may or may not have a job for them, and shows them the door, not even giving them time to clean themselves up or to put their clothes back on. One of them he calls a 'stupid bitch', and tells her that she was the worse one he ever had. Another one, Naomi (who is also in the bangbus hall of fame), he writes words like 'slut' and 'whore' all over her body, while he is fucking her. What I would like to know is, did Naomi fall prey to the bangbus before or after she went to see this guy. In the bangbus she was spouting all this ghetto talk and was acting like some kind of 'home girl', while this time she came across as more innocent and naive - I don't know what to think, maybe she was just showing off to Sanchez and his crew. All I know is, it ain't acting. I don't think that many women would go through that kind of personal humiliation (and believe me, it is humiliation) for a few bucks. He even told one of them, Precious (his "first filmed conquest"), that she was "stinky". When they ask him why does he need to film it, he says that it's for legal reasons, which makes sense (can you imagine the potential lawsuits), but is also convenient for him, as he can then humiliate them again on the internet, and also make some money for his troubles.

As for the bangbus, whoever said that Sanchez & co are losers need to think again. They are basically 'amateur professionals'. They obviously spend a lot of money spreading the 'bangbus' word, because there are bangbus 'advertising' sites all over the place. This bangbus thing is now an empire - those guys must be multi- millionaires by now. I have seen most of the episodes, and although a few of the girls may be hip to what might be going on, and are probably in the porn industry to some extent, it's clear that most of them definitely are not. The thing is, Sanchez has unique powers of persuasion, not everyone can do what he does - although I must add that I think that he is also bitter and twisted - the kind of guy who pretends to love women, but really hates them. Garak Lamb's post earlier explained it all. Another point that I'd add is that he uses flattery quite a bit, because he knows that it can go a long way with certain females, basically insecure types with low self-esteem. When he gets them to take their tops off, even when their chest is almost as flat as a pancake (as in Reagan's case), he's still gushing "beautiful, beautiful", as if they were the best thing since sliced bread. They do at first come across as harmless college kids, which is part of the trick to get them in the van, and it's clear that they're thinking that they're only going to hang out with some cool guys in a cool van. Now any female with half a brain would not step into any van (with tinted windows) with a bunch of guys, no matter how cool or funny they are. So these bangbus victims are not exactly the smartest chicks in town, unless they're the type who don't really care what happens to them, and who no one else cares about - the Dirty One's favorite kind. A lot of it is down to basic lack of life experience, naivety and common sense - and there are people out there who are willing to take advantage of that.

Dark Angel, Tuesday, 18 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

hey dark angel, it's owned by oxcash, same company that does bangbus, boobsquad etc. naomi is just another model they hired. and its not a few bucks for public humiliation, oxcash makes enough money and has a SHITLOAD of sites.

Truth Revealer, Wednesday, 19 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

hey gwaipor how do i get a password? i want to see the whole movie!

gino, Wednesday, 19 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Oxcash/Oxideas own all those sites and Naomi was not victimized but a willing participant. She makes her share of money to be treated as such and understand the situations fully.

bert, Wednesday, 19 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Guess what? There is an easy way to find out. I think it is fairly obvious that they are a lucrative business. From their ubiquitous presence on porn-related site, I would have to say that they are spending a considerable amount of time, effort, and especially money on marketing. Furthermore, the numbers that Tom has provided us above (incidentally, could you tell me how you found these statistics) "316,000 European visitors last month, 570,000 US visitors" indicated to me that they must be pulling in millions.

Now, I've got three suggestions for you:

1) They are obviously pulling in loads of cash, if they are illegitimate, I guarantee that the IRS would have audited them by now. If not, you can contact the IRS at 1-800-829-1040 for the Criminal Investigation Hotline in your area. Report 'em.

2) Their advertising explicitly states that this is all "real." This is in direct contradiction to the waiver that you must checkmark before you enter the site. Now, if these videos are "real," it is evident that at no time do they ask the girls for their agreement to be filmed in a movie that will be distributed for cost, they are illegally voiding the individual's right to a cut of the profit in the process. This constitutes a violation of the individual's rights to receive reimbursement for their services. If they are receiving reimbursement, then their advertising campaign is clearly false, and therefore they can be investigated by the BBB. Incidentally, if anyone wishes to file a complaint with the BBB, you can find information at this URL: http://www.bbb.org/bbbcomplaints/Welcome.asp

3) They have repeatedly mentioned their affiliation with a University and the fact that they reside in Miami. I believe it would be worth contacting both the University as well as the councilmember or local congressman in Miami, explaining the situation and letting them know that this situation exists and is defiling the reputation of Miami, as well as their educational institution.

4) I think many of their documented statements about hispanics and their actions towards hispanic women might be of interest to certain hispanic organizations. A complete listing can be found at: http://www.hispaniconline.com/res&res/org_ix.html Here are some suggestions:

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HISPANIC JOURNALISTS (est. 1984) PRESIDENT: CECILIA ALVEAR VICE PRESIDENT-PRINT: MARILYN GARATEIX VICE PRESIDENT-BROADCAST: WALTER BALLEZA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: ANNA LOPEZ 1193 National Press Building, Washington, D.C. 20045 Tel: 202-662-7145 Fax: 202-662-7144 1-888-346-NAHJ E-mail: nahj@nahj.org Web site: www.nahj.org

ASSOCIATION OF HISPANIC ADVERTISING AGENCIES (AHAA) (est. 1996) PRESIDENT: HORACIO GOMES (e-mail: horacio@headquartersadv.com) 8201 Greensboro Drive, Suite 300, McLean, VA 22102 Tel: 703-610-9014 Fax: 703-610-9005 Web site: www.ahaa.org

5) Finally, alerting the FBI is never a bad idea, particularly if you mention how easily accessible their clips are for young children.

These are just a few ideas for anyone who is interested, to get a little payback for these sons-of-bitches.

-D. Bruml

D. Bruml, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

2002 Most Boring Thread Evah

Brian MacDonald, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Maybe Brian, or maybe it's the one you started with the query

"What would have happened to disco then?"

http://www.ilxor.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=008w2C

Syble, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Well, at least that boring thread ended..

Brian MacDonald, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Exactly.

Rocky, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'm speechless.

Brian MacDonald, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Dark Angel hit the spot

Robert Williams, Thursday, 20 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

back to bangbus, fizuck you disco beyatchdes

augustus, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Beyatchdes?

Chris, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

beyatc....what? Wow nice spelling. I want to know more of who dirt and ugly are though. If anyone has a take Id like to hear it.

zeb, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I love disco. my favourite disco track is 'Lost In Music' by Sister Sledge. As you know, it was produced by Chic.

DV, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

back to bangbus you idiots, disco sucks, 80's suck, the 80's show suck.

sigma, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

You know, for enthusiasts of prank style porn, you guys exhibit far less humor than even the History & Theory Of Psychology forum here on Greenspun.

Brian MacDonald, Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

die stupid thread, DIE!!


i'm not helping, am i.

Dave M., Friday, 21 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Why is cream so ...creamy?

mike hanle y, Saturday, 22 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Bert’s original post mentioned something that I agree is at the root of this thread, “it's obvious that some of the girls are fake but some others are either incredible actresses or they really are naive enough to let these guys do, umm, unspeakable acts to them.” I personally am not into professional porn, because if you’ve seen one too-perfect girl act like she’s having an orgasm you’ve seen them all. Homegrown Videos out of San Diego is a good source of amateur porn if you can rent them. Most are tapes of guys with professional women of one sort or another. I try to avoid these, but some are truly couples that have taped themselves. The porn industry was caught by surprise when amateur porn took off. They couldn’t understand why many would rather see these average looking people having sex rather than what they had decided porn should look like. The answer for me is the reality. The true enjoyment of sex is far more interesting I think than pretend. But tapes of this type typically only show sex between two partners who have already consented. Bangbus is interesting in a different way because with a number of these girls we are watching genuine seduction. Some are obviously acting, and know about Bangbus and they are totally forgettable, they stick out like sore thumbs. Bangbus is not all real, but curiously it is not all fake either. This thread collectively has pointed out a series of factors that would seem to indicate that Bangbus is fake-the disclaimer, the lack of condom use, how all the girls are similarly manicured, the fact that some have appeared on other sites, the artifice apparent in the initial pick-up and drop-off, the logical assumption that a site so well known would eventually be shut down if the girls hadn’t signed releases beforehand (either by law enforcement or lawsuit). And yet . . . there are long stretches of time when these girls absolutely are not acting. Explaining how we know this would take too long, but the clues are there for all of us to see, and I think careful viewing of girls like Melissa and many others, make this apparent. Great acting is too difficult a craft to be pulled off by so many, so consistently, so well on this site. And so, Bangbus cannot be dismissed as totally fake. That it is unscripted is a given. The real question is do they have a rough outline of the outcome before they get in the van. For instance: 1. Resist getting in the van, 2. Question where we are going, 3. Resist taking off your blouse…etc. Since I believe that I am witnessing so much genuine emotion my guess is no. That Sanchez is good at what he does and is using very sophisticated mind control techniques is also a given. You then have to explain why a girl would allow herself to be manicured and tested for aids, if she has no knowledge that she is about to be taped having sex. The following is my best guess. A girl is somehow contacted (a newspaper ad, or perhaps girls they meet and solicit) Ideally I think they want girls who they know are easy, but not prostitutes. These guys would not want to have to deal with a hostile prostitute. Sometimes they have ended up with one. Remember when Rene announced she was bored and wanted to get on with it J. But I think for the most part they try to avoid this. Once they have a girl they like here’s one way they might set it up. 1. Tell her they are students at a local University doing a study on sexuality. They will pay her to ride around in a van with them so they can ask her some questions. The guy in the van with them is actually the one being studied, so they need her to pretend she is walking down the street, waiting for a bus, etc. For the purposes of the study they may tape a little, take photos, so they need her to sign a standard release, so they can use the footage for their course work. They tell her they are going to be studying his reaction to her for the purposes of the study as they ask her various questions. They might even point out that the contract states that if she purposefully gives away the set up, that she forfeits her money. With all the money they are making they can probably offer these girls a lot of money up front. Here’s where it gets tricky. They tell her sometimes if subjects of the study like each other, they might make out a little. They promise that at no time will they be forced to do anything, and this might be boldly lettered in the contract. Because they are offering so much money and there might be some physical contact they are required by the University to insist on an aids test and they assure the girls that the male will be similarly tested. Here’s where it gets really tricky. They also insist that because they are measuring the male’s response to her, she should dress in a sexy manner. They want her to feel sexy too. They might say, “A male can sense that you know. We want you to feel more sexual than you’ve ever felt. Wear sexy clothing on the outside and underneath. You have to wear this thong and (now your not going to believe how this is going to make you feel) we want you to visit this Emma Jean’s around the corner. They’re going to make you up, fix your hair, and give you a manicure.” She might protest that she has no intention of taking off her clothes and of course they will tell her no problem, but this is something that we require, and you can take it or leave it. “Believe us your going to enjoy all of this. You like to have a little fun don’t you. We promise you, look it says right here in the contract. You will be in complete control of the situation. It will only go as far as you want it too.” They might even tell her there is going to be some abusive language to analyze the male’s protective response. Most of the girls seem not to react to strongly to Sanchez’s verbal abuse. They might even throw in some extra money if the girl goes all the way. And so the setup-they have someone they will pick up. She has signed the release. Whatever they tape, they are paying for and can use for the web site. She is pretending to a certain extent, but doesn’t really know what she’s gotten herself into. The drama that plays out once she gets in the van is, from her perspective, a total surprise. She may have no intention of taking off her clothes, or having sex, but may know in the back of her mind that she gets more money if she does. Then throw in the intense pressuring techniques. What is totally unique about Bangbus is that they actually tape the seduction. We see these girls go through the entire process from not wanting to be touched, to full intercourse. That is why as much as I despise certain aspects of it, Bangbus is initially very interesting. It is original and unique. I halfway expect that it will not always be available and maybe that’s for the best. Returning to Bert’s original post, “(if you don't know what Bangbus is then I recommend that you keep it that way, it has caused no end of guilt and self-analysis in this little boy).” That’s not bad advice.

rocky, Saturday, 22 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Well put and analyzed, that was an excellent post and shows like many who have watched bangbus it is a spectacle that forces the viewer to either contemplate the setup or masterbate and fall asleep.

tom hatcher, Saturday, 22 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I really hope that bangbus is not real! Otherwise the girls would be ready for a psycologist after being humilated like that. During watching I thought it was kind of fun for the stupid girls till the end of the clip. But the way they affronted and finally threw them out of the van isn't funny anymore. If they aren't actresses they would feel raped after that.

If it is real... just shoot the guys, if not... it's a little too much showing badly prosecuted power on women

kroz, Saturday, 22 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Congrats, this thread is number one on google :P

not really Bert, Sunday, 23 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Damnn..pathetic losers, what the fuck does it matter if its real or not... Why dont yall just try to score some chicks in real life instead of jerking behind your monitor...

bless, Sunday, 23 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Man fuck you, its tight as fucking amateur porn you just into baitbus you fucking bitch

, Sunday, 23 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Interesting thread. As a girl that likes porn, I have to admit that bangbus is very exciting. Like almost everyone else, I also I'm not sure about whether this is fake or not. You know what? It doesn't matter (okay, maybe it matters if you think you are some sort of "Protector of Innocent Women" and you think it's your job to shed light into the fact you think this is real. If anyone is really worried, then what are people doing to stop these "criminals"? I say just enjoy the ride (no pun intended). Even if this is somewhat real, the girls must have had to sign something releasing the tape. If not, lawsuits would be everywhere. It's the same thing that happened to the guy from Girls Gone Wild. At first he didn't get releases from the women, and then he had to settle out of court up the butt. In other words, at the very least, these girls must have signed a consent at some point. Perhaps the van comes right back to their house and they "really" give them money this time. Regardless, I think the whole premise is very interesting and exciting. I'm tired of seeing women with fake boobs and fake orgasms . . . "reality" (even if it's pseudo) sex is the best.

Bang, Sunday, 23 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Hey! Googler here (1st post). Great thread. I'm wondering what you all think about captainstabbin.com ? Is it fake too? I'm not advertising for them- it's just along the lines of BB and mike's- apartment.com . Except it's not quite as humiliating to the girls and it's pretty damn funny. Anyway after reading this thread I'm getting more convinced that BB is setup. My theory is that they do the escort thing, and their reactions to being dumped off is real (since they don't get paid). I'd say there's a good possibility that the escorts were told to expect sex before they're picked up. We may never know. But anyway if anybody's checked out the captain's website, tell me what you think.

Jeff, Tuesday, 25 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

yeah gohin...icq me for a password 107512048 don't use the email

it's not actually a movie but a series of movies

gwaipor, Tuesday, 25 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I would like to know what site ugs and d sanchez referred to as those punks in new york biting their style. anyone know?

cibomatto@yahoo.com, Tuesday, 25 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I think it's staged, first off: these chicks would have to get AID's tested "at least I hope they would" second: I'm assuming to appear in a porno movie they would have to sign a contract.

me, Tuesday, 25 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

BangBus

jeez, Tuesday, 25 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

This site has a bunch of pics from Bangbus and its free...These chicks are definitally faking..probably hookers Shitty Bangbus Preview Shite

Shithead, Tuesday, 25 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Of course they are paid models, it even says so on their site, http://support.oxcash.com/records/ is at the bottom of the main page.

They're busted, Tuesday, 25 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Man those guys are sick !!! I was searching about bangbus and found another site from the bangbus crew that is more degrading for females...I can't think it can be real...

chico, Tuesday, 25 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

wow.. i have been watching bangbus for months, and never considered it to be fake until coming across a file on kazaa called "bangbus is fake".. viewing it.. it was a clip of reagan sucking cock for another porn site. i'd definetly agree that reagan and pantera (both taken off the site, but i'd never heard of until I dug their episodes off kazaa) are fake. but the rest.. i'd never have guessed. there is fairly good evidence for both arguments of this story.. the acting is too real to be fake, period.

btw, i'm a "googler", what does it really matter? i know nothing of greenspun.com, and will never go to it I assure you. i was searching for "bangbus fake" if you're dying to know.

~BH~Infected, Tuesday, 25 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Reagen is just a pornstar slut, she was used as a building block for bangbus when they were starting out, so she is what is called a starlet, these girls are in many sites, the site you probably were thinking of was cumfiesta.. Bangbus is real! and here to stay

Jud http://www.judsmovies.com

judsmovies.com, Tuesday, 25 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.