01. Good Lies 02. Where in this World 03. Gloomy Planets 04. Alphabet 05. The Devil, You & Me 06. Gravity 07. Sleep 08. On Planet Off 09. Boneless 10. Hands on Us 11. Gone Gone Gone
― Bee OK, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 06:12 (eighteen years ago)
downloading now :-)
― Bee OK, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 06:13 (eighteen years ago)
Completely unlike the Portishead album, this was not worth several years of waiting.
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 06:16 (eighteen years ago)
Completely unlike the Portishead album. (that's the part I agree with)
― StanM, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 07:00 (eighteen years ago)
It's like Neon Golden.5 -- halfway between the last album and what should have been the next. It sounds lazy and insubstantial like Radiohead's In Rainbows, but I'm pretty sure I'm in the minority on that line of thinking as well.
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 07:10 (eighteen years ago)
3 tracks in and it seems very nice.
― Scik Mouthy, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 14:24 (eighteen years ago)
i'd rather have a new tied + tickled trio album.
― Jordan, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 14:29 (eighteen years ago)
*fires up itunes* *drags files into library* *fusses with tags* *searches internet for album art* *sends bragging text messages to friends* *wonders aloud what groundbreaking marketing method they will use to "sell" this "album"* *cat nap* *notices album thread on ILM is up to 60 posts* *clicks play*
and the rest is history!
― The Macallan 18 Year, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 15:19 (eighteen years ago)
so this is neon golden pt 2, i take it?
― baaderonixx, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 15:21 (eighteen years ago)
hmmm
― Surmounter, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 15:22 (eighteen years ago)
I lurve Neon Golden so much and I want to hear this.
― St3ve Go1db3rg, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 16:49 (eighteen years ago)
I spent one weekend listening to neon golden so much that I always think of that weekend when I hear it. And it was a pretty uneventful weekend.
― I know, right?, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 17:43 (eighteen years ago)
i, so far, like this album. we will see if it's good after a few more good listens.
― Bee OK, Friday, 28 March 2008 04:55 (eighteen years ago)
I'm listening to the first time now. There's much more of an emphasis on his voice, which kind of highlights his pretty limited range of melodic ideas.
But - the production is really, really nice. With headphones you can really appreciate the little panning and dynamic details.
― Z S, Friday, 28 March 2008 05:50 (eighteen years ago)
I just had that weird moment (on "On Planet Off") when I realize that they're using the same barely tweaked Subtractor preset in Reason that I used a few months ago.
― Z S, Friday, 28 March 2008 05:57 (eighteen years ago)
I really dig the new video.
― St3ve Go1db3rg, Thursday, 3 April 2008 16:16 (eighteen years ago)
this is horrible. the lyrics/vox are completely embarassing.
― cutty, Thursday, 3 April 2008 17:16 (eighteen years ago)
no sign of this album on any UK retailer website at the mo.
has the album been delayed till the summer by cityslang for the UK/ Europe?
― djmartian, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 21:07 (eighteen years ago)
surprised to the lack of love for this album :-(
― Bee OK, Thursday, 1 May 2008 03:11 (eighteen years ago)
"Pilot" is one of my favorite songs, haven't listened to it in ages
I find a lot of their other stuff boring, though
― Curt1s Stephens, Thursday, 1 May 2008 14:15 (eighteen years ago)
After a handful of listens, it's one or two along the lines of "Pilot", then a lot of "This Room"-ish songs. Johnny Fever's "Neon Golden .5" description is apt. Not that it's bad. It's wonderful, after changing my expectations, though I wish they'd added a few full-out, world-brightening "One with the Freaks" tunes.
I'll have to rewatch their DVD, because I'm thinking the title track cropped up in that documentary. Swear I've heard the chorus before this record.
― scampering alpaca, Thursday, 1 May 2008 20:49 (eighteen years ago)
having been very excited about the idea of this earlier in the year, i forgot all about it. it's on iTunes, i see. i'll get it at some point but i really do need to be conserving cash right now (and this is one i'd feel bad about acquiring without paying for).
― grimly fiendish, Sunday, 22 June 2008 15:17 (seventeen years ago)
this thread, i have to say, hasn't exactly done much for my rekindled anticipation levels.
― grimly fiendish, Sunday, 22 June 2008 15:18 (seventeen years ago)
i picked this up the other day and have yet to listen to it. will do so asap.
― stephen, Sunday, 22 June 2008 17:36 (seventeen years ago)
sounded like a snooze at the record store the other day. like, a total too little too late snooze. dudes at the record store put on new steven malkmus after this and it was a big relief! even the new malkmus songs that just sound like bad pavement songs were a relief.
anyway, definitely not another neon golden.
― scott seward, Sunday, 22 June 2008 17:47 (seventeen years ago)
yep, definitely on the boring side. sounds sterile next to "neon golden."
― Simon H., Sunday, 22 June 2008 18:08 (seventeen years ago)
Is it pronounced No_Twist or Not_Wist?
― Scik Mouthy, Monday, 7 July 2008 07:55 (seventeen years ago)
I think from watching the Neon Golden dvd it's Not_wist, although I'm not totally sure. Helpful post.
― Bocken Social Scene, Monday, 7 July 2008 08:53 (seventeen years ago)
I think I say it Not_Wist generally.
― Scik Mouthy, Monday, 7 July 2008 09:32 (seventeen years ago)
me too
― Surmounter, Monday, 7 July 2008 12:36 (seventeen years ago)
I say Not-wist. But they're German, so I sometimes wonder if it shouldn't be Not-veest or something.
― St3ve Go1db3rg, Monday, 7 July 2008 14:29 (seventeen years ago)
I've always gone with No-Twist.
I don't remember if they introduced themselves when last I saw them live.
― dblcheeksneek, Monday, 7 July 2008 14:34 (seventeen years ago)
"I asked Markus Acher how to pronounce the Notwist when they were setting up at ATP. It's "no twist". Some of the Americans I was with thought it was "not whist". Eejits." Source, fwiw.
― dblcheeksneek, Monday, 7 July 2008 14:39 (seventeen years ago)
So this might be my favourite album of the year; certainly running very close with Shearwater and probably edging out Elbow and The Do as the year rolls on. There's something really beautiful about it, both... phenomenologically (?) and emotionally. It's not got the outright POP moments that Neon Golden had, but there are some exquisite electro/acoustic arrangements on here, that at times recall Talk Talk somewhere between CoS and SoE only... lighter, more resigned, less intense, more 'pop' -but not POP - the pop on CoS is a desperate, climactic pop, whereas this is gentle (predominantly - there are enough jarring textures and rhythms and little dynamic explosions here to prevent it being soporific). So yes, this is beautiful, and low-key, and I can play it almost regardless of my mood or current aesthetic impulse re; music and still enjoy it, which is a great sign.
― Scik Mouthy, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 10:03 (seventeen years ago)
bought this at Amoeba Hollywood the other day but have yet to listen to my purchased copy. remember liking it a lot but doubt it will make my Top 10.
― Bee OK, Thursday, 24 July 2008 06:46 (seventeen years ago)
Lack of love for this saddens me.
― Scik Mouthy, Friday, 25 July 2008 08:56 (seventeen years ago)
It's an album that only shows it true self with repeated listens. It took me a while to realize just how good it is; maybe a dozen times before it differentiated itself enough from Neon Golden for me to appreciate it on its own terms. Like you, it has become one of my favorites of 2008.
― EZ Snappin, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:35 (seventeen years ago)
it's funny reading all the belated-appreciation for this record, because i've only just heard it and think it's pretty zeddin'. a lot of the production sounds kind of dated, with nyow-nyow guitars and too much fractured bleepiness. but then i can kind of trust a lot of the people who love it now, so i'll persevere.
― schlump, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:42 (seventeen years ago)
Maybe I need to listen to it more, but I was really bored with it. I think of it more as Neon Golden 0.7 - somewhere between their OK EPs and Neon Golden, which was GREAT soft pop. It was also very new at the time, and I think this new one is nothing really too new. Call it critically stereotypical, but the electronic music world in the years since Neon Golden has gone through leaps and bounds (DFA, discopunk, dubstep, minimal, electro, electroclash, and all the house music that's come out in droves since then, etc.). While none of those directly affect Notwist's trajectory, it's weird hearing something that sounds just like 2002.
― skygreenleopard, Saturday, 26 July 2008 01:12 (seventeen years ago)
this would make my top 15 of the year, and i've probably heard 50-60 albums this year. so it's up there in the better stuff. not top 10 material yet but that may speak to how good the other stuff is.
― stephen, Saturday, 26 July 2008 02:23 (seventeen years ago)
Hi Louis.
― Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 18 March 2009 13:35 (seventeen years ago)
― Curt1s Stephens, Thursday, 1 May 2008 14:15 (10 months ago
Curt1s Stephens OTM in May 2008.
This album is really boring compared to Neon Golden, and that had a lot of clunkers on it, but The Pilot is incredible!
― the next grozart, Wednesday, 18 March 2009 16:51 (seventeen years ago)
hi nick
― POLLonius (country matters), Wednesday, 18 March 2009 16:52 (seventeen years ago)
it certainly seems, on first listen, to be better than the majority of ILXors give it credit
― POLLonius (country matters), Wednesday, 18 March 2009 17:23 (seventeen years ago)