― slow jamz and white guy indie acoustic shit (Chris V), Friday, 7 April 2006 23:15 (7 years ago) Permalink
― cutty (mcutt), Friday, 7 April 2006 23:18 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 7 April 2006 23:19 (7 years ago) Permalink
― cutty (mcutt), Friday, 7 April 2006 23:20 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 7 April 2006 23:20 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 7 April 2006 23:22 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Roy Kasten (Roy Kasten), Friday, 7 April 2006 23:25 (7 years ago) Permalink
― cutty (mcutt), Friday, 7 April 2006 23:37 (7 years ago) Permalink
― earinfections (Nick Twisp), Friday, 7 April 2006 23:53 (7 years ago) Permalink
― brokenfuses (brokenfuses), Saturday, 8 April 2006 01:09 (7 years ago) Permalink
Good, not great. The real gem: "Our Swords".
― Simon H. (Simon H.), Saturday, 8 April 2006 01:20 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Sean Braudis (Sean Braudis), Saturday, 8 April 2006 18:27 (7 years ago) Permalink
― bobby.lasers (bobby.lasers), Saturday, 8 April 2006 18:40 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Brooker Buckingham (Brooker B), Saturday, 8 April 2006 19:30 (7 years ago) Permalink
― nancyboy (nancyboy), Saturday, 8 April 2006 22:41 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 9 April 2006 05:37 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Clipper (D.J.), Sunday, 9 April 2006 20:11 (7 years ago) Permalink
I'm a little disappointed by the album's overwhelming sense of samey-ness. However "Funeral" is one of the year's better singles thusfar, one of the few things so far this year that, if it didn't knock my socks off, definitely opened the velcro closures on my Keds and gave me a hard shove to the solar plexus.
― M. Biondi (M. Biondi), Sunday, 9 April 2006 21:05 (7 years ago) Permalink
― Dan Floss (Dan Floss), Sunday, 9 April 2006 21:12 (7 years ago) Permalink
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Sunday, 9 April 2006 21:20 (7 years ago) Permalink
― slow jamz and white guy indie acoustic shit (Chris V), Wednesday, 26 April 2006 23:14 (7 years ago) Permalink
Funeral song reminds me a lot of Red House Painters. in general their sounds comes from 10 yrs ago it seems.
― SusanD, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 06:34 (5 years ago) Permalink
woops- their sound
― SusanD, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 06:36 (5 years ago) Permalink
i think i only like the voice. atleast in funeral they use every instrument as a drum? and just bang-away weird controlled melodrama.
― SusanD, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 07:53 (5 years ago) Permalink
"The Funeral's" a great single, but you know it sounds really sounds like?
U2
At least Ned's consistent :-)
― rogermexico., Tuesday, 29 May 2007 16:51 (5 years ago) Permalink
also, is it ok to sound like perry farrell in 2007? i think so.
― SusanD, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:02 (5 years ago) Permalink
i tried to listen to this again the other day and i still can't stand it.
― poortheatre, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:06 (5 years ago) Permalink
They have a new single, "Is There a Ghost." I was surprised by how bad it is. But my opinion of the first album has fallen, as well. I think the only really good thing about it is the sound, as in the production, and the timbre of everything. It's a pleasant sound, but none of the songs are great. But this new one sounds totally substanceless.
― St3ve Go1db3rg, Thursday, 30 August 2007 15:42 (5 years ago) Permalink
I couldn't even get halfway through it. And I liked the first album.
― kornrulez6969, Thursday, 30 August 2007 15:52 (5 years ago) Permalink
WRONG ST3VE GOLDB3RG! If you like Amelie and Dave Matthews, then you will LOVE "Is There a Ghost?" It's on some pre-Swayze, Britpop obsession with Kangols shit, but it's Juan Glaze fho sho. Maybe you should take a tip from the king Eddie Winslow and lock yourself in a screening room for an entire year drinking your own urine. That'll teach you to respect the spirit of Bridwell (I bet you probably have a poster of Seth Green on your wall, but that's neither here nor there...)
― TynanTynan, Thursday, 30 August 2007 16:04 (5 years ago) Permalink
Saw these guys again last week.
Uniformly brilliant when playing album tracks, but the set sagged big time half-way through when they launched into their "new stuff" and promptly turned into CSN&Y. 'Alt-country' without the 'alt', unfortunately.
― SeekAltRoute, Wednesday, 6 August 2008 06:00 (4 years ago) Permalink
So this is the band that whenever I hear them makes me think of a harder-rocking Shins.
― Cunga, Thursday, 12 November 2009 05:17 (3 years ago) Permalink
It's the guys voice - but it's weird that Coyne and Farrel seem equally appropriate as comparisons
― Cunga, Thursday, 12 November 2009 05:20 (3 years ago) Permalink
it's all about "st. augustine"
― k3vin k., Thursday, 12 November 2009 05:23 (3 years ago) Permalink
i love this album
BOH fans should check for the new band signed to sub pop called Avi Buffalo
― see-those-tit-ies (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 12 November 2009 05:29 (3 years ago) Permalink
The name always make me think of banda horses, which brings up this:
― _Rudipherous_, Thursday, 12 November 2009 05:32 (3 years ago) Permalink
Infinite Arms is the upcoming third album of band Band of Horses, set to be released on May 18, 2010 on Brown Records, Fat Possum Records and Columbia.
1. Factory2. Compliments3. Laredo4. Blue Beard5. On My Way Back Home6. Infinite Arms7. Dilly8. Evening Kitchen9. Older10. For Annabelle11. NW Apt.12. Neighbor
― Bee OK, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 05:47 (3 years ago) Permalink
leaked, will listen one of these days, likely when it's hot as shit out
― nabisco infiltrator (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 05:48 (3 years ago) Permalink
I like "Compliments" more than I expected.
― Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 00:43 (3 years ago) Permalink
it's streaming this week. not many hooks, but i like that reverb-y southern gothic vibe with layered vocals drenched in echo. i've never paid attention to this band before. this disc reminds me of my-morning-jacket from a few years ago (with fewer hooks, and maybe weaker melodies . . . but still pretty good!).
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 13 May 2010 18:40 (3 years ago) Permalink
all you need is Z imo
― my baby's got the bans (ksh), Thursday, 13 May 2010 18:41 (3 years ago) Permalink
i like the discs before and (to a lesser extent) after Z, too.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 13 May 2010 18:44 (3 years ago) Permalink
which are your favorites, Daniel? i strongly disliked Evil Urges, and only listened to part of the one w/ "One Big Holiday" on it iirc
― my baby's got the bans (ksh), Thursday, 13 May 2010 18:47 (3 years ago) Permalink
z or it still moves are my favorites.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 13 May 2010 19:52 (3 years ago) Permalink
awesome
― my baby's got the bans (ksh), Thursday, 13 May 2010 19:52 (3 years ago) Permalink
they perfected that reverb-y vibe on it still moves, but the melodies are stronger and there's much more inventiveness on z so it's hard to choose.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 13 May 2010 19:54 (3 years ago) Permalink
yeah, i haven't listened to much of It Still Moves, but I love Z
― my baby's got the bans (ksh), Thursday, 13 May 2010 19:55 (3 years ago) Permalink
try golden.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 13 May 2010 19:58 (3 years ago) Permalink
thanks Daniel -- good song
― my baby's got the bans (ksh), Thursday, 13 May 2010 21:39 (3 years ago) Permalink
i'm crushing on this album more-and-more.
i'm a pescetarian, but in music, sometimes i need meat-and-potatoes. and this is it: big, sweeping choruses with echo reverberating off the vocals and through the woods, a sound big enough to fill a stadium, and a southern-vibe that reminds me of a dozen bands from the seventies -- eighties. i love this, and i've had absolutely no interest whatsoever in this band up to now.
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 18 May 2010 20:47 (3 years ago) Permalink
Okay, so the Pitchfork review is pretty dead on and this newest album is mostly terrible. HOWEVER, the bonus disc of the Sonic Ranch Sessions EP is really pretty good. Each of the five tracks on that are easily better than 85% of the album proper and I'm stunned that none of them were included on the album proper. I'm not sure if this was a label decision or what, but it was a head-smackingly dumb decision.
― heated debate over derpy hooves (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 25 September 2012 03:13 (7 months ago) Permalink