Joy Division vs. New Order

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Yeah, I know it's "cooler" to like Joy Division, but dammit, I just think New Order has better music. What do you think?

Manny Parsons, Monday, 5 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I like both a lot, but I'm ruled by the dance floor.

Dan Perry, Monday, 5 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

New Order is better. Joy Division is for rockists. New Order is pop so automatically better and cooler. And you cant dance your ass off to JD.

craig, Monday, 5 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

New Order. Better songs, better energy.

paul, Monday, 5 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Split decision down the middle. Both worthy of endless wuv.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 5 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Ian Curtis was a better songwriter/lyricist than Bernard, but failing that, they're both stunningly brilliant. From the utter, abject emotional depths of CLOSER through the ecstatic euphoria of TECHNIQUE, their is a combined legacy....so intertwined that you cannot judge one without factoring the other into the equation.

Alex in NYC, Monday, 5 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Split decision down the middle. Both worthy of endless wuv.

Jeff W, Monday, 5 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

DO YOU SEE what? etcet.

Jeff W, Monday, 5 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Yay consistency.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 5 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

DANCE DANCE DANCE to the radio!does that answer who's better?ian we miss you...

ihategeorgeWbush, Monday, 5 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

love them both, but favor Joy Division a little bit more.

Chris, Monday, 5 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Joy Division. Better singing.

sundar subramanian, Monday, 5 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

New Order has the worst lyrics ever. See: "Bizarre Love Triangle". Bad lyrics don't bother me if they're just bland or if I can't understand what the singer is saying, but those "BLT" (haha) lyrics jump right out and smack you in the face with their clumsiness. Joy Division is beyond criticism. Joy Division is perfect. Ian = classic Barney = dud

Sorrow's Native Son, Tuesday, 6 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

For what's it's worth I always thought the most amazing thing of all was that the simple people (nearly) produced two such extraordinary, and extraordinarily different, bodies of work.

But the answer to your question depends on the old pop v rock debate. Which is better, music that stimulates the feet and the brain equally while making a beautiful noise? or music that addresses the Big Questions of Life and Death, Purging the Soul With Its Deepness? Niether, of course, and those guys have done the best of both.

New Order: schubert - pop: dance: bad singing and lyrics: but if the beauty of pure noise is your bag, their 12inchers are as good as anything in existence

Joy Division: beethoven - rock: art ... in 100 years time, when 'Rock' is as hoary as Classical and Jazz, those two albums will be among the handful of musical creations of the late twentieth century still pored over by those who want profundity, deep emotion, etc with their art. Sounds pretentious, not meant to be.

jon, Tuesday, 6 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

It all went down hill after blue monday.

Doubts Even Here = Classic

mt, Sunday, 11 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

i'd say joy division any day. i knew new order first - i really loved them then and i still do - but joy division basslines and ian curtis = genius. and i guess i just prefer the joy division style of music to the more disco new order stuff - guitar vs keyboard etc. i think get ready is the best new order i have heard too. although i wouldn't claim to be an expert on either band.

livvie, Sunday, 11 August 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

four years pass...
There's so many Joy Division threads. I can't seem to choose a good choice.

All I know is I want to die while the brilliance of Martin Hannett shows on "Closer". I want to die by that music. Please. Look I'll pull out Unknown Pleasures in a minute here but "Decades" is nothing at all to sneer at. Please let me lie down in the studio while Martin Hannett is at the soundboard, and I'll be happy forever, please. Please.

I am not Ted Nugent (Bimble...), Monday, 11 September 2006 01:54 (seventeen years ago) link

You folks know I'm a Hannett freak, already don't you? Listen to "Passover" - listen to the way the bass line sucks itself into a void and back again. That's Hannett.

I am not Ted Nugent (Bimble...), Monday, 11 September 2006 01:56 (seventeen years ago) link

Too drunk to go to work tomorrow. Christ I love JD.

I am not Ted Nugent (Bimble...), Monday, 11 September 2006 01:56 (seventeen years ago) link

See, I waste all my time collecting Hannett produced records, but in the end, Joy Division was realy his peak wasn't it? Or maybe I'm wrong? No I'm not. Many of you who love JD don't really realize just how much your favourite band would have been absolutely nowhere without Hannett's touch. You'll find out, 8 years from now.

I am not Ted Nugent (Bimble...), Monday, 11 September 2006 01:59 (seventeen years ago) link

Look, you all know I love New Order more than Joy Division, but right now it just doesn't bloody matter.

I am not Ted Nugent (Bimble...), Monday, 11 September 2006 02:13 (seventeen years ago) link

TWENTY FOUR HOURS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

I am not Ted Nugent (Bimble...), Monday, 11 September 2006 02:14 (seventeen years ago) link

You know the 4 songs they did as their demo or whatever - "Warsaw"/"Leaders Of Men"/"No Love Lost"/"Failures"

Yeah that is fucking amazing dude. I don't even CARE about New Order when that shit is playing.

I am not Ted Nugent (Bimble...), Monday, 11 September 2006 19:17 (seventeen years ago) link

There's a noise at the beginning of Autosuggestion that is totally Hannett's doing. But you only see in hindsight the brilliance. If I'm going to a desert island you can fucking bet Joy Division's Substance is one of the 10 CD's I'm going with.

I am not Ted Nugent (Bimble...), Monday, 11 September 2006 19:21 (seventeen years ago) link

Martin Hannett is a wanker.

Just kidding, I just want to throw myself into the middle of this.

Dammit, I want to be too drunk to go to work tomorrow morning.

Zachary Scott (Zach S), Tuesday, 12 September 2006 01:41 (seventeen years ago) link

Look, it ain't funny. I got a job interview tomorrow and woke up at 9:30 pm and couldn't find my glasses and I've now got my shirt in the washer. I'm way more drunk than I thought I would be at this hour. I don't know what to do but drink water.

I am not Ted Nugent (Bimble...), Tuesday, 12 September 2006 04:09 (seventeen years ago) link

I saw a Joy Division advert on the telly last night. It appeared to be for HMV. It was on some obscure channel.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Tuesday, 12 September 2006 06:45 (seventeen years ago) link

joy division i'd say is superior. i'm really into most of their stuff.

as for new order, i think i generally prefer the singles. please help me to like power, corruption and lies. i've listened to it only a handful of times ever and can't think of a reason to listen to it again. what should i be listening for?

Charlie Howard (the sphinx), Tuesday, 12 September 2006 14:21 (seventeen years ago) link

what should i be listening for?

You caught me at a bad time
So why don't you piss off?

(PS: The non-singles on Low-Life except for "Face Up" are fucking incredible.)

Young Fresh Danny D (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 12 September 2006 14:24 (seventeen years ago) link

let me revisit. it's all stuff i want to like

Charlie Howard (the sphinx), Tuesday, 12 September 2006 14:28 (seventeen years ago) link

Both r good. New Order's sound is occasionally too muddled in the low-mids to dance to, but then again so is Ian Curtis's voice. And both would probably be inferior if that were not the case.

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Tuesday, 12 September 2006 19:18 (seventeen years ago) link

Seriously, New Order are a lot better. Ian Curtis may have been a spokesman for a generation or how you'd put it, but New Order have made a lot better music.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Tuesday, 12 September 2006 20:28 (seventeen years ago) link

Ian Curtis was a lot of things, but I hardly think "spokesman for a generation" was one of them.

Icidentally, whether you agree or not that NO have made a lot better music than JD (I don't), you'd have to say that they've made a lot worse music, too.

Si.C@rter (SiC@rter), Tuesday, 12 September 2006 21:20 (seventeen years ago) link

Part of that is a simple function of having made a lot more music!

Young Fresh Danny D (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 12 September 2006 21:23 (seventeen years ago) link

Well, yes, but I was running more along the lines that NO's quality control is poorer than JD's.

Si.C@rter (SiC@rter), Tuesday, 12 September 2006 21:26 (seventeen years ago) link

I wouldn't say so, just that they have released eight albums (and numerous non-album singles) compared to Joy Divisions' two.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Wednesday, 13 September 2006 11:21 (seventeen years ago) link

Regardless of the size of their respective outputs, NO have put out a higher percentage of crap. I can think of plenty of NO tracks that are mediocre to poor. But I'm hard pushed to think of any JD tracks. Off the top of my head, I don't much like Novelty (although the intro's good), and there are a couple of the early thrashy tracks that aren't up to much, but that's about it.

Revivalist (Revivalist), Wednesday, 13 September 2006 11:41 (seventeen years ago) link


The fact that NO has existed long enough to put out the inevitable crap shouldn't be held against them unless you want to embrace a vision of romantic death. This taking sides (perhaps the most obvious this side of beatles vs beach boys or something) reminds me of residence hall conversations I had ten years ago. Sure enough, 10 years ago, hands down, it was JD. Now, it's NO. What is it? Less angst? Less of a purist about lyrics?

Jacobo Rock (jacobo rock), Wednesday, 13 September 2006 11:57 (seventeen years ago) link

ten years ago, hands down, it was NO. now it's JD. the reason? the existence of "get ready" (pretty much all of it) and "waiting for the sirens' call" (about 70% of it) fucks new order's grade average really badly :)

seriously, though: love and adore new order as i do, joy division is pretty much musical perfection, and the older i get the more i realise that.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 13 September 2006 20:52 (seventeen years ago) link

they are the same-ass thing, stupes

RoxyMuzak© (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 13 September 2006 21:02 (seventeen years ago) link

Gillian Gilbert was Ian Curtis in drag? I love this band!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 13 September 2006 21:08 (seventeen years ago) link

I can think of plenty of NO tracks that are mediocre to poor. But I'm hard pushed to think of any JD tracks.

I think my main problem about JD is that I cannot mention one Joy Division track that I really like. They are kind of overrated, particularly compared to better contemporaries such as The Cure and Magazine.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Wednesday, 13 September 2006 21:15 (seventeen years ago) link

i imagine geir sitting there with a big shit-eating grin as he writes this stuff. and a list headed "sacred cows" with some serious-ass score marks through certain entries.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 13 September 2006 21:20 (seventeen years ago) link

as for new order, i think i generally prefer the singles. please help me to like power, corruption and lies. i've listened to it only a handful of times ever and can't think of a reason to listen to it again. what should i be listening for?

-- Charlie Howard (charlieflie...), September 12th, 2006.

Actually, speaking as someone who still claims New Order are their favourite band, I totally respect this position. Despite a few insanely good tracks I've always felt a bit uneasy about praising PCL as a whole. Seems they were just noodling about too much sometimes, the album has ups and downs, not really focused. (I mean this as no offense to ILMer Noodle Vague) So it's nice to hear someone express that, since I've not yet found the courage to admit it. And before I get attacked by PCL loving wolves I do understand the brilliance of Leave Me Alone, 586, The Village & of course Age Of Consent, but the rest...they were just kindof coasting. Not that it's BAD, but just not up to standards. You Silent Face doesn't do a whole lot for me anymore, but it still has a special place in my heart as the first song I remember hearing by them and thinking "I'm going to like anything else this band does" which was nearly true. ETC.

Anyway...

Icidentally, whether you agree or not that NO have made a lot better music than JD (I don't), you'd have to say that they've made a lot worse music, too.

-- Si.C@rter (car
ter.si@gmale.com), September 12th, 2006.

This is also a terribly good point which I'm at a loss as to how to address. The new Ian Curtis book paints him (Ian) as the maverick, the Throbbing Gristle fan, the one which would have steered them into much less commercial waters according to Paul Morley. I simply can't add anything more about this. We'll never know.

I would like to say upon reading further in this thread, though, that New Order have a rather unfair advantage in years. Who the hell KNOWS if Ian had lived and Joy Division had stayed together all this time if they wouldn't have put out just as much crap as New Order or more? Fuck people, we really don't know that for sure. You can't compare a few years to many years and come out ahead. It's not a fair comparison.

Grimly is correct that JD looks better and better all the time in the scheme of things. I'm the first to admit that. In fact, I really don't understand it. It's not just reliving my adolescence now that draws me to their records, it's the intricacies of Hannett's sound. I didn't know when I was a wee teenager that Hannett had so much to do with their sound, but I've heard his other records and I am beginning to unravel the subtle genius of Hannett. It all sounds different to me now than it did then, even Closer, which I couldn't listen to for years until now, just too painful you know? I mean I just couldn't listen to it, but I can now. And that's a victory for me. Really it is. Just to hear Hannett's work. And I daresay Closer is his best work. But I'll probably change my mind in a few months.

Gillian Gilbert was Ian Curtis in drag? I love this band!

-- Ned Raggett (ne...), September 13th, 2006.

And low and behold, Ned wins. I won't say all your jokes are good, Ned, but when you get it right, you really get it right. Cheers.

Ugh. Geir says The Cure and Magazine are better. Well...I pulled out Faith the other night, you see. And it was what I wanted to hear, there was a reason I pulled it out, but aside from a few tracks I thought "okay, but I've heard this enough times" Can't say that about JD. They continue to fascinate. Maybe not all their songs but most.

Magazine I feel almost like a virgin about. Never been able to get into them as much I would like. Don't hate them at all, but never felt firey and passionate about them. But I did buy their Hannett produced LP "The Correct Use Of Soap" some months ago and I did quite enjoy it. So I will give that another go because of you, and I appreciate the suggestion. Because I've got all this vinyl laying about and know I need to get to my recently bought vinyl records properly.

All is Hannett for me, sorry. No actually I won't apologize. I don't care about you lot, Tony Wilson and Vini Reilly know he was a genius among others. So if you don't care about him fuck you. Take your JD records home to mummy and surrender them.

This has been a Bimble production (Bimble...), Saturday, 16 September 2006 04:15 (seventeen years ago) link

DECADES IS TEARING ME APART

I am not Ted Nugent (Bimble...), Saturday, 16 September 2006 04:51 (seventeen years ago) link

now it's JD. the reason? the existence of "get ready"

thus, joy division. i still kick myself for blowing money on that.

mox twelve (Mox twleve), Saturday, 16 September 2006 05:20 (seventeen years ago) link

The new Ian Curtis book paints him (Ian) as the maverick, the Throbbing Gristle fan, the one which would have steered them into much less commercial waters according to Paul Morley.

heheh. whereas wilson's take on it has always been "they'd have been bigger than U2". useful things, dead rock stars, when you've got a singular point of view to peddle.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 16 September 2006 09:08 (seventeen years ago) link

Look, I'm not saying I'm a Paul Morley fan, let us get that straight, I pretty actively dislike Morley, in fact.

I am not Ted Nugent (Bimble...), Saturday, 16 September 2006 09:13 (seventeen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.