brits: explain arctic monkeys

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
apparently the new record is the fastest-selling album in UK chart history, and may actually sell out because not enough copies were shipped to stores (paraphrasing Billboard here).

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Friday, 27 January 2006 14:57 (twenty years ago)

is this a surprise to you folks or is there some kind of arctic monkey-mania going on that none of us outside of the UK knew about?

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Friday, 27 January 2006 14:58 (twenty years ago)

not a brit, but my boss wrote something about this the other day that might help you

marc h. (marc h.), Friday, 27 January 2006 15:01 (twenty years ago)

we liked George Formby; we like them.

leeroy, Friday, 27 January 2006 15:02 (twenty years ago)

I don't like them. Or George Formby. It makes no sense to me.

Zora (Zora), Friday, 27 January 2006 15:03 (twenty years ago)

there is a dreadful thread somewhere where some people try to claim that the arctic twats are good :(

The Lex (The Lex), Friday, 27 January 2006 15:03 (twenty years ago)

In a radical departure for bands, they used something called "the Internet" to market themselves, apparently.

Neil Stewart (Neil Stewart), Friday, 27 January 2006 15:06 (twenty years ago)

Rock music is popular in the UK. The end.

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Friday, 27 January 2006 15:06 (twenty years ago)

Steve the shorthand for that is "people are stupid in the UK"

The Lex (The Lex), Friday, 27 January 2006 15:07 (twenty years ago)

This does sound like a phenomenon from over here in the colonies. I don't think we really 'got' Oasis either.

mcd (mcd), Friday, 27 January 2006 15:07 (twenty years ago)

We *are* explaining, or at least debating, them here...

OK, so who amongst us is popping out lunchtime to buy the Arctic Monkeys album?

mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 27 January 2006 15:07 (twenty years ago)

This does sound like a phenomenon from over here in the colonies. I don't think we really 'got' Oasis either.

-- mcd

You lucky lucky people.

fandango (fandango), Friday, 27 January 2006 15:08 (twenty years ago)

yeah we had our own completely horrible shit without needing any of yours, thank you very much. that said, morning glory was pretty damn successful over here.

ZR (teenagequiet), Friday, 27 January 2006 15:10 (twenty years ago)

yeah, oasis did pretty well for awhile over here (maybe moreso here in canada than in the states)

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Friday, 27 January 2006 15:11 (twenty years ago)

brits in liking moronic derivative rock shockah

lupine luck, Friday, 27 January 2006 15:14 (twenty years ago)

not a suprise. they're cool as and they clearly offer something people need - all the usual stuff - but they do it better than everyone else.

also, significantly, they follow in a great tradition of british working class 'realism' (cf. loneliness of a long distance runner/coronation street/alan bennet/the clash), parochial in nature, alien to outsiders.

absent, Friday, 27 January 2006 15:15 (twenty years ago)

that sounds good!

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Friday, 27 January 2006 15:16 (twenty years ago)

It's a surprisingly decent record. Has absolutely no right to be all told, and it's quite a wrench to admit it, but I've been enjoying it a lot.

What it says about music in the UK in a wider sense.... *shrugs*

fandango (fandango), Friday, 27 January 2006 15:17 (twenty years ago)

well i'm sure it says nothing musically. its the lyrics, attitude, uh...aesthetics and community side of it all that people give a shit about.

absent, Friday, 27 January 2006 15:25 (twenty years ago)

brits in liking moronic derivative rock shockah

america gave us good charlotte.

The Lex (The Lex), Friday, 27 January 2006 15:25 (twenty years ago)

I can't think of another band who have been so written about and overanalysed, with so little discussion of their actual *music*, although The Libertines would run them close. Based on listening to the album once about six weeks ago, I find this especially annoying. I don't find anything interesting in their lyrics (the problem with "real life" being that it's frequently fucking boring), but I don't agree that it sounds like the generic UK mook-indie that it's been claimed as. I didn't especially like it, you understand, but if they were from Detroit and on In The Red Records or something I strongly doubt they'd provoke such opprobrium from people round here, should they happen to hear them

DJ Mencap (DJ Mencap), Friday, 27 January 2006 15:27 (twenty years ago)

Don't get me wrong, I kinda like AM.

I thought Robbie Williams was pretty cute when he tried to "break" over here. We didn't get him either.

mcd (mcd), Friday, 27 January 2006 15:28 (twenty years ago)

We got Led Zeppelin.

mcd (mcd), Friday, 27 January 2006 15:28 (twenty years ago)

america gave us good charlotte.

Innit, there can barely be a country on the planet where boring rock music isn't wildly popular

DJ Mencap (DJ Mencap), Friday, 27 January 2006 15:29 (twenty years ago)

wow, do they actually sound like they could be from detroit and on in the red?

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Friday, 27 January 2006 15:31 (twenty years ago)

Arctic Monkeys would have to write tossy stadium rock anthems ala Wonderwall and Don't Look Back In Anger if they were to make an impact on American mainstream audience. Can't see this happening.


How many albums do The White Stripes, The Strokes or The Yeah Yeah Yeahs actually sell in their homeland?

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Friday, 27 January 2006 15:34 (twenty years ago)

Fritz, the Arctic Monkeys' success has even been getting the Financial Times newspaper (UK equiv. of Wall Street Journal) all excited this week.

You might want to look at some of these articles for basic "explanations" of the phenomenon:
http://search.ft.com/search/totalSearch_Form.html?vsc_appId=ts&symb=&ftsite=FTCOM&searchtype=equity&vsc_query=arctic+monkeys&searchOption=news&x=18&y=10

(although you'll need to subscribe to read)

zebedee (zebedee), Friday, 27 January 2006 15:46 (twenty years ago)

wow, do they actually sound like they could be from detroit and on in the red?

Maybe one of the more poppy things. I know this is kind of your area so I'm quite worried about the result being something of a letdown, but that was the thing that stuck with me after I'd passed the CD on to someone else

DJ Mencap (DJ Mencap), Friday, 27 January 2006 15:48 (twenty years ago)

i think a decent comparison would be the buzzcocks. they certainly both plow the same furrows and furrow the same brows. the monkeys are more knowing and the 'cocks have better tunes but both are as opportunistic as the other.

absent, Friday, 27 January 2006 15:49 (twenty years ago)

Doesn't sound like anything on In the Red IMHO. I mean, there was a song I listened to yesterday where they talk about ringtones and such.

mcd (mcd), Friday, 27 January 2006 15:52 (twenty years ago)

Mmm monkey cocks.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 27 January 2006 15:52 (twenty years ago)

'opportunistic'? I can think of several sticks to beat both bands with but that wouldn't have been the first one that came to mind

zebedee (zebedee), Friday, 27 January 2006 15:52 (twenty years ago)

i don't use that word as a negative. taking your opportunities is important. success, ie:getting heard/bought (a good thing!,) is as much about making the right decisions at the right time as actually being much cop.

absent, Friday, 27 January 2006 16:01 (twenty years ago)

I mean, there was a song I listened to yesterday where they talk about ringtones and such.

I meant the music, obviously the lyrics and identity are very specifically from northern England. Whether people, especially Americans, can get past that is another matter

DJ Mencap (DJ Mencap), Friday, 27 January 2006 16:03 (twenty years ago)

btw : every main street shop i have frequented this week is chocka with copies .. no sign of them all selling out in bristol ..

mark e (mark e), Friday, 27 January 2006 16:07 (twenty years ago)

british working class 'realism' (cf. loneliness of a long distance runner/coronation street/alan bennet/the clash)

Working class? Alan Bennett? Joe Strummer?

Dittoismus (Dada), Friday, 27 January 2006 16:09 (twenty years ago)

You know I don't even know why we have to explain them. They exist - quite a few people like them (including me) - if you don't like them - well never mind and listen to something else. Slagging Brits off for something that some people don't like elsewhere in the world is old. I seem to remember the same thing with The Smiths.

The hype is irritating but just 'cos something is hyped doesn't mean it's no good.

Incidentally, I've said this before but - if they remind me of anyone stateside, it's Kings of Leon. Esp. the accents obviously. And they are nothing remotely like Oasis. Thank fck.

Ned T.Rifle (nedtrifle), Friday, 27 January 2006 16:11 (twenty years ago)

It's a great record, spunky tunes, wry funny lyrics which are actually worth listening to. Bombs along by virtue of it's own confidence when the tunes lapse a bit. Not as some may say a 10/10 album but a fine debut. Why it's selling so fast, I haven't a clue.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Friday, 27 January 2006 16:15 (twenty years ago)

pretensions to working class then.

no-one's been working class since 1945 anyways.

absent, Friday, 27 January 2006 16:15 (twenty years ago)

no-one's been working class since 1945 anyways.

Bollocks

Dittoismus (Dada), Friday, 27 January 2006 16:20 (twenty years ago)

... as Johnny "Middle Class" Rotten might have put it

Dittoismus (Dada), Friday, 27 January 2006 16:21 (twenty years ago)

haha.

welfare state yo.

absent, Friday, 27 January 2006 16:22 (twenty years ago)

when girls aloud display working class signifiers, people make snide remarks about them being classless chavs from hotspots of teenage pregnancy
when arctic monkeys do it it's 'gritty realism'???

The Lex (The Lex), Friday, 27 January 2006 16:23 (twenty years ago)

... ha ha, yer right, remember what they used to say about Atomic Kitten? Maybe it's just women indie kids hate

Dittoismus (Dada), Friday, 27 January 2006 16:26 (twenty years ago)

"maybe"

The Lex (The Lex), Friday, 27 January 2006 16:29 (twenty years ago)

I don't understand where these working class signifiers come in anyway. Last I checked, downloading ringtones and going to crappy nightclubs and arguing with one's girlfriend are not exclusively proletarian activities

DJ Mencap (DJ Mencap), Friday, 27 January 2006 16:30 (twenty years ago)

yeh but with GA there is a presumption that the signifiers are unmediated, uncriticised... authentic maybe. whereas the AM types but also Sway or Dizzee are supposedly offering comment on these situations... Girls Aloud don't write there own songs see ha ha aha

pscott (elwisty), Friday, 27 January 2006 16:30 (twenty years ago)

maybe its different people making those comments, lex-genius.

hey dumbo, Friday, 27 January 2006 16:30 (twenty years ago)

Slagging Brits off for something that some people don't like elsewhere in the world is old

that wasn't my intention at all! i'm just curious.

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Friday, 27 January 2006 16:32 (twenty years ago)

That's interesting because that seems to me like maybe a real VU-inspired idea (always figured this is what people were really getting at by comparing The Strokes to them, littleto do with actual sound or origin). And this would be the only way for the VU to really manifest influence in crossover British indie-rock it seems.

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Monday, 20 February 2006 17:07 (twenty years ago)

but if there really are no cycles, do trends/styles/ideas only get revived once? or if they get revived more than once it's pure coincidence?

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Monday, 20 February 2006 17:07 (twenty years ago)

I'd say the fact that their internet origins contribute to their veneer of realness makes them a key point in the development of the internet / music / development nexus thing.

Something being revived more than once does not equal a cycle, because things are never revived in exactly the same way - cross-pollination due to history prevents that.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Monday, 20 February 2006 17:12 (twenty years ago)

I don't really see the Arctic Monkeys as a revival myself. If you ever listened to Steve Lamacq, you know that shite indie-rock never really went away, did it? They're just the latest Scarfo aren't they? Maybe there's a revived *interest* in that sort of thing, but I think that's just a whole generation of kids thinking they've discovered something new-and-not-actually-done-to-death, other older folks drifting along on the hype, and older folks still hearing something that maybe reminds them of when they used to be passionate about music.

NickB (NickB), Monday, 20 February 2006 17:24 (twenty years ago)

realnezzz is a BANE. in both rock and hip-hop.

Internet now and for a while been perceived as instrumental in breaking bands. It seems to get tacked on to AM press just to strengthen the story, creating a mythology of sorts. The only difference I can see is that somehow the scale of it was a new high (rather than a new thing in itself). If that's deemed noteworthy on it's own terms then fair enough but really it's just a statistic.

Cross-pollination doesn't always come through in either the music or messages though. It's not coming through enough in what I've heard of the AMs whereas I think it seems more evident in the sound of FF or Kaisers.

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Monday, 20 February 2006 17:32 (twenty years ago)

The Arctic Monkeys remind me of (how I think I remember) These Animal Men! Hahahahahaha.

Jamie T Smith (Jamie T Smith), Monday, 20 February 2006 18:14 (twenty years ago)

weird, I made same comparison on another thread.

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Monday, 20 February 2006 18:29 (twenty years ago)

Do you think the AMs popularity may be, in part, due to the fact that they're the first A-list indie band for a long time (ever?) with no noticeable Beatles influence?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 20 February 2006 21:19 (twenty years ago)

No noticable Beatles influence yet.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Monday, 20 February 2006 22:10 (twenty years ago)

Does anyone else think the closer approximation to Franz career could be Suede? With them just releasing albums to more and more indifference until they call it a day and people didn't even realise they were still going. I don't know what happened with that second Franz album, I can't see a reason why it wasn't lapped up as much as the first one on the strength of one single. It's unlikely to reach the top ten again without a very well timed tour/single. Festivals are too far from the albums release.

I think a lot of the people buying the AM's record aren't just in the 15-21 bracket, that explains the two #1 singles. I think that as it's a relatively quiet since the Franz album for releases of that ilk (Just The Strokes and Ashcroft.) Throw in lack of large rock act having a greatest hits over christmas. (Take That, The Progidy, Destiny's Child and Supertramp probably didn;t end up in too many Dad's stockings) I think it's safe to say that a lot of Coldplay, Stereophonics and Oasis fans are buying this record too.

I also guess that Editors slow burn chart success is due to good singles selction at the right time. Bullets was top of the MTV2/NME chart for a long time and re-releasing 'Munich' and knocking a couple of quid from the price has done them wonders. It had still sold 200,000 by October at any rate (When I read that I assumed it was an extra zero.) Does this explain Hard-Fi and Kasiers as well (Kaisers never got above #3 but was only outsold by Blunt and Coldplay.)

Is that all it takes to be a success now? An album with three catchy singles one you can re-release a year after and you quietly shift 5,000 records a week for 8 months. I guess even Funeral fits under that catergory (I think it charted at #47 and then on the back of Neighbourhood #3, Rebelion (Lies) and Wake Up it re-entered the top 50 but not the top 40 until it got so many EOY plaudits.)

MitchellStirling (MitchellStirling), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 01:11 (twenty years ago)

http://www.nme.com/news/arctic-monkeys/22375

OK, explanations over. Now it's the yanks' go.

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 2 March 2006 11:54 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, I was gonna mention this. Number 24 at the end of its first week. Is that what was expected? It actually seemed a little lower than I thought it might be - just because the UK story has also received quite a bit of coverage in the media here (New York, at least). It's also selling at Tower for $10, and Virgin for $12 I think, which is pretty cheap. In terms of "explaining" it from here, I would suppose it's the combined result of a media story, a global international youth with web access, Anglophiles, and prominent placement / cheap price.

paulhw (paulhw), Sunday, 5 March 2006 23:07 (twenty years ago)

Well, Robbie Williams had all that (didn't he?) and still managed to get nowt.

Put it this way: I'm still playing it, the best track seems to be the one tacked on at the end at the last minute, What's not to like?

mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 6 March 2006 09:25 (twenty years ago)

the hype

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Monday, 6 March 2006 11:07 (twenty years ago)

OK, apart from that?

mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 6 March 2006 11:15 (twenty years ago)

the title and cover

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Monday, 6 March 2006 11:17 (twenty years ago)

i've come around re. the cover.

The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Monday, 6 March 2006 11:18 (twenty years ago)

two weeks pass...
From NME:

Noel Gallagher compares Arctic Monkeys to Oasis
The Oasis star speaks out

Noel Gallagher has stuck up for Arctic Monkeys following Morrissey's comments that success has come to fast for the band.

The Oasis guitarist spoke just hours before the Monkeys opened for the band at the Toronto Air Canada Centre (March 20).

"It happens when it happens, man, and I would say thank God that it does happen," he said. "You'd be a bit of an idiot if you said, 'No, I'm too young for a record deal.'"

He also explained that Arctic Monkeys' success reminded him of Oasis' career, telling the local Toronto Sun newspaper: "We used to sit and read things about us and think, 'Are they talking about the same band?' Cause we've sold a few records but we've not sold that many records, and we're not that popular.'"

He added: "But I would embrace success when it happens. Any level of it. Just fucking get on with it. If the music didn't stand up... but you've only got to listen to (their) tunes. They're unique to themselves. And they've got their own thing and I think it's great. It doesn't sound like anybody else and I like the way that they don't wear shirts and ties and blazers... These kids seem to be pretty much like us. They kind of look like we do."

Morrissey slammed Arctic Monkeys earlier in the week, saying: ""It's happening all too quickly for them. They haven't proved a thing and they haven't had to work very hard - that must make them insecure. It's all a bit unnatural. OK they've sold about 700,000 albums, but it can't be gratifying. They haven't been driving up and down the M1 for fifteen years."

Gallagher however has praised the band's lyrics saying: "I think with the Arctic Monkeys, a lot of it is about the world play. 'Cause they are quite stunning lyrics, to be honest. The thing about the words, it's alright if you understand them."

He continued: "But I'm sure that the Arctic Monkeys couldn't really give a monkey's - whether it translates to people in China or not. They're just doing their thing. And when this kind of thing happens in the first two years, people will dislike the Arctic Monkeys purely for all the hype that surrounds them but that's got nothing' to do with them.

"They're probably as embarrassed by it as people who don't like them, 'They don't fucking deserve it.' They're probably as upset about it as Morrissey is, but there's nothing they can do about it. You've just got to fucking get out there man and ride it out."

BeeOK (boo radley), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 12:32 (twenty years ago)

"They haven't been driving up and down the M1 for fifteen years."

eh?

Real Goths Don't Wear Black (Enrique), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 12:54 (twenty years ago)

That's what Mozza did from 1969 until 1984 when their debut album charted at #2.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 12:56 (twenty years ago)

oic

Real Goths Don't Wear Black (Enrique), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 12:58 (twenty years ago)

He was working for Eddie Stobart at the time

Dadaismus, the Male Poster (Dada), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 12:59 (twenty years ago)

and I like the way that they don't wear shirts and ties and blazers... These kids seem to be pretty much like us. They kind of look like we do.

I HATE EVERYTHING THAT ISN'T ME

Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 13:02 (twenty years ago)

http://www2.freefoto.com//images_d/21/47/21_47_29_web.jpg?&k=Eddie+Stobart+Truck

Dadaismus, the Male Poster (Dada), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 13:03 (twenty years ago)

That's what Mozza did from 1969 until 1984 when their debut album charted at #2.

-- Onimo

OTM, that is what I was thinking.

BeeOK (boo radley), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 13:13 (twenty years ago)

Jools Holland is, like, head of the Eddie Spotters or something.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 15:10 (twenty years ago)

yanks: no

Bush's Brain Escapes Justice, Tuesday, 21 March 2006 15:22 (twenty years ago)

Mozzer admits to talking out of his arse...

Morrissey has apologised to the Arctic Monkeys if his recent comments about them caused offence.

The singer was quoted criticising the band's rapid success while at the South By South West festival last week (March 16), suggesting it was too soon and "a bit unnatural".

However Morrissey has issued a further statement to NME.COM, explaining he was not criticising the Sheffield newcomers.

"I'm sorry that the comments I made at SouthBySouthWest about the Arctic Monkeys were printed so harshly in The Times and the NME," states Morrissey.

"I actually quite like the Arctic Monkeys and whatever I said was said with tender, avuncular concern. I hope to God I didn't upset their grannies," he added.

"In any case, I was wrong about their success being too sudden and without any dues paid, because that's exactly how it happened for The Smiths. So, I really should shut it."

mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 14:06 (twenty years ago)

oasis, arctic monkeys, the smiths - maybe the three worst bands EVER?

The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 14:10 (twenty years ago)

I'm with you on the first...

file under cozy techno (fandango), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 14:22 (twenty years ago)

Alex "Lex" MacPherson- do you yet have opinions on WigWam or Lily Allen?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 14:24 (twenty years ago)

Over here in Australia all we get is American rubbish, 50 Cent!!!! What the fook is he on about??? The most boring, crappy music ever!!

Thank god we occasionaly get some decent stuff from the UK!!!!

Alby Mangles, Thursday, 30 March 2006 09:06 (twenty years ago)

wigwam - boring indie, in all the excitement over betty boo people overlooked that the other person involved was someone from blur
lily allen - who?
50 cent - i luv him

The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 30 March 2006 09:16 (twenty years ago)

can you explain 50 cent?

RJG (RJG), Thursday, 30 March 2006 09:26 (twenty years ago)

people like him because he releases really good singles?

The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 30 March 2006 09:34 (twenty years ago)

Wigwam is a good single. as is 'IBYLGOTD'. 50 Cent had a COUPLE of good singles. ph3ar my pan-partiality!

Konal Doddz (blueski), Thursday, 30 March 2006 10:08 (twenty years ago)

you're talking about music

crosspost

RJG (RJG), Thursday, 30 March 2006 10:08 (twenty years ago)

he's also quite buff!

50 cent singles which are not just good but GREAT: wanksta, in da club, candy shop, outta control, just a lil bit, plus he's on lil kim's magic stick, and g-unit's poppin' them thangs.

The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 30 March 2006 10:16 (twenty years ago)

ahem "Hate It Or Love It"

Robocock (noodle vague), Thursday, 30 March 2006 11:22 (twenty years ago)

oh yeah, that one's good. not GREAT though.

The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 30 March 2006 11:37 (twenty years ago)

It's why-do-birds-suddenly-appear GRRRRRREAT!

Robocock (noodle vague), Thursday, 30 March 2006 11:43 (twenty years ago)

Artic Monkeys' Riot Van vs. The Walkmen's We've Been Had -- FITE!

nancyboy (nancyboy), Thursday, 30 March 2006 12:31 (twenty years ago)

"oasis, arctic monkeys, the smiths - maybe the three worst bands EVER?"

SO OTM it draws blood from a stone!!!
if you added the Cure or Depeche Mode you'd destroy reality with yr correctness...

eedd, Thursday, 30 March 2006 20:28 (twenty years ago)

he's also quite buff!

I believe the correct term is "rather ripped."

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Thursday, 30 March 2006 21:22 (twenty years ago)

seven years pass...

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/mar/04/british-teenager-michael-piggin-planned-new-columbine-massacre

eardrum buzz aldrin (NickB), Tuesday, 4 March 2014 17:47 (twelve years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ADwLN586vw

I never did nothing to no curry (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 4 March 2014 17:50 (twelve years ago)

Obviously he wasn't planning on assassinating rock'n'roll, then.

Toni Braxton-Hicks (Turrican), Tuesday, 4 March 2014 18:23 (twelve years ago)

band this terrorist music now!

jamiesummerz, Wednesday, 5 March 2014 14:28 (twelve years ago)

ban.
ban.

jamiesummerz, Wednesday, 5 March 2014 14:28 (twelve years ago)

I think that song on the radio sounds like the Carpenter score to "Escape from New York:"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpOSxM0rNPM&feature=kp

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OnM2v2DnBo&list=PL5xYrQPWgYDgvJC2YIq0i6n_re2FE9U4G

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 5 March 2014 14:33 (twelve years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.