'The thing that blew my mind first hearing the Strokes was that they were the closest I had heard rock come to classical,' she says. 'Their music is extraordinarily orderly and composed. It's almost

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (221 of them)
if there's one thing that is a hallmark across the many genres that are commonly described as "classical music", it's rubato, PARTICULARLY with someone like Mozart (check any of his operas, for example).


But is Mozart really known for rubato? My cursory knowledge of him, based on an opera or two and my daughters's toy Mozart Cube (an excellent gift to new parents, by the way) is that his rubato ratio is low compared to, say, Puccini.

The Player In The Redd Cap (Two-Headed Doge) (Ken L), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 00:11 (seventeen years ago) link

Biz's expression seems to more accurately represent the tenor of this thread there.

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 00:12 (seventeen years ago) link

Just w/r/t "vertical composition" I'd assume that most people talking about it on this board would have gotten the expression (either 1st or 2nd hand) from this:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0306806495/002-8012783-3903221?v=glance&n=283155

It's not the greatest book in the world...

dlp9001 (dlp9001), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 00:44 (seventeen years ago) link

Steve, I don't know. I thought my drive-by explanation of vertical composition was brief and clear enough for casual message board discussion. Wolfgang Rihm has given lectures on the subject, so it's not just a Canadian thing, you sexy, sanctimonious Brit.

What can I say to defend myself that won't make me sound even more over-academic and boring? Nothing.

But serious! Listen to any Mozart quartet or divertimento, even Eine Kleine Nachtmusik. You must agree, at least, that it sounds more like The Strokes than The Beach Boys or The Cars or The Zombies.

Owen Pallett (Owen Pallett), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 04:10 (seventeen years ago) link

But is Mozart really known for rubato? My cursory knowledge of him, based on an opera or two and my daughters's toy Mozart Cube (an excellent gift to new parents, by the way) is that his rubato ratio is low compared to, say, Puccini.

Well, yes. Puccini was also composing 100 years after Mozart was. Also, this doesn't mean Mozart never uses rubato (check, for example, "Vedrai carino" from "Don Giovanni" or "Ach, ich fuehl's" from "The Magic Flute"). Mozart was not a rigid metronome the way that someone like Bach was.

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 11:19 (seventeen years ago) link

It also occurs to me, given Spektor's frame of reference and the way she's talking here, that she might be using the word "rock" in a way that wouldn't include things like "God Only Knows" and "Strawberry Fields Forever." (Haha: and where does metal fit here?)

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 13:35 (seventeen years ago) link

Show me any real metal that you (and most non-fan listeners) would describe as "elegant," "understated," "restrained" and "delightful," and we'll see where metal fits in here...

fuckfuckingfuckedfucker (fuckfuckingfuckedfucker), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 14:44 (seventeen years ago) link

anthrax!

M@tt He1geson, Rendolent Ding-Dong (Matt Helgeson), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 15:24 (seventeen years ago) link

Anthrax is more swellegant

Rev. PappaWheelie (PappaWheelie 2), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 15:27 (seventeen years ago) link

Good point.

fuckfuckingfuckedfucker (fuckfuckingfuckedfucker), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 15:27 (seventeen years ago) link

weird that Geir hasn't popped up on this thread yet.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 15:29 (seventeen years ago) link

Um, I meant metal in terms of formal similarities to classical music. I mean, metal can be pretty explicit about obvious top-level connections to classical, down to the point of quoting and such.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 15:32 (seventeen years ago) link

He did, Shakey. Check it:

Interesting quote. Makes me wonder what she has been smoking.

-- Geir Hongro (geirhon...), June 30th, 2006. (later)

perhaps marijuana ;-)

-- gear (speed.to.roa...), June 30th, 2006. (later)

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 15:36 (seventeen years ago) link

debunking the classically trained scam: http://www.slate.com/id/2122512

she should've sighted some super obscure composer, not the most famous one in the world. i doubt she's really classically trained - she's not even good at being pretentious.

jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 16:07 (seventeen years ago) link

When I first heard The Strokes, I thought, this is the closest I've heard rock music come to Luigi Nono!

CDDB (Dan Deluca), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 16:36 (seventeen years ago) link

I thought the most common meaning of rock music "sounding like Bach" was those kind of scalar but melodic basslines and even, um, melodies, that McCartney liked, as in "Hello Goodbye."

The Player In The Redd Cap (Two-Headed Doge) (Ken L), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 16:39 (seventeen years ago) link

Also, lots of quarter notes.

The Player In The Redd Cap (Two-Headed Doge) (Ken L), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 16:40 (seventeen years ago) link

I believe Paul has said that the chord progression of Black Bird was swiped from a Bach piece that he used to play. I couldn't tell you what piece, though.

Steve Go1dberg (Steve Schneeberg), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 17:14 (seventeen years ago) link

beatles always be ripping off sebastian bach

Rev. PappaWheelie (PappaWheelie 2), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 17:26 (seventeen years ago) link

That Slate article is a bit bizarre, though -- or at least it's attacking something that doesn't seem to really exist. I can't think of many instances in which I've seen someone's "classical training" held up as proof that they're a "better" musician. In most of the instances I see, it's just used as a descriptive/informative thing. Like saying that Nathan Michel studied composition isn't a claim that his music is "better" -- but if you're wondering what his music is like, that information does a good deal to explain some of the things he's interested in, and some of the ways that he approaches writing.

All the Slate piece points out is that (a) lots of people are "classically trained," and that (b) "classical trained" does not imply mastery, just study; you can study in that mold and be lousy at it. But I don't know that people are necessarily often saying it that way -- I think usually they're trying to point out that someone's frame of reference is coming from a more classical mold, whether or not there's mastery or virtuosity attached to it.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 17:29 (seventeen years ago) link

Actually, well, I take that back a little bit -- I've seen plenty of instances in which fans will trot out "classically trained" as an example of why their beloved artist is the awesomest thing ever. But, you know, that's just being fannish. I'd like to think that when critics and writers say it, they're just trying to provide relevant background. (Haha: along the same lines as specifying that someone went to Berklee -- kind of an attempt to explain what particular music-world and frame-of-reference and way-of-thinking a person might be coming from, or at least have instilled in them.)

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 17:37 (seventeen years ago) link

Nabisco, you're being way more even-handed about the "classically-trained"/"went to Berklee" tag than about 98% of humanity.

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 17:40 (seventeen years ago) link

one of the main points of the slate article is that alicia keys (et al) taking piano lessons when she was a kid doesn't count as classical training.

it's like saying a harvard phd and a semester at a community college is the same thing. those educations may contain some of the same elements and maybe generalizing that someone went to college might even provide some insight - but it's pretty sloppy and often employed deceptively.

jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 19:06 (seventeen years ago) link

I was classically trained to rock.

Steve Go1dberg (Steve Schneeberg), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 19:08 (seventeen years ago) link

I was baroquely trained to save no monies.

Rev. PappaWheelie (PappaWheelie 2), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 19:14 (seventeen years ago) link

That Slate article seemed to make a fair point with regard to the vauge usage of "classically trained," although it seemed to focus a lot on technique rather than theory, which is I think what tends to be more lacking in a musician who isn't classically-trained. It's one thing to write a catchy tune, but lots of songwriters have to turn things over to someone else when it comes to arranging the string parts, etc. It's also, in my experience, much easier/quicker to teach and flesh out parts with someone who has a good grounding in theory.

Steve Go1dberg (Steve Schneeberg), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 19:18 (seventeen years ago) link

er, vague.

Steve Go1dberg (Steve Schneeberg), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 19:18 (seventeen years ago) link

That article manages to be somewhat correct and completely lame at the same time.

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Thursday, 6 July 2006 00:09 (seventeen years ago) link

like this thread, excepting the "somewhat correct" bit

gear (gear), Thursday, 6 July 2006 00:11 (seventeen years ago) link

Hehe.

James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Thursday, 6 July 2006 00:12 (seventeen years ago) link

Well, I suppose most people interpret "classically trained" as implying some formal course of study, as distinct from just "taking lessons" -- you say that and people tend to imagine the musician either studied at a conservatory or at least went for an undergraduate major in music. (Though there's slippage there, too: I assume you could take a degree in another aspect of music without ever spending much time on classical music or common practice in particular.)

Ha, the funny part is that there are plenty of places where someone would say "hey, I have a college education" and mean community college (wasn't that on the Matos stepdad thread?) -- situations where someone's presuming that kind of education to be a rare thing in general. That might be another problem with the way "classically trained" gets used. There's this idea that formal training is a rare thing in rock (which it doesn't actually seem to be, but whatever) -- but when you're talking about Tori Amos or something, I'm not sure there's any context that should lead anyone to be surprised or impressed by training. I can't really think of any style of music right now where people should be surprised to find training.

P.S. Steve, yes, OTM on arrangements -- I've always assumed the thing is that the average brain can pretty easily hold a melody and chord structure and see all that at once, whereas the more complex an arrangement gets, the more you need an actual musical language to codify and symbolize it all in your head. (Maybe there's the odd untutored genius who can hear and conceptualize that kind of thing just as raw information, but most people surely need tools to keep it under control.)

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 6 July 2006 01:16 (seventeen years ago) link

Indeed. Although it has to be said that Brian Wilson, one of pop music's greatest arrangers, had no formal music training. Though this was said to have made things difficult for him in the studio, as I imagine it would; he had to laboriously explain each part of his compositions to the other Beach Boys and the various session musicians by singing it to them or repeatedly demonstrating on the piano.

Steve Go1dberg (Steve Schneeberg), Thursday, 6 July 2006 01:49 (seventeen years ago) link

trees wins.

Marmot 4-Tay: forth-coming, my child. forth-coming most righteous champion (mar, Thursday, 6 July 2006 03:04 (seventeen years ago) link

marmot, this is not about winning. jeez!

trees (treesessplode), Thursday, 6 July 2006 03:15 (seventeen years ago) link

oops, my bad.

Marmot 4-Tay: forth-coming, my child. forth-coming most righteous champion (mar, Thursday, 6 July 2006 03:48 (seventeen years ago) link

two years pass...

the strokes should do some ken russell "lizstomania" style mozart biopic to really fuck with regina spektor.
this thread is balls

velko, Sunday, 27 July 2008 04:52 (fifteen years ago) link

Yes, I am indeed being patronizing and complaining about everyone's attitude, because I think people's attitudes in here are stupid and sucky and bullshit.

-- nabisco (nabisco), Saturday, July 1, 2006 7:48 PM (2 years ago) Bookmark Link

lol i love this fucken post

when nabisco stops bein polite and starts gettin REAL~

cankles, Sunday, 27 July 2008 08:03 (fifteen years ago) link

is that guy an aspie? who makes numbered lists?

bug, Sunday, 27 July 2008 09:59 (fifteen years ago) link

ha nabisco got really mad on this thread!

max, Sunday, 27 July 2008 14:04 (fifteen years ago) link

two years pass...

Apparently this thread inspired Owen P.'s cover of "Hard to Explain" for Stereogum.

jaymc, Tuesday, 26 July 2011 17:01 (twelve years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.