Rap will never be influencial.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
That's what my roommate told me today after she asked if I thought Jay-Z was influencial. She says all rap is about bling bling guns and hoes and it'll "never be influencial like the Beatles." Now, of course, this is the billionth time this conversation has taken place on earth probably, but I figured I'd take the oportunity to make The Authoritative Influencial HipHop Mix Disc. I think the bling-bling criticism is too broad (i.e., Outkast) so excluding all rap that touches on these subjects definitely isn't necessary. So what makes the cut, why?

Stuart, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'm still waiting for her list of influencial bands, so the definition of who/what is being influenced can be pretty broad... Influencing other artists or trends or society as a whole or what have you. When she says "influencial" she probably means "socially- conscious" or something anyway.

Stuart, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

what's a bling-bling?

fields of salmon, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Bling bling(n) Jewellery, derived from the sound it makes.

Judd Nelson, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

rap will never be as socially conscious as the Beatles!

* bolt of lightning *

Fried Hand, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Is "influencial" a British spelling?

o. nate, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

All she has to do is look around her....rap/hip-hop has infultrated popular cutlure to its very core -- for better or worse -- and has overtaken the mainstream. Witness the rise in Rap-Rock! It's already been influential, it's already left a lasting, indelible mark. What does she want?

I think what she probably means, however, is that most rap/hip-hop isn't *TIMELESS*. You can listen to a Beatles record today and probably still completely identify with it, yet so much of hip-hop is rooted in passing trends within the genre, and utilizes slang and patois that will be dated and obscure within a six month time-period. Hip-Hop is firmly rooted in the *now*, which will make it seem a bit hard to idenfity with in years to come. Don't believe me? Trying selling used hip-hop discs. No one'll touch'em. Who wants to buy old Das Efx and Digital Underground albums? Precious few people outside of completists.

But to assert that it's not influential is ridiculous. Has she stepped outside the apartment in the last fifteen years or switched on the radio or television?

Alex in NYC, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

re: "influenCial" No i'm just a moron. yowzers. heh.

Stuart, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

But can anyone immediately identify with a Beatles song? "I Am the Walrus" probably meant a lot more back in the day than it does now, or at least it meant something different. It could be a question of who's doing the listening. Someone who identifies with the Beatles might not identify with Jay-Z, and vice-versa.

Prude, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Oh, whoops -- I forgot to answer the question:

Well, I'm not a big rap/hip-hop fan, but it seems to me you would have to include "Bring the Noise" by Public Enemy (or at least one example of militant/conscious hip-hop with the famed Bomb Squad production).

As far as the knee-jerk answers (B.I.G and Tupac), I don't think either of them did anything too radical. But before you jump all over me for that statement, please understand that this is not my area of exptertise, so I could completely have my head up my ass about it. It just doesn't strike me that either of them were saying anything especially new or innovative....just more self-aggrandizement and self-mythologizing as a gun-toting hustlers/killers/thugs/pimps/ players. That is the stuff of yawns, as far as I'm concerned. But once again -- not my area of expertise.

Be original and *DON'T* include "Walk This Way" by Run-Dmc/Aerosmith. I'm so tired of hearing how that overhyped slab of wax altered the course of history.

Alex in NYC, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Good point, Prude. I guess I was just thinking about the Beatles' more user-friendly stuff like "Taxman" and/or "I Wanna Hold Your Hand" and/ or "I'm Only Sleeping" and/or....er..."Why Don't We Do It in the Road" than their more surreal stuff like "I Am the Walrus" and/or "Blue Jay Way" and/or "Glass Onion."

Alex in NYC, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Yeah everybody can relate to the Beatles and no one can relate to hip- hoppers. Except people who aren't suburban whites, in which case the opposite is true.

J Blount, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

But doesn't Taxman lose something if you don't know the particular historical context in which it was written? Personally, I relate more to the Beatles than I do to rap and hip-hop, but that's because I'm a white guy raised in the suburbs and I'm socially conditioned to accept what the Beatles do as aesthetically pleasing. I like the Beatles, but if I had friends who were into rap when I was younger, maybe I'd be able to relate to it more than I can now.

Prude, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

The hip hop stylings of Timbaland and the Neptunes are all over modern pop; every major pop star wants them and will pay serious money for just one track by them to go as the first single, eg. "Slave 4 U", "Girlfriend" etc

Nick, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'm an URBAN white, thank you very much, not a SUBURBAN white.

Alex in NYC, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Yeah, right...."Goo Goo Ga Joob" versus "Fashizzle mah Nizzle, knowhum'sayin', word!"

Which is more "timeless"?

Why does race have *ANYTHING* to do with it? Lyrical nonsense is lyrical nonsense, regardless of race, creed and colour.

Motel Hell, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Alex's point about hip-hop being about the 'now' is more interesting that the topic to me...I think that there is that element, but quality music is quality music no matter what comes after it. Just like how the vocabulary of bebop took the place of the jazz styles that came before but doesn't make those Louis Armstrong (for example) records worse or obsolete, good old-school records aren't exactly irrelevant even though no one is playing in that style anynmore.

Jordan, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'm afraid I've given you all the impression that I actually expect to change her ridiculous opinion of rap. All I was after was a dope mix of influential/landmark and now maybe socially-conscious/timeless rap tracks to burn to a cd labeled "Ha ha. So there" that I would then slip under her door and be done with it. But I like how the discussion is going.

Fuel to the fire: She's a big Sublime fan. Ha. She says they're not influential though.

I will be catching myself misspelling influential for the rest of my life, thanks o. nate.

Stuart, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

My friend has this theory that "Bling Bling" comes from the sound that (Super) Mario makes when he jumps for kwon (coin). Also, there are hundreds of rap artists over a quarter century who belie the purely bling thing. Also, realize that "Bling, Bling", is a rather influential catch-phrase (I'm sure those haters at the OED will have to include it soon). I predict the next most influential phrase/word will be one that I came across else-thread today: "Hatorade"

Spencer Chow, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

"She's a big Sublime fan. Ha. She says they're not influential though."

Well, at least she's able to recognize that. But, doesn't being a big fan of Sublime render every possible argument she could ever possibly make about any genre of music moot?

Alex in NYC, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Yes, obviously... which is why i was trying to steer the thread back towards mixtapes. Her relationship with music is something I cannot comprehend, so that's a pandora's box of worms I never should've touched.

Stuart, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

The most interesting influence of rap is on other rap. Why measure the worth of a genre of music by it's impact on extraneous genres? That would be like using Yngwie Malmsteen to defend the influentialness of Bach.

o. nate, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

of course more fun is trying to grasp why the word "influence" has no real useful meaning

mark s, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Mark, can words EVAH have meaning? apropos of nutting my Mano Negra wuvving cousin just said "I heard this tune by the Streets and I am OBSESSED with it. Apparenlty he's from the streets and is putting that to musick." then we entered the club and danced ourselves silly to turd rate reggae muzak.

nathalie, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

meanning: some words have it, some words sekruityviub

mark s, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

mark, you foulmouthed intellectual hunkah.

nathalie, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Alex: Mark that sounds like something Bloch would say. Has he been influencing you again?
Small Child: Shut up. (Begins pelting Alex with pudding pops)

Yawn. This is a boring argument. Some people don't like hip hop. This isn't exactly news. Personally, I think those peeps is silly and the "big" arguments are Ludacris oversimplications (dude, like they AREN'T even playing instruments and all rappers talk about is bitches and how hard they are and shit) but hey everyone's got to have an opinion about something, right.

Alex in SF, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

You want a great, important, classic hip hip mix that denies that narrow, foolishly dismissive view? There are obvious things like Public Enemy, but you start with The Message - it's by Grandmaster Flash, one of the key figures in inventing what we now mean by the term DJ, it's a stone cold classic, it's socially conscious and it's massively influential. Actually, forget the mix, just play her that repeatedly until she submits.

Martin Skidmore, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I liked what Alex in NYC said about timelessness vs the now - assuming that he wasn't making a qualitative distinction - but I'd argue that the timelessness is not something conferred upon the music via its subsequent veneration and historicization (eg. canons ad nauseum). The Beatles seem timeless because they've been played fairly regularly for the last thirty years, and thus the cultural indicators that might have otherwise faded into obscurity become entrenched. This is all part of the general law that no baby boomer culture can be ephemereal because it was the peak of human existence (yawn).

Or to look at it another way: in twenty, thirty years time, what *will* radio stations play from this period if not Britney, Nelly, Mystikal etc? Please god *tell* me it won't just be Train.

Tim, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

so what were the equivalent (in stature?) pop music main players 30- 40 years ago and which ones don't we hear anymore? or has the face of pop changed so much media-wise and whatnot that the comparison is meaningless?

Stuart, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

martin's right about "the message." it actually still impresses me, 20 years after the fact

bc, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Here's where I say that "The Message" sorta felt weak to me musically, therefore undercutting the sentiments. There's also this air of...how to put it...projected importance onto it, as if, "Ah! Now at last this hip-hop stuff became VALID! Ignore the earlier trash." Not saying anyone here is saying that, but after hearing so much about it and then finally hearing it, I was underwhelmed.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I wept. Again. Profusely.

Your Pal, http://www.jesus.com/images/jesusright.jpg
Jesus.

Jesus., Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Being all knowing does not mean Jesus took an HTML class at the local community collge.

Your Pal,
http://www.jesus.com/images/jesusright.jpg
Jesus.

Jesus., Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

fairnuff ned, but aside from the actual title of the song, it reads to me less like a serious social issue song and more about beginning the rap tradition of painting the picture of urban decay that plenty of later acts have followed. the balance of this and the palpable stress of the song give it the right feel of manic claustrophobia, as opposed to the icy detach of mobb deep or the macho macho gangster/thug vein. the song alone is worth it for melle mel's unsettling half laugh/half cry and the line "I SWEAR I MIGHT HIJACK A PLANE!" that's one guy at the end of his rope.

bc, Friday, 3 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

"I Am the Walrus" probably meant a lot more back in the day than it does now, or at least it meant something different

This is my favourite thing today.

N., Saturday, 4 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

more about beginning the rap tradition of painting the picture of urban decay

*nods* Yeah, that makes sense...more a subject shift as opposed to a moment of revelation and justification.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 4 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

What's Ted Nugent doing in a toga?

Prude, Saturday, 4 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Whatever the hell he wants to.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 4 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Tim: there won't be radio stations in the future. Instead everybody will eat only soup.

Sterling Clover, Sunday, 5 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Just realised I meant to say: "I'd argue that the timelessness is something conferred upon the music via its subsequent veneration and historicization..."

Sterling: how do your two predictions of the future correlate?

Tim, Monday, 6 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

isn't it obvious?

Sterling Clover, Monday, 6 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Alex said... "Hip-Hop is firmly rooted in the *now*, which will make it seem a bit hard to idenfity with in years to come. Don't believe me? Trying selling used hip-hop discs. No one'll touch'em. Who wants to buy old Das Efx and Digital Underground albums? Precious few people outside of completists.">>> Depends what you're selling. Last week I sold my olde Eric B & Rakim singles for $13. each. Coulda got more on ebay but I'm not greedy.

richee, Monday, 6 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

They were probably bought by middle-class white grad students. Hip- hop, and to an extent R&B, is not nearly as tied to its history as rock music. Whereas the average rock fan will have a good deal of knowledge of say, the Beatles or the Velvet Underground or Black Sabbath or Nick Drake or Wire (depending where they're coming from, ahem, aesthetically), most hip-hop fans are focused on what's going on now and pay attention to the past only to the extent to which it directly relates to whats going on right now. This is why comebacks are much more difficult in r&b and especially rap than they are in rock and why in a rock a group can imitate a style that's thirty years old and have great success while in rap imitating a sound that's merely say, three years old can lead to quick career death.

J Blount, Tuesday, 7 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

middle-class white grad students = me haha

your average rock fans sound pretty marginal to me.

Josh, Tuesday, 7 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

That seems like a pretty big generalization J and also a pretty inaccurate one as far as I can tell. Every genre has their music geeks, people concerned with digging into the crates of history. New hip hop heads are no different than new fans in any other genre in their desire to pick up ol' skool classics (although since the genre they love is. . . hmmn. . . a little less DEAD they tend to buy more "new" records that let's say a blues enthusiast or hahaha indie rawk fans).

Alex in SF, Tuesday, 7 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Yeah, it's on overgeneralization no doubt, but from my experience the average rock fan (and I'm just saying the average fan, not your trainspotter types) is much more likely to own a copy of Abbey Road than your average hip-hop fan is to own a copy of Paid in Full (and this is hardly a judgement towards the relative merits of those albums - I prefer Paid In Full). I'm not saying that rap fans are ignorant of the music's history, simply that they don't seem to be as tied to it or feel as obligated towards it as rock fans do to rock history. Rock fans still debate Stones versus Beatles, Rap fans don't still debate Kool Moe Dee versus LL Cool J (they debate Jay-Z versus Nas). This isn't an indictment of rap or rock - there are advantages to both approaches.

J Blount, Tuesday, 7 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'll also add that this is one reason rap isn't as dead as rock. Could you imagine the hip-hop equivalent of the Strokes, a group that sounded straight out of 1977, receiving the same amount of ink in the hip-hop press that the Strokes received in the rock press?

J Blount, Tuesday, 7 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

TS: The Strokes vs. The Jurassic 5

Kris, Tuesday, 7 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I was almost going to add that one of the things that makes underground hip-hop underground hip-hop is it's awareness and reverance toward the past - just count all the Grand Wizard Theodore samples - but it probably this very tendency that helps keep it underground. That said, J5 didn't get nearly as much ink in Vibe as the Strokes got in Spin and the gulf between "Hard to Explain" and "Some Weird Sin" isn't nearly as great as the gulf between "Monkey Bars" and "King Tim III".

J Blount, Tuesday, 7 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Okay. Paid in Full sold a fraction of the copies of an Abbey Road. Comparing something like the The Chronic is probably fairer, although no one has sold continually quite like the Beatles has so this line of thinking is somewhat unfair too. And most of the people who still debate Beatle vs. Stones vs. whatever think all current rock is pretty awful. One day hip hop'll get that way to though and we can all look forward to Public Enemy vs. De La Soul fites or something like that. Sadly there are groups that attempt to revive ol' skool sounding rap and they do get mainstream press and they are for the most part kind of dull (just like the Strokes).

Alex in SF, Tuesday, 7 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

Of course it occurs to me (negating much of my argument) that people definitely still argue Tupac vs. Biggie and that I probably know more hip-hop fans who own Straight Outta Compton (or The Chronic) than rock fans who own Exile on Main Street. Still, I think with rock there's a greater since of a tradition that must be maintained or respected than there is in hip-hop.

J Blount, Tuesday, 7 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

blount's observation rings true w me though. in years participating in discussions with insular hiphop fans, retrospective is almost non- existent except to establish markers like innovations, trends and exceptional works, but then these are not treated as significant musical topics. they serve mainly as 'fact' to reference in disputes of who had what style first, whose double album was the tightest, what years were the golden age (judged by most excellent releases) and so on, but given so very little actual consideration. those earlier saying part of the problem is that hiphop seems so temporally bound have a point--newcomers are of the opinion not that it's necessary to establish foundations, but to leap in and infer what came before (or to just fucking dance). past hiphop history is treated not as a religious document but as a missed opportunity-i've heard "i guess i had to have been there" far more times than any person should have to endure. i don't know if it's the close (forced?) intermingling of hiphop's music and 'culture', the music serving more as document than standalone art, but there is very minimal musical and historical discourse about the music ITSELF. the good old days are not explicitly explained in literature handed out when you buy your first ja rule cd, but rather from misty eyed ol skool heads who shake their heads at these kids who can't appreciate busy bee. "did you read the source article on busy bee?" "hell no" it's not to say i am particularly distressed at hiphop's seemingly minimal regard for it's past - this seems to allow fresh ideas to still spring. at any rate it's better than being beholden to draconian KRS-type decree of what's real or not, when it's really just a moron positioning himself as an authority long past his relevancy. i fear those who harp so much on hiphop's past (usually very piously) and are so heavily indebted to it by default exclude alot of the variety of culture of the non-metropolitan areas that couldn't help not being NYC or LA- incidentally and thankfully, where most of the interesting hiphop is coming from these days.

bc, Tuesday, 7 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

"Still, I think with rock there's a greater since of a tradition that must be maintained or respected than there is in hip-hop."

Unless you run the Mo'Wax label!!! Hahaha.

Alex in SF, Tuesday, 7 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-one years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.