Say Something Interesting About The Beatles

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
A couple of times recently I've seen mention of ILM having some kind of Beatle-phobia. My personal theory on this is that while, yeah, collectively we like the Beatles less than any other message board I know of, the average poster here still likes them, or at least some of their music.

I think the problem is that nobody has anything to say about them - there's a kind of Beatle fatigue in music criticism, a difficulty in finding new angles, in saying things that don't just feel old before they've even left your brain.

So this is the thread where we work against that. Say something interesting about the Beatles or one of their records or songs, something people don't say all the time. A new angle, a personal story, a weird fact, a good joke, a fresh diss, a technical snippet, anything you like.

Tom, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Of course if not many people answer we can surmise there really IS nothing left to say about the Beatles and we can BANISH THEIR NAME FROM ILM FOREVER.

Tom, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

But conversely if lots of people DO answer and it works then we have a new and potentially very rewarding THREAD FORMAT.

Go Beatles Go! (I will think of my own interesting thing after a good night's sleep).

Tom, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I think I like The Beatles because they always have multiple minor key hooks in their songs.

Melissa W, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

i love most beatles covers even if i hate the original, like overton berry trio doing hey jude (or the choral version in royal tenenbaums!).

ethan, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

It's not that the songs aren't good (as a lot of Beatles covers are very enjoyable) I just can't get into the performances, their voices (ugh! except for George) and some of the production I find actually quite irritating.

electric sound of jim, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

i own plastic ono band and although i haven't listened to it in probably over six months i used to treasure it deeply. i love 'remember'.

ethan, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

i love most beatles covers even if i hate the original

Even the recent Eddie Vedder and Ben Harper covers of Beatles songs, Ethan?

Tadeusz Suchodolski, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

well i love most beatles covers that i actually hear. isn't that new retarded sean penn movie soundtrack all beatles covers? i bet that's really really bad. but still i think beatles covers are usually a good idea, if i were a musician i'd cover back in the ussr because that's the best song ever anyway.

ethan, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I would cover my head in a plastic bag before ever considering such a thing.

electric sound of jim, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

well, I've just been listening to Rubber Soul for the first time in years, and I like the stereo separation, or whatever you call it. Where you can here some instruments more or less entirely in one speaker, and others in the other. It's fun to pan the balance back and forth and get a different take on the songs.

pauls00, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I liked Yellow Submarine, the film, a great deal as a child. "Hey paul, I've got a hole in my pocket!" I liked that, it was good for children. I also think the beatles were important because they spurred on the beach boys to greater heights. I think they would have been better if they had never gone psychadelic.

Sterling Clover, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

the plastic bag joke was a pretty fresh dis i think.

ethan, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

They didn't plan their futures and the remaining two are probably heartily sick of it all by now. If only the music would reflect that.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I also like Plastic Ono Band, but that really isn't talking about the Beatles is it?

The remixed version of Yellow Submarine (came out in 1999, I think) is wonderful. I guess it sorta presages Terry Gilliam's Monty Python cartoon work (as does the cover for the Kinks' Face to Face).

Tadeusz Suchodolski, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Yellow Submarine was my favorite film as a child. It was colorful and strange and absolutely entrancing to me.

Melissa W, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

There really is nothing new to say about the Beatles.

Maybe I'll play them tonight; it's been 10 years easily since I have.

Sean, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

this joke doesn't work so well since george died, but:

what will it take to finally bring together a beatles reunion?

three more bullets.

ethan, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I saw Yellow Submarine once. Six or seven, over at my friend Daniel's house, his older brother had rented it. Daniel and I came in late, surveyed the situation, and immediately sided with the Blue Meanies over the dirty hippies. We started chanting for them over the songs until Daniel's brother yelled at us and kicked us out. That's the only time I ever saw a Beatles movie.

Ian, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

the first song i sang at a kareoke bar was 'back in the ussr'

tyler, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

If it's about their music, you really can't say much, because it doesn't exist apart from their canonical/iconic status. Any given Beatles song isn't a record, but a Cultural Artifact. Which is why so much of what's written about them gives me the runs. I do think Rubber Soul is a record worth talking about, especially with regard to a connection Simon Joyner draws between it and Dylan's Blonde on Blonde (which connection continues with Sgt Pepper, about which the less said the better).

John Darnielle, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Simon Joyner draws between it and Dylan's Blonde on Blonde

And I was thinking about Simon today and all. So what did he say? [Let it be clear I sold _Rubber Soul_ last year and won't have Dylan in the house.]

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I hate every last one of their stupid boring songs.

DG, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

something INTERESTING you strokes fan.

ethan, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I hate the beatles. They wrecked pop music forever.

mt, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

and won't have Dylan in the house.

you make it sound like he soiled the carpet last time.

the beatles are like...beef. they're there. if you want it. but america has made it the center of it's diet. even though it's probably not healthy. and you can certainly do without and never be unhappy.

jess, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

jess that's brilliant.

ethan, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Jesus you guys are COPPING OUT majorly. In saying nothing interesting about the Beatles, and in claiming there is nothing interesting left to be said about them, we only reinforce and strengthen their canonical status. I haven't listened to them in a while, but there are some fascinating things about their records. I promise to post something when I'm back at my apartment and can give them a fair listen.

Clarke B., Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

"I'm Only Sleeping" swallows its own tail.

David Raposa, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

One more reason to avoid McDonalds. Except for their tasteee fries

electric sound of jim, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

err that was a reference to the beef

electric sound of jim, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

you make it sound like he soiled the carpet last time.

I think he did.

Jesus you guys are COPPING OUT majorly.

Heavens no, Clark, we're just BORED. I'd rather talk about the Associates anyway.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I think I just fear that one day when Kraftwerk's ultimate importance to pop music is fully felt, there will be a harsh backlash against them, too. And that's something I don't even want to think about.

Clarke B., Thursday, 17 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Their sense of humour doesn't get talked about nearly enough.

sundar subramanian, Friday, 18 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

i don't know enough about the beatles to really say but clark is sounding seriously on the money about this.

ethan, Friday, 18 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I don't think Kraftwerk will ever be as hated as much as the Beatles. When I was in seventh grade I had a t-shirt with the Revolver cover on it which I wore quite a bit. The yellow submarine kids thought I was weird because they weren't familiar with that album. I always liked that. I still have that t-shirt, it's at least 8 years old. However over Christmas at my job we had to play the Beatles#1 album over and over again throughout the store. All those songs sound the same! Fuck!

Lindsey B, Friday, 18 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

If y'all think the Beatles are lame, here's something that's slightly worse: what about when other bands nick obvious melodies from them? I heard "I'm Free" by the Who on the radio tonight, and I swear there's one part of it that nicks a vocal melody from the Beatles' "Tomorrow Never Knows" (the better of the two songs, in my opinion).

hstencil, Friday, 18 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

hence the beatles wrecking pop music forever.

oh, has anybody made any necrophiliac jokes about George's fresh corpse yet?

(Golly, that sure was offensive!)

mt, Friday, 18 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

See, this is part of why I think the _Anthology_ series was so valuable--it clarified that everything the Beatles did had at some point been a work in progress, and opened up the perfect canonized surfaces of their records.

I love them. I love that they altered their arrangments slightly every couple of seconds; that they used up their entire supply of dorky obviousness on the "bum BUM" at the end of the bridge of "Love Me Do"; that they thought about their errors and left the good ones in (like the totally screwed-up rhythm on the second verse of "Rain" that I mentioned a few weeks ago). I love how thrilled and forceful their early covers of American and British obscurities are. I love that their failures are from overreaching rather than excessive willingness to repeat themselves. I love that they could put out a single with only one of them on one side and only another one of them on the other side and it was no big deal, it was still the Beatles. I love that they all knew when to sit out or hold back--that they didn't all have to be playing all the time.

How's that?

Douglas, Friday, 18 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I don't think the Beatles influenced music as much as people say. It just seems that way if you presuppose that they really did, and understand everything else in terms of how it matches up to something the Beatles did. If you started thinking the same way about Donovan instead, it would seem like all pop was just variations on the fundamental Donovan canon, too. That's what's so great about Donovan.

Nitsuh, Friday, 18 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

(I also don't think the Anthology effect Douglas mentions would have been there if we didn't all hear Beatles songs as the "cultural artifacts" that John mentions, and start getting excited about the idea that anyone actually made then, like mythologizing the idea of Leonardo actually painting the Last Supper! What we are being impressed by is not necessarily that they are doing something good -- we are just impressed at the fact that they don't realize they're doing something that will become Very Very Important. Cf Donovan bootlegs.)

Nitsuh, Friday, 18 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I love that they could put out a single with only one of them on one side and only another one of them on the other side and it was no big deal, it was still the Beatles. I love that they all knew when to sit out or hold back--that they didn't all have to be playing all the time.

This is also why the Wu-Tang Clan and So Solid Crew are good. (Still thinking about my contribution).

Tom, Friday, 18 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

"Lies" (Knickerbockers) vs. "Serve the Servants" (Nirvana)

dave q, Friday, 18 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Where exactly does Tom's call for more personal music writing fit in with his request here? Surely it shouldn't matter THAT much that a bunch of other people have written things abou the Beatles...

Josh, Friday, 18 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I was obsessed with Tomorrow Never Knows when I was 10 (or somewhere around there). I had a tape of "Revolver," which I listened to non- stop, mostly because I wanted to hear TNK but didn't want to keep rewinding. So I ended up listening too much to a lot of songs that probably didn't deserve such attention (not that they were bad, but they sure as hell weren't TNK), and maybe even convincing myself that I liked them, when really I was just tolerating them. This side-effect is still lingering - I have trouble being critical about "Revolver" even though I know a lot of those songs aren't nearly as good as I want them to be.

But, about Tomorrow Never Knows. It is, first of all, the only song that I love with the same passion now that I did the first time I heard it. Second (and this is certainly connected to the first), this is the only song I can think of that I can listen to in any of the number of ways I've learned to listen to music and still sound good. It was first of all about pop-melody perfection, which is the only level I was probably capable of appreciating music at that age. But when I got into the harder/faster/louder aesthetic of punk and metal as a teenager, TNK still sounded good in that context. When I took a modern music class in college and was exposed to the whole Young/Reich minimalism thing, layering/phasing/texturing music, TNR still sounded good in that context. When I got interested in the whole samples/beats aesthetic of techno and hiphop, TNK still sounded good in that context. And when, after a few months of lurking around the ILM/FT world, I started to let myself to become interested in music artists as personalities in a way I hadn't since grade school, this song once again sounded good in that context (encapsulating a great deal of the whole Lennon persona).

I'm just as bothered as anyone else on ILM by the absolute worship of the Beatles that seems to be at the root of so much "informed" music/rock writing. I don't think that the Beatles invented or even anticipated the future of pop music. But this song is pretty damn impressive - it's the only song I can think of that makes sense to me no matter what aesthetic standards I apply.

It's also the only Beatles song upon which my Beatle hating friend was able to bestow the following words of praise: "I can see why someone might like this."

Matthew Cohen, Friday, 18 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Two years ago, whilst working in an Amsterdam second-hand bookshop, I once met an eccentric elderly gay English guy. A louche figure, chainsmoking and speaking with the sort of cut-glass accent one only hears nowadays in 50s Pathé news reels.

It turned out he’d worked for EMI in the early ‘60s so I immediately asked him about you-know-who. Hearing him talk was a real eye- opener. He absolutely hated them from the very beginning, thought they were total rubbish, and claimed this attitude was shared throughout the company….

“Stupid adolescent music for stupid adolescent girls, that’s what we thought. Of course we creamed it for everything we could because we never once thought it was last more than a few years. If I think about how much money some of the stuff I had my hands on must be worth now….. But they were completely shit, couldn’t write, couldn’t sing, could barely play their instruments, barely qualifies as music, utterly worthless. They had no style, no class, couldn’t hold a candle to the likes of Noel Coward, by-the-way have you ever heard his..” starts singing.

stevo, Friday, 18 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

What hell was Anthony Sanderson doing in Amsterdam?

Marcello Carlin, Friday, 18 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Something interesting about The Beatles?

(1)Their enormous success has polarised peoples' views to such extremes...these debates always get heated

(2)I suppose this is George Martin thing, but the quality of production from 1964 (Hard Day's Night) has never been rivalled - it still sounds modern. I find it baffling - they were the only group to lose the big reverb & ringing drums before 1968...four years, to be precise. Even The Action (also George Martin) had the standard mid-sixties sound. It's almost as though GM reserved this quality for The Beatles.

(3)They split up at the right time (cf Rolling Stones)

Jez, Friday, 18 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Well, I love them. I haven't listened to them much for the last couple of years as I over-indulged around the time of the Anthologies and needed a rest. This is a good thing, as it's stopped them loomng over everything else which, good as they were, they shouldn't.

Dr. C, Friday, 18 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

god the beatles. smelly old shit my grandad listens to. what's next. say something interesting about jason and the argonuts?

XStatic Peace, Friday, 18 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Dollar's version of "I Wanna Hold Your Hand" came on the radio yesterday. I'd never heard it before, but wouldn't hesitate in saying it's now my favourite ever Beatles cover, an honour previously held by Scritti & Shabba's "She's A Woman".

Robin Carmody, Sunday, 20 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

god the beatles. smelly old shit my grandad listens to.

But it's really GREAT shit, Mrs. Presky!

Michael Daddino, Sunday, 20 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

beatles = hydra which guards the golden fleece (old essence of pop)

to gain possession of fleece (which raises the dead) (but this at a cost untouched in movie) one has to KILL the hydra

this allows the high priest of hecate to gather and sew the dragon's teeth = MOST BRILLIANT CUTE SKELETONS in history = punk rock hurrah

beatles set up mirror to american pop cultural exploson allowing US to see itself and JUDGE and VALUE itself (as in a love affair), turning pop into something which csan be shaped and used, not just consumed, something with history and self-awareness and accessible entry points: proof of this on this thread = mt's tirelessly reiterated kneejerk loathing of ALL THINGS ANGLO, for what we get "wrong" about eg Techno (rooted of course in an unspoken fear that it is actually right, and the things he loves have uglier strands and tendencies in them than he can bear)

Beatles = prior gods i'd say of the freaky trigger ethic, that chart pop and major label engagement are fields (potentially) for far more powerful subtle multiple expression (by artists self-acknowledged as collector- fan critic-obsessives) than then politically middlebrow-approved INDIEWORLDS of jazz, r&b, folk etc

mark s, Sunday, 20 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

By god, Mark S has something there! Not that I'm surprised he's come up with it, of course. The thing to note is that they're 'prior gods,' not current ones -- which is where the problem can lie.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 20 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

The thing that I dislike about "Anglo" music is when the English use their record industry to beat the rest of the world over the head with their second hand copies of other people's music.

The Beatles were the group that set the standard for the pop music canon that has been strangling musical creativity for the last 30 years. They were the group that everybody points to as the best rock group, they are the group that we keep getting banged over the head with on vh1 and rolling stone...I dislike the Canon they signify as much as I dislike them. The major label system and their press wings have never gotten past the beatles.

As for Kneejerk anglophobia, I don't think that is true. What I have a problem with is when the English try to step outside their national character and copy other people's culture and get it wrong. I love Eno/Roxy, I love Bowie, Visage, Japan, Autechre, Factory Records, Slowdive, Baby Ford, and lots of other artists. It is not like I listen to black music all day long.

I just dislike the fact that the worst English music is what English music companies promote the hardest. eg Shasha van oakenweed and the Beatles. I dislike that history is being reshaped into something other than it actually was because the people who control popular culture cannot get over the Beatles and their Englishness. The Beatles are the band that you are supposed to like, and they made the music you are supposed to emulate. I hate the fact that they are shoved down my throat every day, I hate the fact that I cannot say that I never liked them in public without getting weird looks and people saying "buh..buh..buh..but their THE BEATLES!!!"

To me, Kraftwerk hold the place that the Beatles have in most peoples hearts. You will never see Kraftwerk on TV in the U.S. because They did not have handsome smiles, wear beatle boots, or play guitar. Karftwerk were more innovative than the Beatles, but they did not have the signifiers that the Beatles and their record companies used to strangle western culture with.

In Europe, they have sold more turntables than guitars over the last few years. Detroit, Chicago, and NYC might be ugly and coarse, but our House Music, Techno and Hip-Hop are slowing killing your Anglophile necrophiliac Rock and Roll. The only thing Rock has is the lies about the past that are retold everyday in the corporate music press. Rock is all back-catalogue. Rock's golden age has passed, you choked to death on your golden fleece. The Strokes anyone???

mt, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

a) Kraftwerk had very nice smiles

b) More Rubik's Cubes than guitars were sold at one point

dave q, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

What I have a problem with is when the English try to step outside their national character and copy other people's culture and get it wrong.

Bah. Nonsense. The privileging of a music's "original spirit" is a much more oppressive idea than anything you could reasonably blame the Beatles for. It reeks of the moldy fig, O Kraftwerk fan.

Copying other people's culture "wrong" is sometimes your best entertainment value.

Michael Daddino, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

anyway we don't get it "wrong": it was wrong already — we get it RIGHT huzza!

tea and muffins all round!!

mark s, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Sixties British bands worth listening to = those who tried to play African-American music, but did it badly I.e., not just the Beatles, but also the Stones, the Who, the Kinks, Beck-era Yardbirds, Syd-era Floyd, etc.

Sixties British bands not worth listening to = those who played African-American music well. I.e., anything involving Eric Clapton or Steve Winwood.

Which bunch (if any) "got it right" depends on what the meaning of "got it right" is. Probably irrelevant, in any case.

Tadeusz Suchodolski, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

The whole nature of pop music to me is that it renders the idea of "national character" irrelevant, so that's mt's argument fucked from the start.

Robin Carmody, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

ILM Consenus: momentary popularity=grate. Lasting popularity=dud.

DeRayMi, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Isn't most current African music a "wrong" copy of Western rock and roll? Or if not a wrong copy at least a heavily-influenced native form? Would you have them retreat to acoustic instruments and pre- rock and roll forms?

Good Firesign Theatre ref, Michael.

nickn, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

current african music = RIGHT copy of jazz, at least I thought.

Sterling Clover, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Apparently last year's best of "1" was the first Beatles record ever that made the annual no.1 of the Billboard album charts. In 1965 Beatles '65 (compiled mainly from Beatles for Sale) was #2.

alex in mainhattan, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Most assumptions about the Canonized Beatles -- that they are the central foundation of late 20th-century pop music, that they do something basic that everyone can appreciate -- are equally if not more true when applied to Motown. The weird paradox is that as much as black American artists are now pilloried over things like drugs and political stridency, these are some of the biggest reasons why John Lennon gets canonized as "serious" while Smokey Robinson does not.

Another thing that makes the Beatles seem good is the fact that while we now take their songs as Important Canonical Texts, they largely didn't know that at the time -- and to their credit didn't succumb to it toward the end of their career -- and thus their renditions of these Important Canonical Texts are a lot looser and have way more of a sense of humor and humility about them than we get from most modern covers. I realized this while watching Aimee Mann and Michael Penn mince their way reverentially through "Two of Us" on TV last night --- "Two of Us" which sounds singularly half-assed and shambly and laughingly-cobbled-together on Let it Be, "Two of Us" which basically shouldn't be played well, and should basically sound like everyone involved just learned the song five minutes ago but are having a great time getting through it.

Ni~|suh, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I like "Two of Us". I also like the Flying Lizards' version of "Money", which of course straddles early Motown and early Beatles.

Robin Carmody, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Oh, just to be clear, I like "Two of Us" as well, but largely because of that shambliness.

Nitsuh, Wednesday, 23 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

My theory (still to be tested to destruction): until about age 14 or 15 you like "Beatles 1962-66", then you get into "Beatles 1967-70" and downgrade your opinion of the red record. Then when you get to about 35 years old you reverse your stance again and start dissing the blue record.

Robin C's remarks about "Money" reminded me of this site, which has links to some quite good thought-pieces on 12 Beatles songs and a Lennon.

Jeff W, Wednesday, 23 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Well, I did my poor best...

Tom, Wednesday, 23 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

i once participated in an orgy with ringo

bob snoom, Friday, 25 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

"Paperback Writer" is their most underrated song, both historically and aesthetically. Who cares if it's a smug character sketch -- it was the first time the bass on their records really rurururumbled in a quasi-psychedelic frenzy.

Michael Daddino, Monday, 28 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

one year passes...
Has anyone heard the rumours about the "Tavistock Institute"? Aside from their merits/otherwise artistically theres just something unnatural about the production on those records.

tim smoot, Friday, 5 September 2003 03:56 (twenty years ago) link

???

Rumors about the "Tavistock Institute":

http://www.geocities.com/covertmatrix/tavistock.html

Dock Miles (Dock Miles), Friday, 5 September 2003 05:16 (twenty years ago) link

seven years pass...

Admit it - you LIKE the beatles, they were (mostly) great!

Interior shop day an eager customer enters (admrl), Thursday, 30 September 2010 06:05 (thirteen years ago) link

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxpost why not just say two

sleepingbag, Thursday, 30 September 2010 06:30 (thirteen years ago) link

The line "Now that I know our view must be right/I'm here to show everybody the light" is some proto-rave messiah stuff, which is appropriate for such a hypnotic and dancey song as "The Word". LOVE LOVE LOVE the way John sings "I'm here to show everybody the light!!!" He has a little bit of a knowing or punk sneer with those words.

Also, for having a one-note-turning-into-dissonance organ solo, this song is definitely my favorite right now.

Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 30 September 2010 14:35 (thirteen years ago) link

"Wait!"

Purely for the uncelebrated couplet:

".. and I've been good, as good as I can be"

i.e. he's not been good at all!

Mark G, Thursday, 30 September 2010 14:38 (thirteen years ago) link

four years pass...

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/features/lord-woodbine-the-forgotten-sixth-beatle-2015140.html

In 1958 he was with the All-Steel Caribbean Band, led by a fellow Trinidadian, Gerry Gobin. At the Joker's Club, where the band often played, the musicians noticed two white lads who seemed keen. They were Lennon and McCartney, wide-eyed and restless kids, like many others on rock and dole. The steel-pannists moved to the popular Jacaranda Club in Liverpool 1 and The Beatles followed. Gobin, unimpressed by their music, was initially irritated by these hangers-on. Candace Smith, then Gobin's partner, was also suspicious of them: "Bloody white kids, trying to horn in on the black music scene."

Marylee Smith, Jamaican, 81, used to visit her cousins in Liverpool. Interviewed for this article, she recalled Toxteth's music scene then: "They was there all the time, you know, all the time, like they was looking for some black magic, pushing in, rough boys, unwashed sometimes. Jumping on to the stage, playing the pans like it was theirs. Some of us didn't like that. But the musicians, they didn't mind so much." Woodbine was bohemian, free, left wing, incautious. He even had the boys performing in his strip club. It must have been madly exciting.

In 2008, McCartney recalled those times in Mojo magazine: "Liverpool being the first Caribbean settlement in the UK, we were very friendly with a lot of black guys – Lord Woodbine, Derry Wilkie, they were mates we hung out with."

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 19 August 2015 00:13 (eight years ago) link

Is there any likelihood of the Yoko Ono lps being remastered/reissued at any time? I thought they might be included in the Apple reissues of the last few years but I haven't seen any sight of them.

Stevolende, Wednesday, 19 August 2015 09:51 (eight years ago) link

one year passes...

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CxU225tW8AE9BjO.png

mookieproof, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 20:03 (seven years ago) link

haha

imago, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 20:04 (seven years ago) link

Warren Wilmer got his wish this year, sort of

imago, Tuesday, 15 November 2016 20:05 (seven years ago) link

three years pass...

Stumbled upon this interesting audio interview from Sept 19 1969 of Paul McCartney plugging Abbey Road with David Wigg for the BBC series Scene and Heard:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Iwas2xM6-M

The following day (Sept 20 1969) Lennon would announce leaving the Beatles. McCartney discusses his interest in possibly playing small clubs (to which he suggests the Beatles do the following day to John's famous "Your daft and I'm leaving..." response.)

Darin, Saturday, 18 July 2020 23:08 (three years ago) link

two months pass...

ever notice how George is wearing a cowboy hat on the back sleeves for Help! + Rubber Soul and the front sleeve of Revolver? howdy, pardner!

brimstead, Tuesday, 22 September 2020 17:57 (three years ago) link

That Shakespeare bloke, total hack, can't hold a candle to Marlowe and Johnson, we all hate him on I Love Elizabethan Theatre

Dr X O'Skeleton, Friday, 25 September 2020 11:22 (three years ago) link

SHIRLEY MOORE otm

O tempura! O scampes! (Noodle Vague), Friday, 25 September 2020 11:55 (three years ago) link

Is there ILM consensus on the best Beatles country/country-adjacent song? (original, ie not Act Naturally)

Indexed, Friday, 25 September 2020 16:22 (three years ago) link

it's probably just because i'm listening to Beatles for Sale (which i've been obsessing over this year for some reason), but i really like "i don't want to spoil the party"

Karl Malone, Friday, 25 September 2020 16:36 (three years ago) link

Beatles for Sale is the best Beatles

All cars are bad (Euler), Friday, 25 September 2020 16:40 (three years ago) link

following that on Beatles for Sale is the glorious "what you're doing", which has the most perfect rickenbacker-style guitar accompaniment. the performance is perfect, which is especially astounding considering that was back when they recorded things in just a few hours.

Karl Malone, Friday, 25 September 2020 16:45 (three years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XswcADHL5zc

Karl Malone, Friday, 25 September 2020 17:01 (three years ago) link

I don't want to spoil the party. I'm not partial to C&W pastiches either, but the harmonies on "I still love her" make it special

Dr X O'Skeleton, Friday, 25 September 2020 17:08 (three years ago) link

Good point.

If that’s the Dave Edmunds special in that video, just notice that the related album is streamable.

ABBA O RLY? (James Redd and the Blecchs), Friday, 25 September 2020 17:10 (three years ago) link

The vocal performances on I Don't Want to Spoil the Party are really great.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXvpZwPE_3M

Darin, Saturday, 26 September 2020 15:38 (three years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.