Completely Optimistic Batman Begins Anticipation Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
No doubting Thomas Waynes allowed.

Huck, Thursday, 29 July 2004 19:01 (nineteen years ago) link

Speaking of which, does anyone else think it's kind of creepy that Batman and Superman's mothers both have the same first name?

Huck, Thursday, 29 July 2004 19:02 (nineteen years ago) link

And it's the same first name of the first First Lady of the United States! SCANDALOUS!

Clicking through the photo gallery & seeing various members of the cast (Liam Neeson / Morgan Freeman / Michael Caine / Gary Oldman) made me grin. Also, hearing Christian Bale do the Batman voice.

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 29 July 2004 19:06 (nineteen years ago) link

I just wanna say again, how awesome and "right" this looks (Oldman as Jim Gordon).

http://batmanbegins.warnerbros.com/images/07.jpg

Huck, Thursday, 29 July 2004 19:07 (nineteen years ago) link

thanks for the retreat, Huck. How is Ra's Al Ghul going to fit into this storyline, I wonder?

jocelyn (Jocelyn), Thursday, 29 July 2004 19:21 (nineteen years ago) link

When I clicked on the thread, the cookie request for Warner Bros popped up, and for a moment I thought, "the optimistic thread for Batman redirects to WB! That's clever!"

I don't know if I'm optimistic. I'm not pessimistic. And if Catwoman tanks completely, I think WB will shelve the movie rather than release it knowing it's bad -- it's already a tainted franchise, and they have actual competition from Marvel now.

But dude, when the Burton Batman came out, I waited in a line filled with Girl Scouts on a field trip from summer camp -- the loudest of whom complained Vicki Vale wasn't in the movie enough, and sat right behind me -- and still wasn't disappointed (except that Vicki Vale sucked). I had bought a copy of the script at a con, back before there was an internet for things like that to be leaked on, and didn't let myself read it until after I saw the movie, so I could compare the two. I wasn't even really a comic book geek -- I just really dug Batman.

And then after the first one, they took their sweet time revelling in the pleasure of pissing all over the franchise. They got some making up to do.

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 29 July 2004 19:23 (nineteen years ago) link

From IMDB: After disappearing to the East where he seeks counsel with the dangerous but honorable ninja cult leader known as Ra's Al-Ghul, he returns to his now decaying Gotham City overrun by organised crime and dangerous individuals manipulating the system whilst the company he inherited is slowly being pulled out from under him

I won't say anything, out of respect for the spirit of the thread.

Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 29 July 2004 19:24 (nineteen years ago) link

1) That synopsis sounds totally fine.

2) Offer a synopsis of a comic-book related flick (or any action flick) that doesn't stank like late August donkey poo.

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 29 July 2004 19:51 (nineteen years ago) link

"Ninja cult leader" sounds a little ... not quite how I'd describe Ra's ... but that's fine. I mean, I guess it just sounds reductive, but summaries are like that.

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 29 July 2004 19:53 (nineteen years ago) link

As I said on the not-so-optimistic ILE thread there seems to be a Count of Monte Cristo vibe to this. actually I think Jocelyn said it first. She is awesome.

xpost

"League of Assassins leader" would sound worse (though he ain't really that either, but I assume he's part Ra's/part Sensei, just because there are so many redundancies when you have a character who has been appearing no less than twice a month for over 60 years)

Huck, Thursday, 29 July 2004 19:55 (nineteen years ago) link

i kiss you.
Plus I think they're trying to stay away from the arabic sounding/terrorist associations of Al Ghul.

jocelyn (Jocelyn), Thursday, 29 July 2004 19:58 (nineteen years ago) link

Was Ra's responsible for any of little Brucie's training in the comics?

Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 29 July 2004 20:00 (nineteen years ago) link

"Eco-terrorist" also invokes naked PETA girls rather than menacing eastern megalomaniacs.

xpost
no.

Huck, Thursday, 29 July 2004 20:00 (nineteen years ago) link

In a not-just-limited-to-the-specifics-of-this-movie way, like more generally, bringing Ra's in is a very good idea. It gives a sense of Batman's world outside of Gotham, the whole passel of action movie/pulp hero type stuff he gets involved in when he leaves the city; it alludes to a Batman who isn't in the alleys and gutters but also isn't kicking the hackey sack with Apache Chief in the Hall of Justice or fighting the Joker of Jupiter in space. I'm all for including Ra's -- he's a pulp-style, or at least "pulp-appropriate," villain more than a supervillain. Guys like Mr Freeze don't work in a Batman story when it isn't a cartoon or comic, I think. (Even if Schwurzenmacher hadn't been involved.)

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 29 July 2004 20:03 (nineteen years ago) link

Mr. Freeze was used quite nicely in Gotham Central...which is a comic, but not so much a superhero comic.

Huck, Thursday, 29 July 2004 20:06 (nineteen years ago) link

Good point, Tep. I've always liked the International Batman of Batmystery type stories, and come to think of it they've almost always involved Ra's.

Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 29 July 2004 20:06 (nineteen years ago) link

Oddly enough, I remember one of the Batman vs. Predator mini's having a very good Freeze portrayal.

Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 29 July 2004 20:07 (nineteen years ago) link

Just as long as there's no Bat-Whirly-Gig

Huck, Thursday, 29 July 2004 20:09 (nineteen years ago) link

Yeah, I can totally buy Mr Freeze outside of a live-action movie -- I liked the Batman cartoon with him, was it called Subzero? -- I think it's just the tendency of the live action movies to have low costume populations. Like, if Superman II had had the Toyman as a villain ... then you're sitting there thinking, okay, so the supervillains in this world are the not-super-at-all Lex Luthor, who's kind of a dweeb and has a dorky sidekick -- and THE TOYMAN? Whereas you can have a perfectly good issue of Action with the Toyman in it, because we're cool with the fact that there are 50 other bad guys out there.

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 29 July 2004 20:10 (nineteen years ago) link

(This is maybe one of my problems with Batman Returns: the Penguin isn't a very compelling villain even outside of that particular version of him. I liked him in Contagion/Legacy, though, and he probably had a similar role in No Man's Land.)

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 29 July 2004 20:11 (nineteen years ago) link

x-post
I think over-top-villians worked in Spiderman, because it had that very technicolor, insular feel to it, whereas with this Batman it seems like they're going for more of a political thriller/ "pulp" as Tep said, feel. And I think it may be what the film and WB need to counteract the Catwoman silliness.

jocelyn (Jocelyn), Thursday, 29 July 2004 20:12 (nineteen years ago) link

Aha, now I see what you mean. And agree completely.
I think that's one of the reason's Superman movies will be hard, because after Luthor, who's Supes got? Brainiac? Puh-leeze. Mongul? Whatev! Doomsday? Wake me when it's over. Bizarro? Mxy-blah-blah? Are we 5 here?

Huck, Thursday, 29 July 2004 20:15 (nineteen years ago) link

And the Spider-Man crew have been very careful -- maybe to a fault, but that's another issue and I will hear no ill spoken of Spidey! -- about giving the villains emotional connections to and emotional import for Spidey, which is something else the last three Batman movies lacked. It doesn't make them less over the top (help my robot arms are plotting against me!), but it makes them less out of place, I think.

It's harder to do that with Batman without jeopardizing the character's integrity, because he just doesn't have that kind of emotional vulnerability, whereas Spidey is almost defined by it.

Not that I'm calling Spidey emo.

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 29 July 2004 20:17 (nineteen years ago) link

The whole emo-spidey thing is intriguing, because surely he does strike that chord with his audience. How do people idenitify with Batman?

Huck, Thursday, 29 July 2004 20:19 (nineteen years ago) link

But he is.

Gary Gordon = excellent.

R.I.M.A. (Barima), Thursday, 29 July 2004 20:19 (nineteen years ago) link

Bizarro is the best bet, I think, depending on who the villain is in the first movie (it wouldn't have to be Luthor!) -- but you could do Bizarro well, because he's a villain who can exist because of Superman, so you could have a sequel that didn't seem like a lot of sequel elements patchworked together.

Mxyzptlk, well, I'd like to see him, but they'd probably get Jamie Kennedy to play him or something, and that would suck.

xpost; people identify with Batman in a Bernhard Goetz sort of way, a Death Wish way, only toned down -- he's the guy getting revenge, but without getting out of line.

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 29 July 2004 20:20 (nineteen years ago) link

(That's just a random guess or one possible identification.)

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 29 July 2004 20:25 (nineteen years ago) link

I love Spidey too, and I know what you're talking about-the very personal decisions in Spiderman are what makes his character compelling, Batman's a badass. Christian Bale would not be a good Spiderman.

jocelyn (Jocelyn), Thursday, 29 July 2004 20:26 (nineteen years ago) link

Mxyzptlk = John Leguizamo, duh.

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 29 July 2004 20:55 (nineteen years ago) link

Batman = expresses the turmoil of his childhood through righteous violence = massive appeal for adolescent males.

Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 29 July 2004 20:58 (nineteen years ago) link

It's not a coincidence, I think, that the three superheroes we've talked about in terms of successful (and ghetto-escaping) movies are Batman, Spider-Man, and Superman. The first two are the tragedy guys -- "criminals are a superstitious, cowardly lot"/revenge vs "with great power comes great responsibility"/guilt -- and Superman is based on the same "I'm actually special!" power fantasy that fuels Buffy and Alias.

(Likewise, I think a lot of Unbreakable's inability to really become a smash came down to the fact that Bruce Willis wasn't playing a superhero in the sense those three are superheroes. He was playing a guy with super powers. There's nothing wrong with that, but the powers aren't enough to trip all the resonance triggers successful superhero stories trip. Lifting A Lot Of Heavy Stuff isn't enough of a fantasy to vicariously groove to.)

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 29 July 2004 21:51 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm gonna be the lone Complete Pessimist, but that trailer shows waaay too much Tibet (which is pretty and all) and not enough Batman (like any.) I'm hoping that Bats will be in the movie for more than fifteen minutes, but am not holding my breath.

Matt Maxwell (Matt M.), Thursday, 29 July 2004 21:53 (nineteen years ago) link

I haven't seen the trailer yet (I'm not going to go out of my way to see it, it'll hit me when it hits me), but in the spirit of optimism, that could be just to focus on the ways this movie is different from the Schlockmacher. It's still just a teaser, isn't it?

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 29 July 2004 21:59 (nineteen years ago) link

Entirely possible that it's part of their strategy to generate buzz by not doing a big reveal of the Batman and all, but the indications that I've gotten is that it's BY FAR more Bruce Wayne than Batman, which is a little worrying.

Matt Maxwell (Matt M.), Thursday, 29 July 2004 22:21 (nineteen years ago) link

Having Batman is the centerpiece didn't necessarily help the last two (four?) movies. I.e. Bruce Wayne = can't hurt.

The Dreaded Rear Admiral (Leee), Thursday, 29 July 2004 22:44 (nineteen years ago) link

Batman's appeal is based upon the fact that he is cool. A total badass. Superman's appeal is based on the fact that he is a God. Spidey's is based on the fact that hes a geek, just like us. Lets face it, Bruce Wayne and Kal El would have been jocks in High School, tragic childhoods not having gotten in the way. Parker would have been geek all the wayyy.

The whole Ras Al Ghul as Ninja cult leader seems to suggest more Daredevil/Elektra and the Hand than Batman to me, but I like the epic feel suggested by the teaser. And from an interview with goyer I read, theres plenty of Batman in the second hour of his script - hardcore Batman fights ninja stuff...

David N (David N.), Thursday, 29 July 2004 23:12 (nineteen years ago) link

Nothing could help the last two movies, Lee. Not even the presence of the entire JLA. Flawed outings from the onset.

Batman should be the centerpiece of a Batman movie. Just sayin'.

Matt Maxwell (Matt M.), Thursday, 29 July 2004 23:22 (nineteen years ago) link

The whole Ras Al Ghul as Ninja cult leader seems to suggest more Daredevil/Elektra and the Hand

Exactly what I thought. I just like how artfully ostentatious it looks (rather than the neon cheese of yore).

Matt -- if what you're talking about is akin to the One/Same Monster in the Hellboy movie, then agreed.

The Dreaded Rear Admiral (Leee), Thursday, 29 July 2004 23:23 (nineteen years ago) link

I haven't seen Hellboy yet, Lee. Was considering watching it tonight, as I picked it up on a whim from Costco yesterday.

Matt Maxwell (Matt M.), Thursday, 29 July 2004 23:28 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm all for treating Batman like the alien (in _Alien_).

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 30 July 2004 01:29 (nineteen years ago) link

If Bat-Mite pops out of ANYONE's chest, I'm leavin.

Tep (ktepi), Friday, 30 July 2004 01:33 (nineteen years ago) link

What if he comes out the back door after a meal of Taco Bell?

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 30 July 2004 01:40 (nineteen years ago) link

Leaving and buying new socks.

Tep (ktepi), Friday, 30 July 2004 01:45 (nineteen years ago) link

I actually bought Wizard today (for the GL: Rebirth preview) and they have a little tiny blurb where Bale compares to the movie to a bunch of other movies, including Serpico. REmember, this is Batman Begins so he doesn't have to put on the cowl until the last frame of the movie. They wouldn't sell many happy meals like that, but I'd be impressed (if it was well done).
One that does worry me is that everything, the batmobile, the batsuit, etc, is supposed to be WayneTech prototype, which like, hello, that's a pretty direct connection from BW to BM.

Huck, Friday, 30 July 2004 06:24 (nineteen years ago) link

...that's not optimism, Huck...

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 30 July 2004 12:04 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm, uh, optimistically worried? I'm worried it will be so great it will blow my mind?

Huck, Friday, 30 July 2004 13:59 (nineteen years ago) link

For Chicago folks, perhaps
http://www.suntimes.com/output/entertainment/cst-nws-batman30.html

jocelyn (Jocelyn), Friday, 30 July 2004 15:51 (nineteen years ago) link

the train scene in Spider-Man 2 was really in Chicago???? OMG, I hate NY now.

Huk-El (Horace Mann), Friday, 30 July 2004 15:55 (nineteen years ago) link

One of my friends was an extra on a train in Chicago for Spider-Man 2, but it was done by a secondary camera crew out filming location footage (I think there's another term for it that I can't remember)before the main shoot even started. I wonder if he's in the movie (oh no! I let slip that I haven't seen SM2 yet!).

Jordan (Jordan), Friday, 30 July 2004 16:04 (nineteen years ago) link

Dude, see it! Assuming you liked the first one, anyway.

Tep (ktepi), Friday, 30 July 2004 16:08 (nineteen years ago) link

Point; but I'm afraid that it'll only underscore the macho tackiness of the chase scenes (judging by the trailer).

But another good in its favor: Brucey opening the closet with the COWL looking back at him and the shadows oboy!

Lee (Leee), Tuesday, 10 May 2005 17:52 (nineteen years ago) link

OPTIMOTHERF*CKINGMATISM AHOYHOY

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 10 May 2005 18:02 (nineteen years ago) link

macho tackiness, you realize this is Batman we're talking about, right?

Aside from the whole K8E H01m3s rides the subway business, this movie seems to be ALL ABOUT man-man relationships and Bruce's actual quest, not for justice, but for a father figure.

Huk-L, Tuesday, 10 May 2005 18:11 (nineteen years ago) link

Which completely reconciles his need for youthful wards!

Huk-L, Tuesday, 10 May 2005 18:14 (nineteen years ago) link

But Batman is REALLY about taco matchiness!

Le (Leee), Tuesday, 10 May 2005 19:23 (nineteen years ago) link

I am beginning think L1am Neeson is now doomed to play wise old teachers of hot young protogees in fantasy/historical epics for the rest of his career. Which would be a waste.

jocelyn (Jocelyn), Tuesday, 10 May 2005 19:58 (nineteen years ago) link

I was thinking just the other day that he's what actually gave TPM a bit of class. Also that he must have watched Sanjuro a few times beforehand.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 11 May 2005 12:17 (nineteen years ago) link

I'd love for this to pave the way for a Nightwing movie. Partly because Robin, even the Teen Wonder version, seems to disinterest the more auteristic Bat-directors.

The Irrelevant Man (Negativa) (Barima), Wednesday, 11 May 2005 12:27 (nineteen years ago) link

BLUDHAVEN: DENIED!

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 11 May 2005 12:40 (nineteen years ago) link

The Batman Adventures: The Missing Years is probably the best Robin -> Nightwing story ever, despite the terrible, terrible hair.

Huk-L, Wednesday, 11 May 2005 14:07 (nineteen years ago) link

Not to get to off-topic (by raising doubts), but am I the only one who suspects David Goyer might be a big of a, um, how do I say this diplomatically, douchebag?

In the June issue of Premiere magazine there is a very interesting article along with new photos. The article is about Batman Begins being a restart, and has new information from Goyer, Nolan, and Bale. Also, the magazine has some exclusive information about future Bat-Films.

Writer David Goyer talks about possible sequels and says (spoilers ahead) [THAT'S SPOILERS A-COMIN', FOLKS - MOD.], "The next one would have Batman enlisting the aid of Gordon and [Harvey] Dent [aka Two-Face] in bringing down the Joker... but not killing him, which is a mistake they made in the first one." The article then says that "In the third, the Joker would go on trial, scarring Dent in the process."

Huk-L, Wednesday, 11 May 2005 19:36 (nineteen years ago) link

Er, BIG = BIT.

And "douchebag" is too strong. I'm just not sure I like the idea of him as the official usher of all comics to movies ever.

Huk-L, Wednesday, 11 May 2005 19:37 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm just preparing myself for the day that Chr!stian B@le is on every single magazine cover in the world this June. Which wouldn't have been bad when I was 14 and knew all the songs and dances in Newsies, but now I just feel bad for this as he seems to shy away from publicity a lot.

jocelyn (Jocelyn), Wednesday, 11 May 2005 20:11 (nineteen years ago) link

i generally hate comic book/superhero bullshit but im looking forward to this actually.

latebloomer: B Minus Time Traveler (latebloomer), Thursday, 19 May 2005 17:22 (nineteen years ago) link

HOLY SHIT, some serious hardcore nerdery going on...http://imdb.com/title/tt0372784/fullcredits

scroll down and you'll see: Tim Booth .... Victor Zsasz

which is the birth name of Vic Sage, crusading TV journalist who sheds his identity by night to fight crime as the faceless QUESTION!!!

Huk-L, Thursday, 19 May 2005 19:53 (nineteen years ago) link

What the hell is the lead singer of James doing on a IMDB thread?

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 19 May 2005 19:54 (nineteen years ago) link

AND I just noticed that it's Tim Booth, from James! WTF!?!?!?!?!?!

also, there's a "Barbara Gordon" playing a nameless Gotham Cop.

xpost

Huk-L, Thursday, 19 May 2005 19:55 (nineteen years ago) link

Isn't Zsasz also some sort of serial killer notches on his arm guy, or am I thinking of someone else?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 19 May 2005 20:04 (nineteen years ago) link

Is that Zsazs or Szasz?

(yes, such a dude exists)

Huk-L, Thursday, 19 May 2005 20:06 (nineteen years ago) link

Internet says:

Victor Zsasz = serial killer

Charles Victor Szasz = Vic Sage

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 19 May 2005 20:10 (nineteen years ago) link

I was just about to post the same thing. So I guess James-Man will be a badguy, and not a plug for the upcoming Objectivist Superhero Masterpiece: THE QUESTION!

dang.

Huk-L, Thursday, 19 May 2005 20:11 (nineteen years ago) link

He's competing with Jarvis Cocker's upcoming role in Harry Potter IV.

jocelyn (Jocelyn), Thursday, 19 May 2005 20:19 (nineteen years ago) link

OH MY EYES!!!
there's a supposed Batman Begins leak out there in the filesharingverse, but it is NOT, repeat NOT Batman Begins. It is dirty porn of the the worst legal kind.

Huk, Monday, 30 May 2005 06:23 (eighteen years ago) link

On a more postive note, advance review:
http://www.buzzscope.com/features.php?id=985

Huk-L, Monday, 30 May 2005 14:54 (eighteen years ago) link

I've got tickets for an advance screening on the 6th. It's free, so even if the movie's crap I can't really complain.

Leon Federline (Ex Leon), Tuesday, 31 May 2005 14:07 (eighteen years ago) link

Oh, cool. Do report back, but mind the spoilers. After my porn fiasco, I've decided that God wants me to see this movie virginally.

Huk-L, Tuesday, 31 May 2005 14:10 (eighteen years ago) link

five star BBC review

i want to believe.

Lee F# (fsharp), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 09:11 (eighteen years ago) link

This is going to be completely humourless, isn't it?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 09:43 (eighteen years ago) link

Yes, because there is nothing funny about a man dressing up as a bat.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 09:44 (eighteen years ago) link

well, apparently Oldham is playing Gordon in a slapstick, Sellers/Clouseau fashion, as a counterpoint to the darkness of Bale's Batman. they were worried that the film would just come off as totally po-faced, so Nolan decided to use Gordon to inject the needed humour.

Lee F# (fsharp), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 11:20 (eighteen years ago) link

TS Humorless vs.
http://img201.echo.cx/img201/3692/batshark9wi.gif

jocelyn (Jocelyn), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 12:18 (eighteen years ago) link

I loved it! Mind you, I have never read the Batman comics so most of my knowledge of Batman comes from the movies and Batman: the animated series. So I don't know if someone who's a fan of the comics will like it as much as I did, but I thought it was a lot of fun. Even though it's about two hours long it doesn't drag on the way, say, Revenge of the Sith did. I will probably even go see it again.

Leon hearts Crazy Frog (Ex Leon), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 12:38 (eighteen years ago) link

To be honest even though I like shark-fighting Batman and think it's about time to give Miller a rest, I am looking forward to this.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 12:46 (eighteen years ago) link

Bad new yorker review, but denby doesn't count:
www.newyorker.com/critics/cinema/articles/050613crci_cinema

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 13:48 (eighteen years ago) link

That's the whole Bat-Truth, though, isn't it, Tom?
The very key to the character's longevity is his adaptability. There's this arch-rockist mindset that Miller-Bat is "Batman done right", but that's a complete load of bullshit. If Batman hadn't fought giant orange koalas from the Ninth Dimension in the 50s, and veered towards true romance under Carmine Infantino in the 60s, he would have gone the way of...um, nearly every other superhero who was around in 1951.
And even Miller's Batman, for all his snarling masculinity, has moments of High Camp. Especially in The Dark Knight Returns--Year One was basically Taxi Driver in tights--and, fuck, what was The Dark Knight Strikes Again if not a stunning failure to reconcile Adam West with, um, moody-Bats?

Christopher Nolan is crime thriller director, so he's made THAT kind of Batman movie. There's no reason why someone couldn't make a wonderful Bat-Farce.

Huk-L, Tuesday, 7 June 2005 13:49 (eighteen years ago) link

I'm fine with BroodyBats as a character who other, more rounded characters react to (as in Gotham Central) but as the focus of a story he gets on my nerves.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 14:04 (eighteen years ago) link

Yeah, there's nowhere to go characterwise, with that, unless you actually allow Batman to deal with some of his issues, and if he could deal with his issues, he wouldn't be Batman, so it's a no-win situation if you wanna do character work with Batman.

Huk-L, Tuesday, 7 June 2005 14:06 (eighteen years ago) link

Christian Bale backs me up here (not really):

Actor Christian Bale showed off his comics prowess at Sci Fi Wire, saying ""I liked the artwork of Alex Ross, but my favorites were the Jeph Loeb and Tim Sale stories. I've read a damn lot of them, all that DC sent me. I don't feel like Batman's ever really been defined in any portrayal, so I felt like this was an opportunity to finally do that, in regards to way that Bob Kane originally intended it when he wrote it in 1939. He intended it as being a dark and terrifying and intimidating character. It's kind of ended up being spoofed more. And then there's great material in the newer graphic novels of Frank Miller and Jeph Loeb and Tim Sale. So the source material is right there, and I just don't think it was ever taken advantage of until now. With 'Superman,' you can really look at Christopher Reeve and the way that he played it, and he's become the defining Superman. Whoever's playing him in the next one has got a really tough job to come up against him. I don't feel like that ever happened with 'Batman' before, so I felt like I had an opportunity to expand and bring something new to it."

Huk-L, Tuesday, 7 June 2005 14:20 (eighteen years ago) link

I liked the artwork of Alex Ross

Leeeeee (Leee), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 15:17 (eighteen years ago) link

but my favorites were the Jeph Loeb and Tim Sale stories

Huk-L, Tuesday, 7 June 2005 15:23 (eighteen years ago) link

Hey, at least he read some comics.

jocelyn (Jocelyn), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 15:33 (eighteen years ago) link

If only he had read "The PLAYA On The Other Side!"

Huk-L, Tuesday, 7 June 2005 15:34 (eighteen years ago) link

There's no reason why someone couldn't make a wonderful Bat-Farce.

-- Huk-L (handsomishbo...), June 7th, 2005.

um, http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0790732912.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

latebloomer: Pain Don't Hurt (latebloomer), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 16:44 (eighteen years ago) link

KEYWORD: WONDERFUL

Huk-L, Tuesday, 7 June 2005 16:47 (eighteen years ago) link

ICE TO MEET YOU

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:18 (eighteen years ago) link

Sorry - the previous post should be:

PROGNOSIS: NEGATIVE

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:19 (eighteen years ago) link

Seriously, check this shit out: http://www.radiolovers.com/pages/batman.htm

Huk-L, Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:22 (eighteen years ago) link

way that Bob Kane originally intended it when he wrote it

kit brash (kit brash), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 21:40 (eighteen years ago) link

THE HEART! THE HEART is in the right place, and that's what matters! Details schmetails.

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 22:01 (eighteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.