― N., Saturday, 23 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Andy K, Saturday, 23 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― DJ Martian, Saturday, 23 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― ethan, Saturday, 23 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
1) It's not completely a Mary Margaret O'Hara album, because there are a couple of tracks by other people (it's a soundtrack album after all). That said, it's close enough...13 of 14 tracks are her. 2) Initial reaction: it's not as deep as Miss America. Mind you, I've only listened through a couple of times. It's very jazzy and slight in places, which is probably in keeping with the plot of the movie, in which she stars as a homeless woman who sings, from what I understand. Could be wrong, though. 3) Still, that VOICE. Even when the music seems far more slight than we remember from her, that voice is the important part. There are parts that are sweetly pretty, but in other places she sounds like she's undergoing an exorcism. Which is pretty much like Miss America. 4) I keep saying "slight", and the main reason is probably because the band is pared down a lot. Miss America had a lot of people on it, but this one is trimmed down to a very small core of performers, including Rusty McCarthy on guitars and Mike Sloski on drums, with a few others guesting on various tracks. So the sound is still recognizably her, even if it isn't as expansive.
5) As a soundtrack, it's more of a collection of songs than a coherent statement. Some of those songs are DAMN GOOD but it just can't hold together as well as Miss America did. Bottom line: I think this one is going to be a hell of an album once I let it set in, but don't get your hopes up TOO high, because it's not really the album we've been waiting for. It's probably as close as we're going to get for a while, though.
― Sean Carruthers, Saturday, 23 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
Considering it's been, what, 14 years or so since the last one, I suspect most will not quibble. ;-)
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 23 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Michael Jones, Saturday, 23 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
http://www.chartattack.com/gallery/
― cybele, Saturday, 23 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Dr. C, Sunday, 24 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― alex in mainhattan, Sunday, 24 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
Why?
**From Joni Mitchell to Mary Margaret O'Hara it is not such a long way**
They happen to be female Canadian singer-songwriters, I'll concede that, but they have as much in common in my musical world as Bach and Britney.
― Edna Welthorpe, Mrs, Monday, 25 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
Why? It's just so *confessional* in a hippy-ish kinda way. It conjours up images of long-skirted,lank haired girls and goofy bearded blokes passing joints and *getting in touch with one another's feelings* in a meadow somewhere. Perhaps at a festival, or in a commune. Maybe a small group of naked children frolic nearby.
Soon, this is supplanted in my imagination by an alternative vision - me stomping on their campfire and snapping the necks of their acoustic guitars. Offensive and irrational - quite probably, but it's a strong enough reaction to be counted as a damn good reason to avoid frequent exposure to the works of Mitchell.
― Dr. C, Monday, 25 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― alex in mainhattan, Monday, 25 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
As a yout' it always struck me that 'authority' would be happier to have me sitting around in a field too fried to move, rather than getting right in their face.
*Punk later on somehow was too vulgar and banal for me at the time*
I have vulgar and banal tendencies, it's true.
― fields of salmon, Monday, 25 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Sean Carruthers, Monday, 25 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 25 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Michael Jones, Monday, 4 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― N., Wednesday, 6 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Friday, 1 August 2003 14:26 (twenty years ago) link
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 1 August 2003 14:30 (twenty years ago) link
― Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Friday, 1 August 2003 16:44 (twenty years ago) link
― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Friday, 1 August 2003 16:47 (twenty years ago) link
― cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 23:11 (twenty years ago) link
― youn, Thursday, 18 December 2003 03:07 (twenty years ago) link
― jed (jed_e_3), Thursday, 18 December 2003 04:22 (twenty years ago) link
I always wished that the mention of Michael Brooks' "infinite guitar" playing in the liner notes was more audible on the album.
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 18 December 2003 04:36 (twenty years ago) link
― Skinny, Thursday, 18 December 2003 14:22 (twenty years ago) link
― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Thursday, 18 December 2003 14:49 (twenty years ago) link
― jed (jed_e_3), Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:05 (twenty years ago) link
Sean's review (six posts into the thread) sums it up. Although at moments I think I prefer the 'slight' instrumentation to Brook's polish. Also, doing a soundtrack allowed her to do some fragmentary pieces that wouldn't have fit within an all-song album; she gets even further out. So it's a casual affair overall, but every second she's singing, you don't care, she sounds incredible, better than ever.
It's great, it starts out as something you could play for your Julie Christy / Nat King Cole lovin' parents, but seconds into track 2 the demons show up, and want out.
Playing 'Chez Le Nez Suite' again now, she is going off on something and we'll never know what
― (Jon L), Saturday, 20 December 2003 06:49 (twenty years ago) link