― SLeeeter Kinney (Leee), Thursday, 22 April 2004 02:54 (twenty years ago) link
― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Thursday, 22 April 2004 04:54 (twenty years ago) link
― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Thursday, 22 April 2004 05:58 (twenty years ago) link
― SLeeeter Kinney (Leee), Thursday, 22 April 2004 20:20 (twenty years ago) link
One of the few strips I remember showed the mom grocery shopping with the baby and a woman saying, "Look at the wittle girl! Are you a good girl? Is the good girl grocery shopping with her mommy?" Something like that. When the woman goes away, the girl says, "Some people can be so oddnoxious, mommy." I thought that was cute.
It all seemed too nice, though. Like 7th Heaven. I like to read about grittier stuff.
― Vermont Girl (Vermont Girl), Friday, 23 April 2004 11:48 (twenty years ago) link
― David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 23 April 2004 14:58 (twenty years ago) link
'Then there's Family Circus, bottom right corner, just waiting to suck. It's the last things you read and it spoils everything you read before it.'
― Vermont Girl (Vermont Girl), Friday, 23 April 2004 16:40 (twenty years ago) link
― sLeeeter kinney (Leee), Friday, 23 April 2004 19:58 (twenty years ago) link
― Leeeeeeee (Leee), Monday, 15 August 2005 21:01 (eighteen years ago) link
― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Monday, 15 August 2005 21:58 (eighteen years ago) link
I love this strip.
― Truckdrivin' Buddha (Rock Hardy), Monday, 15 August 2005 22:51 (eighteen years ago) link
― Austin Still (Austin, Still), Tuesday, 16 August 2005 03:06 (eighteen years ago) link
― Austin Still (Austin, Still), Tuesday, 16 August 2005 03:07 (eighteen years ago) link
― s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 16 August 2005 03:44 (eighteen years ago) link
― M. V. (M.V.), Tuesday, 16 August 2005 04:01 (eighteen years ago) link
― Leeeeeeee (Leee), Tuesday, 16 August 2005 05:26 (eighteen years ago) link
― jocelyn (Jocelyn), Tuesday, 16 August 2005 12:52 (eighteen years ago) link
The official site has a rundown of most of the minor characters here:
http://www.fborfw.com/char_pgs/who/
― Austin Still (Austin, Still), Tuesday, 16 August 2005 13:13 (eighteen years ago) link
― Rock Hardy (Rock Hardy), Tuesday, 16 August 2005 13:20 (eighteen years ago) link
― Austin Still (Austin, Still), Tuesday, 16 August 2005 13:37 (eighteen years ago) link
― The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 16 August 2005 15:01 (eighteen years ago) link
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Tuesday, 16 August 2005 15:03 (eighteen years ago) link
― jocelyn (Jocelyn), Tuesday, 16 August 2005 15:25 (eighteen years ago) link
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Tuesday, 16 August 2005 15:30 (eighteen years ago) link
The awesomeness of FBOFW is lost on me. Gimme a talking robot and WoW references, plz.
― David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 16 August 2005 16:20 (eighteen years ago) link
Oh sorry, wrong thread.
― The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 16 August 2005 16:29 (eighteen years ago) link
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Tuesday, 16 August 2005 16:47 (eighteen years ago) link
Maybe I'd get the FBORFW books, it sounds like a soap opera. ... No, no I won't ever get them.
― Vermont Girl (Vermont Girl), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 15:53 (eighteen years ago) link
― Leeeeeeee (Leee), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:04 (eighteen years ago) link
― Rock Hardy (Rock Hardy), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 18:15 (eighteen years ago) link
― Dan I. (Dan I.), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 23:38 (eighteen years ago) link
― Dan I. (Dan I.), Wednesday, 17 August 2005 23:41 (eighteen years ago) link
― Casuistry (Chris P), Thursday, 18 August 2005 13:14 (eighteen years ago) link
― mushy, Thursday, 18 August 2005 13:39 (eighteen years ago) link
Did you know there's a bunch of websites dissecting and satirizing this strip? Here's a couple of links:
http://www.livejournal.com/community/binky_betsy/
http://www.livejournal.com/users/ellcee/
http://aprilsrealblog.blogspot.com/
― Leon C. (Ex Leon), Thursday, 18 August 2005 13:52 (eighteen years ago) link
― Casuistry (Chris P), Thursday, 18 August 2005 19:53 (eighteen years ago) link
― Dan I. (Dan I.), Thursday, 18 August 2005 20:50 (eighteen years ago) link
― Dan I. (Dan I.), Thursday, 18 August 2005 20:55 (eighteen years ago) link
― Dan I. (Dan I.), Thursday, 18 August 2005 21:00 (eighteen years ago) link
― Keep the juices flowing by jangling around gentleee as you move (Leee), Monday, 5 December 2005 22:53 (eighteen years ago) link
I just went to the syndicate's website to steal some of these priceless images and ran across this:
As of September 1st "For Better or For Worse" will no longer be available on Comics.com due to the fact that the creator has not renewed her contract with Comics.com.
― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Thursday, 8 December 2005 20:02 (eighteen years ago) link
― I do feel guilty for getting any perverse amusement out of it (Rock Hardy), Thursday, 8 December 2005 21:16 (eighteen years ago) link
― jocelyn (Jocelyn), Thursday, 8 December 2005 21:27 (eighteen years ago) link
― Casuistry (Chris P), Thursday, 8 December 2005 21:33 (eighteen years ago) link
― Lars and Jagger (Ex Leon), Friday, 9 December 2005 03:33 (eighteen years ago) link
― Obsessing over the unobtainable and nonexistent. (Leee), Friday, 9 December 2005 19:27 (eighteen years ago) link
― scamperingalpaca (Chris Hill), Friday, 9 December 2005 22:22 (eighteen years ago) link
Cripes, the shit that lives in my brane...
― Austin Still (Austin, Still), Friday, 9 December 2005 22:46 (eighteen years ago) link
― scamperingalpaca (Chris Hill), Saturday, 10 December 2005 01:23 (eighteen years ago) link
― chaki (chaki), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 02:34 (seventeen years ago) link
I'm saying, yo! My scenario only ends with three minor characters dead and one major one utterly traumatized, alas.
― 100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 02:44 (seventeen years ago) link
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 04:20 (seventeen years ago) link
― anthony easton (anthony), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 05:37 (seventeen years ago) link
― s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 12:48 (seventeen years ago) link
― barefoot manthing (Garrett Martin), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 13:18 (seventeen years ago) link
― lumberingwoodsman (Chris Hill), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 14:36 (seventeen years ago) link
― Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 15:39 (seventeen years ago) link
― 100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 15:43 (seventeen years ago) link
― c('°c) (Leee), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 16:19 (seventeen years ago) link
― c('°c) (Leee), Monday, 2 October 2006 22:28 (seventeen years ago) link
(I guarantee we see this sentiment in print by the end of the week.)
― It's the lazy and immoral way to become super hip. (Austin, Still), Monday, 2 October 2006 23:33 (seventeen years ago) link
― c('°c) (Leee), Thursday, 4 January 2007 19:22 (seventeen years ago) link
― do i have to draw you a diaphragm (Rock Hardy), Friday, 12 January 2007 16:20 (seventeen years ago) link
― A B C (sparklecock), Friday, 12 January 2007 16:28 (seventeen years ago) link
― Jordan (Jordan), Friday, 12 January 2007 16:43 (seventeen years ago) link
― do i have to draw you a diaphragm (Rock Hardy), Friday, 12 January 2007 16:51 (seventeen years ago) link
― Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Friday, 12 January 2007 17:53 (seventeen years ago) link
This strip has me in tears.
― c('°c) (Leee), Friday, 12 January 2007 18:01 (seventeen years ago) link
BOOOOOO. Just end the strip, for fuck's sake, while you've got Leee in tears!
Actually, if the syndicate owns it and could continue it without her, this is probably the best solution.
― do i have to draw you a diaphragm (Rock Hardy), Friday, 12 January 2007 18:07 (seventeen years ago) link
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 12 January 2007 18:32 (seventeen years ago) link
― do i have to draw you a diaphragm (Rock Hardy), Friday, 12 January 2007 18:48 (seventeen years ago) link
The strip's creator was referring to Farley, the shaggy canine whose heroic 1995 death (after saving April from drowning) brought Johnston an avalanche of reader mail.
I'm surprised she'd want to fix the characters in teim. Aging is so preferable to the umpteenth time Lucy pulls the ball before Charlie Brown can kick it or Bart's 15th year at Springfield Elementary (to a lesser degree). Farley's death, the Doonesbury characters, Luann, Crankshaft, even Gasoline Alley - all gain greater investments because the characters age.
― lumberingwoodsman (Chris Hill), Friday, 12 January 2007 20:58 (seventeen years ago) link
― Candy: tastes like chicken, if chicken was a candy. (Austin, Still), Friday, 12 January 2007 21:58 (seventeen years ago) link
― c('°c) (Leee), Friday, 12 January 2007 22:24 (seventeen years ago) link
I know too much about this comic considering I don't actually read it.
― Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Friday, 12 January 2007 22:46 (seventeen years ago) link
― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Friday, 12 January 2007 23:20 (seventeen years ago) link
― A B C (sparklecock), Saturday, 13 January 2007 01:25 (seventeen years ago) link
Why? It's static. Charlie Brown's a loser with a good heart. He doesn't ask the red-headed girl out (or did he? Seems like he got kissed once). He loses his kite. Lucy pulls the football. Repeat, repeat, repeat. Whereas in Luann (and that was just an example of a strip with the characters aging), the characters are allowed to grow, act on crushes/jobs/whatever, fail or succeed, but they evolve to a degree. Peanuts loops. Don't get me wrong, I like Peanuts, but it's McDonalds - guaranteed the same taste regardless of year - while strips that age at least make it to Burger King or Burgerville taste.
Maybe it's the models of Loser, Brat, Wise, Imaginative, Creative, Chaotic that make Peanuts worthy or resonant, not so much their stories, which is where the aging comes in?
And true, on Crankshaft. The adult characters are more timeless than the grandkids, who seem to be growing and moving on. Lena died, however - the woman who made the coffee. Alas, poor Lena.
― lumberingwoodsman (Chris Hill), Saturday, 13 January 2007 02:16 (seventeen years ago) link
!!!
― Casuistry (Chris P), Saturday, 13 January 2007 10:17 (seventeen years ago) link
― Casuistry (Chris P), Saturday, 13 January 2007 10:18 (seventeen years ago) link
But the whole point of some strips is variations and refinements on a set of themes, finding new angles and new approaches, teasing out new aspects of it.
The football strips are sort of obvious in their emotional heft, and are iconic of the strip, but consider the "x days until Beethoven's birthday!" strips, which seem to last for weeks in some years, and which are the true test of a daily stripper -- how many times can you tell the same joke without telling the same joke, while bringing something new to it.
I can't imagine what you'd make of Krazy Kat!
― Casuistry (Chris P), Saturday, 13 January 2007 10:27 (seventeen years ago) link
the tone of 50s Peanuts is MASSIVELY different from 80s Peanuts! and, you know, probably about 300 strips a year were not about topics that Schulz returned to, let alone how his returning to the ones that did become staples let him try and find new nuances or add depth by building on years of playing with the themes.
― nu-mongrel (kit brash), Saturday, 13 January 2007 14:44 (seventeen years ago) link
schulz did acknowledge the passing of time on occasion. there's a few sunday strips from the early '70s where charlie brown is remembering the times he used to sit on the bench at lunchtime (in the early '60s, that is) and pine over the little red-haired girl (who has apparently moved away). i think they're the best strips schulz ever did. (you can find them in "sandlot peanuts," if you're interested)
― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Sunday, 14 January 2007 04:27 (seventeen years ago) link
― c('°c) (Leee), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 21:46 (seventeen years ago) link
― do i have to draw you a diaphragm (Rock Hardy), Wednesday, 17 January 2007 23:36 (seventeen years ago) link
― Candy: tastes like chicken, if chicken was a candy. (Austin, Still), Friday, 19 January 2007 13:25 (seventeen years ago) link
― Leee, Monday, 26 March 2007 18:56 (seventeen years ago) link
― Deric W. Haircare, Monday, 26 March 2007 19:27 (seventeen years ago) link
― A B C, Monday, 26 March 2007 20:04 (seventeen years ago) link
― Oilyrags, Monday, 26 March 2007 20:24 (seventeen years ago) link
― Oilyrags, Monday, 26 March 2007 21:03 (seventeen years ago) link
― chaki, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 03:50 (seventeen years ago) link
― Mordechai Shinefield, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 04:57 (seventeen years ago) link
― Leee, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 19:18 (seventeen years ago) link
― R Baez, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 19:20 (seventeen years ago) link
― Leee, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 19:24 (seventeen years ago) link
― Leee, Tuesday, 27 March 2007 20:21 (seventeen years ago) link
― A B C, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 12:26 (seventeen years ago) link
― Leee, Wednesday, 28 March 2007 16:38 (seventeen years ago) link