01. Good Lies 02. Where in this World 03. Gloomy Planets 04. Alphabet 05. The Devil, You & Me 06. Gravity 07. Sleep 08. On Planet Off 09. Boneless 10. Hands on Us 11. Gone Gone Gone
― Bee OK, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 06:12 (sixteen years ago) link
downloading now :-)
― Bee OK, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 06:13 (sixteen years ago) link
Completely unlike the Portishead album, this was not worth several years of waiting.
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 06:16 (sixteen years ago) link
Completely unlike the Portishead album. (that's the part I agree with)
― StanM, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 07:00 (sixteen years ago) link
It's like Neon Golden.5 -- halfway between the last album and what should have been the next. It sounds lazy and insubstantial like Radiohead's In Rainbows, but I'm pretty sure I'm in the minority on that line of thinking as well.
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 07:10 (sixteen years ago) link
3 tracks in and it seems very nice.
― Scik Mouthy, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 14:24 (sixteen years ago) link
i'd rather have a new tied + tickled trio album.
― Jordan, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 14:29 (sixteen years ago) link
*fires up itunes* *drags files into library* *fusses with tags* *searches internet for album art* *sends bragging text messages to friends* *wonders aloud what groundbreaking marketing method they will use to "sell" this "album"* *cat nap* *notices album thread on ILM is up to 60 posts* *clicks play*
and the rest is history!
― The Macallan 18 Year, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 15:19 (sixteen years ago) link
so this is neon golden pt 2, i take it?
― baaderonixx, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 15:21 (sixteen years ago) link
hmmm
― Surmounter, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 15:22 (sixteen years ago) link
I lurve Neon Golden so much and I want to hear this.
― St3ve Go1db3rg, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 16:49 (sixteen years ago) link
I spent one weekend listening to neon golden so much that I always think of that weekend when I hear it. And it was a pretty uneventful weekend.
― I know, right?, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 17:43 (sixteen years ago) link
i, so far, like this album. we will see if it's good after a few more good listens.
― Bee OK, Friday, 28 March 2008 04:55 (sixteen years ago) link
I'm listening to the first time now. There's much more of an emphasis on his voice, which kind of highlights his pretty limited range of melodic ideas.
But - the production is really, really nice. With headphones you can really appreciate the little panning and dynamic details.
― Z S, Friday, 28 March 2008 05:50 (sixteen years ago) link
I just had that weird moment (on "On Planet Off") when I realize that they're using the same barely tweaked Subtractor preset in Reason that I used a few months ago.
― Z S, Friday, 28 March 2008 05:57 (sixteen years ago) link
I really dig the new video.
― St3ve Go1db3rg, Thursday, 3 April 2008 16:16 (sixteen years ago) link
this is horrible. the lyrics/vox are completely embarassing.
― cutty, Thursday, 3 April 2008 17:16 (sixteen years ago) link
no sign of this album on any UK retailer website at the mo.
has the album been delayed till the summer by cityslang for the UK/ Europe?
― djmartian, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 21:07 (fifteen years ago) link
surprised to the lack of love for this album :-(
― Bee OK, Thursday, 1 May 2008 03:11 (fifteen years ago) link
"Pilot" is one of my favorite songs, haven't listened to it in ages
I find a lot of their other stuff boring, though
― Curt1s Stephens, Thursday, 1 May 2008 14:15 (fifteen years ago) link
After a handful of listens, it's one or two along the lines of "Pilot", then a lot of "This Room"-ish songs. Johnny Fever's "Neon Golden .5" description is apt. Not that it's bad. It's wonderful, after changing my expectations, though I wish they'd added a few full-out, world-brightening "One with the Freaks" tunes.
I'll have to rewatch their DVD, because I'm thinking the title track cropped up in that documentary. Swear I've heard the chorus before this record.
― scampering alpaca, Thursday, 1 May 2008 20:49 (fifteen years ago) link
having been very excited about the idea of this earlier in the year, i forgot all about it. it's on iTunes, i see. i'll get it at some point but i really do need to be conserving cash right now (and this is one i'd feel bad about acquiring without paying for).
― grimly fiendish, Sunday, 22 June 2008 15:17 (fifteen years ago) link
this thread, i have to say, hasn't exactly done much for my rekindled anticipation levels.
― grimly fiendish, Sunday, 22 June 2008 15:18 (fifteen years ago) link
i picked this up the other day and have yet to listen to it. will do so asap.
― stephen, Sunday, 22 June 2008 17:36 (fifteen years ago) link
sounded like a snooze at the record store the other day. like, a total too little too late snooze. dudes at the record store put on new steven malkmus after this and it was a big relief! even the new malkmus songs that just sound like bad pavement songs were a relief.
anyway, definitely not another neon golden.
― scott seward, Sunday, 22 June 2008 17:47 (fifteen years ago) link
yep, definitely on the boring side. sounds sterile next to "neon golden."
― Simon H., Sunday, 22 June 2008 18:08 (fifteen years ago) link
Is it pronounced No_Twist or Not_Wist?
― Scik Mouthy, Monday, 7 July 2008 07:55 (fifteen years ago) link
I think from watching the Neon Golden dvd it's Not_wist, although I'm not totally sure. Helpful post.
― Bocken Social Scene, Monday, 7 July 2008 08:53 (fifteen years ago) link
I think I say it Not_Wist generally.
― Scik Mouthy, Monday, 7 July 2008 09:32 (fifteen years ago) link
me too
― Surmounter, Monday, 7 July 2008 12:36 (fifteen years ago) link
I say Not-wist. But they're German, so I sometimes wonder if it shouldn't be Not-veest or something.
― St3ve Go1db3rg, Monday, 7 July 2008 14:29 (fifteen years ago) link
I've always gone with No-Twist.
I don't remember if they introduced themselves when last I saw them live.
― dblcheeksneek, Monday, 7 July 2008 14:34 (fifteen years ago) link
"I asked Markus Acher how to pronounce the Notwist when they were setting up at ATP. It's "no twist". Some of the Americans I was with thought it was "not whist". Eejits." Source, fwiw.
― dblcheeksneek, Monday, 7 July 2008 14:39 (fifteen years ago) link
So this might be my favourite album of the year; certainly running very close with Shearwater and probably edging out Elbow and The Do as the year rolls on. There's something really beautiful about it, both... phenomenologically (?) and emotionally. It's not got the outright POP moments that Neon Golden had, but there are some exquisite electro/acoustic arrangements on here, that at times recall Talk Talk somewhere between CoS and SoE only... lighter, more resigned, less intense, more 'pop' -but not POP - the pop on CoS is a desperate, climactic pop, whereas this is gentle (predominantly - there are enough jarring textures and rhythms and little dynamic explosions here to prevent it being soporific). So yes, this is beautiful, and low-key, and I can play it almost regardless of my mood or current aesthetic impulse re; music and still enjoy it, which is a great sign.
― Scik Mouthy, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 10:03 (fifteen years ago) link
bought this at Amoeba Hollywood the other day but have yet to listen to my purchased copy. remember liking it a lot but doubt it will make my Top 10.
― Bee OK, Thursday, 24 July 2008 06:46 (fifteen years ago) link
Lack of love for this saddens me.
― Scik Mouthy, Friday, 25 July 2008 08:56 (fifteen years ago) link
It's an album that only shows it true self with repeated listens. It took me a while to realize just how good it is; maybe a dozen times before it differentiated itself enough from Neon Golden for me to appreciate it on its own terms. Like you, it has become one of my favorites of 2008.
― EZ Snappin, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:35 (fifteen years ago) link
it's funny reading all the belated-appreciation for this record, because i've only just heard it and think it's pretty zeddin'. a lot of the production sounds kind of dated, with nyow-nyow guitars and too much fractured bleepiness. but then i can kind of trust a lot of the people who love it now, so i'll persevere.
― schlump, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:42 (fifteen years ago) link
Maybe I need to listen to it more, but I was really bored with it. I think of it more as Neon Golden 0.7 - somewhere between their OK EPs and Neon Golden, which was GREAT soft pop. It was also very new at the time, and I think this new one is nothing really too new. Call it critically stereotypical, but the electronic music world in the years since Neon Golden has gone through leaps and bounds (DFA, discopunk, dubstep, minimal, electro, electroclash, and all the house music that's come out in droves since then, etc.). While none of those directly affect Notwist's trajectory, it's weird hearing something that sounds just like 2002.
― skygreenleopard, Saturday, 26 July 2008 01:12 (fifteen years ago) link
this would make my top 15 of the year, and i've probably heard 50-60 albums this year. so it's up there in the better stuff. not top 10 material yet but that may speak to how good the other stuff is.
― stephen, Saturday, 26 July 2008 02:23 (fifteen years ago) link
Hi Louis.
― Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 18 March 2009 13:35 (fifteen years ago) link
― Curt1s Stephens, Thursday, 1 May 2008 14:15 (10 months ago
Curt1s Stephens OTM in May 2008.
This album is really boring compared to Neon Golden, and that had a lot of clunkers on it, but The Pilot is incredible!
― the next grozart, Wednesday, 18 March 2009 16:51 (fifteen years ago) link
hi nick
― POLLonius (country matters), Wednesday, 18 March 2009 16:52 (fifteen years ago) link
it certainly seems, on first listen, to be better than the majority of ILXors give it credit
― POLLonius (country matters), Wednesday, 18 March 2009 17:23 (fifteen years ago) link