― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Tuesday, 5 September 2006 00:55 (3 years ago) Permalink
― Rickey Wright (Rrrickey), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 01:49 (3 years ago) Permalink
― a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 01:50 (3 years ago) Permalink
― trees (treesessplode), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 02:18 (3 years ago) Permalink
― a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 02:32 (3 years ago) Permalink
― trees (treesessplode), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 03:00 (3 years ago) Permalink
― A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 03:09 (3 years ago) Permalink
― ath (ath), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 03:12 (3 years ago) Permalink
― genital hyphys (haitch), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 03:19 (3 years ago) Permalink
― genital hyphys (haitch), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 03:21 (3 years ago) Permalink
W--y--yeah--n--no--uh
― A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 03:25 (3 years ago) Permalink
-- genital hyphys (carlos....), September 5th, 2006.
ROFL
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 04:07 (3 years ago) Permalink
step off deez niggy nuts
yours in christ,adrian
― SLUTSPIRIA (Adrian Langston), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 14:32 (3 years ago) Permalink
― a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 15:53 (3 years ago) Permalink
― roc u like a § (ex machina), Monday, 2 October 2006 13:03 (3 years ago) Permalink
― roc u like a § (ex machina), Monday, 2 October 2006 13:04 (3 years ago) Permalink
I made the comment that she wasn't like other female college students, who would either finish college and get married or enter into fields that are traditionally female.
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Monday, 2 October 2006 18:50 (3 years ago) Permalink
― roc u like a § (ex machina), Monday, 2 October 2006 18:55 (3 years ago) Permalink
― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Monday, 2 October 2006 19:01 (3 years ago) Permalink
― GILLY'S BAGG'EAR VANCE OF COUPARI (Ex Leon), Monday, 2 October 2006 19:29 (3 years ago) Permalink
― s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 2 October 2006 19:39 (3 years ago) Permalink
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Wednesday, 4 October 2006 01:14 (3 years ago) Permalink
― chakra khan chakra khan (sanskrit), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 02:05 (3 years ago) Permalink
― robinnnnnn edgerton (edgertor), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 04:06 (3 years ago) Permalink
― gear (gear), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 04:11 (3 years ago) Permalink
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Wednesday, 4 October 2006 04:13 (3 years ago) Permalink
― gear (gear), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 04:18 (3 years ago) Permalink
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Wednesday, 4 October 2006 04:24 (3 years ago) Permalink
― Fetchboy (Felcher), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 04:42 (3 years ago) Permalink
― Rickey Wright (Rrrickey), Wednesday, 4 October 2006 05:06 (3 years ago) Permalink
discus
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Wednesday, 3 January 2007 23:39 (3 years ago) Permalink
cf. Baise-Moi
― You've Got Scourage On Your Breath (Haberdager), Thursday, 4 January 2007 00:09 (3 years ago) Permalink
― spectre (gear), Thursday, 4 January 2007 00:19 (3 years ago) Permalink
― the gangsta Yankee Hotel Foxtrot (H2-H4), Thursday, 4 January 2007 00:27 (3 years ago) Permalink
don't forget to ban me here too, faggots.
― like murderinging (modestmickey), Thursday, 4 January 2007 03:01 (3 years ago) Permalink
― cutty (mcutt), Thursday, 4 January 2007 04:47 (3 years ago) Permalink
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 4 January 2007 12:35 (3 years ago) Permalink
― roc u like a § (ex machina), Thursday, 4 January 2007 16:00 (3 years ago) Permalink
― deej, Wednesday, 21 February 2007 23:35 (2 years ago) Permalink
― BLASTOCYST, Thursday, 22 February 2007 00:22 (2 years ago) Permalink
― deej, Thursday, 22 February 2007 00:31 (2 years ago) Permalink
― Curt1s Stephens, Thursday, 22 February 2007 00:42 (2 years ago) Permalink
― Curt1s Stephens, Thursday, 22 February 2007 00:44 (2 years ago) Permalink
― deej, Thursday, 22 February 2007 01:05 (2 years ago) Permalink
― mh, Thursday, 22 February 2007 18:25 (2 years ago) Permalink
― bb, Thursday, 22 February 2007 18:39 (2 years ago) Permalink
― lfam, Thursday, 22 February 2007 19:01 (2 years ago) Permalink
― am0n, Saturday, 14 April 2007 03:31 (2 years ago) Permalink
in fairness that could be all otm, did not read
― Swat Valley High (goole), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 03:59 (8 months ago) Permalink
Twelve: Feminism is not a dating service - if you think women should fall all over you just because you're feminist, you're in the wrong movement. If, in the course of doing feminism, you happen to meet someone and you both want to date, then fine. But if you think feminism is a dating service, it doesn't need you, and you don't need it - you need to learn social skills as to not have to use feminism to get closer to women.
Kinda falls into the "not that I'd ever want to see you nude because I respect you as a person" category.
But hey, dude's probably 95% walking the walk and defending Iraq to boot, so what do I care?
― •--• --- --- •--• (Pleasant Plains), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 04:24 (8 months ago) Permalink
Loi-brand feminism has a perverse fascination with dudes being boneheaded neanderthal anti-feminists by nature. It's like listening to one of those evangelical preachers who focuses on sin & the Fall of Man etc. Of course my clowning him on this thread would probably just further confirm whatever beliefs he has that contributes to his distrust of males but I'm in it for the lols man
― Pvt. Gonorrhea's dishonorable discharge (Curt1s Stephens), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 04:33 (8 months ago) Permalink
it seems like some ppl run into a particular explanation for the way the world is when they're young and stick with it, for some it's 'anti-semitism' or 'the matrix' so this doubtless a net plus for the ppl in marc loi's life
― Swat Valley High (goole), Wednesday, 13 May 2009 05:01 (8 months ago) Permalink
If, in the course of doing feminism,
― ice cr?m, Friday, 15 May 2009 16:53 (8 months ago) Permalink
Loi-brand feminism has a perverse fascination with dudes being boneheaded neanderthal anti-feminists by nature. It's like listening to one of those evangelical preachers who focuses on sin & the Fall of Man etc.
This is really, really on the money. He does appear to define himself as against what HE THINKS other people think like! Quite a bit part of what makes his spiel so annoying.
― tzzt (Pashmina), Friday, 15 May 2009 16:59 (8 months ago) Permalink
I think you mean "makes his spiel so lol-rrific"
― Skip "Ex" Spence (Noodle Vague), Friday, 15 May 2009 17:00 (8 months ago) Permalink
quite a biG part, even.
It varies, I guess, NV? Sometimes, it's funny, sometimes JESUS STFU ALREADY.
― tzzt (Pashmina), Friday, 15 May 2009 17:01 (8 months ago) Permalink
I'm sure if I was sharing a tent with the guy it'd be JESUS STFU ALREADY but at this distance he's just some magnificent stuffed specimen of...something.
― Skip "Ex" Spence (Noodle Vague), Friday, 15 May 2009 17:02 (8 months ago) Permalink
I guess to me, ppl who's steez is to tell you what you should be thinking reallky set my teeth on edge. Reminds me of radical veggie/huntsab guys who were on the periphery of my social circle back in the '80's. No fun to be w/.
Yeah, I guess "stuffed specimen of..something", I mean I haven't encoundered someone like that IRL since the '80's now I think about it.
― tzzt (Pashmina), Friday, 15 May 2009 17:03 (8 months ago) Permalink
lol University in the 80s....good times. I recently saw some photos of the Student Union in Hull circa 1990 and it was all NICARAGUA BENEFIT posters and debates about whether Blue Velvet shd be banned for misogyny. The same building today is all mobile phone ads and topless celebrity disco coke party nights. NB Am not saying the future is an improvement.
― Skip "Ex" Spence (Noodle Vague), Friday, 15 May 2009 17:08 (8 months ago) Permalink
Yeah... I mean, a bunch of that shit was terribly over-analytical, prone to bossiness w/r/t the opinions you should have about a whole variety of shit, quite embarrassing in retrospect, but at the same time, preferable (as in: infinitely less depressing to contemplate) to adverts on bus shelters for the local spearmint rhino knockof peeler bar or ladmags or wtfe.
― kr0p3r0m: a9ff (Pashmina), Friday, 15 May 2009 17:13 (8 months ago) Permalink
http://community.feministing.com/2008/11/bitch.html
But, me? I love bitches! I love each and everyone of them, and I don't care what society says. Of my relationships, only one was with a bitch. It was good. I didn't have to treat her like anything other than a human being. We respected each other, and loved each other, but knew we didn't need each other. She did her things to change the world, and I did mine. For Christmas, she donated $100 to Planned Parenthood for me; and I donated $100 to the Make-a-Wish Foundation for her. She kicked ass.She's only one among many bitches out there.Hillary Clinton = a total bitch.Gloria Steinem = the bitch of bitches.Lisa Simpson = a fictional bitch.Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton = the foremothers of bitchery.Angelina Jolie = the biggest bitch in Hollywood (although one would argue she's a privileged white bitch, which makes the complexities of class, race and gender the moreso interesting.)My future wife = better be a bitch.My future daughter = will be raised to be the biggest 5-year-old bitch in pre-school.The next time I am on a date and decide the girl is good enough for a second date, I'll say with the utmost sincerity, "You're the biggest bitch I've ever met." I think I'd enjoy getting a black eye in a restaurant.All of you who with whom I associate = total bitches - and if you're a male, you're an honorary bitch, and I love you all for it. In fact, I think there might be something wrong if, in the 21st Century, a woman isn't a bitch.
She's only one among many bitches out there.
Hillary Clinton = a total bitch.
Gloria Steinem = the bitch of bitches.
Lisa Simpson = a fictional bitch.
Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton = the foremothers of bitchery.
Angelina Jolie = the biggest bitch in Hollywood (although one would argue she's a privileged white bitch, which makes the complexities of class, race and gender the moreso interesting.)
My future wife = better be a bitch.
My future daughter = will be raised to be the biggest 5-year-old bitch in pre-school.
The next time I am on a date and decide the girl is good enough for a second date, I'll say with the utmost sincerity, "You're the biggest bitch I've ever met." I think I'd enjoy getting a black eye in a restaurant.
All of you who with whom I associate = total bitches - and if you're a male, you're an honorary bitch, and I love you all for it. In fact, I think there might be something wrong if, in the 21st Century, a woman isn't a bitch.
― He's a dilly through and through (unregistered), Tuesday, 21 July 2009 04:50 (6 months ago) Permalink
the guy "this guy" was made for
― dont blaze me dro (roxymuzak), Tuesday, 21 July 2009 13:38 (6 months ago) Permalink
i've always argued that angelina jolie is a privileged white bitch
― the meth got me open like challopian tubes (s1ocki), Tuesday, 21 July 2009 13:42 (6 months ago) Permalink
barf
― blobfish russian (harbl), Tuesday, 21 July 2009 13:43 (6 months ago) Permalink
this guy is the gift that keeps on giving.
― De Mysteriis Dom Passantino (jim), Tuesday, 21 July 2009 13:44 (6 months ago) Permalink
[0+] Author Profile Page thiskiss said:
You haven't convinced me that men can reclaim the word.
It's honestly rather grating.
― 1p3 freely (s1ocki), Tuesday, 21 July 2009 14:03 (6 months ago) Permalink
pwned
keep wanting to tell the dude where he's missing the point, but then I'd really be missing the point
― mh, Tuesday, 21 July 2009 15:08 (6 months ago) Permalink
Thoughts?!?!?
― goole, Tuesday, 21 July 2009 15:15 (6 months ago) Permalink
"Of my relationships, only one was with a bitch. It was good. I didn't have to treat her like anything other than a human being."
I don't get it. What have his other relationships been with?
― He was only 21 years old when he 16 (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 21 July 2009 17:44 (6 months ago) Permalink
here I was thinking I wouldn't be finding a new screen name this week
― Lisa Simpson = a fictional bitch (HI DERE), Tuesday, 21 July 2009 18:04 (6 months ago) Permalink
lisa seems pretty nice IMO not bitchy at all
― midge url (M@tt He1ges0n), Tuesday, 21 July 2009 18:26 (6 months ago) Permalink
that's because her bitchiness is fictional
― stupidcrazyswagilisticjumpininyaladyocious (some dude), Tuesday, 21 July 2009 18:57 (6 months ago) Permalink
you know, i'm beginning to suspect that marc loi doesn't know what he's talking about
― midge url (M@tt He1ges0n), Tuesday, 21 July 2009 18:58 (6 months ago) Permalink
i think this might be the real deal here
― goole, Tuesday, 21 July 2009 19:00 (6 months ago) Permalink
For those who cannot see the video, a little boy, a 3rd-grader, is organizing a rally for gay marriage!
While I am against parents using their children as political tools, if this is something he wants to do on his own, more power to him!
Marc. Wants. Feminist. Babies. Now.
― 1p3 freely (s1ocki), Tuesday, 21 July 2009 19:26 (6 months ago) Permalink
oh hell I'll explain it for him since he'll never come here, and therefore remain ignorant:
While misogynists very often call a woman a bitch as she is acting intelligently and s some self worth, a great deal of people use it to indicate negative aspects that all people feel are negative aspects, not just misogynists. If someone says "I am a bitch" then it's generally assumed they mean a positive, take-it-back connotation. The Loi saying "Lisa Simpson is a bitch" is about as acceptable as me saying... well, you fill it in
― mh, Tuesday, 21 July 2009 19:28 (6 months ago) Permalink
that's what she said.
― http://tinyurl.com/zom720 (Pleasant Plains), Tuesday, 21 July 2009 19:55 (6 months ago) Permalink
i wish he would post here. if he really cared he would.
― blobfish russian (harbl), Tuesday, 21 July 2009 19:57 (6 months ago) Permalink
we should tell him we have a lot of bitches here
― goole, Tuesday, 21 July 2009 19:58 (6 months ago) Permalink
we should get him on a thread with kate
― "he said...all things passantino the night" (omar little), Tuesday, 21 July 2009 20:01 (6 months ago) Permalink
haaaa
― 1p3 freely (s1ocki), Tuesday, 21 July 2009 20:50 (6 months ago) Permalink
actual giggles out loud
― that's because her bitchiness is fictional (latebloomer), Wednesday, 22 July 2009 01:58 (6 months ago) Permalink
The next time I am on a date and decide the girl is good enough for a second date
― julien schNAGL (s1ocki), Sunday, 26 July 2009 21:12 (6 months ago) Permalink
"Can't Rape the Willing"
This is a rant on the phrase "can't rape the willing," which, in recent days, I've heard many more people say.
About a week ago, I was telling some friends about a new hair salon in the Hampton Roads area (my hometown) in which attractive stylists are hired simply for that reason, as to attract more men. "Hot chicks cutting your hair," is their selling point, and you can sort of think of it as yet another Hooter's, except there are no wings and fried pickles, or the kick-ass roasted oysters, for that matter.
In response, one of my friends wrote me back: "But is anyone forcing those women? You can't rape the willing." This, for me, shows great lack of insight on the plights of women, as well as the challenges women face economically. For this, I'll try to frame the arguments through the lens of, firstly, economic choices, and secondly, as rape itself.
Firstly: there is a difference between "will" and "desire." That is, while I am willing to follow the law, I don't often necessarily "desire" to follow the law. But my choices are limited - either I follow the law or I go to jail.
The same applies for some women who enter into industries that use their bodies as a selling point. While those jobs may not seem "desirable," some women are "willing" to take those jobs based on the limited choices they have.
If you're given a choice, as a college student, between failing out of school or selling your body, in some instances, you do sell your body. What this speaks of, then, is the lack of choices women are given - and as well, that they lack the economic autonomies to make actual decisions. Limited choices, then, aren't truly choices, but rather, something forced upon women. In some cases, I do buy into the argument that porn, indeed, is rape.
Couple women's lack of choices with societal messages of what women are actually good for, it's no wonder why some women "choose" to enter into industries in which they have to sell their bodies. I am not saying these women are making these choices out of ignorance, I am merely saying these women make choices because they have no other choice.
Is a choice really a choice, then, when it's between a rock and a hard place? Did women pre- Roe v. Wade really have a choice then? Surely, they could have had the baby and ruin their careers, they could have spent thousands of dollars to go to states in which abortions were legal, or, they could induce their own abortions, risking deaths. If we understand choices in terms of reproductive justice, then why are we still blind when it comes to women's lack of economic autonomies?
On the subject of rape, framing through the same arguments, while no one "desires" to be raped, given the choices between getting your throat cut or being raped, for some, rape is a choice - albeit not much of a choice. Given society's victim-blaming mentalities, and the heteronormative attitudes about dating and sexuality, most certainly, some women would be willing to lay there while a date or boyfriend has sex with her when she doesn't want to have sex . This, most certainly, is the definition of rape, is it not? What does this mean then?
It means, for me, that in these situations in which women are faced with making tough choices, power as well as gender and economics come into play. It also means that the next time you are decide to say that some women are making choices out of their free will, check your privilege, because it may not always be what it seems.
― harbl, Wednesday, 9 December 2009 02:50 (2 months ago) Permalink
in conclusion: hottttt ladies giving haircuts -----> rape -----> abortion ------> life is not what it seems
― harbl, Wednesday, 9 December 2009 02:55 (2 months ago) Permalink
lol it is a mystery.
― millivanillimillenary (Trayce), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 03:03 (2 months ago) Permalink
he knows the hooters menu pretty well for not being a rapist
― bnw, Wednesday, 9 December 2009 03:19 (2 months ago) Permalink
okay so going into porn is like following the law? this shit is making my
― 囧 (dyao), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 03:47 (2 months ago) Permalink
imma gonna stick my neck out and say that marc loi is kinda otm there
― 102. LJ: British. 5. (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 03:54 (2 months ago) Permalink
lj, two hours ago
― LA CANCION MAS PRETENCIOSA DEL MUNDO... (The Reverend), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 05:39 (2 months ago) Permalink
― 102. LJ: British. 5. (acoleuthic), 09 December 2009 03:54 (6 hours ago)
about the hooters menu, i hope you mean?
― Louis Cll (darraghmac), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 10:28 (2 months ago) Permalink
Dr. Chomsky said nearly the same thing.
― rise, Wednesday, 9 December 2009 12:18 (2 months ago) Permalink
think i posted this before on another similar thread, but economic pressures make just about everyone do stuff they'd rather not. mcdonald's isn't where the employees go to get their fix of daily dignity, y'know?
― Louis Cll (darraghmac), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 12:20 (2 months ago) Permalink
+99% of the people who went to work this work this morning. we all gonna get raped.
― bnw, Wednesday, 9 December 2009 15:22 (2 months ago) Permalink
given the choices between getting your throat cut or being raped, for some, rape is a choice
― omar little, Wednesday, 9 December 2009 18:34 (2 months ago) Permalink
― sharty is a shit (s1ocki), Wednesday, 9 December 2009 18:52 (2 months ago) Permalink