Allow me to harp on this wrong opinion from the Spin Alternative Record Guide...

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
The Kronos Quartet's "Black Angels album tries to built [sic] a theme around musical spookiness, but the effect-driven George Crumb piece of the title doesn't belong on the same disc as Shostakovich's doom-laden Eighth Quartet."

First of all, the theme isn't "musical spookiness," it's "the ravages of war" or something like that. Granted, I got that from the liner notes, but three of the pieces on here (including Shostakovich) aren't even that spooky.

Second, why don't they belong on the same disc?! If they're both good (as they are), stick 'em on there!

dr. phil (josh langhoff), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 14:40 (twenty-one years ago)

(please forgive my anachronistic posting, I just got the cassette)
(and the engaging writer in question is Alex Ross)

dr. phil (josh langhoff), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 14:42 (twenty-one years ago)

What do you really expect from the Spin Alternative Record Guide? Accuracy?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 14:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Wait a minute, you're not Alex Ross, are you?

dr. phil (josh langhoff), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 14:49 (twenty-one years ago)

"lives in Brooklyn, New York, and writes for the New York Times, the New Yorker, SPIN, and 10 Percent"?

I think it's you. Sorry, dude, but we can talk about this...

dr. phil (josh langhoff), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 14:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Ironically the essay about the Kronos Quartet is one of the few I don't have memorized. While I disagree with a lot of it now (Powerage gets a 3?????), this book was responsible for the majority of my personal canon. Rob Sheffield's reviews in there are some of my favorite ever.

Proof of how many times I've read the book:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v291/TheManthony/booksiveabused.jpg

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 15:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Nope, I'm Alex Smith.

Anthony swears by the Spin guide? No wonder you're so wrong about so many things.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 15:02 (twenty-one years ago)

ha Micco should rebrand his blog : anythonyiswrong.blogspot.com

DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 15:10 (twenty-one years ago)

anthonyiswrong.blogspot.com

DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 15:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh come on Rob Sheffield is a joke.

David Allen (David Allen), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 15:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Alex Ross is the guy that wrote that long, fawning profile of Radiohead in the New Yorker a couple of years ago. He usually reviews classical music for them.

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 15:30 (twenty-one years ago)

i used to read that book all the time at bookstore my mom works at. half the reviews in the book are BUNKUM

latebloomer (latebloomer), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 16:14 (twenty-one years ago)

the other half are semi-accurate

latebloomer (latebloomer), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 16:15 (twenty-one years ago)

I really love that book, too. Only recently did I notice Ross's name in the list of contributors and scoured the book looking for his (sole) entry, which is that Kronos one. I'm in no position to critique his review of that disc, as I've only heard it once, a long long time ago, but I do like his writing in general.

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 16:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Anthony swears by the Spin guide?

dude, get literate. I disagree with a lot (especially anything by Weisbard or Powers) but it introduced me to a lot of albums (a good portion of its top 100 would make mine). And Sheffield hasn't done much I've enjoyed at Rolling Stone but his Record Guide entries are hilarious, insightful and honest.

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 17:00 (twenty-one years ago)

I spent most of my high school years reading record guides over and over, to the point were I can usually remember at the drop of a hat what rating any album got. This isn't necessarily a point of pride.

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 17:03 (twenty-one years ago)

I agree that Sheffield's reviews are FANtastic. My favorite line of his is "That's just our Sting," and I like in the new Rolling Stone guide where he explains Desire, I think, by saying Dylan had 20 lbs of headlines stapled to his chest. For wit coupled with accuracy, he's unmatched.

And I would've heard Sonny Sharrock a lot later without the Spin guide.

dr. phil (josh langhoff), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 17:32 (twenty-one years ago)

I got that Spin guide when I was a teenager and it was really useful and informative. It helped me navigate through the canon when I was a teen up through my first two years of college. That's what those books are meant to be, right?

Matthew "Flux" Perpetua, Wednesday, 19 January 2005 17:37 (twenty-one years ago)

''Powerage' gets a 3????'

'Spin' Guide' vs all time classic 'RS red guide' -

"AC/DC are an Australian hard-rock band whose apparent purpose is to offend everyone in sight or earshot. They succeed on both counts.
High Voltage (0 stars)
Let There Be Rock (O stars)
Powerage (0 Stars)"

dave q (listerine), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 17:44 (twenty-one years ago)

at least the RS guide is consistent. Dirty Deeds gets a 6!

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 17:45 (twenty-one years ago)

'Dirty Deeds' twice as good as 'Powerage'??? Who the fuck wrote the 'Spin' one? "All right officer, I confess, everything's coming back/ I didn't mean to kill the 'Spin' reviewer, it was a heart attack"

dave q (listerine), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 17:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Why do you have to agree with the ratings and rankings for a guide to be useful? I never cared about what it thought of records I already liked, it was better for finding things I'd never heard.

Matthew "Flux" Perpetua, Wednesday, 19 January 2005 17:51 (twenty-one years ago)

the RS Guide from '92 is the single worst collection of reviews I've ever read, anywhere.

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 17:52 (twenty-one years ago)

J.D. Considine is seriously on the PC alt-prog tip in that. Midnight Oil is the best band ever.

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 17:56 (twenty-one years ago)

"Robbie Robertson solo!" *gush*

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 17:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Natasha Stovall wrote the AC/DC piece.

High Voltage = 4
Dirty Deeds = 6
Let There Be Rock = 5
Powerage = 3
If You Want Blood = 5
Highway = 7
Back In Black = 8
For Those = 6
Flick = 3
74 Jailbreak = 6
Fly On The Wall = 3
Who Made Who = 6
Blow Up = 3
Razors = 5
Live = 6

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 17:59 (twenty-one years ago)

It's basically something where she admires them for being the least pretentious of a genre that she has no time for (there's little explanation of why any album is actually better than the other, Scott's ouvre is summed up as "Loud but lame" and that Johnson's style was entirely identical. Bullllshit)

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 18:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Do you think the Silos would have been in the Alternative Guide if not for Weisbard?

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 18:05 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm embarrassed by how seriously you take this star-rating-rock-crit stuff, man.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 18:07 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah but c'mon those AC/DC ratings are bullshit

dave q (listerine), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 18:09 (twenty-one years ago)

...yeah, just like the Motorhead ones. G-d forbid those morons would ever seriously entertain the thought of someone actually listening to & enjoying AC/DC or Motorhead (or Sabbath, or even U2 for chrissakes) SINCERELY, rather than in an ironic nudge-nudge yuk-yuk it's-all-a-big-Shatner/Spinal Tap-joke-and-we're-all-in-on-it fashion.

Myonga Von Bontee (Myonga Von Bontee), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 18:38 (twenty-one years ago)

The only thing the Spin guide is good for is AS A GODDAMN DOORSTOP!

I'm pleased to see, however, that Anthony also has the entirely superior Trouser Press guide (though its binding suggests that it hasn't been cracked as many times as the Spin guide).

I've often said many a deservedly harsh thing about Rob Sheffield, but I've met the man a couple of times, and he's a damn nice guy (which makes me feel like a heel for saying he should be bludgeoned with objects made of cement).

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 19:35 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah but c'mon those AC/DC ratings are bullshit

You're right, those scores should be much lower than that.

Matthew "Flux" Perpetua, Wednesday, 19 January 2005 19:37 (twenty-one years ago)

hahah

Ive only seen him on Vh1 and he seemed to me like if the entire band Belle and Sebastian were one person, and American, you would have him.

David Allen (David Allen), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 19:40 (twenty-one years ago)

i tossed out my record guides three years ago!

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 20:25 (twenty-one years ago)

though its binding suggests that it hasn't been cracked as many times as the Spin guide).

it's still pretty damn cracked though! pages falling out and all

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 20:26 (twenty-one years ago)

and that Rolling Stone guide on the far left I've had since I was 13.

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 20:27 (twenty-one years ago)

keith harris on faith hill and tim mcgraw in the new rolling stone guide: "They could be a great testament to the joys of married sex if only their duets weren't so DOA. You'd think the two had never fucked with the lights on".

Hahahaha! I gotta look for more of his.

JDC gives robyn hitchcock's Jewels For Sophia 4 and a half stars in the new R.S. guide. I've never even heard of that album. And 4 stars to Robyn Sings. Which I've also never heard of. But only 2 and a half stars to I Often Dream Of Trains and 3 and a half stars to Black Snake Diamond Role. Two albums that I always liked. Who knows, maybe those later albums are great.

scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 21:17 (twenty-one years ago)

I can't believe Alex's last name isn't really In NYC!

nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 21:21 (twenty-one years ago)

in the old rolling stone guide JDC basically did the same thing for Hitchcock. his love for Hitchcock goes up a few exponents starting with Fegmania. The guy evidently made LOTS of four-and-a-half-star albums.

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 21:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Second, why don't they belong on the same disc?! If they're both good (as they are), stick 'em on there!

I guess because Shostakovich's 8th has a reputation as arguably the finest string quartet written in the 20th century, and the Crumb piece, while interesting, doesn't carry the same rep, and is in a totally different style. Which still isn't necessarily a great reason to say that, but whatever, people say crazy things.

I will give props to this record guide for recognizing the greatness of Can's Soon Over Babaluma.

Dominique (dleone), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 21:25 (twenty-one years ago)

He also thinks that the '84-'89 era Fall just stomps all over the years before. Hex Enduction got **h, most of the Brix era got ****h.

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 21:26 (twenty-one years ago)

I totally agree with that - the glory years of The Fall are most certainly the Brix period, though there are great songs scattered through their entire catalog.

Matthew "Flux" Perpetua, Wednesday, 19 January 2005 21:32 (twenty-one years ago)

all of miccio's postings should now be filtered through that photo

john'n'chicago, Wednesday, 19 January 2005 21:55 (twenty-one years ago)

why else would I share it?

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 21:56 (twenty-one years ago)

though you should throw in my tattered copy of Stairway To Hell too

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 21:56 (twenty-one years ago)


Musty, dusty, tattered and torn
all of the toys I played with
Out of tune my little tin horn
all of my memories shattered and gone

Teddy Bear, and Bo Bo the clown
little soldiers waiting at arms
for the day which cannot be found
Gone back to the sun,
music box that spun,
lost all it's songs

Musty dusty, tattered and torn
all of the toys I played with
Out of tune my little tin horn
all of my memories shattered and gone

Save your tears, my lost little friends
from the years when all of us meet
they saw no beginnings no ends
All the maple trees, butterflies and leaves vanished again

Musty dusty, tattered and torn
all of the toys I played with
Out of tune my little tin horn

scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:09 (twenty-one years ago)

those books are my Giving Tree

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Byron Coley's John Fahey ratings in the Spin book are extremely helpful and (to my ears) accurate, particularly since almost everything there was OOP when the book came out. I've found it invaluable to help decide which reissues of his to pick up, and pretty much dead on in the comparative ratings.

Alex will be happy to know that my Trouser Press cracked into pieces long ago, though, while my Spin Guide remains quite intact (and largely worthless, but there are a few noteworthy exceptions, the Fahey one being the main one I can think of now).

also, Alex, you sure bust on a lot of people for someone who gets their paycheck from a magazine that named GWB Man of the Year. don't you ever feel really slimy for still beingn there (asked more from a curious perspective, as I worked there for 10 years until 1998, and know Alex fairly well)?

jon abbey, Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:35 (twenty-one years ago)

he was the man of the year though. last year was all about dubya.

scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:39 (twenty-one years ago)

they did pick Khomeini once

dave q (listerine), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:45 (twenty-one years ago)

the spin guide's daft as hell in many assessments but it's a good read, ja otm re: fahey, it definitely helped me there at the time. i found a copy for a couple of bucks used and got it for my sister who decided upon moving back to athens to investigate indie rock, i told her to check out pitchfork too but turns out she already had it bookmarked (ott was right - THEY'RE FUCKING HUGE). sheffield as a tv persona is a bit bleh (tv does that to people though. cf. adm. stockdale) but he's a hell of a writer in the right venue.

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:46 (twenty-one years ago)

"adm. stockdale"! haha, i love you, jb.

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:47 (twenty-one years ago)

the RS Guide from '92 is the single worst collection of reviews I've ever read, anywhere.

no, it's actually much worse than that.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:47 (twenty-one years ago)

picking whoever wins the presidential election in an election year is so corny, time used to rarely do that, they do it like crazy now, almost acknowledging that the only time their readers pay attention to politics is in an election year (which is still more often than alot of people). maybe whichever european leader will muster up the balls to arrest bush/cheney/rumsfeld/rice on war crimes charges gets man of the year this year. maybe.

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:49 (twenty-one years ago)

it wasn't simply that they picked him, it was the fawning suckup job that went along with it (admittedly from second-hand reports, as I haven't really read more than a couple of issues of TIme since I left). yech.

jon abbey, Wednesday, 19 January 2005 23:08 (twenty-one years ago)

The Spin guide made me slavishly buy the Pooh Sticks' Great White Wonder tape, which I just listened to in the car. Is that, like, a transcribed Neil Young solo on "I'm In You"? I dug it.

Also, thanks to those of you who've at least TRIED to address the Kronos Quartet.

dr. phil (josh langhoff), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 23:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Hmmm, I got the Silos for the same reason. Not so great.

dr. phil (josh langhoff), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 23:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Is that, like, a transcribed Neil Young solo on "I'm In You"?

hmm, i don't remember, was that one a neil young cop? the solo in "the rhythm of love" is most definitely a transcription of neil's "powderfinger" solo, though the rest of that song is pretty much a cover of the strangeloves' "the rhythm of love." "who loves you" owes its chorus to the four seasons song of the same title. "the wild one, forever" isn't quite as close to tom petty's "the wild one, forever" as it wants to be, but it's a good try. i love this album.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 23:26 (twenty-one years ago)

(and if your tape version doesn't have trudi's explanatory liner notes, you're not quite getting the whole album!)

fact checking cuz (fcc), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 23:27 (twenty-one years ago)

It does have the liner notes, I just haven't read them yet.

Okay, now I heard the "who loves you" thing and I heard the 7 note Powderfinger riff (which made me laugh), but you're telling me there's a Powderfinger solo in there, too? Of the Strangeloves and that Tom Petty song I'm woefully ignorant. But doesn't that kickass solo in "I'm In You" sound exactly like Neil Young? Maybe they just got his guitar tone.

So, that Black Angels by George Crumb--screechy, huh?

dr. phil (josh langhoff), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 23:32 (twenty-one years ago)

those liners are amazing

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 23:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Anthony, if you're referring to the notes for the Kronos Quartet's Black Angels album, then YES THEY ARE!

dr. phil (josh langhoff), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 23:35 (twenty-one years ago)

I know nothing about Kronos. I speak of the Pooh Sticks. Who rule.

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 23:35 (twenty-one years ago)

God you're so indie Miccio.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 23:37 (twenty-one years ago)

(x-post)
isn't the 7-note powderfinger riff (which made me laugh the first time i heard it, too) immediately followed by a solo on the pooh sticks tune? it's been a while since i listened, and my memory cells are starting to crumble, so maybe i'm wrong, but according to my crumbling memory it's there! "i'm in you" is young-ish, yeah, though i'm not sure i ever heard an obvious reference there (or if they ever admitted one). and that guitar tone was being used by a lot of people back in those crazy early '90s, wasn't it?

fact checking cuz (fcc), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 23:38 (twenty-one years ago)

JON ABBEY, HOW THE FUCKAREYA?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 23:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Hmmm, I got the Silos for the same reason. Not so great.

i dunno what Spin guide had to say about the Silos, but if you got Cuba you should give it another, er, spin, cuz it's a phenomenal album. In descending order: Cuba, About Her Steps, self-titled, Susan Across the Ocean, everything else...

john'n'chicago, Wednesday, 19 January 2005 23:40 (twenty-one years ago)

God you're so indie Miccio.

you should have seen me at 19, dude.

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 23:44 (twenty-one years ago)

also, Alex, you sure bust on a lot of people for someone who gets their paycheck from a magazine that named GWB Man of the Year. don't you ever feel really slimy for still beingn there (asked more from a curious perspective, as I worked there for 10 years until 1998, and know Alex fairly well)?

A few things, Jon my droog....

1. I bust on those who deserve busting on, but it is rarely -- if ever-- intended as mean-spirited. No apologies.
2. Since you did work at "that magazine" for a decade (much like myself), then you really should know that "Person of the Year" (it's no longer "man" of the year, you know) is NOT an accolade nor an award. Hitler, Stalin and Khomeni -- all "Men of the Year". It merely signifies the individual who -- for better or worse -- had the most sway over global events over the 365 days in question. But, of course, you knew that, being the dutiful employee you were.
3. It's "slimey" by the way.
4. I HATE still being there, and I'm doing my hardest to extricate myself with all speed. Interviewing here and there. I had a review in Entertainment Weekly last week. Believe me, man, it's a soul-crushing experience still being at the News Desk.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 23:46 (twenty-one years ago)

"It merely signifies the individual who -- for better or worse -- had the most sway over global events over the 365 days in question."

see, this is what I'm talking about, the slow brainwashing that you undergo as a TWInc.ie. as I said above, picking him is one thing, a long, lingering collective fellating quite another.

anyway, glad to hear that you're trying to get out, I know it ain't easy, especially with a kid. I'm good, got married in December, e-mail me sometime...

Jon Abbey, Wednesday, 19 January 2005 23:55 (twenty-one years ago)

It merely signifies the individual who -- for better or worse -- had the most sway over global events over the 365 days in question

As someone born on Feb 29, I'd like to point out last year had 366 days.

dr. phil I have nothing to say on the Kronos album aside from the fact that Kronos was formed after its leader heard "Black Angels" on the radio, and it is the title track, so it should be the centerpiece, regardless of the Shostakovich, and there's room for both. And there's nothing "spooky" aboot the Charles Ives piece on the album, other than it sounds like Kronos is playing in the same room as a dead man.

Vic Funk, Thursday, 20 January 2005 00:05 (twenty-one years ago)

With the Charles Ives, maybe they meant "kooky," but I prefer the choral/orchestral version on my Norton Anthology. That's interesting about the Black Angels.

In re the Silos, other Josh in Chicago, yes indeed it was Cuba (plus S/T, but I haven't played that one yet), so I suppose I'll listen again at your urging. I liked the violin parts and several of the melodies were nice, but on the whole it was unengaging. Bits and pieces stuck out, so it wasn't a total dog; we'll see what happens when I hear it again.

dr. phil (josh langhoff), Thursday, 20 January 2005 01:44 (twenty-one years ago)

winter was hard was my fave kronos back in the day. lurie, zorn, barber, webern, riley. they were rockin' that shit.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 20 January 2005 01:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, I really tried to get into that Zorn, but it was a little too spazzed out to make me feel at home. I remember the Barber and Webern being nice, though. Their Steve Reich "Different Trains" is cool.

dr. phil (josh langhoff), Thursday, 20 January 2005 01:53 (twenty-one years ago)

several of the melodies were nice, but on the whole it was unengaging

I think on the whole this is Eric Weisbard's definition of the perfect album

miccio (miccio), Thursday, 20 January 2005 01:58 (twenty-one years ago)

My thoughts on the Spin guide (to which I actually contributed a few things) can be found somewhere on this thread:

Who does Scott Seward review in the new Rolling Stone Guide?

chuck, Thursday, 20 January 2005 02:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Person of the Year" (it's no longer "man" of the year, you know)

And in fact, even "person" is insufficient sometimes, as in 1982 and '88:
http://i.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1989/1101890102_400.jpg http://i.timeinc.net/time/magazine/archive/covers/1983/1101830103_400.jpg

Myonga Von Bontee (Myonga Von Bontee), Thursday, 20 January 2005 21:59 (twenty-one years ago)

eleven months pass...
Just had an interesting convo in NYC w/ some friends about this — after having flipped through it for a decade, I bought it for a few bucks at home. Some nice surprises — the Simon Reynolds bits, the "genre reviews" where they summarize, like, dub or world music. And they're serviceable!

But what's most interesting is how it appears at exactly the moment (post-Nirvana) in which the pop splintering began to accelerate furiously, ushering in a half-decade during which retrochic was all the rage. Now, so much of the stuff that seemed important seems...irrelevant. As one friend said, would Kronos even be in an updated version of this book today?

Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Tuesday, 3 January 2006 16:52 (twenty years ago)

several of the melodies were nice, but on the whole it was unengaging

I think on the whole this is Eric Weisbard's definition of the perfect album

-- miccio (anthonyisrigh...), January 20th, 2005.

rofl

latebloomer (latebloomer), Tuesday, 3 January 2006 17:14 (twenty years ago)

But what's most interesting is how it appears at exactly the moment (post-Nirvana) in which the pop splintering began to accelerate furiously, ushering in a half-decade during which retrochic was all the rage. Now, so much of the stuff that seemed important seems...irrelevant. As one friend said, would Kronos even be in an updated version of this book today?

I have been CONTINUALLY tempted to start a thread about "bands who'd be axed in a second edition of the Spin Alternative Guide." (First answer: Blake Babies/Juliana Hatfield) Thing is, I'm not sure the educative aspect of such a book -- the idea that there are wide swathes of the music world a Spin reader might want some advice on -- is compatible with Spin's current editorial voice and readership.

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 3 January 2006 17:33 (twenty years ago)

I'd guess that Thinking Fellers Union Local 282 (whose music I love) would be axed from Spin V.II. What's interesting is that TFUL282 were even included in the Spin guide. I don't remember them ever hitting any sort of mid-90's pop spotlight (unlike Juliana Hatfield) -- they were quite underground and never really "surfaced," so to speak. But that was true of a few of the artists included in the book (the Pooh Stocks and Fahey as mentioned upthread for example).

James, Tuesday, 3 January 2006 18:15 (twenty years ago)

I have been CONTINUALLY tempted to start a thread about "bands who'd be axed in a second edition of the Spin Alternative Guide."

I tried to start a thread that asked that and other questions a couple of years ago:

SPIN and the "Alternative" Canon

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 3 January 2006 18:34 (twenty years ago)

to its credit, the Spin record guide bowed down and gave Reign in Blood a 10/10. eve they couldn't deny that one.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Tuesday, 3 January 2006 18:37 (twenty years ago)

What's interesting is that TFUL282 were even included in the Spin guide. I don't remember them ever hitting any sort of mid-90's pop spotlight
I can only speak for local experience, but I recall them having a reasonably high profile around Mother of all Saints and especially the more accesible followup album, probably tied in w/Matador, the search for the "next Pavement," etc. Their CDs were definitely around in NYC and people seemed to know their name. But, as mentioned, a new Spin guide would be written for a completely different audience than the 1st one.

dlp9001, Tuesday, 3 January 2006 18:54 (twenty years ago)

I like how they predicted what would be benchmarks for alternative music when they chose stuff for their Top 100 Alternative Albums list.

Beck and PJ Harvey = Dead On.

Freedy Johnson and Barbara Manning = Oops

Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Tuesday, 3 January 2006 20:12 (twenty years ago)

Since the book came out in 1995, I mean.

Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Tuesday, 3 January 2006 20:13 (twenty years ago)

Barbara Manning's -Lately I Keep Scissors- *was* a benchmark album for a particular segment of the indie rock audience at the time. I know; I was part of that group. If it's not talked about as much as it was in 1995, I guess you can blame fashion. That and the fact the record has fallen out of print and doeesn't look to be reissued anytime soon.

James, Tuesday, 3 January 2006 20:17 (twenty years ago)

i still kinda dig can you fly by freedy johnston.

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Tuesday, 3 January 2006 21:09 (twenty years ago)

Here's a correct opinion but a mistaken fact:

Cynthia's wonderful "Change on Me" and "Love Me Tonight" followed in the next year, in this style. These songs could be prayers, the way she sings them, questioning, pleading. "Why did you have to change on me?" "Please make this an endless night."

Problem is that the second song isn't "Love Me Tonight," it's "Endless Nights," which I'd correctly identified in the text I submitted but was changed by a fact checker. They called me to check but I wasn't home, and when I called back a few hours later apparently it was too late (Spin being such a professional organization that they were checking their facts two hours before they went to press). When Eric finally got back to me he told me that they he instructed them to keep the title as I'd had it. But obviously they didn't.

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Tuesday, 3 January 2006 21:34 (twenty years ago)

Also, I'm something of an ignoramus, so I didn't even mention the song "Freestyle," which I hadn't heard and which I still haven't heard, actually. (This was in a piece on freestyle.)

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Tuesday, 3 January 2006 21:39 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.