Last two paragraphs.
― unperson, Monday, 8 October 2007 19:11 (5 years ago) Permalink
i saw, i cringed
― Dr Morbius, Monday, 8 October 2007 19:17 (5 years ago) Permalink
i like it
― kamerad, Monday, 8 October 2007 19:21 (5 years ago) Permalink
Coming next week:
"The center of the Bush administration's complex of lies about the war in Iraq is a delicate and breakable thing, like a heart of glass..."
― Oilyrags, Monday, 8 October 2007 19:28 (5 years ago) Permalink
Jesus died for somebody's sins but not the neocons.
― kornrulez6969, Monday, 8 October 2007 19:41 (5 years ago) Permalink
I like it too.
― curmudgeon, Monday, 8 October 2007 20:55 (5 years ago) Permalink
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/04/02/who-took-the-money-away/
p-krugs came to cambridge this week to talk about keynes and i didn't even know it :/
― ADMIN FROG WATCH (history mayne), Friday, 24 June 2011 00:06 (1 year ago) Permalink
From 2002: Really?
The basic point is that the recession of 2001 wasn't a typical postwar slump, brought on when an inflation-fighting Fed raises interest rates and easily ended by a snapback in housing and consumer spending when the Fed brings rates back down again. This was a prewar-style recession, a morning after brought on by irrational exuberance. To fight this recession the Fed needs more than a snapback; it needs soaring household spending to offset moribund business investment. And to do that, as Paul McCulley of Pimco put it, Alan Greenspan needs to create a housing bubble to replace the Nasdaq bubble.
― der dukatenscheisser (Sanpaku), Sunday, 2 October 2011 17:12 (1 year ago) Permalink
Oops, wrong forum...
― der dukatenscheisser (Sanpaku), Sunday, 2 October 2011 17:15 (1 year ago) Permalink
i love paul krugman
― u0sd0ןɟ (flopson), Sunday, 2 October 2011 17:25 (1 year ago) Permalink
The basic point is that the recession of 2001 wasn't a typical postwar slump, brought on when an inflation-fighting Fed raises interest rates and easily ended by a snapback in housing and consumer spending when the Fed brings rates back down again. This was a prewar-style recession, a morning after brought on by irrational exuberance. To fight this recession the Fed needs more than a snapback; it needs soaring household spending to offset moribund business investment. And to do that, as Paul McCulley of Pimco put it, psycho killer qu'est que c'est fafafa fa fa fafafa fa fa..
― m0stlyClean, Sunday, 2 October 2011 17:35 (1 year ago) Permalink
There’s something happening here. What it is ain’t exactly clear
Krugman line in the NYT quoting some other group
― curmudgeon, Friday, 7 October 2011 14:39 (1 year ago) Permalink
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/07/27/friday-night-music-cat-power/
― buzza, Sunday, 29 July 2012 22:36 (9 months ago) Permalink
about 50% of his posts involve the arcade fire at this point
― iatee, Sunday, 29 July 2012 22:38 (9 months ago) Permalink
we need to get his take on the gaslight anthem
― mookieproof, Sunday, 29 July 2012 22:43 (9 months ago) Permalink