― Jay Watts III (jaywatts), Monday, 30 May 2005 00:15 (eighteen years ago) link
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 30 May 2005 00:20 (eighteen years ago) link
― Jay Watts III (jaywatts), Monday, 30 May 2005 00:22 (eighteen years ago) link
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 30 May 2005 00:23 (eighteen years ago) link
I believe the original owner responsible for it was John Cale, but I don't think it was his street sale.
― Jay Watts III (jaywatts), Monday, 30 May 2005 00:25 (eighteen years ago) link
― Tokyo Ghost Stories (Tokyo Ghost Stories), Monday, 30 May 2005 00:27 (eighteen years ago) link
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 30 May 2005 00:28 (eighteen years ago) link
― chris andrews (fraew), Monday, 30 May 2005 00:28 (eighteen years ago) link
(hopefully it's not like that first disc of the box set. no-one needs any more early versions of "all tomorrow's parties" ever again after that!)
― haitch (haitch), Monday, 30 May 2005 00:30 (eighteen years ago) link
― Jay Watts III (jaywatts), Monday, 30 May 2005 00:33 (eighteen years ago) link
― mullygrubbr (bulbs), Monday, 30 May 2005 00:34 (eighteen years ago) link
― Jay Watts III (jaywatts), Monday, 30 May 2005 00:34 (eighteen years ago) link
― chris andrews (fraew), Monday, 30 May 2005 00:34 (eighteen years ago) link
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 30 May 2005 00:36 (eighteen years ago) link
― chris andrews (fraew), Monday, 30 May 2005 00:37 (eighteen years ago) link
― Jay Watts III (jaywatts), Monday, 30 May 2005 00:38 (eighteen years ago) link
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 30 May 2005 00:40 (eighteen years ago) link
― chris andrews (fraew), Monday, 30 May 2005 00:42 (eighteen years ago) link
― Jay Watts III (jaywatts), Monday, 30 May 2005 00:43 (eighteen years ago) link
He's in the background, plugging his ears.
― Jay Watts III (jaywatts), Monday, 30 May 2005 00:44 (eighteen years ago) link
― Amon (eman), Monday, 30 May 2005 00:52 (eighteen years ago) link
― Jay Watts III (jaywatts), Monday, 30 May 2005 00:53 (eighteen years ago) link
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 30 May 2005 00:54 (eighteen years ago) link
― chris andrews (fraew), Monday, 30 May 2005 00:55 (eighteen years ago) link
thx!
― Amon (eman), Monday, 30 May 2005 00:56 (eighteen years ago) link
― Amon (eman), Monday, 30 May 2005 00:57 (eighteen years ago) link
― haitch (haitch), Monday, 30 May 2005 01:05 (eighteen years ago) link
― nickn (nickn), Monday, 30 May 2005 04:04 (eighteen years ago) link
― sleeve (sleeve), Monday, 30 May 2005 04:11 (eighteen years ago) link
― Amon (eman), Monday, 30 May 2005 04:14 (eighteen years ago) link
― modern impatient music consumer (eman), Thursday, 14 July 2005 23:50 (eighteen years ago) link
― Gear! (Gear!), Thursday, 14 July 2005 23:51 (eighteen years ago) link
― jed_ (jed), Thursday, 14 July 2005 23:54 (eighteen years ago) link
― tylerw, Friday, 15 July 2005 00:22 (eighteen years ago) link
― Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 15 July 2005 01:56 (eighteen years ago) link
― That One Guy (That One Guy), Friday, 15 July 2005 02:14 (eighteen years ago) link
― Rickey Wright (Rrrickey), Friday, 15 July 2005 06:08 (eighteen years ago) link
― Rickey Wright (Rrrickey), Friday, 15 July 2005 06:09 (eighteen years ago) link
― mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 15 July 2005 07:32 (eighteen years ago) link
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 15 July 2005 12:49 (eighteen years ago) link
― mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 15 July 2005 12:53 (eighteen years ago) link
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 15 July 2005 13:14 (eighteen years ago) link
― mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 15 July 2005 13:18 (eighteen years ago) link
[NB: I haven't got / heard it, so don't blame me if it turns out to be a typo of "Flaming"].
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 15 July 2005 13:44 (eighteen years ago) link
― mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 15 July 2005 13:47 (eighteen years ago) link
You're missing out, seriously. The first disc is awesome. The two previously unreleased songs, "Wrap Your Troubles in Dreams" and especially "Prominent Men", are really good songs. And the strange, English-ballad version of "Venus in Furs" is also excellent. But I think the absolute best thing on it is the country-fried version "Waiting for the Man" which is described by David Fricke in the liner notes as sounding like Hank Williams trying to score a fix.
Seriously, it's a great fucking disc, not just a novelty thing. I highly suggest that all VU fans check it out, because it's awesome.
― Vestigial Appendages, Esq. (King Kobra), Friday, 15 July 2005 15:19 (eighteen years ago) link
(and I speak as one with that Stooges box)
Although the "THAT DOESN'T MEAN IT'S RIGHT!!!" from a teenage lou is classic...
― mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 15 July 2005 15:32 (eighteen years ago) link
Maybe-- but again, it collects the whole tape. To condense it would have been to release a disc that was contoured as a rarities album rather than a historical document, which I'm not sure does service to showing the songs' evolutions. The 'voyeurism' element is crucial to the success of the disc as well, where you can hear Lou yelling "fucking shit!" when he messes up. Unedited, it is particularly raw and unadulterated. While this does make it a historical document, it happens to have excellent versions of these songs on it. I'm not complaining. It's easy enough to skip tracks, or burn a new disc excising unwanted material.
― Vestigial Appendages, Esq. (King Kobra), Friday, 15 July 2005 15:44 (eighteen years ago) link
― sleeve (sleeve), Friday, 9 December 2005 03:02 (eighteen years ago) link
― PB, Tuesday, 3 January 2006 21:15 (eighteen years ago) link
As if I missed my chance: Jim Carrol saying, "what is that? a tuinal? Oh my god, I've gotta hide - look who's over there."
― D.I.Y. U.N.K.L.E. (dave225.3), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 02:50 (eighteen years ago) link
It's annoying not to be able to find the most recent thread about this when it was offered on ebay. I think Scott Seward started the thread, but even adding his name to the search didn't help me. I sure would like to be able to find that thread.
Anyway, I actually got round to listening to this the other night and it kindof put me in a trance, without being on any substances. Especially the Heroin version. Cause it's like...you're so used to these songs being done ONE way, and then you hear very subtly that you're not hearing the same old thing and it's kindof wild sometimes.
― Bimble, Sunday, 24 June 2007 07:46 (sixteen years ago) link
I think that other thread was on the sandbox?
― Edward III, Sunday, 24 June 2007 18:42 (sixteen years ago) link
Yeah, I think it all happened during the sandbox days.
― Johnny Fever, Sunday, 24 June 2007 19:34 (sixteen years ago) link
Oh so *that* explains it! Thanks! :)
― Bimble, Sunday, 24 June 2007 19:42 (sixteen years ago) link
relly good version fo sunday morning
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WI7x2LBDzlY
― Violet Jax (Violet Jynx), Thursday, 25 May 2017 18:59 (six years ago) link
https://www.post-gazette.com/ae/music/2022/11/09/warhol-museum-master-tracks-velvet-underground-debut/stories/202211090082
― sleeve, Friday, 11 November 2022 16:24 (one year ago) link
I saw that yesterday; it's pretty cool, but I'm unclear on the history of the masters for this album. These are mono masters, and seem to have some unreleased or unheard takes? Was there a stereo master for this album with the same material? Have there been any reissues of this album that claimed to be derived from the master tapes? Is this extra material really unheard?
― akm, Friday, 11 November 2022 16:35 (one year ago) link
I'm guessing the abysmal nerds of the Hoffman forums can answer this
aiui these are the Sceptre acetate recordings, but in master tape quality
― sleeve, Friday, 11 November 2022 16:37 (one year ago) link
not the ones in the link above: "The Andy Warhol Museum announced Wednesday that it had discovered and digitized rare master tapes of the Velvet Underground’s seminal 1967 debut album “The Velvet Underground & Nico” from Verve Records."
― akm, Friday, 11 November 2022 16:38 (one year ago) link
unless the reporting on this is a complete mess which I wouldn't be surprised to learn
― akm, Friday, 11 November 2022 16:39 (one year ago) link
it's the Scepter acetate — "Although an acetate version, which was made from these master tapes, was released for the 45th anniversary of the album, it is of a different sonic quality, given the generation loss inherent in an analog copy."
That said, some of the Scepter sessions on that 45th anniversary set are from a "tape source" so I don't know if this will be a marked improvement.
― tylerw, Friday, 11 November 2022 16:41 (one year ago) link